in which stable cells expressing this factor at not too-high levels
Aoki, K., Kondo, Y., Naoki, H., Hiratsuka, T., Itoh, R.E., and Matsuda, M.
can be prospectively screened and identified. In contrast, due to
2017. Propagating Wave of ERK Activation Orients Collective Cell
the lower dark background activity of eGAV, this is more
Migration. Dev. Cell, 43: 305–317.e305.
advantageous for transient transfection experiments where the
Baeriswyl, T., Mauti, O., and Stoeckli, E.T. 2008. Temporal control of
rigorous control of PA-transcription factor expression levels is
gene silencing by in ovo electroporation. Methods Mol. Biol., 442:
more difficult, and transfection efficiencies are more variable
231–244.
between cells.
Bajar, B.T., Wang, E.S., Lam, A.J., Kim, B.B., Jacobs, C.L., Howe, E.S.,
In summary, eGAV can be introduced into cells by various
Davidson, M.W., Lin, M.Z., and Chu, J. 2016. Improving brightness
methods including lipofection, electroporation, hydrodynamic-
and photostability of green and red fluorescent proteins for live
based transfection and lentivirus vectors. We demonstrated
cell imaging and FRET reporting. Sci. Rep., 6: 20889.
reliable blue light-controllable gene expression in in vitro and in
Barna, J., Csermely, P., and Vellai, T. 2018. Roles of heat shock factor
vivo models. Compared to the widely used PA-Gal4 transcription
1 beyond the heat shock response. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 75: 2897–
factor hGAVPO, the dark background activity of eGAV was
significantly lower and the maximum light-induced gene
2916.
Beerli, R.R., Segal, D.J., Dreier, B., and Barbas, C.F., 3rd. 1998. Toward
expression level was higher, thus improving the reliability of light-
controlling gene expression at will: specific regulation of the
induced gene expression controls. Therefore, we believe that
erbB-2/HER-2 promoter by using polydactyl zinc finger proteins
eGAV will be a valuable tool for the systematic analysis of
constructed from modular building blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
dynamic
USA, 95: 14628–14633.
changes
morphological,
in
cellular
functional,
and
gene
expression
pathological
during
changes
in
multicellular systems.
Benedetti, L., Marvin, J.S., Falahati, H., Guillén-Samander, A., Looger,
L.L., and De Camilli, P. 2020. Optimized Vivid-derived Magnets
photodimerizers for subcellular optogenetics in mammalian cells.
Elife, 9.
Author Contributions
Brand, A.H. and Perrimon, N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a
S.C.N. and I.I. conceived the project and designed the
experiments. S.C.N. performed most of the experiments. T.D.F.
and S.C.N. performed the eGAV-eMag variant evaluation
experiments.
A.T.G.
and
S.C.N.
performed
the
in
means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes.
Development, 118: 401–415.
Chan, Y.B., Alekseyenko, O.V., and Kravitz, E.A. 2015. Optogenetic
ovo
Control of Gene Expression in Drosophila. PLoS One, 10: e0138181.
electroporation experiments. Y.S.III and S.C.N. conducted data
Chavez, A., Scheiman, J., Vora, S., Pruitt, B.W., Tuttle, M., E, P.R.I., Lin,
analysis. M.Y., R.K. and I.I. supervised the experiments to evaluate
S., Kiani, S., Guzman, C.D., Wiegand, D.J., Ter-Ovanesyan, D., Braff,
the optogenetic tools. S.C.N., A.T.G. and I.I. wrote the manuscript
J.L., Davidsohn, N., Housden, B.E., Perrimon, N., Weiss, R., Aach, J.,
with input from all of the other authors.
Collins, J.J., and Church, G.M. 2015. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated
transcriptional programming. Nat. Methods, 12: 326–328.
44
Cell Structure and Function 48: 31–47 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.22074
Enhancement of Gal4-Vivid transcription factor
Cell Structure and Function
photoacoustic imaging using a near-infrared transgenic mouse
Crefcoeur, R.P., Yin, R., Ulm, R., and Halazonetis, T.D. 2013. Ultraviolet-
model. Nat. Commun., 13: 2813.
B-mediated induction of protein-protein interactions in mammalian
cells. Nat. Commun., 4: 1779.
Kawano, F., Suzuki, H., Furuya, A., and Sato, M. 2015. Engineered
di Pietro, F., Herszterg, S., Huang, A., Bosveld, F., Alexandre, C.,
pairs of distinct photoswitches for optogenetic control of cellular
proteins. Nat. Commun., 6: 6256.
