リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Current development in surgical techniques, graft selection and additional procedures for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a path towards anatomic restoration and improved clinical outcomes—a narrative review」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Current development in surgical techniques, graft selection and additional procedures for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a path towards anatomic restoration and improved clinical outcomes—a narrative review

Nukuto, Koji Hoshino, Yuichi Kataoka, Kiminari Kuroda, Ryosuke 神戸大学

2023.10

概要

Background and Objective: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been widely used for ACL injury for a long time. However, residual rotational instability and osteoarthritic changes after ACL reconstruction have been identified as problems. Thus, anatomic reconstruction techniques, various types of grafts and additional procedures have been desired to improve the clinical outcomes and knee instability. Although clinical outcomes and knee stability are better than in the past, ipsilateral graft failures still occur in 4–17% and osteoarthritic changes are seen in about 20% of patients after ACL reconstruction. To remedy these problems, it is necessary to improve the understanding of various surgical techniques and grafts and to pursue further improvement of surgical techniques. Therefore, the objective of this review is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical techniques and graft selection, and additional procedures for ACL injury. Methods: A literature review was conducted on the surgical procedures for ACL injury. Recent trends in surgical techniques, graft selection, and additional procedures for ACL injury were described. We performed a literature search in PubMed for studies published from origin to May 8, 2023. Studies were required to be English-language articles. Key Content and Findings: Although many reports indicate that double-bundle ACL reconstruction is comparable to anatomic single-bundle (SB) reconstruction, intraoperative complications such as tunnel coalition exist in double-bundle reconstruction, and the technique needs to be improved. ACL repair has shown good short-term results, but long-term results need to be examined in the future. Quadriceps tendon autograft is being used more frequently, but hamstrings tendon autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft also have good results. In addition, in higher-risk cases, lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction can be performed with good results. Conclusions: To further improve clinical outcomes, more anatomical reconstructions should be pursued. Autografts are better than allografts and synthetic grafts, but further study is needed to determine which graft is better. Additional procedures should be performed in highly unstable cases and in revision cases.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. Kaeding CC, Léger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA.

Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Injuries. Clin Sports Med 2017;36:1-8.

2. Bowman EN, Limpisvasti O, Cole BJ, et al. Anterior

Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Preference Most

Dependent on Patient Age: A Survey of United States

Surgeons. Arthroscopy 2021;37:1559-66.

3. Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, et al. Development of a

national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian

National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med

2008;36:308-15.

4. Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M, et al. Incidence and

trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the

United States. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:2363-70.

5. Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, et al.

Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and

Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study. Am J

Sports Med 2016;44:1502-7.

6. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, et al. Nonanatomic tunnel

position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by threedimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am

2010;92:1427-31.

7. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, et al. Transtibial ACL

reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels

Ann Joint 2023;8:39 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoj-23-39

Page 10 of 16

8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. anatomically in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Sports

Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:2200-7.

Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, et al. Biomechanical

comparison of anatomic double-bundle, anatomic

single-bundle, and nonanatomic single-bundle anterior

cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med

2011;39:279-88.

Liu C, Wang Y, Li Z, et al. Tibiofemoral joint contact area

and stress after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction with transtibial versus anteromedial portal

drilling techniques. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13:247.

Rothrauff BB, Jorge A, de Sa D, et al. Anatomic ACL

reconstruction reduces risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis:

a systematic review with minimum 10-year follow-up.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;28:1072-84.

Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, et al. Biomechanical

analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002;30:660-6.

Ferreira A, Saithna A, Carrozzo A, et al. The Minimal

Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable

Symptom State, and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior

Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction A

Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group.

Am J Sports Med 2022;50:3522–32.

Bosco F, Giustra F, Crivellaro M, et al. Is augmentation

the best solution in partial anterior cruciate ligament tears?

A literature systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop

2023;36:11-7.

Anderson MJ, Browning WM 3rd, Urband CE, et al. A

Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic

of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Orthop J Sports Med

2016;4:2325967116634074.

Ciccotti MC, Secrist E, Tjoumakaris F, et al. Anatomic

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via

Independent Tunnel Drilling: A Systematic Review of

Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Patellar

Tendon and Hamstring Autografts. Arthroscopy

2017;33:1062-1071.e5.

Arnold MP, Calcei JG, Vogel N, et al. ACL Study Group

survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29:3871-6.

