Assessing the Productivity of Forest Harvesting Systems Using a Combination of Forestry Machines in Steep Terrain

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Liski, E.; Jounela, P.; Korpunen, H.; Sosa, A.; Lindroos, O.; Jylhä, P. Modeling the productivity of mechanized CTL harvesting

with statistical machine learning methods. Int. J. For. Eng. 2020, 31, 253–262. [CrossRef]

Spinelli, R.; Magagnotti, N.; Visser, R. Productivity models for cable yarding in Alpine forests. Eur. J. For. Eng. 2015, 1, 9–14.

Available online: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejfe/issue/5186/70454 (accessed on 10 February 2023).

Varch, T.; Erber, G.; Spinelli, R.; Magagnotti, N.; Stampfer, K. Productivity, fuel consumption and cost in whole tree cable yarding:

Conventional diesel carriage versus electrical energy-recuperating carriage. Int. J. For. Eng. 2021, 32, 20–30. [CrossRef]

Böhm, S.; Kanzian, C. A review on cable yarding operation performance and its assessment. Int. J. For. Eng. 2022, 34, 229–253. [CrossRef]

Cavalli, R. Prospects of research on cable logging in forest engineering community. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2012, 33, 339–356. Available

online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/116850 (accessed on 7 February 2023).

Ghaffariyan, M.R.; Stampfer, K.; Sessions, J. Production equations for tower yarders in Austria. Int. J. For. Eng. 2009, 20, 17–21. [CrossRef]

Stampfer, K.; Visser, R.; Kanzian, C. Cable corridor installation times for European yarders. Int. J. For. Eng. 2006, 17, 71–77. [CrossRef]

Heinimann, H.R.; Stampfer, K.; Loschek, J.; Caminada, L. Perspectives on Central European cable yarding systems. In Proceedings

of the International Mountain Logging 11th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, Seattle, WA, USA, 10–12 December 2001.

Available online: https://depts.washington.edu/sky2001/proceedings/papers/Heinimann.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).

Holzfeind, T.; Kanzian, C.; Gronalt, M. Challenging agent-based simulation for forest operations to optimize the European cable

yarding and transport supply chain. Int. J. For. Eng. 2021, 32, 77–90. [CrossRef]

Hara, Y.; Sakagoshi, H. Survey and analysis of exploitation thinning in Shimane Prefecture. Bull. Shimane Pref. Mount. Reg. Res.

Ctr. 2007, 3, 21–26. Available online: https://www.pref.shimane.lg.jp/admin/region/kikan/chusankan/syoseki/research/No3

_kenkyuhoukoku.data/kenkyuhoukokudai3gou04.pdf (accessed on 9 February 2023). (In Japanese with English Summary)

Yoshimura, T.; Noba, T. Productivity analysis of thinning operations using a swing yarder on steep slopes in western Japan. In

Proceedings of the IUFRO Unit 3.06 International Conference Forest Operations in Mountainous Conditions, Honne, Norway,

2–5 June 2013.

Nakazawa, M.; Yoshida, C.; Sasaki, T.; Taki, S.; Uemura, T.; Ito, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Mozuna, M.; Usui, K.; Inomata, Y.; et al.

Productivity of logging large diameter logs and long logs during final cutting in a mountain forest in Japan. Int. J. For. Eng. 2019,

30, 203–209. [CrossRef]

Forests 2023, 14, 1430

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

15 of 17

Kameyama, S.; Suzuki, R.; Yoshioka, T.; Inoue, K. Productivity and economic balance in the plantation forest behind thinning: A

case study of Mishima city, Shizuoka. J. Jpn. For. Eng. Soc. 2017, 32, 137–142. (In Japanese) [CrossRef]

Forestry Agency. Annual report on forest and forestry in Japan (Fiscal Year 2021); Forestry Agency: Tokyo, Japan, 2022; p. 207. Available

online: https://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/kikaku/hakusyo/r3hakusyo/attach/pdf/zenbun-34.pdf (accessed on 9 February 2023).