Sancéré, L., Pelletier, S., Joudat, A., Kapoor, V., Vincent, J.P., and
Bellaïche, Y. 2021. Rapid and robust optogenetic control of gene
Kawano, F., Okazaki, R., Yazawa, M., and Sato, M. 2016. A
expression in Drosophila. Dev. Cell, 56: 3393–3404.e3397.
photoactivatable Cre-loxP recombination system for optogenetic
genome engineering. Nat. Chem. Biol., 12: 1059–1064.
Dunsing, V., Luckner, M., Zühlke, B., Petazzi, R.A., Herrmann, A., and
Chiantia, S. 2018. Optimal fluorescent protein tags for quantifying
Kawashima, T., Kitamura, K., Suzuki, K., Nonaka, M., Kamijo, S.,
protein oligomerization in living cells. Sci. Rep., 8: 10634.
Takemoto-Kimura, S., Kano, M., Okuno, H., Ohki, K., and Bito, H.
Fischer, J.A., Giniger, E., Maniatis, T., and Ptashne, M. 1988. GAL4
2013. Functional labeling of neurons and their projections using the
activates transcription in Drosophila. Nature, 332: 853–856.
synthetic activity-dependent promoter E-SARE. Nat. Methods, 10:
Guglielmi, G., Barry, J.D., Huber, W., and De Renzis, S. 2015. An
Optogenetic Method to Modulate Cell Contractility during Tissue
889–895.
Kennedy, M.J., Hughes, R.M., Peteya, L.A., Schwartz, J.W., Ehlers,
Morphogenesis. Dev. Cell, 35: 646–660.
M.D., and Tucker, C.L. 2010. Rapid blue-light-mediated induction of
protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods, 7: 973–975.
Guntas, G., Hallett, R.A., Zimmerman, S.P., Williams, T., Yumerefendi,
H., Bear, J.E., and Kuhlman, B. 2015. Engineering an improved light-
Kinjo, T., Terai, K., Horita, S., Nomura, N., Sumiyama, K., Togashi, K.,
induced dimer (iLID) for controlling the localization and activity of
Iwata, S., and Matsuda, M. 2019. FRET-assisted photoactivation of
signaling proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112: 112–117.
flavoproteins for in vivo two-photon optogenetics. Nat. Methods,
16: 1029–1036.
Hallett, R.A., Zimmerman, S.P., Yumerefendi, H., Bear, J.E., and
Kuhlman, B. 2016. Correlating in Vitro and in Vivo Activities of
Konermann, S., Brigham, M.D., Trevino, A., Hsu, P.D., Heidenreich, M.,
Light-Inducible Dimers: A Cellular Optogenetics Guide. ACS Synth.
Cong, L., Platt, R.J., Scott, D.A., Church, G.M., and Zhang, F. 2013.
Biol., 5: 53–64.
Optical control of mammalian endogenous transcription and
epigenetic states. Nature, 500: 472–476.
Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H.L. 1951. A series of normal stages in
the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol., 88: 49–92.
Kunii, A., Hara, Y., Takenaga, M., Hattori, N., Fukazawa, T., Ushijima, T.,
Hörner, M., Müller, K., and Weber, W. 2017. Light-Responsive
Yamamoto,
Promoters. Methods Mol. Biol., 1651: 173–186.
Repurposed
Imayoshi, I., Isomura, A., Harima, Y., Kawaguchi, K., Kori, H., Miyachi,
and
Sakuma,
Technology
for
T.
2018.
Enhanced
Three-Component
Expression:
Highly
Accumulable Transcriptional Activators via Branched Tag Arrays.
Crispr J., 1: 337–347.
H., Fujiwara, T., Ishidate, F., and Kageyama, R. 2013. Oscillatory
control of factors determining multipotency and fate in mouse
T.,
Kuwasaki, Y., Suzuki, K., Yu, G., Yamamoto, S., Otabe, T., Kakihara, Y.,
neural progenitors. Science, 342: 1203–1208.
Nishiwaki, M., Miyake, K., Fushimi, K., Bekdash, R., Shimizu, Y.,
Imayoshi, I. and Kageyama, R. 2014a. bHLH factors in self-renewal,
Narikawa, R., Nakajima, T., Yazawa, M., and Sato, M. 2022. A red
multipotency, and fate choice of neural progenitor cells. Neuron,
light-responsive photoswitch for deep tissue optogenetics. Nat.
82: 9–23.
Biotechnol., 40: 1672–1679.
