リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Development of novel calibration methods and performance forecaster of cutting-edge superconducting detector MKIDs for CMB experiments」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Development of novel calibration methods and performance forecaster of cutting-edge superconducting detector MKIDs for CMB experiments

Kutsuma Hiroki 東北大学

2021.03.25

概要

The Big Bang theory has recognized widely as the standard model describing the evolution of the universe. However, the theory is inherent by the fundamental prob- lems, e.g., the horizontal problem and the flatness problem. In 1980s, Alan Guth and Katsuhiko Sato proposed the inflationary cosmology. Assuming the universe had an exponentially expanding period at the very early universe, they showed that these problems are naturally solved. According to the standard inflation theory, the tensor fluctuation was generated due to the quantum fluctuation of the space-time during the inflation period and it drifts in our universes as the primordial gravita- tional wave. The cross mode and plus mode primordial gravitational waves imprint the B-mode and E-mode polarizations in the CMB, respectively. Since the scalar mode fluctuation generates only the E-mode polarization, the detection of the B- mode CMB polarization provides smoking gun evidence of the inflation theory.

Many observation efforts have been done aiming for the first detection of the primordial B-mode CMB polarization. The power spectrum of the CMB B-mode po- larization has two bumps. One is called recombination bump appeared at around small angular scale of 2 degree (l 100), and the other is called reionization bump appeared at around large angular scale of 20 degree (l < 10). Many conventional ground-based CMB experiments target to detect the recombination bump. How- ever, the expected amplitude of the primordial B-mode CMB polarization is less than the B-mode polarization caused by the disturbance on the E-mode CMB po- larization due to the gravitational lensing effect of the large scale structure. On the other hand, the detection of the reionization bump from the ground-based observa- tion is limited by 1/f atmospheric fluctuation. The atmospheric fluctuation becomes significant below 0.1 Hz. It is hard to detect reionization bump by conventional ground-based observations since it is impossible to cover a few tenth degree of sky within a few second. To access the reionization bump by the ground-based CMB polarization experiments, invention for observational strategy to mitigate the atmo- spheric fluctuation is required.

The sum of neutrino masses is one of the important parameters in describing the evolution of the early universe. It is experimentally proposed that the neutrinos have mass. Since the non-zero neutrino mass can not be explained by the standard model of the particle physics, the neutrinos are the only particles beyond the stan- dard model currently known. We can evaluate the sum of the neutrino masses from the observation of the B-modes polarization due to the gravitational lensing effect of the large scale structure. However, to limit the sum of neutrino masses from the B-mode polarization due to the gravitational lensing effect of the large scale struc- ture we need to know the precise optical depth at the reionization epoch τ, since the influence of the gravitational lensing effect of the large scale structure and Thom- son scattering by the free electrons in the reionization are strongly degenerate. To evaluate the optical depth at the reionization epoch, the CMB E-mode polarization below l 10 is useful since the scalar perturbation below l 10 entered inside of the Hubble horizon after the reionization epoch. There is a systematic difference in the estimated τ between WMAP and Planck satellites results. The independent measurement of the optical depth at the reionization epoch by the CMB polarization experiment which is able to perform the secure measurement of the large angular scale signal is an important.

In order to observe the faint signal like the CMB polarization, various types of large format detector arrays toward astronomical observations, including CMB po- larization observations are proposed. Recently, majority of CMB polarization experi- ments use a superconducting detector as a focal plane detector, because it is sensitive enough to reach the noise level of the photon noise of the atmosphere for the ground- based observations. At present, many millimeter and submillimter telescope includ- ing CMB observation use a large format Transition Edge Sensor (TES) array as a focal plane detector. The TES is a superconducting detector. In next decade, over mega pixel focal plane detector is going to be required in order to increase the precision of the observations. However, the development of the mega pixel TES camera is hard with the current readout multiplexer system. The Microwave Kinetic Induc- tance Detector (MKID) is the cutting-edge superconducting detector which enable to break the mega pixel wall. The advantage of the MKID is that it has a potential to read over thousands pixels per single readout line. Moreover, the time response of the MKID (< 100 µs) is significantly faster than the TES.

