1. Dayson C, Bashir N. The social and economic impact of the Rotherham social prescribing pilot: Main evaluation report. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University; 2014 [published 2014 Sep; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www4.shu.ac.uk/resea rch/cresr/sites/shu.ac.uk/files/social-economic-impact-rotherham. pdf
2. Dowden A. How social prescribing can benefit patients and pre- scribers. Prescriber. 2019 April;21–4:21–4.
3. Pescheny JV, Randhawa G, Pappas Y. The impact of social prescrib- ing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Public Health. 2019;30(4):664–73.
4. NHS England and NHS Improvement. Social prescribing and community-based support: Summary guide. 2020. [updated 2020 Jun; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs. uk/publication/social-prescribing-and-community-based-support- summary-guide/
5. Social Prescribing Network Conference. Report of the annual social prescribing network Conference. London: University of Westminster; 2016 [published 2016 Jan; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.artshealthresources.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2017/01/2016-Social-Prescribing-Network-First-Conference-Report.pdf
6. Kimberlee R. What is social prescribing. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2015;2(1):102–10.
7. Husk K, Blockley K, Lovell R, Bethel A, Lang I, Byng R, et al. What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28:309–24.
8. Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social pre- scribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013384.
9. Carnes D, Sohanpal R, Frostick C, Hull S, Mathur R, Netuveli G, et al. The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in pri- mary care: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(835):1–9.
10. Moffatt S, Steer M, Lawson S, Penn L, O'Brien N. Link worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long- term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015203.
11. Polley M, Fleming J, Anfilogoff T, Carpenter A. Making sense of social prescribing. London: University of Westminster; 2017 [pub- lished 2017 Aug 18; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https:// westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/q1v77/making- sense-of-social-prescribing
12. Ogden J. Where next for social prescribing in England? Prescriber. 2018 May;29:31–4.
13. Bertotti M, Frostick C, Hutt P, Sohanpal R, Carnes D. A realist eval- uation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018;19:232–45.
14. Skivington K, Smith M, Chng NR, Mackenzie M, Wyke S, Mercer SW. Delivering a primary care-based social prescribing initiative: a qualitative study of the benefits and challenges. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jul;68:e487–94.
15. Pescheny J, Randhawa G, Pappas Y. Patient uptake and ad- herence to social prescribing: a qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2018;101(598):1–12.
16. Pescheny J, Pappas Y, Randhawa G. Facilitators and barriers of im- plementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:86.
17. South J, Higgins TJ, Woodall J, White SM. Can social prescribing provide the missing link? Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2008;9:310–8.
18. Kilgarriff-Foster A, O'Cathain A. Exploring the components and im- pact of social prescribing. J Public Ment Health. 2015;14(3):127–34.
19. Thomson LJ, Camic PM, Chatterjee HJ. Social prescribing: a re- view of community referral schemes. London: University College London; 2015 [published 2015; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.artsh ealthresources.org.uk/wp-conte nt/uploa ds/2017/01/2015-Thompson-Social_Prescribing_Review.pdf
20. Hutt P. Social prescribing: a new medicine? InnovAiT. 2016;10(2):90–5.
21. Loftus AM, McMauley F, McCarron MO. Impact of social prescrib- ing on general practice workload and polypharmacy. Public Health. 2017;148:96–101.
22. Costa A, Sousa CJ, Seabra PRC, Virgolino A, Santos O, Lopes J, et al. Effectiveness of social prescribing programs in the primary health-care context: a systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2021;13:2731.
23. Reinhardt GY, Vidovic D, Hammerton C. Understanding loneliness: a systematic review of the impact of social prescribing initiatives on loneliness. Perspect Public Health. 2021;141(4):204–13.
24. Rempel ES, Wilson EN, Durrant H, Barnett J. Preparing the pre- scription: a review of the aim and measurement of social referral programmes. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017734.
25. Hsu E. The polyglot practitioner: towards acceptance of different approaches in treatment evaluation. In: Gosvig Olesen S, Hoeg E, editors. Studies in alternative therapy 3: communication in and about alternative therapies. Odense: Odense University Press; 1996. p. 37–53.
26. Hsu E. Treatment evaluation: an anthropologist's approach. In: Scheid V, MacPherson H, editors. Integrating east Asian medicine into contemporary healthcare. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2012. p. 157–72.
27. Kleinman A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books; 1988.
28. Good BJ. Medicine, rationality, and experience: an anthropological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
29. Donabedian A. Quality of care: problems of measurement. II. Some issues in evaluating the quality of nursing care. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1969 Oct;59(10):1833–6.
30. Lock M. Encounters with aging: mythologies of menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1993.
31. Farquhar J, Lock M. Introduction. In: Lock M, Farquhar J, editors. Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life. Durham: Duke University Press; 2007. p. 1–16.
32. Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture: an ex- ploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine, and psychiatry. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980.
33. Lewis G. Knowledge of illness in a Sepik society. A study of the Gnau, New Guinea. London: The Athlone Press; 1975.
34. Csordas TJ, editor. Embodiment and experience: the existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
35. Csordas TJ. Body/meaning/healing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002.
36. Merleau-Ponty M. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard; 1945.
37. Bourdieu P. La Distinction. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit; 1979.
38. Husserl E. Cartesianische Meditationen: Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie (Philosophische Bibliothek; Bd. 291). Hamburg: Felix Meiner; 1977.
39. Thompson MG. Phenomenology of intersubjectivity: a historical overview and its clinical implications. In: Mills J, editor. Relational and intersubjective perspectives in psychoanalysis: a critique. Lanham: Jason Aronson; 2005. p. 5–70.
40. Csordas TJ. Intersubjectivity and Intercorporeality. Subjectivity. 2008;22:110–21.
41. Chau AY. The sensorial production of the social. Ethnos. 2008;73(4):485–504.
42. Stickley T, Hui A. Social prescribing through arts on prescription in a UK city: participants' perspective (part 1). Public Health. 2012;126(7):574–9.
43. Csordas TJ. The rhetoric of transformation in ritual healing. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1983;7:333–75.
44. Turner VW. The ritual process: structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine; 1969.
45. van Gennep A. Les Rites de Passage. Paris: Émile Nourry; 1909.
46. Hassan SM, Giebel C, Morasae EK, Rotheram C, Mathieson V, Ward D, et al. Social prescribing for people with mental health needs living in disadvantaged communities: the life rooms model. BMC Health Service Research. 2020;20:19.
47. Woodall J, Trigwell J, Bunyan AM, Raine G, Eaton V, Davis J, et al. Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social pre- scribing service: a mixed methods analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:604.
48. Redmond M, Sumner RC, Crone DM, Hughes S. ‘Light in dark places’: exploring qualitative data from a longitudinal study using creative arts as a form of social prescribing. Arts Health. 2018. [published 2018 Jul 18; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://artlift.org/ wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2018-Arts-_-Health-Journal-Light-in-dark-places.pdf;11:232–45.
49. Foster A, Thompson J, Holding E, et al. Impact of social prescrib- ing to address loneliness: a mixed methods evaluation of a na- tional social prescribing programme. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;29:1439–49.
50. Realpe A, Wallace LM. What is co-production? London: The Health Foundation; 2010 [published 2010; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://qi.elft.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/what_ is_co-production.pdf
51. Needham C, Carr S. Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation, research briefing 31. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2009 [published 2009 Mar; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.scie.org.uk/publi cations/briefings/briefing31/
52. Baker K, Irving A. Co-producing approaches to the Management of Dementia through social prescribing. Soc Policy Adm. 2016;50(3):379–97.
53. Social Care Institute for Excellence. Co-production in social care: what it is and how to do it, Adults' Services: SCIE guide 51. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2015 [published 2015 Oct; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.scie.org.uk/publi cations/guides/guide51/
54. Kellezi B, Wakefield JRH, Stevenson C, McNamara N, Mair E, Bowe M, et al. The social cure of social prescribing: a mixed-methods study on the benefits of social connectedness on quality and effec- tiveness of care provision. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e033137.
55. WHO. Health 2020: a European policy framework supporting ac- tion across government and society for heal and well-being. 2013. [published 2013; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www. Jun 30; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: http://documents.world bank.org/curated/en/827431468765280211/Empowerment-and- poverty-reduction-a-sourcebook
56. Chan RCH, Mak WWS. Empowerment for civic engagement and well-being in emerging adulthood: evidence from cross-regional and cross-lagged analyses. Soc Sci Med. 2020;244:112703.
57. McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C. Patient em- powerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient- reported outcome for chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;2012(12):157.
58. Narayan D, editor. Empowerment and poverty reduction: a source- book. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2002 [published 2002 medical literature. New York: McGraw Hill; 2015.
59. Rubin JC. Patient empowerment and the learning health system. Learn Health Syst. 2017;1:e10030.
60. Pekonen A, Eloranta S, Stolt M, Virolainen P, Leino-Kilpi H. Measuring patient empowerment – a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(4):777–87.
61. Weiner C. Empowering Patients. Lilipoh: The Spirit in Life. Issue #77 Fall 2014. [uploaded 2016 Feb 10; cited 2022 Feb 4]. Available from: https://lilipoh.com/articles/empowering-patie nts/
62. Bond LM, Csordas TJ. The paradox of powerlessness. Alcohol Treat Q. 2014;32:141–56.
63. Foucault M. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard; 1975. euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0006/199536/Health2020
64. Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, Cook DJ, editors. Users' guide to the -Short.pdf?ua=1
論文の公開元へ