(In Japanese)

Picchio, R.; Venanzi, R.; Di Marzio, N.; Tocci, D.; Tavankar, F. A comparative analysis of two cable yarder technologies performing

thinning operations on a 33 year old pine plantation: A potential source of wood for energy. Energies 2020, 13, 5376. [CrossRef]

Heinimann, H. Operational Productivity Studies in Forestry Based on Statistical Models—A Tutorial; Inst. Terrestrial Ecosystems Forest

Engineering: Zurich, Switzerland, 2021; p. 56. [CrossRef]

Talbot, B.; Stampfer, K.; Visser, R. Machine function integration and its effect on the performance of a timber yarding and

processing operation. Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 135, 10–20. [CrossRef]

Heinimann, H.R.; Visser, R.; Stampfer, K. Harvester-cable yarder system evaluation on slopes: A Central European study in

thinning operations. In Proceedings of the Harvesting Logistics: From Woods to Markets, Portland, OR, USA, 20–23 July 1998.

Available online: https://cofe.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/COFE_1998.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).

Stampfer, K. (1999) Influence of terrain conditions and thinning regimes on productivity of a track-based steep slope harvester. In Proceedings of the International Mountain Logging 10th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, Corvallis, OR, USA,

28 March–1 April 1999.

Stampfer, K.; Steinmüller, T. A new approach to derive a productivity model for the harvester “Valmet 911 Snake”. In Proceedings

of the International Mountain Logging 11th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, Seattle, WA, USA, 10–12 December 2001.

Available online: https://depts.washington.edu/sky2001/proceedings/papers/Stampfer.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).

Bogo, A.; Cavalli, R. Productivity of a Tracked Excavator-Based Processor in the North-Eastern Italian Alps. Austro 2003: High

Tech Forest Operations for Mountainous Terrain 2003. Available online: https://www.formec.org/images/proceedings/2003/4

5_bogo_cavalli.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2023).

Affenzeller, G.; Stampfer, K. Comparison of integrated with conventional harvester-forwarder-concepts in thinning operations. In

Proceedings of the International Mountain Logging 13th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, Corvallis, OR, USA, 1–6 April

2007. Available online: https://www.iufro.org/download/file/4702/4504/30000-mountain-logging-symp07_p_pdf/ (accessed

on 10 February 2023).

Rottensteiner, C.; Affenzeller, G.; Stampfer, K. Evaluation of the feller-buncher Moipu 400E for energy wood harvesting. Croat. J.

For. Eng. 2008, 29, 117–128. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/32188 (accessed on 10 February 2023).

Erber, G.; Holzleitner, F.; Kastner, M.; Stampfer, K. Effect of multi-tree handling and tree-size on harvester performance in

small-diameter hardwood thinnings. Silva Fenn. 2016, 50, 1428. [CrossRef]

Huber, C.; Kroisleitner, H.; Stampfer, K. Performance of a mobile star screen to improve woodchip quality of forest residues.

Forests 2017, 8, 171. [CrossRef]

Holzfeind, T.; Stampfer, K.; Holzleitner, F. Productivity, setup time and costs of a winch-assisted forwarder. J. For. Res. 2018,

23, 196–203. [CrossRef]

Cadei, A.; Mologni, O.; Roser, D.; Cavalli, R.; Grigolato, S. Forwarder productivity in salvage logging operations in difficult

terrain. Forests 2020, 11, 341. [CrossRef]

Papandrea, S.F.; Stoilov, S.; Angelov, G.; Panicharova, T.; Mederski, P.S.; Proto, A.R. Modeling productivity and estimating costs

of processor tower yarder in shelterwood cutting of pine stand. Forests 2023, 14, 195. [CrossRef]

Borz, S.A.; Bîrda, M.; Ignea, G.H.; Popa, B.; Câmpu, V.R.; Iordache, E.; Derczeni, R.A. Efficiency of a Woody 60 processor attached to a

Mounty 4100 tower yarder when processing coniferous timber from thinning operations. Ann. For. Res. 2014, 57, 333–345. [CrossRef]

Aruga, K.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, T. Comparative analyses of the cycle time, productivity, and cost between 62- and 107-year-old

Japanese cypress clear-cutting operations using a small-scale cable logging system. Small-Scale For. 2019, 18, 279–289. [CrossRef]

Nakahata, C.; Aruga, K.; Saito, M.; Hayashi, U. Productivity and cost of clear-cutting and regeneration operations with small and

medium-sized forestry machines in Utsunomiya city, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Small-Scale For. 2020, 19, 275–289. [CrossRef]

Oka, M. Selection of harvesting systems. In Management of Mechanization for How to Utilize High-Efficient Forestry Machines to

Increase Local Profitability; Zenrinkyo, Ed.; Zenrinkyo: Tokyo, Japan, 2001; pp. 105–123. (In Japanese)

Sessions, J.; Berry, M.; Han, H.-S. Machine rate estimates and equipment utilization—A modified approach. Croat. J. For. Eng.