Although the MKID is the detector technology which is supposed to explore the mega pixel era, it has several fundamental problems which have to be overcome. The one is that there is significant systematic uncertainty involved in the calibration of the detector performance since there is no novel method for the responsivity cali- bration. The MKID for millimeter and submillimter astronomical observations is op- erated at 250 300 mK. Every day or a few day, the MKID is once warmed up above the transition temperature and cooled down below the transition temperature again. Since the performance of the MKID changes every cooling cycle, we have to perform calibration of the performance of the MKID, especially its responsivity, every cool- ing cycle. Conventionally, the calibration of the responsivity of the MKID has been performed by measuring the change of the response when the temperature of the detector mount plate is heated up by controlling the heater attached to the mount plate. This method is inevitable from following systematic error. It always accom- panies uncertainties whether the plate temperature measured by the thermometer coincides with the detector temperature. This method is also time consuming. It takes several hours for every calibration. Therefore, a few 10% of the observational time is consumed by the responsivity calibration. The other problem is that the 1/f type noise always appears and it limits the performance in low sampling frequency. This noise is supposed to be attributed to the two level system (TLS) formed in the interface of the supercoducting material and substrate. To realize the photon noise limit high sensitivity MKID down to low sampling frequency, we have to mitigate the TLS noise in someway. The third problem is that there is no method to measure the superconducting transition temperature, Tc, of the hybrid type MKID which is widely used for the recent astronomical observations. The superconducting transi- tion temperature of the MKID is one of the crucially important parameters to fix the design of MKID and evaluate performance.

The GroundBIRD is a ground-based CMB polarization experiment to probe the inflationary cosmology. For enabling to attack the reionization bump of the primor- dial B-mode CMB polarization and to observe the precise optical depth to reioniza- tion from the ground by mitigating the 1/f atmospheric fluctuation, the Ground- BIRD performs a rapid rotation scan around the zenith direction with inclining the telescope 30 degree from zenith at rotation speed of 20 rotations per minute, which corresponds to 3 seconds for one rotation. Because of the earth rotation 44% of the full sky area is covered in a day. Since the time response of MKID is significantly faster than TES and satisfies the requirements from the rapid rotation scan strategy, MKID is installed on the focal plane of the GroundBIRD. We show in this thesis that the performance of the prototype MKID is far from the GroundBIRD observation requirements based on the results of our performance verification experiments as shown in Chapter.3. The 1/f type TLS noise dominates over the generation and re- combination noise below 100Hz. Further research and development is required to

optimize performance of the MKID to the GroundBIRD observation. However, the one cycle from the design to evaluation is about three months. We have to iterate this cycle several times to feed back the results to new design. Dramatic reduction of the consumption for this research and development cycle is desired.

We propose new method for the responsivity calibration in Chapter 4. The method uses the change of the number of the excess quasiparticles while changing the mi- crowave readout power. By changing microwave readout power from high power to low power abruptly, the number of the excess quasiparticles transit to a new steady state with time constant. This time constant is called quasiparticle lifetime and the time has an relation between the number of quasiparticles in the MKID. We eval- uate the number of quasiparticles from the quasiparticle lifetime using theoretical formula. As a result, the responsivity is extracted. We apply this method for the real measurement using the MKID maintained at 285 mK. We confirm the consis- tency between the results obtained using this method and conventional calibration methods. Since our method is free from the above mentioned systematic accom- panying in the conventional method, the our method provides much more secure results compared with the conventional method. Furthermore, the time duration consumed for the calibration dramatically shortened, down to 10 minutes, by our proposed method.