Zhao J, Huangfu X. The biomechanical and clinical

application of using the anterior half of the peroneus

longus tendon as an autograft source. Am J Sports Med

2012;40:662-71.

He J, Tang Q, Ernst S, et al. Peroneus longus tendon

autograft has functional outcomes comparable to

© Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Annals of Joint, 2023

19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29:2869-79.

Thomas AC, Wojtys EM, Brandon C, et al. Muscle

Atrophy Contributes to Quadriceps Weakness after ACL

Reconstruction. J Sci Med Sport 2016;19:7-11.

Cristiani R, Forssblad M, Engstrom B, et al. Risk Factors

for Abnormal Anteroposterior Knee Reconstruction.

Arthroscopy 2018;34:2478-84.

Zhao D, Pan JK, Lin FZ, et al. Risk Factors for Revision

or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Am J Sports Med 2023;51:3053-75.

Ventura A, Terzaghi C, Legnani C, et al. Synthetic grafts

for anterior cruciate ligament rupture: 19-year outcome

study. Knee 2010;17:108-13.

Leys T, Salmon L, Waller A, et al. Clinical results and

risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of

hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med

2012;40:595-605.

Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, et al. Risk Factors

and Predictors of Subsequent ACL Injury in Either Knee

After ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Analysis of 2488

Primary ACL Reconstructions From the MOON Cohort.

Am J Sports Med 2015;43:1583-90.

Sanders TL, Pareek A, Hewett TE, et al. Long-term rate

of graft failure after ACL reconstruction: a geographic

population cohort analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol

Arthrosc 2017;25:222-8.

Ajuied A, Wong F, Smith C, et al. Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Injury and Radiologic Progression of Knee

Osteoarthritis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am

J Sports Med 2014;42:2242-52.

Schindler OS. Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament

deficiency: a historical perspective. Knee Surg Sports

Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:5-47.

Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Helito CP, et al. Combined

Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament

Reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech 2016;5:e1253-9.

Dejour D, Pungitore M, Valluy J, et al. Preoperative laxity

in ACL-deficient knees increases with posterior tibial slope

and medial meniscal tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol

Arthrosc 2019;27:564-72.

Song GY, Ni QK, Zheng T, et al. Slope-Reducing Tibial

Osteotomy Combined With Primary Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Reconstruction Produces Improved Knee

Stability in Patients With Steep Posterior Tibial Slope,

Ann Joint 2023;8:39 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoj-23-39

Annals of Joint, 2023

31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. Excessive Anterior Tibial Subluxation in Extension,

and Chronic Meniscal Poster. Am J Sports Med

2020;48:3486-94.

Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R, et al. Lateral

Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring

Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY

Study Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med

2020;48:285-97.

Sonnery-Cottet B, Haidar I, Rayes J, et al. Longterm Graft Rupture Rates After Combined ACL and

Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated

ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the

SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2021;49:2889-97.

Bosco F, Giustra F, Giai Via R, et al. Could anterior

closed - wedge high tibial osteotomy be a viable option

in patients with high posterior tibial slope who undergo

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction ? A systematic

review and meta - analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

2023;33:2201-14.

Nau T, Lavoie P, Duval N. A new generation of artificial

ligaments in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate

ligament: Two-year follow-up of a randomised trial.

J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:356-60.

Gao K, Chen S, Wang L, et al. Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Reconstruction With LARS Artificial Ligament:

A Multicenter Study With 3- to 5-Year Follow-up.

Arthroscopy 2010;26:515-23.

O'Donnell JB, Scerpella TA. Endoscopic anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction: modified technique and

radiographic review. Arthroscopy 1995;11:577-84.

Loucas M, Loucas R, D’Ambrosi R, et al. Clinical and

Radiological Outcomes of Anteromedial Portal Versus

Transtibial Technique in ACL Reconstruction A Systematic

Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2021;9:23259671211024591.

Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, et al. Femoral

bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the

anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic

evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

2009;17:220-7.

Liu Z, Jiang J, Yi Q, et al. An increased posterior tibial

slope is associated with a higher risk of graft failure

following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022;30:2377-87.

Placella G, Bartoli M, Peruzzi M, et al. Return to sport

activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in

skeletally immature athletes with manual drilling original

all inside reconstruction at 8 years follow-up. Acta Orthop

© Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Page 11 of 16

Traumatol Turc 2016;50:635-8.

