リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Scale space calibrates present and subsequent spatial learning in Barnes maze in mice」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Scale space calibrates present and subsequent spatial learning in Barnes maze in mice

Tachiki, Yuto Suzuki, Yusuke Kurahashi, Mutsumi Oki, Keisuke Mavuk, Özgün Nakagawa, Takuma Ishihara, Shogo Gyoten, Yuichiro Yamamoto, Akira Imayoshi, Itaru 京都大学 DOI:10.1523/eneuro.0505-22.2023

2023.06

概要

Animals are capable of representing different scale spaces from smaller to larger ones. However, most laboratory animals live their life in a narrow range of scale spaces like home-cages and experimental setups, making it hard to extrapolate the spatial representation and learning process in large scale spaces from those in conventional scale spaces. Here, we developed a 3-meter diameter Barnes maze (BM3), then explored whether spatial learning in the Barnes maze (BM) is calibrated by scale spaces. Spatial learning in the BM3 was successfully established with a lower learning rate than that in a conventional 1-meter diameter Barnes maze (BM1). Specifically, analysis of exploration strategies revealed that the mice in the BM3 persistently searched certain places throughout the learning, while such places were rapidly decreased in the BM1. These results suggest dedicated exploration strategies requiring more trial-and-errors and computational resources in the BM3 than in the BM1, leading to a divergence of spatial learning between the BM1 and the BM3. We then explored whether prior learning in one BM scale calibrates subsequent spatial learning in another BM scale, and found asymmetric facilitation such that the prior learning in the BM3 facilitated the subsequent BM1 learning, but notvice versa. Thus, scale space calibrates both the present and subsequent BM learning. This is the first study to demonstrate scale-dependent spatial learning in BM in mice. The couple of the BM1 and the BM3 would be a suitable system to seek how animals represent different scale spaces with underlying neural implementation. Significance Statement Animals are capable of representing different scale spaces. However, whether scale space calibrates goal-directed spatial learning remains unclear. The Barnes maze is a well-established experimental paradigm to evaluate spatial learning in rodents. Here, we developed a larger scale 3-meter diameter Barnes maze (BM3) then compared various navigation features in mice between the BM3 and a conventional 1-meter diameter Barnes maze (BM1). We demonstrated that spatial learning on the BM3 was established, but required more trial-and-error and computational resources than in the BM1, prompting mice to visit certain places persistently. Such learning experiences in the BM3 facilitated subsequent spatial learning in the BM1, but not vice versa. These results suggest that scale space calibrates present and subsequent spatial learning.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

Alonso A, van der Meij J, Tse D, Genzel L (2020) Naïve to expert: considering the role of previous knowledge in memory. Brain Neurosci

Adv 4:239821282094868.

Alonso A, Bokeria L, van der Meij J, Samanta A, Eichler R, Lotfi A,

Spooner P, Navarro Lobato I, Genzel L (2021) The HexMaze: a

previous knowledge task on map learning for mice. eNeuro 8:

ENEURO.0554-20.2021.

Bach ME, Hawkins RD, Osman M, Kandel ER, Mayford M (1995)

Impairment of spatial but not contextual memory in CaMKII mutant

mice with a selective loss of hippocampal ltp in the range of the u

frequency. Cell 81:905–915.

Baraduc P, Duhamel J-R, Wirth S (2019) Schema cells in the macaque hippocampus. Science 363:635–639.

Barnes CA (1979) Memory deficits associated with senescence: a

neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. J Comp Physiol

Psychol 93:74–104.

Braun DA, Mehring C, Wolpert DM (2010) Structure learning in action. Behav Brain Res 206:157–165.

Brun VH, Solstad T, Kjelstrup KB, Fyhn M, Witter MP, Moser EI,

Moser M-B (2008) Progressive increase in grid scale from dorsal to

ventral medial entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus 18:1200–1212.

Dabaghian Y, Mémoli F, Frank L, Carlsson G (2012) A topological

paradigm for hippocampal spatial map formation using persistent

homology. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002581.

Dabaghian Y, Brandt VL, Frank LM (2014) Reconceiving the hippocampal map as a topological template. Elife 3:e03476.

Dragoi G, Tonegawa S (2013) Development of schemas revealed by

prior experience and NMDA receptor knock-out. Elife 2:e01326.

Eales KL, Palygin O, O’Loughlin T, Rasooli-Nejad S, Gaestel M,

Müller J, Collins DR, Pankratov Y, Corrêa SAL (2014) The MK2/3

cascade regulates AMPAR trafficking and cognitive flexibility. Nat

Commun 5:4701.

Eilam D (2014) Of mice and men: building blocks in cognitive mapping. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 47:393–409.

Eilam D, Dank M, Maurer R (2003) Voles scale locomotion to the size

of the open-field by adjusting the distance between stops: a possible link to path integration. Behav Brain Res 141:73–81.

Fenton AA, Kao HY, Neymotin SA, Olypher A, Vayntrub Y, Lytton

WW, Ludvig N (2008) Unmasking the CA1 ensemble place code by

exposures to small and large environments: more place cells and

multiple, irregularly arranged, and expanded place fields in the

larger space. J Neurosci 28:11250–11262.

Geva-Sagiv M, Las L, Yovel Y, Ulanovsky N (2015) Spatial cognition

in bats and rats: from sensory acquisition to multiscale maps and

navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci 16:94–108.

June 2023, 10(6) ENEURO.0505-22.2023

17 of 18

Hafting T, Fyhn M, Molden S, Moser M-B, Moser EI (2005)

Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature

436:801–806.

