1. Crawford Nigel, M. et al. Molecular and Developmental Biology of Inorganic Nitrogen N utrition. The Arabidopsis Book. 1, 1–24 (2002).
2. Gutiérrez, R. A. Systems Biology for Enhanced Plant Nitrogen Nutrition. Science. 336, 16 73–1675 (2012).
3. Crawford, N. M. & Glass, A. D. . Molecular and physiological aspects of nitrate uptake i n plants. Trends Plant Sci. 3, 389–395 (1998).
4. Malagoli, P. et al. Modeling Nitrogen Uptake in Oilseed Rape cv Capitol during a Growt h Cycle Using Influx Kinetics of Root Nitrate Transport Systems and Field Experimental Data. Plant Physiol. 134, 388–400 (2004).
5. Léran, S. et al. A unified nomenclature of NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1/PEPTIDE TRA NSPORTER family members in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 5–9 (2014).
6. von Wittgenstein, N. J. et al. Evolutionary classification of ammonium, nitrate, and peptid e transporters in land plants. BMC Evol. Biol. 14, 11 (2014).
7. Dreyer, I. et al. Identification and characterization of plant transporters using heterologous expression systems. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 1073–1087 (1999).
8. Tsay, Y. F., Schroeder, J. I., Feldmann, K. a & Crawford, N. M. The herbicide sensitivit y gene CHL1 of Arabidopsis encodes a nitrate-inducible nitrate transporter. Cell 72, 705– 713 (1993).
9. Liu, K. H. & Tsay, Y. F. Switching between the two action modes of the dual-affinity n itrate transporter CHL1 by phosphorylation. EMBO J. 22, 1005–1013 (2003).
10. Unkles, S. E. et al. crnA encodes a nitrate transporter in Aspergillus nidulans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 204–208 (1991).
11. Quesada, A., Galvan, A. & Fernandez, E. Identification of nitrate transporter genes in Chl amydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 5, 407–419 (1994).
12. Trueman, L. J., Richardson, A. & Forde, B. G. Molecular cloning of higher plant homolo gues of the high-affinity nitrate transporters of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Aspergillus nidulans. Gene 175, 223–231 (1996).
13. Quesada, A. et al. PCR-identification of a Nicotiana plumbaginifolia cDNA homologous t o the high-affinity nitrate transporters of the crnA family. Plant Mol. Biol. 34, 265–274 (1997).
14. Ranamalie Amarasinghe, B. H. R. et al. Regulation of GmNRT2 expression and nitrate tra nsport activity in roots of soybean (Glycine max). Planta 206, 44–52 (1998).
15. Filleur, S. & Daniel-Vedele, F. Expression analysis of a high-affinity nitrate transporter is olated from Arabidopsis thaliana by differential display. Planta 207, 461–469 (1999).
16. Filleur, S. et al. An Arabidopsis T-DNA mutant affected in Nrt2 genes is impaired in nit rate uptake. FEBS Lett. 489, 220–224 (2001).
17. Cerezo, M. et al. Major alterations of the regulation of root NO3- uptake are associated with the mutation of Nrt2.1 and Nrt2.2 genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127, 262–271 (2001).
18. Li, W. et al. Dissection of the AtNRT2.1:AtNRT2.2 Inducible High-Affinity Nitrate Transp orter Gene Cluster. Plant Physiol. 143, 425–433 (2007).
19. Kiba, T. et al. The Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT2.4 plays a double role in roots a nd shoots of nitrogen-starved plants. Plant Cell 24, 245–58 (2012).
20. Lezhneva, L. et al. The Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT2.5 plays a role in nitrate acq uisition and remobilization in nitrogen-starved plants. Plant J. 80, 230–241 (2014).
21. Lejay, L. et al. Molecular and functional regulation of two NO3- uptake systems by N- a nd C-status of Arabidopsis plants. Plant J. 18, 509–519 (1999).
22. Gansel, X., Muños, S., Tillard, P. & Gojon, A. Differential regulation of the NO3- and N H4+ transporter genes AtNrt2.1 and AtAmt1.1 in Arabidopsis: relation with long-distance an d local controls by N status of the plant. Plant J. 26, 143–155 (2001).
23. Lejay, L. et al. Regulation of Root Ion Transporters by Photosynthesis: Functional Import ance and Relation with Hexokinase. Plant Cell 15, 2218–2232 (2003).
