リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Genome-wide Survival Analysis for Macular Neovascularization Development in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Revealed Shared Genetic Susceptibility with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Genome-wide Survival Analysis for Macular Neovascularization Development in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Revealed Shared Genetic Susceptibility with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Mori, Yuki 京都大学 DOI:10.14989/doctor.k24494

2023.03.23

概要

Genome-wide Survival Analysis for Macular
Neovascularization Development in Central
Serous Chorioretinopathy Revealed Shared
Genetic Susceptibility with Polypoidal
Choroidal Vasculopathy
Yuki Mori, MD,1,2 Masahiro Miyake, MD, PhD,1,2 Yoshikatsu Hosoda, MD, PhD,3 Akiko Miki, MD, PhD,4
Ayako Takahashi, MD, PhD,1 Yuki Muraoka, MD, PhD,1 Manabu Miyata, MD, PhD,1 Takehiro Sato, PhD,5
Hiroshi Tamura, MD, PhD,1 Sotaro Ooto, MD, PhD,1 Ryo Yamada, MD, PhD,2 Kenji Yamashiro, MD, PhD,6
Makoto Nakamura, MD, PhD,4 Atsushi Tajima, PhD,5 Masao Nagasaki, PhD,2 Shigeru Honda, MD, PhD,7
Akitaka Tsujikawa, MD, PhD1
Purpose: To identify susceptibility genes for macular neovascularization (MNV) development in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
Design: Genome-wide survival analysis using a longitudinal cohort study.
Participants: We included 402 and 137 patients with CSC but without MNV at their first visit from the Kyoto
CSC Cohort and Kobe CSC dataset, respectively. All patients underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations,
including multimodal imaging, such as fundus autofluorescence, spectral-domain OCT, and fluorescein angiography/indocyanine green angiography or OCT angiography.
Methods: We conducted a genome-wide survival analysis using the Kyoto CSC Cohort. We applied the Cox
proportional hazard model to adjust for age, sex, and the first principal component. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with P values < 1.0  10-5 were carried forward to the replication in the Kobe CSC dataset.
Moreover, we evaluated the contribution of previously reported age-related macular degeneration (AMD) susceptibility loci. We used FUMA and ToppFun for the functional enrichment analysis.
Main Outcome Measures: The association between SNPs and MNV development in patients with CSC.
Results: Rs370974631 near ARMS2 displayed a genome-wide significant association in the meta-analysis of
discovery and replication result (hazard ratio [HR]meta, 3.63; Pmeta ¼ 5.76  10-9). Among previously reported AMD
susceptibility loci, we additionally identified CFH rs800292 (HR, 0.39, P ¼ 2.55  10-4), COL4A3 rs4276018 (HR,
0.26, P ¼ 1.56  10-3), and B3GALTL rs9564692 (HR, 0.56, P ¼ 8.30  10-3) as susceptibility loci for MNV
development in CSC. The functional enrichment analysis revealed significant enrichment of 8 pathways
(GO:0051561, GO:0036444, GO:0008282, GO:1990246, GO:0015272, GO:0030955, GO:0031420, and
GO:0005242) related to ion transport.
Conclusions: ARMS2, CFH, COL4A3, and B3GALTL were identified as susceptibility genes for MNV
development in CSC. These 4 genes are known as susceptibility genes for AMD, whereas COL4A3 and B3GALTL
were previously reported to be polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV)-specific susceptibility genes. Our findings revealed the shared genetic susceptibility between PCV and MNV secondary to
CSC. Ophthalmology 2022;129:1034-1042 ª 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
Supplemental material available at www.aaojournal.org.

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by
serous retinal detachment around the fovea and is one of the
common causes of vision loss, principally in young to
middle-aged men.1 Central serous chorioretinopathy
consists of 2 clinically distinct entities, namely, acute CSC
and chronic CSC.2 Acute CSC resolves spontaneously
within 3 months such that its visual prognosis is generally
good. However, a recent long-term observational study by

1034

ª 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
Published by Elsevier Inc.