2021, 42, 437–443. [CrossRef]

Kanzaki, K. Think much of the labor productivity on the logging system with the help of high efficient forestry machines. J. For.

Mechanization Soc. 1999, 547, 6–11. (In Japanese)

Sawaguchi, I.; Sasaki, S.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Tatsukawa, S. Labor productivity of line thinning with a mini swing-yarder. Bull. Iwate

Univ. For. 2004, 35, 47–57. (In Japanese with English Summary)

Goto, M. Systematic productivity of thinning timber harvesting in Tokushima Prefecture. Appl. For. Sci. 2005, 101–105.

(In Japanese)

Nakazawa, M.; Imatomi, Y.; Oka, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Yoshida, C.; Uemura, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Suzuki, H.; Umeda, S.; Takahashi,

M.; et al. Development of thinning system using excavator with long-reach grapple-Productivity and cost of the system. J. Jpn.

For. Eng. Soc. 2011, 26, 173–180. (In Japanese with English Summary) [CrossRef]

Forests 2023, 14, 1430

38.

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

51.

52.

53.

54.

55.

56.

57.

58.

59.

60.

61.

16 of 17

Nakazawa, M.; Yoshida, C.; Sasaki, T.; Uemura, T.; Suzuki, H.; Jinkawa, M.; Kondo, M.; Oya, S.; Toda, K.; Takano, T. Development

of a thinning system with a small wheel mounted harvester and forwarder-Productivities of ordinary and line thinning. J. Jpn.

For. Eng. Soc. 2013, 28, 187–192. (In Japanese with English Summary) [CrossRef]

Oya, S.; Saito, M.; Shirota, T.; Otsuka, D.; Miyazaki, T.; Yanagisawa, N.; Kobayashi, N. The productivity of one continuous

clearcutting and reforestation operation with the vehicle logging system on moderate slopes in Nagano Prefecture. J. Jpn. For. Soc.

2016, 98, 233–240. (In Japanese with English Summary) [CrossRef]

Katagiri, T. Comparative study of production cost for clear cutting between the vehicle logging system and cable logging system

in Okayama Prefecture. J. Jpn. For. Eng. Soc. 2018, 33, 37–45. (In Japanese) [CrossRef]

Yamasaki, S.; Yamasaki, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Mitani, Y.; Morimoto, M.; Nagasawa, Y. A verification study of a spur road improvement

project on harvesting operational efficiency and total cost reduction. J. Jpn. For. Eng. Soc. 2018, 33, 25–35. (In Japanese with

English Summary) [CrossRef]

Hirayama, K.; Nozue, N.; Hakamata, T.; Nakazawa, M.; Sasaki, T.; Yoshida, C. Labor productivity of full tree and tree length

logging system using a self-propelled carriage introduced from Europe. J. Jpn. For. Eng. Soc. 2019, 34, 141–144. (In Japanese with

English Summary) [CrossRef]

Kimura, S.; Sasaki, S.; Hoshikawa, T. Work efficiency at the clear cutting site using daily work reports. Chubu For. Res. 2020,

68, 59–60. (In Japanese) [CrossRef]

Watai, J.; Kondo, K. The labor productivity of a thinning operation system according to forest-road density-Study of an

operation system using a swing yarder and processor. Bull. Shizuoka Res. Inst. Agric. For. 2012, 5, 53–58. Available online:

https://agriknowledge.affrc.go.jp/RN/2010831114 (accessed on 20 March 2023). (In Japanese with English Summary)

Katagiri, T. Productivity of the felling-yarding alternate system using a swing-yarder-Combination of the felling-yarding alternate

system and bucking, improvement of the felling-yarding alternate system. Bull. Okayama Pref. Tech. Ctr. Agric. For. Fish. Res. Inst.

For. For. Prod. 2016, 31, 1–7. Available online: https://agriknowledge.affrc.go.jp/RN/2010921501 (accessed on 20 March 2023).

(In Japanese)

Miyazaki, T.; Imai, M.; Shiraishi, R. Development of forest operation systems using high-efficient forestry machines. Bull. Nagano

Pref. For. Res. Ctr. 2011, 25, 1–7. Available online: https://agriknowledge.affrc.go.jp/RN/2010900102 (accessed on 20 March 2023).

