1. Sasahira N, Kawakami H, Isayama H, Uchino R, Nakai Y, Ito Y, et al. Early use
of double-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation: the multicenter randomized controlled EDUCATION trial. Endoscopy.
2015;47(5):421–9.
2. Takenaka M, Arisaka Y, Sakai A, Kobayashi T, Shiomi H, Masuda A, et al. A
novel biliary cannulation method for difficult cannulation cases using a
unique, uneven, double-lumen cannula (uneven method). Endoscopy.
2018;50(8):E229–30.
3. Tanaka R, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, et al. Is the
double-guidewire technique superior to the pancreatic duct guidewire
technique in cases of pancreatic duct opacification? J Gastroenterol
Hepatol. 2013;28(11):1787–93.
4. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, et al.
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an
attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(3):383–93.
5. Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced
pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1991;6(3):350–67.
Page 7 of 7
6. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ,
et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter
study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54(4):425–34.
7. Gyokeres T, Duhl J, Varsanyi M, Schwab R, Burai M, Pap A. Double guide
wire placement for endoscopic pancreaticobiliary procedures. Endoscopy. 2003;35(1):95–6.
8. Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our
cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(48):5289–94.
9. Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O, Dohden K, Hattori M, Morita M, et al.
Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using
pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy. 2003;35(9):721–4.
10. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Obana T, Horaguchi J, et al. Pancreatic
guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation during
endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(36):5595–600 (discussion 9).
11. Dumonceau JM, Deviere J, Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep
cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 1998;30(7):S80.
12. Gotoh Y, Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Ohashi A, Satoh Y, et al. A new
method for deep cannulation of the bile duct by straightening the pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(7):820–2.
13. Takenaka M, Yamao K, Kudo M. Novel method of biliary cannulation for
patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis using a unique, uneven, doublelumen cannula (uneven method). Dig Endosc. 2018;30(6):808–9.
14. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Obana T, Horaguchi J, et al. Can
pancreatic duct stenting prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients who
undergo pancreatic duct guidewire placement for achieving selective
biliary cannulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(11):1183–91.
15. Conigliaro R, Manta R, Bertani H, Manno M, Barbera C, Caruso A, et al.
Pancreatic duct stenting for the duration of ERCP only does not prevent
pancreatitis after accidental pancreatic duct cannulation: a prospective
randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):569–74.
16. Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H, Shiono M. Prophylactic pancreatic stent
placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis. J
Gastroenterol. 2014;49(2):343–55.
17. Ryozawa S, Itoi T, Katanuma A, Okabe Y, Kato H, Horaguchi J, et al. Japan
Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic
sphincterotomy. Dig Endosc. 2018;30(2):149–73.
18. Mariani A, Giussani A, Di Leo M, Testoni S, Testoni PA. Guidewire biliary
cannulation does not reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the
contrast injection technique in low-risk and high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(2):339–46.
19. Thaker AM, Mosko JD, Berzin TM. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf ). 2015;3(1):32–40.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ready to submit your research ? Choose BMC and benefit from:
• fast, convenient online submission
• thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field
• rapid publication on acceptance
• support for research data, including large and complex data types
• gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations
• maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year
At BMC, research is always in progress.
Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions
...