Mrejen et al3 reported that chronic CSC lasting > 6 months
resulted in legal blindness in 12.8% of the patients with an
average 11.3 years of follow-up. In this report, 24% of the
patients developed macular neovascularization (MNV),
which was strongly associated with visual acuity at their last
visit. Therefore, MNV is considered a major cause of poor
visual prognosis in patients with CSC. The prevalence of
MNV secondary to CSC ranges from 2% to 28.7%.4-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.04.018
ISSN 0161-6420/22

Mori et al



Susceptibility Genes for MNV in CSC

Researchers have reported on several susceptibility genes
for CSC. CFH was the first reported CSC susceptibility gene,
which is also an established susceptibility gene for agerelated macular degeneration (AMD); however, the effect
direction is opposite between CSC and AMD.8 We have also
identified additional susceptibility genes for CSC through 2
genome-wide association studies (GWASs): (1) an intermediate phenotype 2-staged GWAS of 6110 healthy Japanese
individuals, which led to the identification of VIPR2,9 and (2)
a 2-staged GWAS of 1546 CSC samples and 13 029 controls
from Asian and White participants that identified
TNFRSF10A and GATA5.10 Despite reports on these
susceptibility genes for CSC development, researchers have
not yet explored a detailed phenotype-genotype correlation.
Among a variety of clinical phenotypes for CSC, MNV
development is most important. Macular neovascularization
secondary to CSC is paid more attention after being located
within the novel disease concept, pachychoroid spectrum
diseases, and named pachychoroid neovasculopathy
(PNV).11 Despite speculating that the mechanical damage of
choriocapillaris and Sattler’s layer due to dilated choroidal
vessels may cause MNV,12 its molecular biological
susceptibility is unknown. We aimed to conduct a genomewide survival analysis for MNV development in patients
with CSC, followed by replication in an independent dataset.

Methods
This study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and
was approved by the ethics committee of the Kyoto University
Graduate School of Medicine and Kobe University Graduate
School of Medicine. Written informed consent was obtained from
all participants.

Discovery Dataset
We used the Kyoto CSC Cohort10 for the discovery stage. It consists
of 610 unrelated patients with CSC who visited the Macular Service
of the Kyoto University Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) and were recruited
for genetic studies on disease development and clinical course with
written informed consent. All patients underwent detailed
ophthalmic examinations, including a measurement of the bestcorrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit-lamp
biomicroscopy, color fundus photography, infrared reflectance,
fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine
green angiography (ICGA), and spectral-domain OCT, with or
without OCT angiography. Central serous chorioretinopathy was
diagnosed as subretinal fluid and choroidal thickening in the macula
on OCT with leakage on FA regardless of choroidal hyperpermeability on ICGA. Two retina specialists (M.M. and Y.H.)
independently diagnosed the patients. The discrepancies were
resolved by a face-to-face discussion. We excluded patients with
MNV or characteristics suggestive of AMD, such as confluent soft
drusen, pseudodrusen, or choroidal thinning. Moreover, we excluded
those without follow-up visits and any visits after 2013.

Replication Dataset

Central serous chorioretinopathy was defined as eyes with central
serous retinal detachment without subretinal hemorrhage or suspected MNV in ICGA or OCT. The exclusion criteria were as
follows: (1) a history of corticosteroid treatment; (2) central
choroidal thickness < 250 mm; (3) age > 80 years; and (4) a
history of retinal vessel occlusion or uveitis.