41. Lubowitz JH, Ahmad CS, Anderson K. All-inside anterior

cruciate ligament graft-link technique: second-generation,

no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Arthroscopy 2011;27:717-27.

42. Demange MK, Camanho GL. Nonanatomic anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-stranded

semitendinosus grafts in children with open physes:

minimum 15-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med

2014;42:2926-32.

43. Samitier G, Marcano AI, Alentorn-Geli E, et al. Failure of

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arch Bone Jt

Surg 2015;3:220-40.

44. Usman MA, Kamei G, Adachi N, et al. Revision singlebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with

over-the-top route procedure. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

2015;101:71-5.

45. Nagai K, Rothrauff BB, Li RT, et al. Over-the-top ACL

reconstruction restores anterior and rotatory knee laxity in

skeletally immature individuals and revision settings. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;28:538-43.

46. McIntosh AL, Dahm DL, Stuart MJ. Anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature patient.

Arthroscopy 2006;22:1325-30.

47. Plaweski S, Grimaldi M, Courvoisier A, et al.

Intraoperative comparisons of knee kinematics of doublebundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

2011;19:1277-86.

48. Oh JY, Kim KT, Park YJ, et al. Biomechanical comparison

of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Relat

Res 2020;32:14.

49. Harner CD, Poehling GG. Double bundle or double

trouble? Arthroscopy 2004;20:1013-4.

50. Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, et al. Outcome of

single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the

anterior cruciate ligament - A meta-analysis. Am J Sports

Med 2008;36:1414-21.

51. Mayr HO, Bruder S, Hube R, et al. Single-Bundle

Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction-5-Year Results. Arthroscopy

2018;34:2647-53.

52. Irrgang JJ, Tashman S, Patterson CG, et al. Anatomic

single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a

randomized clinical trial-Part 1: clinical outcomes. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29:2665-75.

53. Mascarenhas R, Cvetanovich GL, Sayegh ET, et al.

Ann Joint 2023;8:39 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoj-23-39

Page 12 of 16

54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability

Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic

Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy

2015;31:1185-96.

Severyns M, Mallet J, Plawecki S. Comparison of Rotatory

and Sagittal Laxity After Single-Bundle Versus DoubleBundle ACL Reconstruction: Outcomes at 7-Year Followup. Orthop J Sports Med 2022;10:23259671221104408.

Alomari MS, Ghaddaf AA, Abdulhamid AS, et al. Single

Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Indian J Orthop 2022;56:1669-84.

Sernert N, Hansson E. Similar cost-utility for double- and

single-bundle techniques in ACL reconstruction. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26:634-47.

Muneta T, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, et al. Two-bundle

reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using

semitendinosus tendon with endobuttons: operative

technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy

1999;15:618-24.

Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, et al. Anatomic

reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral

bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring

tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 2004;20:1015-25.

Kiekara T, Järvelä T, Huhtala H, et al. Tunnel

communication and increased graft signal intensity

on magnetic resonance imaging of double-bundle

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy

2014;30:1595-601.

Kawaguchi Y, Kondo E, Onodera J, et al. Tunnel

Enlargement and Coalition After Anatomic DoubleBundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With

Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Computed Tomography

Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2013;1:2325967113486441.

Siebold R, Cafaltzis K. Differentiation between

intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel widening

and communication in double-bundle anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Arthroscopy

2010;26:1066-73.

Nakanishi Y, Nagai K, Kay J, et al. The incidence of tibial

tunnel coalition is higher than femoral tunnel coalition in

double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

using hamstring autografts: A systematic review. Orthop

Traumatol Surg Res 2022;108:103407.

Nukuto K, Hoshino Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Anatomic

double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

could not achieve sufficient control of pivot-shift when

© Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Annals of Joint, 2023

64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. accompanying tibial tunnel coalition. Knee Surg Sports

Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29:3743-50.

Yoon KH, Bae DK, Cho SM, et al. Standard anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction versus isolated singlebundle augmentation with hamstring autograft.

Arthroscopy 2009;25:1265-74.

Nakamae A, Ochi M, Deie M, et al. Clinical outcomes

of second-look arthroscopic evaluation after anterior

cruciate ligament augmentation: comparison with singleand double-bundle reconstruction. Bone Joint J 2014;96B:1325-32.

