AudioMoth: evaluation of a smart open acoustic
device for monitoring biodiversity and the
Bermant, P. C. 2021. BioCPPNet: automatic
bioacoustic source separation with deep neural
networks. Scientific Reports 11:23502.
Besson, M., J. Alison, K. Bjerge, T. E. Gorochowski,
T. T. Høye, T. Jucker, H. M. R. Mann, and C. F.
environment. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
9:1199–1211.
Howard, J., and S. Gugger. 2020. Fastai: a layered
API
for
deep
learning.
Information.
An
International Interdisciplinary Journal 11:108.
Clements. 2022. Towards the fully automated
Kahl, S., C. M. Wood, M. Eibl, and H. Klinck. 2021.
monitoring of ecological communities. Ecology
BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian
Letters 25:2753–2775.
diversity
monitoring.
Ecological
Informatics
61:101236.
large alluvial plain in Japan. Wetlands 42:106.
Keitt, T. H., and E. S. Abelson. 2021. Ecology in the
age of automation. Science 373:858–859.
M.
Brigham,
Recommendations
and
E.
for
Bayne.
acoustic
McFee, B., A. Metsai, M. McVicar, S. Balke, C.
Thomé, C. Raffel, F. Zalkow, A. Malek, Dana, K.
Knight, E. C., K. C. Hannah, G. J. Foley, C. D. Scott,
R.
spatial scales on paddy field-breeding frogs in a
2017.
recognizer
Lee, O. Nieto, D. Ellis, J. Mason, E. Battenberg,
Thassilo.
2022.
librosa:
0.9.1.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6097378
performance assessment with application to five
Norouzzadeh, M. S., A. Nguyen, M. Kosmala, A.
common automated signal recognition programs.
Swanson, M. S. Palmer, C. Packer, and J. Clune.
Avian Conservation and Ecology 12:14.
2018. Automatically identifying, counting, and
LeBien, J., M. Zhong, M. Campos-Cerqueira, J. P.
describing wild animals in camera-trap images with
Velev, R. Dodhia, J. L. Ferres, and T. M. Aide.
deep learning. Proceedings of the National
2020. A pipeline for identification of bird and frog
Academy of Sciences of the United States of
species in tropical soundscape recordings using a
America 115:E5716–E5725.
convolutional
neural
network.
Ecological
Informatics 59:101113.
Japanese Toad, Bufo japonicus japonicus. VIII.
LeCun, Y., Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton. 2015. Deep
learning. Nature 521:436–444.
Rowley.
2022.
Climatic factors influencing the breeding activity.
Japanese Journal of Ecology 35:527–535.
Liu, G., R. T. Kingsford, C. T. Callaghan, and J. J.
L.
Okuno, R. 1985. Studies on the natural history of the
Anthropogenic
habitat
modification alters calling phenology of frogs.
Global Change Biology 28:6194–6208.
Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, and R Core Team. 2022.
nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed Effects models. R
package
version
3.1-162.
https://cran.r-
project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html
Mac Aodha, O., R. Gibb, K. E. Barlow, E.
R Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment
Browning, M. Firman, R. Freeman, B. Harder, L.
for statistical computing. R Foundation for
Kinsey, G. R. Mead, S. E. Newson, I. Pandourski,
Statistical
S. Parsons, J. Russ, A. Szodoray-Paradi … K. E.
Computing,
Vienna,
Austria.
https://www.R-project.org/
Jones. 2018. Bat detective-Deep learning tools for
Rowley, J. J. L., C. T. Callaghan, T. Cutajar, C.
bat acoustic signal detection. PLoS Computational
Portway, K. Potter, S. Mahony, D. F. Trembath,
Biology 14:e1005995.
P. Flemons, and A. Woods. 2019. FrogID: Citizen
Marques, T. A., L. Thomas, S. W. Martin, D. K.
scientists provide validated biodiversity data on
Mellinger, J. A. Ward, D. J. Moretti, D. Harris,
frogs of Australia. Herpetological Conservation and
and P. L. Tyack. 2013. Estimating animal
Biology 14:155–170.
population
acoustics.
Schneider, S., G. W. Taylor, S. C. Kremer, P.
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical
density
using
passive
Burgess, J. McGroarty, K. Mitsui, A. Zhuang, J.
Society 88:287–309.
R. deWaard, and J. M. Fryxell. 2022. Bulk
Matsui, M., and N. Maeda. 2018. Encyclopedia of
arthropod abundance, biomass and diversity
Japanese frogs. Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan, Tokyo,
estimation using deep learning for computer vision.
Japan.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13:346–357.
Matsushima, N., M. Hasegawa, and J. Nishihiro.
Shimada, T., A. Imamura, and N. Ohnishi. 2013. A
2022. Effects of landscape heterogeneity at multiple
study of larval phenologies of five anuran species in
Japanese paddy fields. Japanese Journal of
Herpetological Conservation and Biology 4:389–
Herpetology 2013:77–85.
402.
Shimoyama, R. 1993. Female reproductive traits in a
Womack, M. C., E. Steigerwald, D. C. Blackburn,
population of the pond frog, Rana nigromaculata,
D. C. Cannatella, A. Catenazzi, J. Che, M. S. Koo,
with prolonged breeding season. Japanese Journal
J. A. McGuire, S. R. Ron, C. L. Spencer, V. T.
of Herpetology 15:37–41.
Vredenburg, and R. D. Tarvin. 2022. State of the
Shirose, L. J., C. A. Bishop, D. M. Green, C. J.
amphibia 2020: a review of five years of amphibian
MacDonald, B. R. J., and N. J. Helferty. 1997.
research and existing resources. Ichthyology &
Validation tests of an amphibian call count survey
Herpetology 110:638–661.
technique in Ontario, Canada. Herpetologica
53:312–320.
Xie, J., R. Zeng, C. L. Xu, J. L. Zhang, and P. Roe.
2017. Multi-label classification of frog species via
Stowell, D. 2022. Computational bioacoustics with
deep learning. p. 187–193. In: 2017 IEEE 13th
deep learning: a review and roadmap. PeerJ
International Conference on e-Science (e-Science).
10:e13152.
Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, N. Walker, A. A. Saveliev,
Weir, L., I. J. Fiske, and J. A. Royle. 2009. Trends
and G. M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and
in anuran occupancy from northeastern states of the
extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York.
North American Amphibian Monitoring Program.
...
論文の公開元へ