Genotyping
The Kyoto CSC Cohort was genotyped using a series of BeadChip
DNA arrays (Illumina), namely, OmniExpress (N ¼ 250) and
Asian Screening Array (N ¼ 360). We performed genotype
imputation using the Michigan imputation server (https://imputationserver.sph.umich.edu/index.html#!pages/home) and used the
East Asian population of the 1000 Genomes dataset (phase III,
version 5 release) as a reference for each dataset. In each dataset,
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a call rate < 90% or
a minor allele frequency (MAF) < 1% were excluded before the
genotype imputation. After the imputation, we also excluded the
following imputed SNPs from the subsequent association analysis:
those with R2 < 0.9, a call rate < 90%, MAF < 1%, or significant
deviation (P < 1.0  10-5) from the HardyeWeinberg equilibrium.
The SNPs included in both datasets after imputation and quality
control were used for the analysis.
The Kobe CSC dataset was genotyped using the Human
OmniExpress BeadChips (Illumina).13 We performed genomic
imputation using the BEAGLE 4.1 with the 1000 Genomes
dataset (phase III, version 5 release) as reference panels. Imputed
SNPs with R2 < 0.7 were excluded. In the current study, the
coordinates and variant identifiers were based on GRCh37/hg19.

Genome-wide Survival Analysis
We reviewed the medical records to obtain phenotypic information
of all participants. The duration from CSC diagnosis to the event
(MNV development) or censoring (final visit in August 2019 or
lost to follow-up) was recorded daily. The age at the first visit was
used for statistical analysis.
We conducted a 2-staged genome-wide survival analysis. In the
discovery stage, using the Kyoto CSC Cohort, we conducted a
survival analysis on the MNV-free period for each SNP with an
MAF  10% using the Cox proportional hazard regression model
to adjust for the age at first visit, sex, and the first principal
component. We carried SNPs with a suggestive association (P <
1.0  10-5) forward to the replication stage. In the replication stage,
using the Kobe CSC dataset, we performed a similar analysis
adjusted for the age at first visit and sex. Eventually, both Cox
regression analysis results were meta-analyzed using the METAL
software14 (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/Metal/), with
the inverse variance-based method and the fixed effect model.

Association of AMD Susceptibility Genes
We investigated the contribution of AMD susceptibility genes to
MNV development in CSC. ...

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. Cheung CMG, Lee WK, Koizumi H, et al. Pachychoroid

disease. Eye (Lond). 2019;33:14e33.

2. Kido A, Miyake M, Tamura H, et al. Incidence of central

serous chorioretinopathy (2011-2018): a nationwide

population-based cohort study of Japan. Br J Ophthalmol.

2021 Jul 14. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021319403. bjophthalmol-2021-319403 Online ahead of print.

3. Mrejen S, Balaratnasingam C, Kaden TR, et al. Long-term visual outcomes and causes of vision loss in chronic central serous

chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:576e588.

1041

Ophthalmology Volume 129, Number 9, September 2022

4. Yeo JH, Oh R, Kim YJ, et al. Choroidal neovascularization secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy: OCT angiography

findings and risk factors. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:7217906.

5. Loo RH, Scott IU, Flynn Jr HW, et al. Factors associated with

reduced visual acuity during long-term follow-up of patients

with idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina.

2002;22:19e24.

6. Shiragami C, Takasago Y, Osaka R, et al. Clinical features of

central serous chorioretinopathy with type 1 choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;193:80e86.

7. Spaide RF, Campeas L, Haas A, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy in younger and older adults. Ophthalmology.

1996;103:2070e2079.

8. Miki A, Kondo N, Yanagisawa S, et al. Common variants in

the complement factor H gene confer genetic susceptibility to

central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:

1067e1072.

9. Hosoda Y, Yoshikawa M, Miyake M, et al. CFH and VIPR2 as

susceptibility loci in choroidal thickness and pachychoroid

disease central serous chorioretinopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U

S A. 2018;115:6261e6266.

10. Hosoda Y, Miyake M, Schellevis RL, et al. Genome-wide

association analyses identify two susceptibility loci for

pachychoroid disease central serous chorioretinopathy. Commun Biol. 2019;2:468.

11. Hosoda Y, Miyake M, Yamashiro K, et al. Deep phenotype

unsupervised machine learning revealed the significance of

pachychoroid features in etiology and visual prognosis of agerelated macular degeneration. Sci Rep. 2020;10:18423.