We propose a new method to measure the Tc of MKID by abrupt change of the applied readout microwave power. The number of quasiparticles in the MKID de- crease with the quasiparticle lifetime during abrupt change of the applied readout microwave power. Therefore, we can measure the relation between the quasiparticle lifetime and the detector phase response by abrupt change of the readout microwave power. As a results, we can estimate the intrinsic quasiparticle lifetime. The intrin- sic quasiparticle lifetime is theoretically modeled by Tc, the physical temperature of the device, and other known parameters. We can extract Tc by comparing the measured lifetime with theoretical model. Using an MKID made of aluminium, we demonstrate this method at a 0.3 K operation. The results are consistent with those obtained by Tc measured by monitoring the transmittance of the readout microwave power for various device temperature. The proposed method opens a possibility to measure Tc of the hybrid type MKID directly. Since there was no method to mea- sure Tc, the speculated value of Tc has been adopted. The speculated values vary largely from author to author in the range from 1.1 K to 1.5 K. This introduces ten- fold difference in the estimated noise level of the MKID under dark condition. Our method fixes this large uncertainty and dramatically improves precision of design- ing the MKID. Since the photon noise of the atmosphere dominates over the intrinsic noise of the MKID for the GroundBIRD application, the uncertainty of the noise level introduced by the uncertainty of Tc in the range of 1.1 K to 1.5 K is about 20%.

We develop the forecaster which evaluate the performance of MKID quantita- tively by setting environmental variables and design parameters as shown in Chap- ter 6. By inputting the design parameters of the prototype MKID into the forecaster, we confirmed that the TLS noise dominates over the BLIP noise below 100 Hz and that the main problem of the prototype MKID is its design. We show that this bad performance is attributed to the design. Since the total width of the coplanar waveg- uide (CPW) line made from Nb of the prototype MKID is too narrow, the contri- bution of the TLS noise became prominent. A new design of MKID with widening the total width of CPW line made from Nb is proposed. We evaluate the expected performance of the new design MKID using the forecaster in Chapter 7. We showed that the TLS noise is significantly reduced from that of the prototype MKID and is suppressed below the BLIP noise down to the GroundBIRD rotation frequency (0.3 Hz).

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

[1] Steven Weinberg et al. Cosmology. Oxford university press, 2008.

[2] E Dwek et al. “Morphology, near-infrared luminosity, and mass of the Galac- tic bulge from COBE DIRBE observations”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 445 (1995), pp. 716–730.

[3] Charles L Bennett et al. “Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: final maps and results”. In: The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 208.2 (2013), p. 20.

[4] Planck Collaboration et al. “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parame- ters”. In: (2020).

[5] Pea de Bernardis et al. “A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cos- mic microwave background radiation”. In: Nature 404.6781 (2000), pp. 955– 959.

[6] Shaul Hanany et al. “MAXIMA-1: a measurement of the cosmic microwave background anisotropy on angular scales of 10’-5”. In: The Astrophysical Jour- nal Letters 545.1 (2000), p. L5.

[7] Alan H Guth. “Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems”. In: Physical Review D 23.2 (1981), p. 347.

[8] Katsuhiko Sato. “First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the Universe”. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 195.3 (1981), pp. 467–479.

[9] Uros Seljak and Matias Zaldarriaga. “Signature of gravity waves in the polar- ization of the microwave background”. In: Physical Review Letters 78.11 (1997), p. 2054.

[10] Lloyd Knox and Yong-Seon Song. “Limit on the Detectability of the Energy Scale of Inflation”. In: Physical Review Letters 89.1 (2002), p. 011303.

[11] Antony Lewis, Anthony Challinor, and Anthony Lasenby. “Efficient compu- tation of cosmic microwave background anisotropies in closed Friedmann- Robertson-Walker models”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 538.2 (2000), p. 473.

[12] PAR Ade et al. “Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves Using Planck, WMAP, and New BICEP2/Keck Observations through the 2015 Season”. In: Physical review letters 121.22 (2018), p. 221301.