Matsushita T, Kuroda R, Nishizawa Y, et al. Clinical

outcomes and biomechanical analysis of posterolateral

bundle augmentation in patients with partial anterior

cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol

Arthrosc 2017;25:1279-89.

Iwaasa T, Tensho K, Koyama S, et al. Clinical outcome of

a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical

double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:

Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and

absent groups. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil

Technol 2021;25:22-9.

Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, et al. Mechanoreceptors

in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint

position sense. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:330-4.

Xie H, Fu Z, Zhong M, et al. Effects of remnant

preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:

A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg

2022;9:952930.

Toy BJ, Yeasting RA, Morse DE, et al. Arterial supply

to the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Athl Train

1995;30:149-52.

Takeuchi S, Rothrauff BB, Kanto R, et al. Superb

microvascular imaging (SMI) detects increased vascularity

of the torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports

Traumatol Arthrosc 2022;30:93-101.

Achtnich A, Herbst E, Forkel P, et al. Acute Proximal

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears : Versus Anatomic

Single-Bundle Reconstruction. Arthroscopy:

2016;32:2562-9.

Osti M, El Attal R, Doskar W, et al. High complication

rate following dynamic intraligamentary stabilization for

primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019;27:29-36.

Ateschrang A, Schreiner AJ, Ahmad SS, et al. Improved

results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact

synovial coverage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

2019;27:37-43.

Ann Joint 2023;8:39 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoj-23-39

Annals of Joint, 2023

75. Kiapour AM, Murray MM. Basic science of anterior

cruciate ligament injury and repair. Bone Joint Res

2014;3:20-31.

76. Kohl S, Evangelopoulos DS, Schär MO, et al. Dynamic

intraligamentary stabilisation: initial experience with

treatment of acute ACL ruptures. Bone Joint J 2016;98B:793-8.

77. Heusdens CHW, Hopper GP, Dossche L, et al. Anterior

cruciate ligament repair with Independent Suture Tape

Reinforcement: a case series with 2-year follow-up. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019;27:60-7.

78. DiFelice GS, Villegas C, Taylor S. Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Preservation: Early Results of a Novel

Arthroscopic Technique for Suture Anchor Primary

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair. Arthroscopy

2015;31:2162-71.

79. Murray MM, Kalish LA, Fleming BC, et al. BridgeEnhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Two-Year

Results of a First-in-Human Study. Orthop J Sports Med

2019;7:2325967118824356.

80. Musahl V, Karlsson J. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear. N

Engl J Med 2019;380:2341-8.

81. Musahl V, Engler ID, Nazzal EM, et al. Current trends in

the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical

technique, prevention, and rehabilitation. Knee Surg

Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022;30:34-51.

82. Leiter JR, Gourlay R, McRae S, et al. Long-term followup of ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014;22:1061-9.

83. Johnson DL, Swenson TM, Irrgang JJ, et al. Revision

anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from

Pittsburgh. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;(325):100-9.

84. Jonsson H, Elmqvist LG, Kärrholm J, et al. Over-the-top

or tunnel reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament?

A prospective randomised study of 54 patients. J Bone

Joint Surg Br 1994;76:82-7.

85. Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, et al. The

influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported

outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic

Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy

2013;29:1948-53.

86. Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, et al.

Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular

Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts

Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Followup. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:3233-42.

87. Grassi A, Macchiarola L, Lucidi GA, et al. Ten-Year

© Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Page 13 of 16

88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. Survivorship, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, and

Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Over-the-Top

Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

With a Lateral Extra-articular Reconstruction: Analysis of

267 Consecutive Cases. Am J Sports Med 2021;49:374-83.

Balasingam S, Karikis I, Rostgård-Christensen L,

et al. Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Reconstruction Is Not Superior to Anatomic

Single-Bundle Reconstruction at 10-Year Followup: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med

2022;50:3477-86.

Kuroda R, Hoshino Y, Kubo S, et al. Similarities and

differences of diagnostic manual tests for anterior cruciate

ligament insufficiency: a global survey and kinematics

assessment. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:91-9.

Musahl V, Griffith C, Irrgang JJ, et al. Validation of

Quantitative Measures of Rotatory Knee Laxity. Am J

Sports Med 2016;44:2393-8.

Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF, et al. An analysis

of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and

subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports

Med 1991;19:148-55.

Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S, et al. A prospective

randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus

double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:

quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic

measurement system. Int Orthop 2011;35:439-46.

van der List JP, Mintz DN, DiFelice GS. The Location

of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears A Prevalence Study

Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Orthop J Sports Med

2016;5:2325967117709966.

Feagin JA Jr, Curl WW. Isolated tear of the anterior

cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports

Med 1976;4:95-100.

Dai W, Leng X, Wang J, et al. Quadriceps Tendon

Autograft Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone and

Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Am J Sports Med 2022;50:3425-39.

Tsai LC, Jeanfreau CM, Hamblin KA, et al. Time, graft,

sex, geographic location, and isokinetic speed influence

the degree of quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and

meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

2022;30:3367-76.

Rousseau R, Labruyere C, Kajetanek C, et al.

Complications After Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction and Their Relation to the Type of Graft

Ann Joint 2023;8:39 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoj-23-39

Page 14 of 16

A Prospective Study of 958 Cases. Am J Sports Med

2019;47:2543-9.

98. Hoogeslag RAG, Brouwer RW, Boer BC, et al. Acute

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Repair or

Reconstruction? Two-Year Results of a Randomized

Controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med

2019;47:567-77.

99. Kösters C, Glasbrenner J, Spickermann L, et al. Repair

With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Versus

Primary Reconstruction of Acute Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Tears 2-Year Results From a Prospective

Randomized Study. Am J Sports Med 2020;48:1108-16.

100. Krismer AM, Gousopoulos L, Kohl S, et al. Factors

influencing the success of anterior cruciate ligament repair

with dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation. Knee Surg

Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25:3923-8.

101. Gabler CM, Jacobs CA, Howard JS, et al. Comparison

of Graft Failure Rate Between Autografts Placed via an

Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Technique: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Metaregression. Am J Sports Med 2016;44:1069-79.

102. Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, et al.

Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft

for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft

Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin

Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:2459-68.

103. Zhao L, Lu M, Deng M, et al. Outcome of bone-patellar

tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of

randomized controlled trials with a 5-year minimum

follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e23476.

104. Zhou P, Liu JC, Deng XT, et al. Hamstring autograft

versus patellar tendon autograft for anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction, which graft has a higher

contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury rate? A

meta-analysis of 5561 patients following the PRISMA

guidelines. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e21540.

105. West RV, Harner CD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg

2005;13:197-207.

106. Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, et al.

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: metaanalysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon

autograft. Arthroscopy 2005;21:791-803.

107. Bansal A, Lamplot JD, VandenBerg J, et al. Metaanalysis of the Risk of Infections After Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Reconstruction by Graft Type. Am J Sports Med

2018;46:1500-8.

© Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Annals of Joint, 2023

108. Poehling-Monaghan KL, Salem H, Ross KE, et al.

Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon

Versus Hamstring Autografts. Orthop J Sports Med

2017;5:2325967117709735.

109. Hurley ET, Mojica ES, Kanakamedala AC, et al.

Quadriceps tendon has a lower re-rupture rate than

hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction - A meta-analysis. J ISAKOS 2022;7:87-93.

110. Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, et al. Anterior Cruciate

Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone and HamstringTendon Autografts. Am J Sports Med 2019;47:3531-40.

111. Johnston PT, Feller JA, McClelland JA, et al. Knee

strength deficits following anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction differ between quadriceps and hamstring

tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

2022;30:1300-10.

112. Slone HS, Romine SE, Premkumar A, et al. Quadriceps

tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current

literature and systematic review of clinical results.

Arthroscopy 2015;31:541-54.

113. Brinkman JC, Tummala S V, Hassebrock JD, et al. MidTerm Outcomes of the All-Soft Quadriceps Tendon

Autograft are Non-Inferior to Hamstring Autograft in

Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction:

Comparison with Minimum 5-year Follow up.

Arthroscopy 2023;39:1008-13.

114. Edi Mustamsir R, Yuarno Phatama K. Tensile strength

comparison between peroneus longus and hamstring

tendons: A biomechanical study. Int J Surg Open

2017;9:41-4.

115. Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, et al. Tensile properties of

the human femur- anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex

the effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports

Med 1991;19:217-25.