12. Yamashiro K, Hosoda Y, Miyake M, et al. Characteristics of

pachychoroid diseases and age-related macular degeneration:

multimodal imaging and genetic backgrounds. J Clin Med.

2020;9:2034.

13. Miki A, Sakurada Y, Tanaka K, et al. Genome-wide association study to identify a new susceptibility locus for central

serous chorioretinopathy in the Japanese population. Invest

Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:5542e5547.

14. Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR. METAL: fast and efficient

meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2190e2191.

15. Fritsche LG, Igl W, Bailey JN, et al. A large genome-wide

association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants. Nat Genet.

2016;48:134e143.

16. Cheng CY, Yamashiro K, Chen LJ, et al. New loci and coding

variants confer risk for age-related macular degeneration in

East Asians. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6063.

17. Cordell HJ, Fryett JJ, Ueno K, et al. An international genomewide meta-analysis of primary biliary cholangitis: novel risk

loci and candidate drugs. J Hepatol. 2021;75:572e581.

18. Bernabeu E, Canela-Xandri O, Rawlik K, et al. Sex differences

in genetic architecture in the UK Biobank. Nat Genet.

2021;53:1283e1289.

19. Harper AR, Goel A, Grace C, et al. Common genetic variants

and modifiable risk factors underpin hypertrophic cardiomyopathy susceptibility and expressivity. Nat Genet. 2021;53:

135e142.

20. Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D.

Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations

with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1826.

21. Chen J, Bardes EE, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. ToppGene Suite for

gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W305eW311.

22. Liu X, Yagi H, Saeed S, et al. The complex genetics of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1152e1159.

1042

23. Small KS, Todorcevic M, Civelek M, et al. Regulatory variants

at KLF14 influence type 2 diabetes risk via a female-specific

effect on adipocyte size and body composition. Nat Genet.

2018;50:572e580.

24. Syed H, Jorgensen AL, Morris AP. SurvivalGWAS_SV:

software for the analysis of genome-wide association studies

of imputed genotypes with “time-to-event” outcomes. BMC

Bioinformatics. 2017;18:265.

25. Machiela MJ, Chanock SJ. LDlink: a web-based application

for exploring population-specific haplotype structure and

linking correlated alleles of possible functional variants. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3555e3557.

26. Myers TA, Chanock SJ, Machiela MJ. LDlinkR: An R package for rapidly calculating linkage disequilibrium statistics in

diverse populations. Front Genet. 2020;11:157.

27. Pan Y, Iejima D, Nakayama M, et al. Binding of Gtf2i-b/

d transcription factors to the ARMS2 gene leads to increased

circulating HTRA1 in AMD patients and in vitro. J Biol Chem.

2021;296:100456.

28. Takahashi A, Hosoda Y, Miyake M, et al. Clinical and genetic

characteristics of pachydrusen in eyes with central serous

chorioretinopathy and general Japanese individuals. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5:910e917.

29. Spaide RF. Disease expression in nonexudative age-related

macular degeneration varies with choroidal thickness. Retina.

2018;38:708e716.

30. Nakanishi H, Gotoh N, Yamada R, et al. ARMS2/HTRA1 and

CFH polymorphisms are not associated with choroidal neovascularization in highly myopic eyes of the elderly Japanese

population. Eye (Lond). 2010;24:1078e1084.

31. Warrow DJ, Hoang QV, Freund KB. Pachychoroid pigment

epitheliopathy. Retina. 2013;33:1659e1672.

32. Mori Y, Miyake M, Hosoda Y, et al. Distribution of choroidal

thickness and choroidal vessel dilation in healthy Japanese individuals: the Nagahama Study. Ophthalmol Sci. 2021;1:100033.

33. Miyake M, Tsujikawa A, Yamashiro K, et al. Choroidal neovascularization in eyes with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:3223e3230.

34. Miyake M, Ooto S, Yamashiro K, et al. Pachychoroid neovasculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Sci Rep.

2015;5:16204.