Harland B, Contreras M, Souder M, Fellous J-M (2021) Dorsal CA1

hippocampal place cells form a multi-scale representation of

megaspace. Curr Biol 31:2178–2190.e6.

Harlow HF (1949) The formation of learning sets. Psychol Rev 56:51–

65.

Huang ZB, Wang H, Rao XR, Zhong GF, Hu WH, Sheng GQ (2011)

Different effects of scopolamine on the retrieval of spatial memory

and fear memory. Behav Brain Res 221:604–609.

Javadi A-H, Emo B, Howard LR, Zisch FE, Yu Y, Knight R, Pinelo

Silva J, Spiers HJ (2017) Hippocampal and prefrontal processing

of network topology to simulate the future. Nat Commun 8:14652.

Kjelstrup KB, Solstad T, Brun VH, Hafting T, Leutgeb S, Witter MP,

Moser EI, Moser M-B (2008) Finite scale of spatial representation

in the hippocampus. Science 321:140–143.

Knierim JJ, Kudrimoti HS, McNaughton BL (1998) Interactions between idiothetic cues and external landmarks in the control of

place cells and head direction cells. J Neurophysiol 80:425–446.

Li J, Zhang R, Liu S, Liang Q, Zheng S, He X, Huang R (2021) Human

spatial navigation: neural representations of spatial scales and reference frames obtained from an ALE meta-analysis. NeuroImage

238:118264.

Lo AC, De Maeyer JH, Vermaercke B, Callaerts-Vegh Z, Schuurkes

JAJ, D’Hooge R (2014) SSP-002392, a new 5-HT4 receptor agonist, dose-dependently reverses scopolamine-induced learning

and memory impairments in C57Bl/6 mice. Neuropharmacology

85:178–189.

Mayford M, Bach ME, Huang YY, Wang L, Hawkins RD, Kandel ER

(1996) Control of memory formation through regulated expression

of a CaMKII transgene. Science 274:1678–1683.

Muller RU, Kubie JL (1987) The effects of changes in the environment

on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells. J

Neurosci 7:1951–1968.

Ocampo AC, Squire LR, Clark RE (2018) The beneficial effect of prior

experience on the acquisition of spatial memory in rats with CA1,

but not large hippocampal lesions: a possible role for schema formation. Learn Mem 25:115–121.

O’Keefe J, Conway DH (1978) Hippocampal place units in the freely

moving rat: why they fire where they fire. Exp Brain Res 31:573–

590.

O’Keefe J, Burgess N (1996) Geometric determinants of the place

fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature 381:6581.

Park E, Dvorak D, Fenton AA (2011) Ensemble place codes in hippocampus: CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus place cells have multiple

place fields in large environments. PLoS One 6:e22349.

Pitts MW (2018) Barnes maze procedure for spatial learning and

memory in mice. Bio Protoc 8:e2744.

Poucet B (1993) Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses

on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychol Rev 100:163–

182.

Poucet B, Herrmann T (2001) Exploratory patterns of rats on a complex

maze provide evidence for topological coding. Behav Processes

53:155–162.

Raber J, Rola R, LeFevour A, Morhardt D, Curley J, Mizumatsu S,

VandenBerg SR, Fike JR (2004) Radiation-induced cognitive impairments are associated with changes in indicators of hippocampal neurogenesis. Radiat Res 162:39–47.

Rich PD, Liaw H-P, Lee AK (2014) Large environments reveal the statistical structure governing hippocampal representations. Science

345:814–817.

Rosenberg M, Zhang T, Perona P, Meister M (2021) Mice in a labyrinth show rapid learning, sudden insight, and efficient exploration.

Elife 10:e66175.

Rosenfeld CS, Ferguson SA (2014) Barnes maze testing strategies

with small and large rodent models. J Vis Exp 84:51194.

Rozenfeld HD, Rybski D, Andrade JS, Batty M, Stanley HE, Makse

HA (2008) Laws of population growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

105:18702–18707.

eNeuro.org

Research Article: New Research

Sarel A, Palgi S, Blum D, Aljadeff J, Las L, Ulanovsky N (2022)

Natural switches in behaviour rapidly modulate hippocampal coding. Nature 609:7925–7127.

Suzuki Y, Imayoshi I (2017) Network analysis of exploratory behaviors of mice in a spatial learning and memory task. PLoS One 12:

e0180789.

Tse D, Langston RF, Kakeyama M, Bethus I, Spooner PA, Wood ER,

Witter MP, Morris RGM (2007) Schemas and memory consolidation. Science 316:76–82.

van Kesteren MTR, Ruiter DJ, Fernández G, Henson RN (2012) How

schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends Neurosci

35:211–219.

June 2023, 10(6) ENEURO.0505-22.2023

18 of 18

Wang JX (2021) Meta-learning in natural and artificial intelligence.

Curr Opin Behav Sci 38:90–95.

Weiss S, Yaski O, Eilam D, Portugali J, Blumenfeld-Lieberthal E

(2012) Network analysis of rat spatial cognition: behaviorally-established symmetry in a physically asymmetrical environment.

PLoS One 7:e40760.

Wolbers T, Wiener JM (2014) Challenges for identifying the neural

mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial

scale. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1–12.

Yaski O, Portugali J, Eilam D (2011) City rats: insight from rat spatial

behavior into human cognition in urban environments. Anim Cogn

14:655–663.

eNeuro.org

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る