(In Japanese)

Schweier, J.; Ludowicy, C. Comparison of a cable-based and a ground-based system in flat and soil-sensitive area: A case study

from southern Baden in Germany. Forests 2020, 11, 611. [CrossRef]

Sakai, H. Seminar on Forestry Production Techniques for Practical Management-Logging, Road Networks and Supply Chain; Zenrinkyo:

Tokyo, Japan, 2012; p. 349. (In Japanese)

Schweier, J.; Klein, M.-L.; Kirsten, H.; Jaeger, D.; Brieger, F.; Sauter, U.H. Productivity and cost analysis of tower yarder systems

using the Koller 507 and the Valentini 400 in southwest Germany. Int. J. For. Eng. 2020, 31, 172–183. [CrossRef]

Borz, S.A.; Secelean, V.-N.; Iacob, L.-M.; Kaakkurivaara, N. Bucking at landing by a single-grip harvester: Fuel consumption,

productivity, cost and recovery rate. Forests 2023, 14, 465. [CrossRef]

Committee for improving productivity in forestry enterprises. In Guide to Productivity Improvement for Establishing a High

Productivity Forestry Industry; Forestry Agency: Tokyo, Japan, 2022; p. 108. Available online: https://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/

gyoumu/gijutu/attach/pdf/torikumi-11.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2023). (In Japanese)

Ackerman, S.A.; McDermid, H.; Ackerman, P.; Terblanche, M. The effectiveness of a small-scale combination harvester/forwarder

in industrial plantation first thinning operations. Int. J. For. Eng. 2022, 33, 56–65. [CrossRef]

Ackerman, P.; Martin, C.; Brewer, J.; Ackerman, S. Effect of slope on productivity and cost of Eucalyptus pulpwood harvesting

using single-grip purpose-built and excavator-based harvesters. Int. J. For. Eng. 2018, 29, 74–82. [CrossRef]

Strandgard, M.; Alam, M.; Mitchell, R. Impact of slope on productivity of a self-levelling processor. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2014, 35,

193–200. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/clanak/187578 (accessed on 12 February 2023).

Borz, S.A.; Marcu, M.V.; Cataldo, M.F. Evaluation of an HSM 208F 14tone HVT-R2 forwarder prototype under conditions of

steep-terrain low-access forests. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2021, 42, 185–200. [CrossRef]

Berendt, F.; Tolosana, E.; Hoffmann, S.; Alonso, P.; Schweier, J. Harvester productivity in inclined terrain with extended machine

operating trail intervals: A German case study comparison of standing and bunched trees. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9168. [CrossRef]

Holzfeind, T.; Visser, R.; Chung, W.; Holzleitner, F.; Erber, G. Development and benefits of winch-assist harvesting. Curr. For. Rep.

2020, 6, 201–209. [CrossRef]

Visser, R.M.; Spinelli, R. Benefits and limitations of winch-assist technology for skidding operations. Forests 2023, 14, 296. [CrossRef]

Wester, F.; Eliasson, L. Productivity in final felling and thinning for a combined harvester-forwarder (harwarder). Int. J. For. Eng.

2003, 14, 45–51. [CrossRef]

Laitila, J.; Asikainen, A. Energy wood logging from early thinnings by harwarder method. Baltic For. 2006, 12, 94–102. Available online: https://balticforestry.lammc.lt/bf/PDF_Articles/2006-12[1]/94_102%20Juha%20Laitila%20&%20Asikainen.pdf

(accessed on 22 February 2023).

Karha, K.; Poikela, A.; Palander, T. Productivity and costs of harwarder systems in industrial roundwood thinnings. Croat. J. For.

Eng. 2018, 39, 23–33. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/clanak/285567 (accessed on 11 February 2023).

Forests 2023, 14, 1430

62.

63.

64.

17 of 17

Jonsson, R.; Rönnqvist, M.; Flisberg, P.; Jönsson, P.; Lindroos, O. Comparison of modeling approaches for evaluation of machine

fleets in central Sweden forest operations. Int. J. For. Eng. 2023, 34, 42–53. [CrossRef]

Inoue, M. The present situation and further research of the high productive mechanization system in logging operation. Res. J. Food

Agric. 1994, 17, 6–12. Available online: https://agriknowledge.affrc.go.jp/RN/2030520036.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).

(In Japanese)

Bjerketvedt, J.; Talbot, B.; Kindernay, D.; Ottaviani Aalmo, G.; Clarke, N. Evaluation of site impact after harvesting in steep terrain

with excavator assisted ground based systems. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Unit 3.06 International Conference Forest Operations

in Mountainous Conditions, Honne, Norway, 2–5 June 2013.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual

author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to

people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

...