[13] R Keisler et al. “Measurements of sub-degree B-mode polarization in the cos- mic microwave background from 100 square degrees of SPTpol data”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 807.2 (2015), p. 151.

[14] JT Sayre et al. “Measurements of B-mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background from 500 square degrees of SPTpol data”. In: Physical Review D 101.12 (2020), p. 122003.

[15] S Adachi et al. “A Measurement of the Degree-scale CMB B-mode Angu- lar Power Spectrum with POLARBEAR”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 897.1 (2020), p. 55.

[16] Y Fukuda et al. “Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos”. In: Phys- ical Review Letters 81.8 (1998), p. 1562.

[17] Erminia Calabrese, David Alonso, and Jo Dunkley. “Complementing the ground- based CMB-S4 experiment on large scales with the PIXIE satellite”. In: Physi-cal Review D 95.6 (2017), p. 063504.

[18] Wayne S Holland et al. “SCUBA: a common-user submillimetre camera oper- ating on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope”. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 303.4 (1999), pp. 659–672.

[19] Jason Glenn et al. “Bolocam: a millimeter-wave bolometric camera”. In: Ad- vanced Technology MMW, Radio, and Terahertz Telescopes. Vol. 3357. 1998, pp. 326– 334.

[20] Brian G Keating et al. “BICEP: a large angular-scale CMB polarimeter”. In: Polarimetry in Astronomy. Vol. 4843. 2003, pp. 284–295.

[21] D Barkats et al. “Cosmic microwave background polarimetry using correla- tion receivers with the PIQUE and CAPMAP experiments”. In: The Astrophys- ical Journal Supplement Series 159.1 (2005), p. 1.

[22] QUIET Collaboration et al. “The QUIET instrument”. In: ArXiv e-prints 1207 (2012).

[23] KD Irwin. “An application of electrothermal feedback for high resolution cryogenic particle detection”. In: Applied Physics Letters 66.15 (1995), pp. 1998– 2000.

[24] M Dobbs et al. “APEX-SZ first light and instrument status”. In: New Astron- omy Reviews 50.11-12 (2006), pp. 960–968.

[25] Hien Trong Nguyen et al. “BICEP2/SPUD: searching for inflation with de- gree scale polarimetry from the South Pole”. In: Millimeter and Submillimeter Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IV. Vol. 7020. 2008, 70201F.

[26] Arthur Kosowsky. “The atacama cosmology telescope”. In: New Astronomy Reviews 47.11-12 (2003), pp. 939–943.

[27] JE Carlstrom et al. “The 10 meter south pole telescope”. In: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 123.903 (2011), p. 568.

[28] Zigmund D Kermish et al. “The POLARBEAR experiment”. In: Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. Vol. 8452. 2012, p. 84521C.

[29] Peter Ade et al. “The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts”. In: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019.02 (2019), p. 056.

[30] T Matsumura et al. “Mission design of LiteBIRD”. In: Journal of Low Tempera- ture Physics 176.5-6 (2014), pp. 733–740.

[31] B Dober et al. “Microwave SQUID multiplexer demonstration for cosmic microwave background imagers”. In: Applied Physics Letters 111.24 (2017), p. 243510.

[32] J Schlaerth et al. “A millimeter and submillimeter kinetic inductance detector camera”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 151.3-4 (2008), pp. 684–689.

[33] NG Czakon et al. “Microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) camera testing for submillimeter astronomy”. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1185. 1. 2009, pp. 172–175.

[34] Alessandro Monfardini et al. “NIKA: A millimeter-wave kinetic inductance camera”. In: Astronomy & Astrophysics 521 (2010), A29.

[35] M Calvo et al. “The NIKA2 instrument, a dual-band kilopixel KID array for millimetric astronomy”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 184.3-4 (2016), pp. 816–823.

