リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

八幡 俊介 今町 憲貴 平林 政人 横井 信哉 佐倉 伸一 齊藤 洋司 島根大学

2023.06

概要

Background: The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinal block (ESPB) with those of opioid- based analgesia. Methods: This prospective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint study evaluated the analgesic effects of ESPB in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. The outcome measures were remifentanil and propofol consumption during operation, fentanyl consumption during 24 hours after anesthesia induction. Results: Data from fifteen patients were analyzed with seven and eight patients in the control and ESPB groups, respectively. There was difference between the groups in remifentanil consumption (median μg/kg lean body mass) 44.1 ［37.1, 49.3］ and 22.4 ［17.3, 26.1］; p = 0.002 in control and ESPB groups during operation. There was no difference between the groups regarding other outcomes including fentanyl consumption for postoperative analgesia. Conclusions: ESPB reduced remifentanil consumption during operation, but did not reduce fentanyl consumption for postoperative analgesia within 24 hours after anesthesia induction in lumbar spine surgery.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

1）Kurd MF, Kreitz T, Schroeder G, Vaccaro AR.

The Role of Multimodal Analgesia in Spine Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017;25（4）:260-8.

doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00049.

2）Mohan S, Lynch CP, Cha EDK, et al. Baseline

Risk Factors for Prolonged Opioid Use Following

Analgesic effect of ESPB in spine surgery: an RCT

Spine Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2022;159:179-88.e2. doi:

10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.086.

3） Berardino K, Carroll AH, Kaneb A, Civilette MD, Sherman WF, Kaye AD. An Update on Postoperative Opioid Use and Alternative Pain Control Following Spine Surgery.

Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2 0 2 1;1 3（ 2）:2 4 9 7 8. doi:

10.52965/001c.24978.

4） Dunn LK, Yerra S, Fang S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for chronic postoperative opioid use after major spine surgery: a

cross-sectional study with longitudinal outcome.

Anesth Analg 2018;127:247-54. doi: 10.1213/

ANE.0000000000003338.

5） Rajan S, Devarajan J, Krishnaney A, George

A, Rasouli JJ, Avitsian R. Opioid Alternatives

in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2022;34（1）:3-13. doi: 10.1097/

ANA.0000000000000708.

6）Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin

KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic

Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016;41:621-7. doi:

10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

7） Harbell MW, Seamans DP, Koyyalamudi V,

Kraus MB, Craner RC, Langley NR. Evaluating the extent of lumbar erector spinae plane

block: an anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med

2020;45（ 8）:640-644. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020101523.

8） Oh SK, Lim BG, Won YJ, Lee DK, Kim SS.

Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block

in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and

meta- analysis. J Clin Anesth 2022;78:110647.

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110647.

9） Singh S, Chaudhary NK. Bilateral Ultasound

Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Lumbar Spine Surgery:

29

A Case Series. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2019;31

（3）:354. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000518.

10）Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, et al. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients

Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World

Neurosurg 2 0 1 9;1 2 6:e7 7 9-8 5. doi: 1 0.1 0 1 6/

j.wneu.2019.02.149.

11）Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available

easy-to-use software EZR for medical statistics.

Bone Marrow Transplant 2013;48（3）:452-8. doi:

10.1038/bmt.2012.244.

12）Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT

group. CONSORT 2 0 1 0 statement: updated

guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized

trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:726-32. doi:

10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232.

1 3） Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin

KJ. Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Anatomical Study. Reg Anesth Pain

M e d 2 0 1 8 ; 4 3（ 7 ）: 7 5 6 - 7 6 2 . d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 9 7 /

AAP.0000000000000798.

14） Harbel MW, Seamans DP, Koyyalamudi V,

Kraus MB, Craner RC, Langley NR. Evaluating the extent of lumbar erector spinae plane

block: an anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain

Med 2020;45（8）:640-4. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020101523.

1 5） Karaca O, Pinar HU. Is high dose lumbar erector spinae plane block safe?. J Clin

Anesth 2 0 2 0;6 2:1 0 9 7 2 1. doi: 1 0.1 0 1 6/

j.jclinane.2020.109721.

16）Yawata S, Imamachi N, Sakura S, Yamamoto

H, Saito Y. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity of

levobupivacaine in erector spinae plane block. Korean J Anesthesiol 2021;74:271-2. doi: 10.4097/

kja.20560.

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文
を
一発検索！

この論文の関連論文を見る