リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study

Masahiko Mukaino Birgit Prodinger Shin Yamada Yuki Senju Shin-Ichi Izumi Shigeru Sonoda Melissa Selb Eiichi Saitoh Gerold Stucki 東北大学 DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6

2020.01.30

概要

Background: The World Health Organization developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in 2001 and has been in the process of implementing it in clinics since then. Current international efforts to implement ICF in rehabilitation clinics include the implementation of ICF Core Sets and the development of simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set (also called Rehabilitation Set). The present study was designed to operationalize these ICF tools for clinical practice in Japan. This work included 1) the development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set, 2) the development of a rating reference guide for Activity and Participation categories, and 3) the examination of the interrater reliability of rating Activity and Participation categories.

Methods: The Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set was developed following the process employed to develop the Chinese and Italian versions. For further operationalization of this ICF Set in practice, a rating reference guide was developed. The development of the rating reference guide involved the following steps: 1) a trial of rating patients by several raters, 2) cognitive interviewing of the raters to analyse the thinking process involved in rating, 3) drafting of the rating reference guide, and 4) review by ICF specialists to confirm consistency with the original ICF concepts. After the rating reference guide was developed, interrater reliability of the rating with the reference guide was determined. Interrater reliability was examined using weighted kappa statistics with linear weight.

参考文献

1. Stucki G, Bickenbach J, Gutenbrunner C, Melvin J. Rehabilitation: the health strategy of the 21st century. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(4):309–16.

2. World Health Organization. International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 1st edn. WHO: Geneva; 2001.

3. Maribo T, Petersen KS, Handberg C, Melchiorsen H, Momsen AM, Nielsen CV, Leonardi M, Labriola M. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic countries focusing on clinical and rehabilitation context. J Clin Med Res. 2016;8(1):1–9.

4. Selb M, Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G, Ustun B, Cieza A. A guide on how to develop an international classification of functioning, disability and health Core set. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(1):105–17.

5. Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, Chatterji S, Stucki G. Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:218.

6. Prodinger B, Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Stucki G. Toward the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) rehabilitation set: a minimal generic set of domains for rehabilitation as a health strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(6):875–84.

7. Prodinger B, Rastall P, Kalra D, Wooldridge D, Carpenter I. Documenting routinely what matters to people: standardized headings for health Records of Patients with chronic health conditions. Appl Clin Inform. 2018;9(2):348–65.

8. Prodinger B, Reinhardt JD, Selb M, Stucki G, Yan T, Zhang X, Li J. Towards system-wide implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in routine practice: developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF generic and rehabilitation set. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(6):508–14.

9. Selb M, Gimigliano F, Prodinger B, Stucki G, Pestelli G, Iocco M, Boldrini P. Toward an international classification of functioning, disability and health clinical data collection tool: the Italian experience of developing simple, intuitive descriptions of the rehabilitation set categories. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(2):290–8.

10. Uhlig T, Lillemo S, Moe RH, Stamm T, Cieza A, Boonen A, Mowinckel P, Kvien TK, Stucki G. Reliability of the ICF Core set for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(8):1078–84.

11. Starrost K, Geyh S, Trautwein A, Grunow J, Ceballos-Baumann A, Prosiegel M, Stucki G, Cieza A. Interrater reliability of the extended ICF core set for stroke applied by physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2008; 88(7):841–51.

12. Prodinger B, Stucki G, Coenen M, Tennant A. The measurement of functioning using the international classification of functioning, disability and health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):541–8.

13. Ehrmann C, Prodinger B, Stucki G, Cai W, Zhang X, Liu S, Liu S, Li J, Reinhardt JD. ICF generic set as new standard for the system wide assessment of functioning in China: a multicentre prospective study on metric properties and responsiveness applying item response theory. BMJ Open. 2018;8(12):e021696.

14. Liu S, Reinhardt JD, Zhang X, Ehrmann C, Cai W, Prodinger B, Liu S, Li J. System-wide clinical assessment of functioning based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health in China: Interrater reliability, convergent, known group, and predictive validity of the ICF Generic-6. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(8):1450–7.

15. Hunt SM, Alonso J, Bucquet D, Niero M, Wiklund I, McKenna S. Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. European Group for Health Management and Quality of life assessment. Health Policy. 1991;19(1):33–44.

16. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004.

17. Flack VF, Afifi A, Lachenbruch P, Schouten H. Sample size determinations for the two rater kappa statistic. J Psychometrika. 1988;53(3):321–5.

18. Bujang MA, Baharum N: Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for kappa agreement test. J Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health 2017, 14(2).

19. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6 –18.

20. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61 –5.

21. Kelsey JL, Berry SD, Procter-Gray E, Quach L, Nguyen US, Li W, Kiel DP, Lipsitz LA, Hannan MT. Indoor and outdoor falls in older adults are different: the maintenance of balance, independent living, intellect, and zest in the elderly of Boston study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(11):2135 –41.

22. Kelsey JL, Procter-Gray E, Berry SD, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, Lipsitz LA, Li W. Reevaluating the implications of recurrent falls in older adults: location changes the inference. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(3):517 –24.

23. Frost Y, Weingarden H, Zeilig G, Nota A, Rand D. Self-care self-efficacy correlates with Independence in basic activities of daily living in individuals with chronic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(7):1649 –55.

24. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(7):559 –66.

25. Kreutzer JS, Gervasio AH, Camplair PS. Primary caregivers' psychological status and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1994;8(3):197 –210.

26. Demeulemeester F, De Letter M, Miatton M, Santens P. Quality of life in patients with PD and their caregiving spouses: a view from both sides. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;139:24 –8.

27. Badia M, Orgaz MB, Verdugo MA, Ullan AM, Martinez M. Relationships between leisure participation and quality of life of people with developmental disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013;26(6):533 –45.

28. Sigafoos AD, Feinstein CB, Damond M, Reiss D. The measurement of behavioral autonomy in adolescence: the autonomous functioning checklist. Adolesc Psychiatry. 1988;15:432 –62.

29. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159 –74.

30. Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Rose H, Harris S, Jackson D. Deriving a Barthel index from the Northwick Park dependency scale and the functional Independence measure: are they equivalent? Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(12):1121 –6.

31. Post MW, de Witte LP. Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay activities index in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(5):548 –52.

32. Chau N, Daler S, Andre JM, Patris A. Inter-rater agreement of two functional Independence scales: the functional Independence measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale. Disabil Rehabil. 1994;16(2):63 –71.

33. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226 –32.

参考文献をもっと見る