35. Sasahara M, Tsujikawa A, Musashi K, et al. Polypoidal

choroidal vasculopathy with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:601e607.

36. Dunne MJ, Cosgrove KE, Shepherd RM, Ämmälä C. Potassium channels, sulphonylurea receptors and control of insulin

release. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1999;10:146e152.

37. Kane C, Shepherd RM, Squires PE, et al. Loss of functional

KATP channels in pancreatic beta-cells causes persistent

hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy. Nat Med. 1996;2:

1344e1347.

38. Kane C, Lindley KJ, Johnson PR, et al. Therapy for persistent

hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy. Understanding the

responsiveness of beta cells to diazoxide and somatostatin.

J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1888e1893.

39. Gottschalk B, Klec C, Leitinger G, et al. MICU1 controls

cristae junction and spatially anchors mitochondrial Ca2þ

uniporter complex. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3732.

40. Hutto RA, Bisbach CM, Abbas F, et al. Increasing Ca2þ in

photoreceptor mitochondria alters metabolites, accelerates

photoresponse recovery, and reveals adaptations to mitochondrial stress. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:1067e1085.

41. Yaddanapudi LN. The American Statistical Association

statement on P-values explained. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32:421e423.

Table S1. Detailed settings for positional gene mapping by FUMA

Parameter

Reference panel

Minimum MAF (≥)

Maximum lead SNP P-value (<)

r2 threshold for independent significant SNPs (≥)

Setting

1000G Phase3 EAS

0*

0.00001

0.6*

Description

Data from East Asian of 1000 Genome Phase 3 were used as the reference

panel for LD r2.

No filtering was performed for the results by MAF obtained from the

reference panel.

SNPs with P ≤ 1×10-5 were identified as “significant SNPs.”

Among the significant SNPs dependent on each other at r2 ≥ 0.6, one with

the lowest P value was defined as an “independent significant SNP.”

Independent significant SNPs dependent on each other at r2 ≥ 0.1 were

2nd r2 threshold for lead SNPs (≥)

0.1*

assigned to similar genomic risk locus, and the one with the lowest P value

was defined as a “lead SNP.”

SNPs with P < 0.05 and in LD of r2 ≥ 0.6 (set in “r2 threshold for

Maximum GWAS P-value (<)

0.05*

independent significant SNPs (≥)”) with each lead SNP were used for gene

mapping and involved similar genomic risk locus.

All SNPs in the reference panel in LD of r2 ≥ 0.6 (set in “r2 threshold for

independent significant SNPs (≥)”) with the independent significant SNPs,

Include variants from reference panel

Yes*

despite not being included in our results, were involved similar genomic

locus. This default setting may provide information on functional variants in

LD with the lead SNP.

Maximum distance of LD blocks to merge (≤)

Distance to genes or functional consequences of SNPs on

genes to map

250 kb*

Maximum distance 10 kb*

Genomic risk loci with a distance ≤ 250 000 base pairs were merged into a

single genomic risk locus.

SNPs located within 10 000 base pairs of a gene were mapped to that gene.

EAS = East Asian; GWAS = genome-wide survival analysis; LD = linkage disequilibrium; MAF = minor allele frequency; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

: Default settings.

Table S2. Results of single nucleotide polymorphisms with P < 1.0×10-5 in the genome-wide survival analysis

SNP

Position

EA/NonEA

HR (95% CI)

P value

Genomic locus

rs9848257

3:99404989

T/C

2.93 (1.85–4.64)

4.70×10-6

COL8A1

rs516732

5:165107100

T/C

3.05 (1.89–4.93)

5.44×10-6

rs4868759

5:165108256

T/C

2.85 (1.80–4.52)

8.85×10-6

rs28772281

6:32674086

A/G

2.87 (1.81–4.56)

7.92×10-6

rs61871744

10:124203787

C/T

3.11 (1.95–4.96)

1.95×10-6

rs59616332

10:124208562

G/GATAAAC

3.34 (2.10–5.30)