24. Lejay, L. et al. Oxidative Pentose Phosphate Pathway-Dependent Sugar Sensing as a Mec hanism for Regulation of Root Ion Transporters by Photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 146, 20 36–2053 (2008).
25. Fraisier, V., Gojon, A., Tillard, P. & Daniel-Vedele, F. Constitutive expression of a putati ve high-affinity nitrate transporter in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia: evidence for post-transcript ional regulation by a reduced nitrogen source. Plant J. 23, 489–496 (2000).
26. Wirth, J. et al. Regulation of root nitrate uptake at the NRT2.1 protein level in Arabidop sis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 23541–23552 (2007).
27. Jacquot, A., Li, Z., Gojon, A., Schulze, W. & Lejay, L. Post-translational regulation of ni trogen transporters in plants and microorganisms. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2567–2580 (2017).
28. Tong, Y., Zhou, J.-J., Li, Z. & Miller, A. J. A two-component high-affinity nitrate uptake system in barley. Plant J. 41, 442–450 (2004).
29. Okamoto, M. et al. High-Affinity Nitrate Transport in Roots of Arabidopsis Depends on Expression of the NAR2-Like Gene AtNRT3.1. Plant Physiol. 140, 1036–1046 (2006).
30. Orsel, M. et al. Characterization of a two-component high-affinity nitrate uptake system in Arabidopsis. Physiology and protein-protein interaction. Plant Physiol. 142, 1304–1317 (2 006).
31. Laugier, E. et al. Regulation of high-affinity nitrate uptake in roots of arabidopsis depends predominantly on posttranscriptional control of the NRT2.1/NAR2.1 transport system. Pl ant Physiol. 158, 1067–1078 (2012).
32. Jacquot, A. et al. NRT2.1 C‐terminus phosphorylation prevents root high affinity nitrate u ptake activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist 228, 1038-1054 (2020).
33. Engelsberger, W. R. & Schulze, W. X. Nitrate and ammonium lead to distinct global dyn amic phosphorylation patterns when resupplied to nitrogen-starved Arabidopsis seedlings. P lant J. 69, 978–995 (2012).
34. Menz, J., Li, Z., Schulze, W. X. & Ludewig, U. Early nitrogen-deprivation responses in Arabidopsis roots reveal distinct differences on transcriptome and (phospho-) proteome lev els between nitrate and ammonium nutrition. Plant J. 1–18 (2016).
35. Zou, X., Liu, M. Y., Wu, W. H. & Wang, Y. Phosphorylation at Ser28 stabilizes the Ar abidopsis nitrate transporter NRT2.1 in response to nitrate limitation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 62, 865–876 (2020).
36. Drew, M. C., Saker, L. R. & Ashley, T. W. Nutrient Supply and the Growth of the Sem inal Root System in Barley. J. Exp. Bot. 24, 1189–1202 (1973).
37. Drew, M. C. & Saker, L. R. Nutrient supply and the growth of the seminal root system in barley: II. Localized, compensatory increases in lateral root growth and rates op nitrate uptake when nitrate supply is restricted to only part of the root system. J. Exp. Bot. 26, 79–90 (1975).
38. Edwards, J. H. & Barber, S. A. Nitrogen Flux into Corn Roots as Influenced by Shoot Requirement. Agron. J. 68, 471–473 (1976).
39. Robinson, D. & Rorison, I. H. A COMPARISON OF THE RESPONSES OF LOLIUM P ERENNE L. *, HOLCUS LANATUS L. AND DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA (L.) TRIN. TO A LOCALIZED SUPPLY OF NITROGEN. New Phytol. 94, 263–273 (1983).
40. Burns, I. G. Short‐ and long‐term effects of a change in the spatial distribution of nitrate in the root zone on N uptake, growth and root development of young lettuce plants. Plant. Cell Environ. 14, 21–33 (1991).
41. Tillard, P., Passama, L. & Gojon, A. Are phloem amino acids involved in the shoot to r oot control of NO3- uptake in Ricinus communis plants? J. Exp. Bot. 49, 1371–1379 (199 8).
42. Ruffel, S. et al. Nitrogen economics of root foraging: Transitive closure of the nitrate-cyt okinin relay and distinct systemic signaling for N supply vs. demand. Proc. Natl. Acad. S ci. U. S. A. 108, 18524–18529 (2011).