Imayoshi, I. and Kageyama, R. 2014b. Oscillatory control of bHLH
Li, H., Zhang, Q., Gu, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Feng, S., Hu, Y.,
factors in neural progenitors. Trends Neurosci., 37: 531–538.
Zheng, Y., Li, Y., Ye, H., Zhou, B., Lin, L., Liu, M., Yang, H., and Li, D.
Isomura, A., Ogushi, F., Kori, H., and Kageyama, R. 2017. Optogenetic
2020. Efficient photoactivatable Dre recombinase for cell type-
perturbation and bioluminescence imaging to analyze cell-to-cell
specific spatiotemporal control of genome engineering in the
transfer of oscillatory information. Genes Dev., 31: 524–535.
mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117: 33426–33435.
Jung, H., Kim, S.W., Kim, M., Hong, J., Yu, D., Kim, J.H., Lee, Y., Kim, S.,
Liu, F., Song, Y., and Liu, D. 1999. Hydrodynamics-based transfection
Woo, D., Shin, H.S., Park, B.O., and Heo, W.D. 2019. Noninvasive
in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA. Gene Ther.,
6: 1258–1266.
optical activation of Flp recombinase for genetic manipulation in
deep mouse brain regions. Nat. Commun., 10: 314.
Liu, H., Gomez, G., Lin, S., Lin, S., and Lin, C. 2012. Optogenetic
control of transcription in zebrafish. PLoS One, 7: e50738.
Kaberniuk, A.A., Shemetov, A.A., and Verkhusha, V.V. 2016. A bacterial
phytochrome-based optogenetic system controllable with near-
Lu, C.C., Jeng, Y.Y., Tsai, C.H., Liu, M.Y., Yeh, S.W., Hsu, T.Y., and Chen,
infrared light. Nat. Methods, 13: 591–597.
M.R. 2006. Genome-wide transcription program and expression of
the Rta responsive gene of Epstein-Barr virus. Virology, 345: 358–
Kaise, T., Fukui, M., Sueda, R., Piao, W., Yamada, M., Kobayashi, T.,
Imayoshi, I., and Kageyama, R. 2022. Functional rejuvenation of
aged neural stem cells by Plagl2 and anti-Dyrk1a activity. Genes
372.
Luker, G.D., Pica, C.M., Song, J., Luker, K.E., and Piwnica-Worms, D.
Dev., 36: 23–37.
2003. Imaging 26S proteasome activity and inhibition in living
mice. Nat. Med., 9: 969–973.
Kasatkina, L.A., Ma, C., Matlashov, M.E., Vu, T., Li, M., Kaberniuk, A.A.,
Yao, J., and Verkhusha, V.V. 2022. Optogenetic manipulation and
Cell Structure and Function 48: 31–47 (2023)
Masamizu, Y., Ohtsuka, T., Takashima, Y., Nagahara, H., Takenaka, Y.,
https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.22074
45
S.C. Nagasaki et al.
Cell Structure and Function
Yoshikawa, K., Okamura, H., and Kageyama, R. 2006. Real-time
Regier, J.L., Shen, F., and Triezenberg, S.J. 1993. Pattern of aromatic
imaging of the somite segmentation clock: revelation of unstable
and hydrophobic amino acids critical for one of two subdomains of
oscillators in the individual presomitic mesoderm cells. Proc. Natl.
the VP16 transcriptional activator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:
Acad. Sci. USA, 103: 1313–1318.
883–887.
Miyoshi, H. 2004. Gene delivery to hematopoietic stem cells using
lentiviral vectors. Methods Mol. Biol., 246: 429–438.
VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. Nature, 335:
Mizushima, S. and Nagata, S. 1990. pEF-BOS, a powerful mammalian
expression vector. Nucleic Acids Res., 18: 5322.
563–564.
Salghetti, S.E., Muratani, M., Wijnen, H., Futcher, B., and Tansey, W.P.
Morikawa, K., Furuhashi, K., de Sena-Tomas, C., Garcia-Garcia, A.L.,
2000. Functional overlap of sequences that activate transcription
Bekdash, R., Klein, A.D., Gallerani, N., Yamamoto, H.E., Park, S.E.,
and signal ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
Collins, G.S., Kawano, F., Sato, M., Lin, C.S., Targoff, K.L., Au, E.,
USA, 97: 3118–3123.