3.39×10-7

rs11200630

10:124209684

C/T

3.52 (2.20–5.62)

1.44×10-7

rs61871745

10:124210369

A/G

3.52 (2.20–5.62)

1.44×10-7

rs11200632

10:124211536

G/A

3.46 (2.16–5.52)

2.04×10-7

rs11200633

10:124211596

T/C

3.46 (2.16–5.52)

2.04×10-7

rs61871746

10:124212913

C/T

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs61871747

10:124213046

T/C

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs370974631

10:124213143

C/CAA

4.07 (2.51–6.60)

1.19×10-8

rs200227426

10:124213671

A/C

3.36 (2.11–5.35)

3.10×10-7

rs201396317

10:124213674

A/C

3.36 (2.11–5.35)

3.10×10-7

rs199637836

10:124213677

A/C

3.36 (2.11–5.35)

3.10×10-7

rs11200634

10:124213680

A/C

3.36 (2.11–5.35)

3.10×10-7

rs75431719

10:124213688

A/C

3.36 (2.11–5.35)

3.10×10-7

rs10490924

10:124214448

T/G

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs61544945

10:124214600

GGT/G

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs36212731

10:124214976

T/G

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs36212732

10:124215198

G/A

3.45 (2.16–5.49)

1.91×10-7

rs36212733

10:124215211

C/T

3.45 (2.16–5.49)

1.91×10-7

rs3750848

10:124215315

G/T

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs3750847

10:124215421

T/C

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs3750846

10:124215565

C/T

3.45 (2.16–5.50)

2.18×10-7

rs566108895

10:124216823

T/G

3.60 (2.26–5.75)

7.89×10-8

rs5788557

10:124217757

GC/G

2.96 (1.89–4.63)

2.05×10-6

rs3793917

10:124219275

G/C

3.41 (2.15–5.40)

1.76×10-7

rs3763764

10:124220061

G/A

3.41 (2.15–5.40)

1.76×10-7

rs11200638

10:124220544

A/G

3.41 (2.15–5.40)

1.76×10-7

rs1049331

10:124221270

T/C

3.41 (2.15–5.40)

1.76×10-7

rs2293870

10:124221276

T/G

3.41 (2.15–5.40)

1.80×10-7

rs2284665

10:124226630

T/G

3.20 (2.03–5.05)

6.05×10-7

rs6083539

20:24488084

G/A

3.03 (1.86–4.92)

7.86×10-6

rs6049745

20:24488170

C/T

3.03 (1.86–4.92)

7.86×10-6

rs1326305

20:24488340

G/A

3.13 (1.92–5.09)

4.40×10-6

RN7SKP60-LOC574080

MTCO3P1

PLEKHA1-ARMS2

ARMS2

ARMS2-HTRA1

HTRA1

SYNDIG1

CI = confidence interval; EA = effect allele; HR = hazard ratio; NonEA = non-effect allele; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Table S3. Contribution of all 34 age-related macular degeneration susceptibility loci on macular neovascularization development in central serous chorioretinopathy

AMD susceptibility Locus

Chr

CFH

Genome-wide survival analysis for MNV development in CSC

SNP

BP

r2

EA/NonEA

HR (95% CI)

P value

rs514591

rs551397

rs800292

rs559350

196640320

196642072

196642233

196642533

0.74

0.74

0.74

0.74

G/A

T/C

A/G

C/T

0.39 (0.24–0.65)

0.39 (0.24–0.65)

0.39 (0.24–0.65)

0.39 (0.24–0.65)

2.55×10-4

2.55×10-4

2.55×10-4

2.55×10-4

COL4A3

rs4276018

rs4263106

228092758

228092899

0.84

0.84

G/T

T/G

0.26 (0.11–0.60)

0.26 (0.11–0.60)

1.56×10-3

1.56×10-3

ADAMTS9-AS2

rs7428936

rs62247658

64710850

64715155

1.00

1.00

C/T

C/T

0.96 (0.55–1.68)