43. Clement, C. R., Hopper, M. J., Jones, L. H. P. & Leafe, E. L. The uptake of nitrate by Lolium perenne from flowing nutrient solution: II. Effect of light, defoliation, and relation ship to CO2 flux. J. Exp. Bot. 29, 1173–1183 (1978).
44. Clarkson, D. T., Hopp, M. J. & Jones, L. H. P. The effect of root temperature on the u ptake of nitrogen and the relative size of the root system in Lolium perenne. I. Solutions containing both NH4+ and NO3−. Plant. Cell Environ. 9, 535–545 (1986).
45. Cooper, H. D. & Clarkson, D. T. Cycling of Amino-Nitrogen and other Nutrients betwee n Shoots and Roots in Cereals—A Possible Mechanism Integrating Shoot and Root in the Regulation of Nutrient Uptake. J. Exp. Bot. 40, 753–762 (1989).
46. Sakakibara, H. Cytokinin biosynthesis and transport for systemic nitrogen signaling. Plant J. 105, 421–430 (2021).
47. Poitout, A. et al. Responses to Systemic Nitrogen Signaling in Arabidopsis Roots Involve trans-Zeatin in Shoots. Plant Cell 30, 1243–1257 (2018).
48. Gent, L. & Forde, B. G. How do plants sense their nitrogen status? J. Exp. Bot. 68, 253 1–2540 (2017).
49. Tabata, R. et al. Perception of root-derived peptides by shoot LRR-RKs mediates systemic N-demand signaling. Science 346, 343–346 (2014).
50. Ohyama, K., Ogawa, M. & Matsubayashi, Y. Identification of a biologically active, small, secreted peptide in Arabidopsis by in silico gene screening, followed by LC-MS-based st ructure analysis. Plant J. 55, 152–60 (2008).
51. Delay, C., Imin, N. & Djordjevic, M. A. CEP genes regulate root and shoot development in response to environmental cues and are specific to seed plants. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 5383 –5394 (2013).
52. Roberts, I. et al. The CEP family in land plants: Evolutionary analyses, expression studie s, and role in Arabidopsis shoot development. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 5371–5381 (2013).
53. Endo, M., Shimizu, H. & Araki, T. Rapid and simple isolation of vascular, epidermal and mesophyll cells from plant leaf tissue. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1388–95 (2016).
54. Xing, S. & Zachgo, S. ROXY1 and ROXY2, two Arabidopsis glutaredoxin genes, are requi red for anther development. Plant J. 53, 790–801 (2008).
55. Xing, S., Rosso, M. G. & Zachgo, S. ROXY1, a member of the plant glutaredoxin famil y, is required for petal development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 132, 1555–1565 (2005).
56. Chen, X. et al. Shoot-to-Root Mobile Transcription Factor HY5 Coordinates Plant Carbon and Nitrogen Acquisition. Curr. Biol. 26, 640–646 (2016).
57. Forde, B. G. LOCAL AND LONG-RANGE SIGNALING PATHWAYS REGULATING P LANT RESPONSES TO NITRATE. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 29–70 (2002).
58. Rouhier, N. Genome-wide analysis of plant glutaredoxin systems. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1685–1 696 (2006).
59. Gutsche, N., Thurow, C., Zachgo, S. & Gatz, C. Plant-specific CC-type glutaredoxins: Fu nctions in developmental processes and stress responses. Biological Chemistry 396, 495–50 9 (2015).
60. Patterson, K. et al. Nitrate-Regulated Glutaredoxins Control Arabidopsis Primary Root Gro wth. Plant Physiol. 170, 989–99 (2016).
61. Li, S., Gutsche, N. & Zachgo, S. The ROXY1 C-terminal L**LL motif is essential for th e interaction with TGA transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 157, 2056–68 (2011).
62. Ota, R., Ohkubo, Y., Yamashita, Y., Ogawa-Ohnishi, M. & Matsubayashi, Y. Shoot-to-roo t mobile CEPD-like 2 integrates shoot nitrogen status to systemically regulate nitrate upta ke in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 11, 641 (2020).
63. Zhang, K. et al. Arabidopsis ABCG14 protein controls the acropetal translocation of root- synthesized cytokinins. Nat. Commun. 5, 3274 (2014).
64. Ko, D. et al. Arabidopsis ABCG14 is essential for the root-to-shoot translocation of cytok inin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 7150–7155 (2014).
