リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Base isolation system with negative stiffness for displacement mitigation under long-period and near-fault ground motions」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Base isolation system with negative stiffness for displacement mitigation under long-period and near-fault ground motions

NEPAL SANDHYA 埼玉大学 DOI:info:doi/10.24561/00019154

2020

概要

Base isolation technique is one of the most widely accepted design philosophy for earthquake resistant design of both the large-scale structures and small-scale structures such as sensitive instruments, cultural assets, furniture, and art monuments. Base isolation detaches the structures/objects to impede the seismic wave propagation from the ground or floor on which they are supported. However, the long-period ground motion anticipated from the near-fault ground motion greatly influence the conventional base isolation systems. Such long-period ground motion has the intensity to resonant the base-isolated object with a long fundamental natural period, generating the large lateral displacement which might cause catastrophic damage to the isolated object due to damage in the components of the base isolation system. Conventional base isolation systems are effective mainly for earthquakes with the high-frequency components. Only a few studies of the earthquakes with the long-period components can be found but even in these earthquakes, the frequency range of long-period component is limited to 2-3 s as compared to earthquakes anticipated in Japan with fundamental period 5-10 s. Mitigating the displacement due to both the near-fault and the long-period ground motions is important from a seismic resistant design point of view. Very few studies have done for the displacement mitigation of the isolated objects subjected to both types of earthquake excitations. Those studies show the presence of the residual displacement due to use of friction device to control displacement. There have been no reported studies on the development of an elastic linear system for displacement mitigation, which is necessary for seismic-resistant design due to both types of ground motions. In these recent years, use of negative stiffness and variable stiffness for base isolation have been increased rapidly. Despite, till date, the performance of negative stiffness with variable stiffness is unknown. This study mainly focuses on displacement mitigation of base-isolated objects or the target objects such as sensitive instruments, critical computer servers, and furniture. Thus, the objectives of this study have been: (1) to study the performance of isolation systems with variable negative stiffness, (2) to develop new device comprising a unit of negative and positive springs (NP unit) arranged in series for displacement mitigation of conventional base isolation system for both near-fault and long-period ground motions simultaneously, and (3) to verify the performance of the proposed model when subjected to observed and simulated earthquake.
In this study first, a comparative study is performed to determine the performance of base isolation systems with variable negative stiffness. For this negative stiffness is varied parametrically using different functions in terms of the displacement response of the isolated objects. To study the performance of base-isolated objects subjected to near-fault and long-period ground motions, equations of motions are constructed. The numerical studies show that varying the stiffness with high-order power, elliptical and exponential functions, effectively mitigate the displacement response. However, with an increase in the order of the power function acceleration response subjected to near-fault ground motion increase appreciably. An optimal order of power function satisfying the allowable limits of both the displacement and acceleration responses in practical use is proposed.
From a practical viewpoint, varying negative stiffness is complicated in comparison with varying positive stiffness because negative stiffness itself is unstable so, stability should also be taken into account. Therefore, a system with varying positive stiffness satisfying the performance of varying negative stiffness with the optimal order of power function is proposed which is also useful for retrofitting of the existing conventional base isolation system.
An external device using NP unit is proposed to fulfill the second objective. This device consists of NP unit arranged in parallel with positive spring and a damper. The positive stiffness of the NP unit is varied linearly in term of displacement response of the base isolated object. The performance of the proposed model is investigated by comparing it with the conventional base isolation model.
Time history analysis is performed by numerical integration using Newmark’s method to verify the performance of the proposed systems. Kobe NS 1995, Ojiya EW 2004, Shin-Tokai EW, and Tomakomai EW 2003 earthquakes are used for applying ground acceleration üg to the systems. Through the numerical analysis, this study verifies the improvement in the performance of base isolation system by using negative-positive springs unit with variable stiffness. The results show that the proposed device markedly reduces the lateral displacement response of the system against both near-fault and longperiod ground motions. The proposed model, exhibits a significant decrease in relative displacement of the object with respect to the base for both types of earthquake excitations. An optimal range of damping values and slope, satisfying the allowable limits of both the displacement and acceleration responses when subjected to near-fault and long-period for practical use is proposed.
For realization of the system, first the variable positive spring of NP unit is to be realized practically. Hence, in this study, approximation of negative-positive stiffness in practical has been discussed using discontinuous stiffness-displacement (K-D) relationship. From the numerical analysis, this study verifies that both the acceleration and displacement responses can be limit to allowable ranges using discontinuous K-D relationship.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

[1]

J. M. Kelly, Aseismic base isolation: review and bibliography, Soil Dyn. Earthq.

Eng., 5 (4) (1986) 202–216.

[2]

I. G. Buckle and R. L. Mayes, Seismic isolation: history, application, and

performance—a world view, Earthq. spectra, 6 (2) (1990) 161–201.

[3]

M. Constantinou, A. Mokha, and A. Reinhorn, Teflon Bearings in Base Isolation II:

Modeling, J. Struct. Eng., 116 (2) (1990) 455–474.