[36] Akira Endo et al. “First light demonstration of the integrated superconduct- ing spectrometer”. In: Nature Astronomy 3.11 (2019), pp. 989–996.

[37] Nicholas Galitzki et al. “The next generation BLAST experiment”. In: Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation 3.02 (2014), p. 1440001.

[38] Jason E Austermann et al. “Millimeter-wave polarimeters using kinetic in- ductance detectors for TolTEC and beyond”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193.3 (2018), pp. 120–127.

[39] Jochem JA Baselmans et al. “A kilo-pixel imaging system for future space based far-infrared observatories using microwave kinetic inductance detec- tors”. In: Astronomy & Astrophysics 601 (2017), A89.

[40] BA Mazin et al. “ARCONS: A 2024 pixel optical through near-IR cryogenic imaging spectrophotometer”. In: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125.933 (2013), p. 1348.

[41] Seth R Meeker et al. “DARKNESS: a microwave kinetic inductance detector integral field spectrograph for high-contrast astronomy”. In: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 130.988 (2018), p. 065001.

[42] SJC Yates et al. “Photon noise limited radiation detection with lens-antenna coupled microwave kinetic inductance detectors”. In: Applied Physics Letters 99.7 (2011), p. 073505.

[43] J. Gao. PhD thesis. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 2008.

[44] WA Phillips. “Two-level states in glasses”. In: Reports on Progress in Physics 50.12 (1987), p. 1657.

[45] P W Anderson, BI Halperin, and C M Varma. “Anomalous low-temperature thermal properties of glasses and spin glasses”. In: Philosophical Magazine 25.1 (1972), pp. 1–9.

[46] Omid Noroozian et al. “Two-level system noise reduction for microwave ki- netic inductance detectors”. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1185. 1. 2009, pp. 148–151.

[47] Osamu Tajima et al. “GroundBIRD: an experiment for CMB polarization mea- surements at a large angular scale from the ground”. In: Millimeter, Submil- limeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. Vol. 8452. 2012, p. 84521M.

[48] S Oguri et al. “GroundBIRD experiment: Detecting CMB polarization power in a large angular scale from the ground”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 176.5-6 (2014), pp. 691–697.

[49] S Oguri et al. “Groundbird: observing cosmic microwave polarization at large angular scale with kinetic inductance detectors and high-speed rotating tele- scope”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 184.3-4 (2016), pp. 786–792.

[50] Shugo Oguri et al. “GroundBIRD: observations of CMB polarization with fast scan modulation and MKIDs”. In: Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI. Vol. 9906. 2016, p. 99063L.

[51] J Choi et al. “Status of the GroundBIRD Telescope”. In: EPJ Web of Conferences. Vol. 168. 2018, p. 01014.

[52] Taketo Nagasaki et al. “GroundBIRD: Observation of CMB Polarization with a Rapid Scanning and MKIDs”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193.5-6 (2018), pp. 1066–1074.

[53] K Lee et al. “GroundBIRD: A CMB Polarization Experiment with MKID Ar- rays”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 200.5 (2020), pp. 384–391.

[54] Jihoon Choi. PhD thesis. Korea University, Korea, 2015.

[55] Y Mizugutch, M Akagawa, and H Yokoi. “Offset dual reflector antenna”. In: isap. 1976, pp. 2–5.

[56] Peter K Day et al. “A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays”. In: Nature 425.6960 (2003), pp. 817–821.

[57] Jonas Zmuidzinas. “Superconducting microresonators: Physics and applica- tions”. In: Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3.1 (2012), pp. 169–214.

[58] Daniel Flanigan et al. “Photon noise from chaotic and coherent millimeter- wave sources measured with horn-coupled, aluminum lumped-element ki- netic inductance detectors”. In: Applied Physics Letters 108.8 (2016), p. 083504.

[59] John Bardeen, Leon N Cooper, and John Robert Schrieffer. “Theory of super- conductivity”. In: Physical review 108.5 (1957), p. 1175.