65. Paultre, D. S. G., Gustin, M.-P., Molnar, A. & Oparka, K. J. Lost in transit: long-distanc e trafficking and phloem unloading of protein signals in Arabidopsis homografts. Plant Ce ll 28, 2016-2025 (2016).
66. Liu, Y., Lin, T., Valencia, M. V., Zhang, C. & Lv, Z. Unraveling the roles of vascular proteins using proteomics. Molecules 26, 1–17 (2021).
67. Kobayashi, Y., Kaya, H., Goto, K., Iwabuchi, M. & Araki, T. A Pair of Related Genes with Antagonistic Roles in Mediating Flowering Signals. Science 286, 1960–1962 (1999).
68. Kardailsky, I. et al. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286, 1962–1965 (1999).
69. Grillet, L., Lan, P., Li, W., Mokkapati, G. & Schmidt, W. IRON MAN is a ubiquitous f amily of peptides that control iron transport in plants. Nat. Plants 4, 953–963 (2018).
70. Walz, C. et al. Proteomics of curcurbit phloem exudate reveals a network of defence prot eins. Phytochemistry 65, 1795–1804 (2004).
71. Dafoe, N. J. et al. Analysis of the poplar phloem proteome and its response to leaf wou nding. J. Proteome Res. 8, 2341–2350 (2009).
72. Giavalisco, P., Kapitza, K., Kolasa, A., Buhtz, A. & Kehr, J. Towards the proteome of B rassica napus phloem sap. Proteomics 6, 896–909 (2006).
73. Ogden, A. J. et al. Phloem exudate protein profiles during drought and recovery reveal a biotic stress responses in tomato vasculature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–20 (2020).
74. Carella, P. et al. Comparative proteomics analysis of phloem exudates collected during the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol. 171, 1495–1510 (2016).
75. Ruffel, S. Nutrient-Related Long-Distance Signals: Common Players and Possible Cross-Ta lk. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 1723–1732 (2018).
76. Oldroyd, G. E. D. & Leyser, O. A plant’s diet, surviving in a variable nutrient environm ent. Science 368, eaba0196 (2020).
77. Fujii, H., Chiou, T. J., Lin, S. I., Aung, K. & Zhu, J. K. A miRNA involved in phospha te-starvation response in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 15, 2038–2043 (2005).
78. Chiou, T. J. et al. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by MicroRNA in Arabidopsis. Pl ant Cell 18, 412–421 (2006).
79. Aung, K. et al. pho2, a phosphate overaccumulator, is caused by a nonsense mutation in a microRNA399 target gene. Plant Physiol. 141, 1000–1011 (2006).
80. Lin, S. I. et al. Regulatory network of microRNA399 and PHO2 by systemic signaling. P lant Physiol. 147, 732–746 (2008).
81. Lappartient, A. G. & Touraine, B. Demand-driven control of root ATP sulfurylase activity and SO42- uptake in intact canola: The role of phloem-translocated glutathione. Plant Phy siol. 111, 147–157 (1996).
82. Lappartient, A. G., Vidmar, J. J., Leustek, T., Glass, A. D. M. & Touraine, B. Inter-orga n signaling in plants: Regulation of ATP sulfurylase and sulfate transporter genes expressi on in roots mediated by phloem-translocated compound. Plant J. 18, 89–95 (1999).
83. Rouached, H. et al. Differential regulation of the expression of two high-affinity sulfate tr ansporters, SULTR1.1 and SULTR1.2, in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 147, 897–911 (200 8).
84. Li, Y. et al. IRON MAN interacts with BRUTUS to maintain iron homeostasis in Arabid opsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, 1–10 (2021).
85. Ohkubo, Y., Tanaka, M., Tabata, R., Ogawa-Ohnishi, M. & Matsubayashi, Y. Shoot-to-roo t mobile polypeptides involved in systemic regulation of nitrogen acquisition. Nat. Plants 3, 1–6 (2017).
86. Wang, Y. fan et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of StPP2C gene f amily in response to multiple stresses in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J. Integr. Agric. 19, 1609–1624 (2020).
87. Yang, Q. et al. Genome-wide Identification of PP2C Genes and Their Expression Profilin g in Response to Drought and Cold Stresses in Medicago truncatula. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–14 (2018).
88. Xue, T. et al. Genome-wide and expression analysis of protein phosphatase 2C in rice an d Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics 9, 1–21 (2008).