[4]

S. Nagarajaiah, A. M. Reinhorn, and M. C. Constantinou, Torsional coupling in

sliding base-isolated structures, J. Struct. Eng. (United States), 119 (1) (1993) 130–

149.

[5]

J. N. Yang, J. C. Wu, A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Riley, Control of sliding-isolated

buildings using sliding-mode control, J. Struct. Eng., 122 (2) (1996) 179–186.

[6]

D. H. Turkington, A. J. Carr, N. Cooke, and P. J. Moss, Seismic design of bridges

on lead-rubber bearings, J. Struct. Eng., 115 (12) (1989) 3000–3016.

[7]

W. Robinson, Lead-rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures

during earthquakes, Seism. Isol. Prot. Syst., 2 (1) (2011) 5–19.

[8]

R. S. Jangid and J. M. Kelly, Base isolation for near-fault motions, Earthq. Eng.

Struct. Dyn., 30 (5) (2001) 691–707.

[9]

M. Dicleli, Supplemental elastic stiffness to reduce isolator displacements for

seismic-isolated bridges in near-fault zones, Eng. Struct., 29 (5) (2007) 763–775.

[10] R. S. Jangid, Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions, Eng.

Struct., 27 (3) (2005) 349–359.

[11] R. S. Jangid, Optimum lead–rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions, Eng.

Struct., 29 (10) (2007) 2503–2513.

[12] C. P. Providakis, Effect of LRB isolators and supplemental viscous dampers on

seismic isolated buildings under near-fault excitations, Eng. Struct., 30 (5) (2008)

R-1

1187–1198.

[13] C. P.-S. D. and E. Engineering and

undefined 2009, Effect of supplemental

damping on LRB and FPS seismic isolators under near-fault ground motions,

Elsevier,.

[14] C. S. Tsai, T.-C. Chiang, and B.-J. Chen, Finite element formulations and

theoretical study for variable curvature friction pendulum system, Eng. Struct., 25

(14) (2003) 1719–1730.

[15] L. Lu, M. Shih, and C. Wu, Near-Fault Seismic Isolation Using Sliding Bearings

With Variable Curvatures, Construction, (3264) (2004).

[16] T. Ariga, Y. Kanno, and I. Takewaki, Resonant behaviour of base-isolated high-rise

buildings under long-period ground motions, Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 15 (3)

(2006) 325–338.

[17] T. Saito, Response of High-Rise Buildings under Long Period Earthquake Ground

Motions, Int. J. Struct. Civ. Eng. Res., 5 (4) (2016) 308–314.

[18] K. Koketsu, K. Hatayama, T. Furumura, Y. Ikegami, and S. Akiyama, Damaging

Long-period Ground Motions from the 2003 Mw 8.3 Tokachi-oki, Japan

Earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76 (1) (2009) 67–73.

[19] S. Zama, H. Nishi, M. Yamada, and K. Hatayama, Damage of Oil Storage Tanks

Caused by Liquid Sloshing in the 2003 Tokachi Oki Earthquake and Revision of

Design Spectra in the Long-Period Range, Proc. Fourteenth World Conf. Earthq.

Eng., (2008).

[20] T. Kobori, M. Takahashi, T. Nasu, N. Niwa, and K. Ogasawara, Seismic response

controlled structure with Active Variable Stiffness system, Earthq. Eng. Struct.

Dyn., 22 (11) (1993) 925–941.

[21] S. Narasimhan and S. Nagarajaiah, A STFT semiactive controller for base isolated

buildings with variable stiffness isolation systems, Eng. Struct., 27 (4) (2005) 514–

523.

[22] S. Nagarajaiah and S. Sahasrabudhe, Seismic response control of smart sliding

R-2

isolated buildings using variable stiffness systems: An experimental and numerical

study, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35 (2) (2006) 177–197.

[23] L. Y. Lu, G. L. Lin, and T. C. Kuo, Stiffness controllable isolation system for nearfault seismic isolation, Eng. Struct., 30 (3) (2008) 747–765.

[24] Y. Liu, H. Matsuhisa, and H. Utsuno, Semi-active vibration isolation system with

variable stiffness and damping control, J. Sound Vib., 313 (1–2) (2008) 16–28.

[25] T. K. Lin, L. Y. Lu, and H. Chang, Fuzzy logic control of a stiffness-adaptable

seismic isolation system, Struct. Control Heal. Monit., 22 (1) (2015) 177–195.

[26] D. M. Fenz and M. C. Constantinou, Spherical sliding isolation bearings with

adaptive behavior: Theory, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37 (2) (2008) 163–183.

[27] S. Nagarajaiah, Adaptive passive, semiactive, smart tuned mass dampers:

Identification and control using empirical mode decomposition, hilbert transform,

and short-term fourier transform, Struct. Control Heal. Monit., 16 (7–8) (2009)

800–841.

[28] H. Iemura, A. Igarashi, M. H. Pradono, and A. Kalantari, Negative stiffness friction

damping for seismically isolated structures, Struct. Control Heal. Monit., 13 (2–3)

(2006) 775–791.