Salling, M.C., and Yazawa, M. 2020. Photoactivatable Cre
Sano, H. and Yokoi, M. 2007. Striatal medium spiny neurons terminate
recombinase 3.0 for in vivo mouse applications. Nat. Commun., 11:
in a distinct region in the lateral hypothalamic area and do not
2141.
directly innervate orexin/hypocretin- or melanin-concentrating
Motta-Mena, L.B., Reade, A., Mallory, M.J., Glantz, S., Weiner, O.D.,
hormone-containing neurons. J. Neurosci., 27: 6948–6955.
Lynch, K.W., and Gardner, K.H. 2014. An optogenetic gene
Schindler, S.E., McCall, J.G., Yan, P., Hyrc, K.L., Li, M., Tucker, C.L., Lee,
expression system with rapid activation and deactivation kinetics.
J.M., Bruchas, M.R., and Diamond, M.I. 2015. Photo-activatable Cre
Nat. Chem. Biol., 10: 196–202.
recombinase regulates gene expression in vivo. Sci. Rep., 5: 13627.
Müller, K., Engesser, R., Metzger, S., Schulz, S., Kämpf, M.M.,
Seipel, K., Georgiev, O., and Schaffner, W. 1992. Different activation
Busacker, M., Steinberg, T., Tomakidi, P., Ehrbar, M., Nagy, F.,
domains stimulate transcription from remote (‘enhancer’) and
Timmer, J., Zubriggen, M.D., and Weber, W. 2013a. A red/far-red
proximal (‘promoter’) positions. EMBO J., 11: 4961–4968.
light-responsive bi-stable toggle switch to control gene expression
in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 41: e77.
C.C., Ulm, R., Timmer, J., Zurbriggen, M.D., and Weber, W. 2013b.
Multi-chromatic control of mammalian gene expression and
signaling. Nucleic Acids Res., 41: e124.
photoinducible
homodimerization
system
with
improved dimer-forming efficiency. ACS Chem. Biol., 9: 617–621.
Sato,
M.
2017.
Shimizu-Sato, S., Huq, E., Tepperman, J.M., and Quail, P.H. 2002. A
CRISPR-Cas9-based
1044.
Strickland, D., Lin, Y., Wagner, E., Hope, C.M., Zayner, J., Antoniou, C.,
Sosnick, T.R., Weiss, E.L., and Glotzer, M. 2012. TULIPs: tunable,
Nihongaki, Y., Furuhata, Y., Otabe, T., Hasegawa, S., Yoshimoto, K.,
and
inducing functional neuronal differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 115: E6722–E6730.
light-switchable gene promoter system. Nat. Biotechnol., 20: 1041–
Nihongaki, Y., Suzuki, H., Kawano, F., and Sato, M. 2014. Genetically
engineered
Shao, J., Wang, M., Yu, G., Zhu, S., Yu, Y., Heng, B.C., Wu, J., and Ye, H.
2018. Synthetic far-red light-mediated CRISPR-dCas9 device for
Müller, K., Engesser, R., Schulz, S., Steinberg, T., Tomakidi, P., Weber,
photoactivatable
transcription systems to induce neuronal differentiation. Nat.
Methods, 14: 963–966.
light-controlled interacting protein tags for cell biology. Nat.
Methods, 9: 379–384.
Sueda, R., Imayoshi, I., Harima, Y., and Kageyama, R. 2019. High Hes1
expression and resultant Ascl1 suppression regulate quiescent vs.
Noda, N. and Ozawa, T. 2018. Light-controllable Transcription System
by Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of a Truncated Phytochrome B.
Photochem. Photobiol., 94: 1071–1076.
active neural stem cells in the adult mouse brain. Genes Dev., 33:
511–523.
Taslimi, A., Zoltowski, B., Miranda, J.G., Pathak, G.P., Hughes, R.M.,
Pathak, G.P., Spiltoir, J.I., Höglund, C., Polstein, L.R., Heine-Koskinen,
and Tucker, C.L. 2016. Optimized second-generation CRY2-CIB
S., Gersbach, C.A., Rossi, J., and Tucker, C.L. 2017. Bidirectional
dimerizers and photoactivatable Cre recombinase. Nat. Chem.
approaches for optogenetic regulation of gene expression in
mammalian cells using Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2. Nucleic Acids
Res., 45: e167.
Polstein,
L.R.
Biol., 12: 425–430.
van Essen, D., Engist, B., Natoli, G., and Saccani, S. 2009. Two modes
of transcriptional activation at native promoters by NF-kappaB
and
Gersbach,
C.A.
2012.
Light-inducible
spatiotemporal control of gene activation by customizable zinc
p65. PLoS Biol., 7: e73.
van Hooijdonk, L.W., Ichwan, M., Dijkmans, T.F., Schouten, T.G., de
finger transcription factors. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134: 16480–16483.