0.96 (0.55–1.68)

0.900

0.900

COL8A1*

rs10033900

110659067

1.00

T/C

0.89 (0.59–1.35)

0.586

CFI

PRLR-SPEF2

C9*

C2-CFB-SKIV2L

rs2284179

31941891

0.58

G/T

1.29 (0.61–2.72)

0.503

VEGFA

rs7758685

43825266

0.88

A/G

0.89 (0.54–1.48)

0.663

PILRB-PILRA

rs314302

rs314333

rs191137

100376549

100386001

100386900

0.53

0.53

0.53

A/G

A/C

T/C

0.64 (0.22–1.86)

0.64 (0.22–1.86)

0.64 (0.22–1.86)

0.418

0.418

0.418

KMT2E-SRPK2

rs144245492

104609793

0.63

C/G

0.70 (0.42–1.17)

0.177

TNFRSF10A

rs13278062

23082971

1.00

G/T

0.84 (0.54–1.33)

0.462

TRPM3†

MIR6130-RORB

rs10781168

rs4014108

rs10781171

76555517

76564465

76565484

1.00

1.00

0.98

T/C

C/T

C/A

0.92 (0.60–1.40)

0.92 (0.60–1.40)

0.92 (0.60–1.40)

0.692

0.692

0.692

TGFBR1

rs1888225

rs3739798

101909657

101914812

0.76

0.76

G/A

A/G

0.93 (0.61–1.41)

0.93 (0.61–1.41)

0.730

0.730

ABCA1

rs111919605

107636559

0.57

A/G

1.19 (0.75–1.89)

0.465

ARHGAP21

10

rs71493396

25018251

0.77

T/C

2.11 (0.93–4.76)

7.34×10-2

ARMS2-HTRA1

10

rs370974631

124213143

0.79

C/CAA

4.07 (2.51–6.60)

1.19×10-8

RDH5-CD63

12

rs3138142

rs3138141

56115585

56115778

1.00

1.00

T/C

A/C

1.19 (0.58–2.46)

1.19 (0.58–2.46)

0.638

0.638

ACAD10*

12

AMD susceptibility Loci

Chr

B3GALTL

Genome-wide survival analysis for MNV development in CSC

SNP

BP

r2

EA/NonEA

HR (95% CI)

P value

13

rs9564692

rs2137075

31821240

31821505

1.00

1.00

T/C

G/A

0.56 (0.36–0.86)

0.56 (0.36–0.86)

8.30×10-3

8.30×10-3

RAD51B

14

rs149571521

68796698

0.76

CAA/C

0.81 (0.55–1.20)

0.295

LIPC

15

rs1532085

58683366

0.86

G/A

1.22 (0.79–1.87)

0.366

16

rs9929488

56998572

0.65

C/G

1.58 (0.89–2.81)

0.119

CETP

CTRB2-CTRB1

16

TMEM97-VTN

17

rs7210719

rs730331

rs2277668

rs2277667

26686218

26689432

26691760

26691916

0.67

0.67

0.67

0.67

T/C

C/G

C/G

C/T

1.38 (0.83–2.30)

1.38 (0.83–2.30)

1.38 (0.83–2.30)

1.38 (0.83–2.30)

0.216

0.216

0.216

0.216

NPLOC4-TSPAN10

17

rs58976732

79569376

0.53

G/C

0.72 (0.44–1.19)

0.201

19

CNN2

C3

19

APOE

19

rs483082

rs438811

45416178

45416741

0.57

0.57

T/G

T/C

0.85 (0.47–1.51)

0.85 (0.47–1.51)

0.572

0.572

MMP9‡

20

C20orf85

20

rs6026016

rs1334108

rs1334109

rs6015187

rs6026020

rs6099916

rs6026022

56655159

56655297

56655360

56656419

56657049

56657729

56658128

0.66

0.66

0.66

0.66

0.66

0.66

0.66

T/A

C/T

G/T

T/G

C/T

T/C

A/G

0.00 (0.00–∞)