[60] AG Kozorezov et al. “Quasiparticle-phonon downconversion in nonequilib- rium superconductors”. In: Physical Review B 61.17 (2000), p. 11807.

[61] M Kurakado. “Possibility of high resolution detectors using superconducting tunnel junctions”. In: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 196.1 (1982), pp. 275–277.

[62] Junta Komine. MA thesis. Kyoto University, Japan, 2019.

[63] Juan R Pardo, José Cernicharo, and Eugene Serabyn. “Atmospheric transmis- sion at microwaves (ATM): an improved model for millimeter/submillimeter applications”. In: IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation 49.12 (2001), pp. 1683–1694.

[64] B Garcıa-Lorenzo et al. “Infrared astronomical characteristics of the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory: precipitable water vapour statistics”. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 405.4 (2010), pp. 2683–2696.

[65] Hiroki Kutsuma et al. “A method to measure superconducting transition temperature of microwave kinetic inductance detector by changing power of readout microwaves”. In: Aip Advances 10.9 (2020), p. 095320.

[66] Taketo Nagasaki. internal document. 2019.

[67] Hiroki Kutsuma. internal document. 2020.

[68] Masato Naruse. PhD thesis. The University of Tokyo, 2011.

[69] Kyungmin Lee. internal document. 2020.

[70] J Gao et al. “Equivalence of the effects on the complex conductivity of super- conductor due to temperature change and external pair breaking”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 151.1-2 (2008), pp. 557–563.

[71] P. J. de Visser. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2014.

[72] SE Thompson et al. “Dynamical behaviour of superconducting microresonators with readout-power heating”. In: Superconductor Science and Technology 26.9 (2013), p. 095009.

[73] PJ De Visser et al. “Microwave-induced excess quasiparticles in supercon- ducting resonators measured through correlated conductivity fluctuations”. In: Applied Physics Letters 100.16 (2012), p. 162601.

[74] PJ De Visser et al. “Evidence of a nonequilibrium distribution of quasiparti- cles in the microwave response of a superconducting aluminum resonator”. In: Physical review letters 112.4 (2014), p. 047004.

[75] Hiroki Kutsuma et al. “A measurement method for responsivity of microwave kinetic inductance detector by changing power of readout microwaves”. In: Applied Physics Letters 115.3 (2019), p. 032603.

[76] WL McMillan. “Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors”. In: Physical Review 167.2 (1968), p. 331.

[77] G. Vardulakis. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2007.

[78] B. A. Mazin. PhD thesis. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Cali- fornia, 2004.

[79] SB Kaplan et al. “Quasiparticle and phonon lifetimes in superconductors”. In: Physical Review B 14.11 (1976), p. 4854.

[80] PJ De Visser et al. “Number fluctuations of sparse quasiparticles in a super- conductor”. In: Physical review letters 106.16 (2011), p. 167004.

[81] DC Mattis and John Bardeen. “Theory of the anomalous skin effect in normal and superconducting metals”. In: Physical Review 111.2 (1958), p. 412.

[82] W Henkels and C Kircher. “Penetration depth measurements on type II su- perconducting films”. In: IEEE Transactions on magnetics 13.1 (1977), pp. 63– 66.

[83] Richard L Kautz. “Picosecond pulses on superconducting striplines”. In: Jour- nal of Applied Physics 49.1 (1978), pp. 308–314.

[84] R. E. Collins. Foundations for microwave engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.

[85] R. Barends. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2009.

[86] David M Pozar. Microwave engineering. John wiley & sons, 2011.

[87] CM Wilson, L Frunzio, and DE Prober. “Time-resolved measurements of ther- modynamic fluctuations of the particle number in a nondegenerate Fermi gas”. In: Physical review letters 87.6 (2001), p. 067004.

[88] Jiansong Gao et al. “Noise properties of superconducting coplanar waveg- uide microwave resonators”. In: Applied Physics Letters 90.10 (2007), p. 102507.