116. Aguila CM, Delcroix GJ, Kaimrajh DN, et al. Effects

of gamma irradiation on the biomechanical properties

of peroneus tendons. Open Access J Sports Med

2016;7:123-7.

117. Bottoni CR, Smith EL, Shaha J, et al. Autograft Versus

Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A

Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study With a Minimum

10-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:2501-9.

118. Kaeding CC, Aros B, Pedroza A, et al. Allograft Versus

Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction:

Ann Joint 2023;8:39 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoj-23-39

Annals of Joint, 2023

Predictors of Failure From a MOON Prospective

Longitudinal Cohort. Sports Health 2011;3:73-81.

119. Tulloch SJ, Devitt BM, Porter T, et al. Primary ACL

reconstruction using the LARS device is associated with

a high failure rate at minimum of 6-year follow-up. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019;27:3626-32.

120. Iliadis DP, Bourlos DN, Mastrokalos DS, et al. LARS

Artificial Ligament Versus ABC Purely Polyester Ligament

for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J

Sports Med 2016;4:2325967116653359.

121. Paulos LE, Rosenberg TD, Grewe SR, et al. The GORETEX anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis A long-term

followup. Am J Sports Med 1992;20:246-52.

122. Maletius W, Gillquist J. Long-term Results of Anterior

Ligament Reconstruction with Prosthesis Cruciate a

Dacron The Frequency of Osteoarthritis After Seven to

Eleven Years. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:288-93.

123. Murray AW, Macnicol MF. 10-16 year results of LeedsKeio anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee

2004;11:9-14.

124. Cavaignac E, Coulin B, Tscholl P, et al. Is Quadriceps

Tendon Autograft a Better Choice Than Hamstring

Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

A Comparative Study With a Mean Follow-up of 3.6

Years. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1326-32.

125. Lind M, Strauss MJ, Nielsen T, et al. Quadriceps tendon

autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is

associated with high revision rates: results from the Danish

Knee Ligament Registry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol

Arthrosc 2020;28:2163-9.

126. Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK, et al. Effect of graft

choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision

Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:2301-10.

127. Dericks G. Ligament advanced reinforcement system

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech

Sports Med 1995;3:187-205.

128. Zhang H, Qiu M, Zhou A, et al. Anatomic Anterolateral

Ligament Reconstruction Improves Postoperative

Clinical Outcomes Combined with Anatomic Anterior

Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Sports Sci Med

2016;15:688-96.

129. Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Cavalier M, et al.

Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated

With Significantly Reduced ACL Graft Rupture Rates

at a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years: A Prospective

Comparative Study of 502 Patients From the SANTI

Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1547-57.

© Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Page 15 of 16

130. Pioger C, Gousopoulos L, Hopper GP, et al. Clinical

Outcomes After Combined ACL and Anterolateral

Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL

Reconstruction With Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Grafts:

A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients From the

SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2022;50:3493–501.

131. Hamido F, Habiba AA, Marwan Y, et al. Anterolateral

ligament reconstruction improves the clinical and

functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol

Arthrosc 2021;29:1173-80.

132. Guenther D, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Bell KM, et al. The

Anterolateral Capsule of the Knee Behaves Like a Sheet of

Fibrous Tissue. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:849-55.

133. Herbst E, Albers M, Burnham JM, et al. The anterolateral

complex of the knee: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports

Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25:1009-14.

134. Park YB, Lee HJ, Cho HC, et al. Combined Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis or and Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Reconstruction Improves Outcomes Compared to Isolated

Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear : A

Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Arthroscopy 2023;39:758-76.e10.

135. Castoldi M, Magnussen RA, Gunst S, et al. A Randomized

Controlled Trial of Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and

Without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: 19-Year

Clinical and Radiological Follow-up. Am J Sports Med

2020;48:1665–72.

136. Li Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, et al. Clinical outcome of

simultaneous high tibial osteotomy and anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction for medial compartment

osteoarthritis in young patients with anterior cruciate

ligament-deficient knees: a systematic review. Arthroscopy

2015;31:507-19.

137. Akoto R, Alm L, Drenck TC, et al. Slope-Correction

Osteotomy with Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is

Highly Effective in Treating High-Grade Anterior Knee

Laxity. Am J Sports Med 2020;48:3478-85.

138. Kennedy MI, Claes S, Fuso FA, et al. The Anterolateral

Ligament: An Anatomic, Radi ...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る