0.00 (0.00–∞)

0.00 (0.00–∞)

0.00 (0.00–∞)

0.00 (0.00–∞)

0.00 (0.00–∞)

0.00 (0.00–∞)

0.999

0.999

0.999

0.999

0.999

0.999

0.999

SYN3-TIMP3

22

rs5754227

33105817

1.00

C/T

0.76 (0.50–1.16)

0.211

SLC16A8

22

rs8135665

rs561679070

38476276

38479774

1.00

1.00

T/C

C/CACCAGGAGCCGGGGGCTGGGGATAG

1.47 (0.79–2.73)

1.47 (0.79–2.73)

0.227

0.227

AMD = age-related macular degeneration; BP = base pair; Chr = chromosome; CI = confidence interval; CSC = central serous chorioretinopathy; EA = effect allele; HR = hazard ratio;

MNV = macular neovascularization; NonEA = non-effect allele; r2 = correlation between the lead SNPs from this study and from European AMD study; SNP = single nucleotide

polymorphism.

: Proxy SNPs were undefinable because the lead SNPs of these loci in the genome-wide association study (GWAS) for European AMD were monoallelic in the Japanese population in the

1000 Genome reference panel; †: Proxy SNPs were not available in our results; ‡: Proxy SNPs were undefinable because the lead SNP of this locus in GWAS for European AMD was not

available in the 1000 Genome reference panel.

Table S4. Mapped genes used for the functional enrichment analysis

Gene

Chr

Start

End

CAPZB

19665267

19812066

RN7SL277P

19750878

19751163

HDAC4

239969864

240323348

COL8A1

99357319

99518070

PGAM5P1

109220311

109221124

SLC25A48

135170338

135224326

LAMB4

107663993

107770801

MICU1

10

74127098

74385899

MCU

10

74451889

74647452

MIR4676

10

74480787

74480858

ARMS2

10

124214169

124216868

HTRA1

10

124221041

124274424

NUCB2

11

17229700

17371521

NCR3LG1

11

17373273

17398888

KCNJ11

11

17407406

17410878

ABCC8

11

17414432

17498449

SYNDIG1

20

24449835

24647252

Chr = chromosome.

Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curves by genotypes of rs370974631 near ARMS2. The red, green, and blue lines

represent non-risk allele homozygotes (CAACAA), heterozygotes (CCAA), and risk allele homozygotes (CC),

respectively. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves of the discovery dataset (Kyoto CSC Cohort). In contrast to patients

with the CAACAA genotype (n = 160), 11.7% of whom developed macular neovascularization (MNV) in 10

years, 20.1% of those with the CCAA genotype (n = 184) and 61.2% of those with the CC genotype (n = 58)

developed MNV in the same duration. (B) Kaplan-Meier curves of the replication dataset (Kobe CSC dataset).

In contrast to patients with the CAACAA genotype (n = 51), 0.0% of whom developed MNV in 10 years,

38.1% of those with the CCAA genotype (n = 73) and 20.0% of those with the CC genotype (n = 13) developed

MNV in the same duration.

*: Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Figure S2. Kaplan-Meier curves, by genotype, of rs370974631 near ARMS2 in dominant model in the

replication stage. The red and blue lines represent non-risk allele homozygotes (CAACAA) and

heterozygotes or risk allele homozygotes (CCAA/CC), respectively. In contrast to patients with the CAACAA

genotype (n = 51), 0.0% of whom developed MNV in 10 years, 33.1% of those with the CCAA/CC genotype

(n = 86) developed MNV in the same duration.

*: Wilcoxon test.

Figure S3. Summary of mapped genes by FUMA

Settings for gene mapping is described in Table S1. A total of 243 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (206 candidate SNPs, including 15 independent

significant SNPs, of the genome-wide survival analysis and 37 SNPs in the reference panel in strong linkage disequilibrium with any of independent significant

SNPs) were mapped into 23 genes in 13 genomic risk loci.

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る