[89] Jiansong Gao et al. “A semiempirical model for two-level system noise in superconducting microresonators”. In: Applied Physics Letters 92.21 (2008), p. 212504.

[90] Shwetank Kumar et al. “Temperature dependence of the frequency and noise of superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators”. In: Applied Physics Let- ters 92.12 (2008), p. 123503.

[91] R Barends et al. “Noise in NbTiN, Al, and Ta superconducting resonators on silicon and sapphire substrates”. In: IEEE transactions on applied superconduc- tivity 19.3 (2009), pp. 936–939.

[92] R Barends et al. “Reduced frequency noise in superconducting resonators”. In: Applied Physics Letters 97.3 (2010), p. 033507.

[93] C Neill et al. “Fluctuations from edge defects in superconducting resonators”. In: Applied Physics Letters 103.7 (2013), p. 072601.

[94] Michael R Vissers et al. “Low loss superconducting titanium nitride coplanar waveguide resonators”. In: Applied Physics Letters 97.23 (2010), p. 232509.

[95] AV Sergeev, VV Mitin, and BS Karasik. “Ultrasensitive hot-electron kinetic- inductance detectors operating well below the superconducting transition”. In: Applied physics letters 80.5 (2002), pp. 817–819.

[96] Ryo Koyano. MA thesis. Saitama University, Japan, 2016.

[97] Hiroki Kutsuma. MA thesis. Tohoku University, Japan, 2018.

[98] Hikaru Ishitsuka. MA thesis. the Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Japan, 2015.

[99] H Ishitsuka et al. “Front–end electronics for the array readout of a microwave kinetic inductance detector towards observation of cosmic microwave back- ground polarization”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 184.1-2 (2016), pp. 424–430.

[100] J Suzuki et al. “Development of a data acquisition system for kinetic induc- tance detectors: wide dynamic range and high sampling rate for astronomi- cal observation”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193.3-4 (2018), pp. 562– 569.

[101] Joris van Rantwijk et al. “Multiplexed readout for 1000-pixel arrays of mi- crowave kinetic inductance detectors”. In: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 64.6 (2016), pp. 1876–1883.

[102] Anthony Megrant et al. “Planar superconducting resonators with internal quality factors above one million”. In: Applied Physics Letters 100.11 (2012), p. 113510.

[103] MS Khalil et al. “An analysis method for asymmetric resonator transmis- sion applied to superconducting devices”. In: Journal of Applied Physics 111.5 (2012), p. 054510.

[104] Junya Suzuki. internal document. 2018.

[105] BL Blackford. “A tunneling investigation of energy-gap anisotropy in super- conducting bulk aluminum crystals”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 23.1-2 (1976), pp. 43–52.

[106] A Fyhrie et al. “Decay Times of Optical Pulses for Aluminum CPW KIDs”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2020), pp. 1–8.

[107] MR Vissers et al. “Ultrastable millimeter-wave kinetic inductance detectors”. In: Applied Physics Letters 116.3 (2020), p. 032601.

[108] Agnes Dominjon et al. “Study of superconducting bilayer for microwave ki- netic inductance detectors for astrophysics”. In: IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 26.3 (2016), pp. 1–6.

[109] RMJ Janssen et al. “High optical efficiency and photon noise limited sensi- tivity of microwave kinetic inductance detectors using phase readout”. In: Applied Physics Letters 103.20 (2013), p. 203503.

[110] Stefan Vehrheul. MA thesis. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2019.

[111] Ilya Besedin and Alexey P Menushenkov. “Quality factor of a transmission line coupled coplanar waveguide resonator”. In: EPJ Quantum Technology 5.1 (2018), pp. 1–16.

[112] RMJ Janssen et al. “Power handling and responsivity of submicron wide su- perconducting coplanar waveguide resonators”. In: Journal of Low Tempera- ture Physics 167.3-4 (2012), pp. 354–359.