Backer, M.W., Adan, R.A., Verbeek, F.J., Vreugdenhil, E., and
Quejada, J.R., Park, S.E., Awari, D.W., Shi, F., Yamamoto, H.E., Kawano,
Fitzsimons, C.P. 2009. Lentivirus-mediated transgene delivery to
F., Jung, J.C., and Yazawa, M. 2017. Optimized light-inducible
transcription in mammalian cells using Flavin Kelch-repeat F-box1/
GIGANTEA and CRY2/CIB1. Nucleic Acids Res., 45: e172.
46
Sadowski, I., Ma, J., Triezenberg, S., and Ptashne, M. 1988. GAL4-
the
hippocampus
reveals
sub-field
specific
differences
in
expression. BMC Neurosci., 10: 2.
Voon, D.C., Subrata, L.S., Baltic, S., Leu, M.P., Whiteway, J.M., Wong, A.,
Redchuk, T.A., Omelina, E.S., Chernov, K.G., and Verkhusha, V.V. 2017.
Knight, S.A., Christiansen, F.T., and Daly, J.M. 2005. Use of mRNA-
Near-infrared optogenetic pair for protein regulation and spectral
and protein-destabilizing elements to develop a highly responsive
multiplexing. Nat. Chem. Biol., 13: 633–639.
reporter system. Nucleic Acids Res., 33: e27.
Cell Structure and Function 48: 31–47 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.22074
Enhancement of Gal4-Vivid transcription factor
Cell Structure and Function
modifications of single cells or cell populations. Nat. Methods, 17:
Vora, S., Cheng, J., Xiao, R., VanDusen, N.J., Quintino, L., Pu, W.T.,
Vandenberghe, L.H., Chavez, A., and Church, G. 2018. Rational
design of a compact CRISPR-Cas9 activator for AAV-mediated
422–429.
Yazawa, M., Sadaghiani, A.M., Hsueh, B., and Dolmetsch, R.E. 2009.
delivery. bioRxiv: 298620.
Induction of protein-protein interactions in live cells using light. Nat.
Biotechnol., 27: 941–945.
Wang, X., Chen, X., and Yang, Y. 2012. Spatiotemporal control of gene
expression by a light-switchable transgene system. Nat. Methods,
Yoshioka-Kobayashi, K., Matsumiya, M., Niino, Y., Isomura, A., Kori, H.,
9: 266–269.
Miyawaki, A., and Kageyama, R. 2020. Coupling delay controls
synchronized oscillation in the segmentation clock. Nature, 580:
Yamada, M., Suzuki, Y., Nagasaki, S.C., Okuno, H., and Imayoshi, I.
2018. Light Control of the Tet Gene Expression System in
Mammalian Cells. Cell Rep., 25: 487-500.e486.
119–123.
Zhou, Y., Kong, D., Wang, X., Yu, G., Wu, X., Guan, N., Weber, W., and
Yamada, M., Nagasaki, S.C., Suzuki, Y., Hirano, Y., and Imayoshi, I.
Ye, H. 2022. A small and highly sensitive red/far-red optogenetic
switch for applications in mammals. Nat. Biotechnol., 40: 262–272.
2020. Optimization of Light-Inducible Gal4/UAS Gene Expression
System in Mammalian Cells. iScience, 23: 101506.
Zoltowski, B.D., Schwerdtfeger, C., Widom, J., Loros, J.J., Bilwes, A.M.,
Yao, S., Yuan, P., Ouellette, B., Zhou, T., Mortrud, M., Balaram, P.,
Dunlap, J.C., and Crane, B.R. 2007. Conformational switching in the
fungal light sensor Vivid. Science, 316: 1054–1057.
Chatterjee, S., Wang, Y., Daigle, T.L., Tasic, B., Kuang, X., Gong, H.,
Luo, Q., Zeng, S., Curtright, A., Dhaka, A., Kahan, A., Gradinaru, V.,
Zoltowski, B.D., Vaccaro, B., and Crane, B.R. 2009. Mechanism-based
Chrapkiewicz, R., Schnitzer, M., Zeng, H., and Cetin, A. 2020. RecV
tuning of a LOV domain photoreceptor. Nat. Chem. Biol., 5: 827–
recombinase
834.
system
for
in
vivo
Cell Structure and Function 48: 31–47 (2023)
targeted
optogenomic
https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.22074
47
...
論文の公開元へ
