[1] “2020 Ethernet Roadmap,” Ethernet Alliance, 2020, [Online], Available: https://ethernetalliance.org/technology/2020-roadmap/.
[2] S. Matsuo and T. Kakitsuka, “Low-operating-energy directly modulated lasers for short-distance optical interconnects,” Adv. Opt. Photon., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 567–643, Sep. 2018.
[3] Y. Matsui, R. Schatz, D. Che, F. Khan, M. Kwakernaak, and T. Sudo, “Isolator-free >67-GHz bandwidth DFB+R laser with suppressed chirp,” in Proc. OFC, San Diego, CA, USA, 2020, Paper Th4A.1.
[4] Y. M. Di Che, X. Chen, R. Schatz, and P. Iannone, “400-Gb/s direct mod- ulation using a DFB+R laser,” Opt. Lett., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 3337–3339, Jun. 2020.
[5] S. Yamaoka et al., “239.3-Gbit/s net rate PAM-4 transmission using directly modulated membrane lasers on high-thermal-conductivity SiC,” in Proc. ECOC, Dublin, Ireland, 2019, Paper PD.2.1.
[6] S. Yamaoka et al., “High-temperature continuous-wave operation of 1.3- µm membrane distributed reflector lasers on SiC,” in Proc. CLEO, San Jose, CA, USA, 2019, Paper STu3N.6.
[7] H. Yamazaki et al., “IMDD Transmission at net data rate of 333 Gb/s using over-100-GHz-bandwidth analog multiplexer and Mach-Zehnder modu- lator,” J. Lightwav. Technol., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1772–1778, Apr. 2019.
[8] H. Yamazaki et al., “Net-400-Gbps PS-PAM transmission using inte- grated AMUX-MZM,” Opt. Express, vol. 18, no. 27, pp. 25544–25550, Sep. 2019.
[9] M. Nagatani et al., “An over-110-GHz-bandwidth 2:1 analog multiplexer in 0.25-µm InP DHBT technology,” in Proc. IMS, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018, Paper We2A-1.
[10] Xi Chen, J. Chandrasekhar, Cho, and P. Winzer, “Single-wavelength and single-photodiode entropy-loaded 554-Gb/s transmission over 22-km SMF,” in Proc. OFC, San Diego, CA, USA, 2019, Paper Th4B.5.
[11] D. Che and W. Shieh, “Approaching the capacity of colored-SNR optical channels by multicarrier entropy loading,” J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 68–78, Jan. 2018.
[12] D. Che and W. Shieh, “Squeezing out the last few bits from band- limited channels with entropy loading,” Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 9321–9329 Apr. 2019.
[13] C. Kottke, C. Caspar, V. Jungnickel, R. Freund, M. Agustin, and N. N. Ledentsov, “High speed 160 Gb/s DMT VCSEL transmission using pre- equalization,” in Proc. OFC 2017, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017, Paper W4I.7.
[14] N. P. Diamantopoulos, T. Fujii, H. Nishi, K. Takeda, T. Kakitsuka, and S. Matsuo, “Energy-efficient 120-Gbps DMT transmission using a 1.3-µm membrane laser on Si,” in Proc. OFC, San Diego, CA, USA, 2018, Paper M2D.5.
[15] F. Buchali, F. Steiner, G. Böcherer, L. Schmalen, P. Schulte, and W. Idler, “Rate adaptation and reach increase by probabilistically shaped 64-QAM: An experimental demonstration,” J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1599–1609, Apr. 2016.
[16] N. P. Diamantopoulos et al., “Net 321.24-Gb/s IMDD transmission based on a >100-GHz bandwidth directly-modulated laser,” in Proc. OFC, San Diego, CA, USA, 2020, Paper Th4C.1.
[17] J. Cho, L. Schmalen, and P. J. Winzer, “Normalized generalized mu- tual information as a forward error correction threshold for probabilis- tically shaped QAM,” in Proc. ECOC, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2017, Paper M.2.D.2.
[18] A. Alvarado, E. Agrell, D. Lavery, R. Maher, and P. Bayvel, “Replacing the soft-decision FEC limit paradigm in the design of optical communication systems,” J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 707–721, Feb. 2016.
[19] T. Kobayashi et al., “35-Tb/s C-band transmission over 800 km employing 1-Tb/s PS-64QAM signals enhanced by complex 8 × 2 MIMO equalizer,” in Proc. OFC, San Diego, CA, USA, 2019, Paper Th4B.2.
[20] T. Fujii et al., “1.3-µm directly modulated membrane laser array employ- ing epitaxial growth of InGaAlAs MQW on InP/SiO2/Si substrate,” in Proc. ECOC, Düsseldorf, Germany, 2016, Paper Th.3.A.2.
[21] H. Nishi et al., “Membrane distributed-reflector laser integrated with SiOx- based spot-size converter on Si substrate,” Opt. Express, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 18346–18352, Aug. 2016.