89. Fan, K. et al. Molecular evolution and lineage-specific expansion of the PP2C family in Zea mays. Planta 250, 1521–1538 (2019).
90. Komatsu, K. et al. Functional analyses of the ABI1-related protein phosphatase type 2C r eveal evolutionarily conserved regulation of abscisic acid signaling between Arabidopsis and the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Mol. Biol. 70, 327–340 (2009).
91. Nelson, C. J., Huttlin, E. L., Hegeman, A. D., Harms, A. C. & Sussman, M. R. Implicati ons of 15N-metabolic labeling for automated peptide identification in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proteomics 7, 1279–1292 (2007).
92. Liu, K.-H. H. & Tsay, Y.-F. F. Switching between the two action modes of the dual-affi nity nitrate transporter CHL1 by phosphorylation. EMBO J. 22, 1005–1013 (2003).
93. Ho, C. H., Lin, S. H., Hu, H. C. & Tsay, Y. F. CHL1 Functions as a Nitrate Sensor in Plants. Cell 138, 1184–1194 (2009).
94. Sun, J. et al. Crystal structure of the plant dual-affinity nitrate transporter NRT1.1. Nature 507, 73–77 (2014).
95. Parker, J. L. & Newstead, S. Molecular basis of nitrate uptake by the plant nitrate transp orter NRT1.1. Nature 507, 68–72 (2014).
96. Straub, T., Ludewig, U. & Neuhäuser, B. The kinase CIPK23 inhibits ammonium transpor t in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 29, 409–422 (2017).
97. Xu, J. et al. A Protein Kinase, Interacting with Two Calcineurin B-like Proteins, Regulate s K+ Transporter AKT1 in Arabidopsis. Cell 125, 1347–1360 (2006).
98. Li, L., Kim, B. G., Cheong, Y. H., Pandey, G. K. & Luan, S. A Ca2+ signaling pathway regulates a K+ channel for low-K response in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 12625–12630 (2006).
99. Ragel, P. et al. The CBL-interacting protein kinase CIPK23 regulates HAK5-mediated hig h-affinity K+ uptake in arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 169, 2863–2873 (2015).
100. Scherzer, S. et al. Calcium sensor kinase activates potassium uptake systems in gland cell s of Venus flytraps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 7309–7314 (2015).
101. Qiu, Q. S., Guo, Y., Dietrich, M. A., Schumaker, K. S. & Zhu, J. K. Regulation of SOS 1, a plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Pr oc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 8436–8441 (2002).
102. Förster, S. et al. Wounding-Induced Stomatal Closure Requires Jasmonate-Mediated Activa tion of GORK K+ Channels by a Ca2+ Sensor-Kinase CBL1-CIPK5 Complex. Dev. Cell 4 8, 87-99.e6 (2019).
103. Tang, R. J. et al. Plant Membrane Transport Research in the Post-genomic Era. Plant Co mmun. 1, 1–18 (2020).
104. Jacquot, A. et al. NRT2.1 C-terminus phosphorylation prevents root high affinity nitrate u ptake activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 228, 1038–1054 (2020).
105. Bhaskara, G. B., Wong, M. M. & Verslues, P. E. The flip side of phospho-signalling: Re gulation of protein dephosphorylation and the protein phosphatase 2Cs. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 2913–2930 (2019).
106. Bhaskara, G. B., Wen, T. N., Nguyen, T. T. & Verslues, P. E. Protein phosphatase 2Cs and microtubule-associated stress protein 1 control microtubule stability, plant growth, and drought response. Plant Cell 29, 169–191 (2017).
107. Fahs, S., Lujan, P. & Köhn, M. Approaches to study phosphatases. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 2944–2961 (2016).
108. Carrasco, J. L. et al. Arabidopsis protein phosphatase DBP1 nucleates a protein network with a role in regulating plant defense. PLoS One 9, (2014).
109. Xiang, Y. et al. Sequence polymorphisms at the REDUCED DORMANCY5 pseudophospha tase underlie natural variation in Arabidopsis dormancy. Plant Physiol. 171, 2659–2670 (2 016).
110. Wong, M. M. et al. Phosphoproteomics of Arabidopsis Highly ABA-Induced1 identifies A T-Hook-Like10 phosphorylation required for stress growth regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 2354–2363 (2019).
論文の公開元へ