[113] G Jones et al. “High quality factor manganese-doped aluminum lumped- element kinetic inductance detectors sensitive to frequencies below 100 GHz”. In: Applied Physics Letters 110.22 (2017), p. 222601.

[114] Hidesato Ishida. MA thesis. Tohoku University, Japan, 2020.

[115] Hiroki Kutsuma. internal document. 2019.

[116] Chunhua Song et al. “Microwave response of vortices in superconducting thin films of Re and Al”. In: Physical Review B 79.17 (2009), p. 174512.

[117] Gheorghe Stan, Stuart B Field, and John M Martinis. “Critical field for com- plete vortex expulsion from narrow superconducting strips”. In: Physical re- view letters 92.9 (2004), p. 097003.

[118] Hiroki Kutsuma et al. “Optimization of Geomagnetic Shielding for MKIDs Mounted on a Rotating Cryostat”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193.3- 4 (2018), pp. 203–208.

[119] Michael Y Frankel et al. “Terahertz attenuation and dispersion characteristics of coplanar transmission lines”. In: IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques 39.6 (1991), pp. 910–916.

[120] S Hähnle et al. “Suppression of radiation loss in high kinetic inductance superconducting co-planar waveguides”. In: Applied Physics Letters 116.18 (2020), p. 182601.

[121] Josh Y Mutus et al. “Strong environmental coupling in a Josephson paramet- ric amplifier”. In: Applied Physics Letters 104.26 (2014), p. 263513.

[122] C Bockstiegel et al. “Development of a broadband NbTiN traveling wave parametric amplifier for MKID readout”. In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 176.3-4 (2014), pp. 476–482.

[123] Saul Perlmutter et al. “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift su- pernovae”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 517.2 (1999), p. 565.

[124] Adam G Riess et al. “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accel- erating universe and a cosmological constant”. In: The Astronomical Journal 116.3 (1998), p. 1009.

[125] Arno A Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson. “A measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080 Mc/s.” In: The Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965), pp. 419–421.

[126] DJ Fixsen and JC Mather. “The spectral results of the far-infrared absolute spectrophotometer instrument on COBE”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 581.2 (2002), p. 817.

[127] JC Mather et al. “Calibrator Design for the COBE Far-Infrared Absolute Spec- trophotometer (FIRAS)”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 512 (1999), p. 511.

[128] DJ Fixsen et al. “The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 473 (1996), p. 576.

[129] COsmic Background Explorer / FIRAS. FIRAS PROJECT DATA SETS.

[130] Damian Twerenbold. “Giaever-type superconducting tunnelling junctions as high-resolution X-ray detectors”. In: EPL (Europhysics Letters) 1.5 (1986), p. 209.

[131] H Kraus et al. “Quasiparticle trapping in a superconductive detector system exhibiting high energy and position resolution”. In: Physics Letters B 231.1-2 (1989), pp. 195–202.

[132] Alex D Semenov, Gregory N Gol’tsman, and Alexander A Korneev. “Quan- tum detection by current carrying superconducting film”. In: Physica C: Su- perconductivity 351.4 (2001), pp. 349–356.

[133] GN Gol’Tsman et al. “Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical de- tector”. In: Applied physics letters 79.6 (2001), pp. 705–707.

[134] Alexei D Semenov et al. “Terahertz performance of integrated lens antennas with a hot-electron bolometer”. In: IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques 55.2 (2007), pp. 239–247.

[135] Andreas Fleischmann, Ch Enss, and GM Seidel. “Metallic magnetic calorime- ters”. In: Cryogenic particle detection. 2005, pp. 151–216.

[136] Colin Bischoff. PhD thesis. The university of Chicago, 2010.

[137] J Wenner et al. “Surface loss simulations of superconducting coplanar waveg- uide resonators”. In: Applied Physics Letters 99.11 (2011), p. 113513.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る