[29] H. Iemura and M. H. Pradono, Advances in the development of pseudo-negativestiffness dampers for seismic response control, Struct. Control Heal. Monit., 16 (7–

8) (2009) 784–799.

[30] A. A. Sarlis, D. T. R. Pasala, M. C. Constantinou, A. M. Reinhorn, S. Nagarajaiah,

and D. P. Taylor, Negative stiffness device for seismic protection of structures, J.

Struct. Eng., 139 (7) (2012) 1124–1133.

[31] T. Sun, Z. Lai, S. Nagarajaiah, and H. N. Li, Negative stiffness device for seismic

protection of smart base isolated benchmark building, Struct. Control Heal. Monit.,

24 (11) (2017).

[32] D. T. R. Pasala, A. A. Sarlis, S. Nagarajaiah, A. M. Reinhorn, M. C. Constantinou,

and D. Taylor, Adaptive Negative Stiffness: New Structural Modification Approach

R-3

for Seismic Protection, J. Struct. Eng., 139 (7) (2012) 1112–1123.

[33] I. Takewaki, Earthquake Input Energy to Two Buildings Connected by Viscous

Dampers, J. Struct. Eng., 133 (5) (2007) 620–628.

[34] I. Takewaki, S. Murakami, K. Fujita, S. Yoshitomi, and M. Tsuji, The 2011 off the

Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and response of high-rise buildings under longperiod ground motions, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31 (11) (2011) 1511–1528.

[35] Z. Xu, A. Agrawal, W. He, and P. Tan, Performance of passive energy dissipation

systems during near-field ground motion type pulses, Eng. Struct., 29 (2) (2007)

224–236.

[36] P. Xiang and A. Nishitani, Optimum design for more effective tuned mass damper

system and its application to base-isolated buildings, Struct. Control Heal. Monit.,

21 (1) (2014) 98–114.

[37] K. Kamae, H. Kawabe, and K. Irikura, Strong ground motion prediction for huge

subduction earthquakes using a characterized source model and several simulation

techniques, Proc. Thirteen. World Conf. Earthq. Eng., (2004).

[38] F. Fadi and M. C. Constantinou, Evaluation of simplified methods of analysis for

structures with triple friction pendulum isolators, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39 (1)

(2010) 5–22.

[39] A. A. Sarlis and M. C. Constantinou, A model of triple friction pendulum bearing

for general geometric and frictional parameters, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45 (11)

(2016) 1837–1853.

[40] M. Saitoh, An external rotary friction device for displacement mitigation in base

isolation systems, Struct. Control Heal. Monit., 21 (2) (2014) 173–188.

[41] R. S. Lakes, Extreme damping in composite materials with a negative stiffness

phase, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (13) (2001) 2897.

[42] R. S. Lakes, Extreme damping in compliant composites with a negative-stiffness

phase, Philos. Mag. Lett., 81 (2) (2001) 95–100.

[43] Y. C. Wang and R. Lakes, Stability of negative stiffness viscoelastic systems, Q.

R-4

Appl. Math., 63 (1) (2005) 34–55.

[44] Y. C. Wang and R. Lakes, Negative stiffness-induced extreme viscoelastic

mechanical properties: Stability and dynamics, Philos. Mag., 84 (35) (2004) 3785–

3801.

[45] W. G. Molyneux, Supports for vibration isolation. HM Stationery Office, (1957).

[46] T. Mizuno, Vibration isolation system using zero-power magnetic suspension, 955

(2002).

[47] H. Iemura and M. H. Pradono, Application of pseudo-negative stiffness control to

the benchmark cable-stayed bridge, J. Struct. Control, 10 (3–4) (2003) 187–203.

[48] N. Nakagawa, T. Okuno, and Y. Sekiguchi, A study on improvement of constant

repulsive force characteristic, Trans. JSME Ser. C (in Japanese), 74 (739) (2008)

536–541.

[49] T. Nakata et al., Strong motion prediction for retrofit of buildings in the Sannomaru

district of Nagoya City: part 1: project summary, Summ. Tech. Pap. Annu. Meet.

Archit. Inst. Japan B-2, Struct. II, Struct. Dyn. Nucl. power plants (in Japanese),

AIJ, (2004).

[50] N. Makris, Rigidity - plasticity - viscosity: Can electrorheological dampers protect

base-isolated structures from near-source ground motions?, Earthq. Eng. Struct.

Dyn., 26 (5) (1997) 571–591.

[51] N. Makris and S. P. Chang, Response of damped oscillators to cycloidal pulses, J.

Eng. Mech., 126 (February) (2000) 123.

[52] N. Makris and S. P. Chang, Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on

the response of seismic isolated structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29 (1) (2000)

85–107.

[53] V. R. Panchal and R. S. Jangid, Variable friction pendulum system for seismic

isolation of liquid storage tanks, Nucl. Eng. Des., 238 (6) (2008) 1304–1315.

R-5

...

参考文献をもっと見る