リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Retinal surface wrinkling as an indicator for internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for retinal detachment (本文)」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Retinal surface wrinkling as an indicator for internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for retinal detachment (本文)

秋山, 邦彦 慶應義塾大学

2021.12.13

概要

Purpose: To assess the validity of retinal surface wrinkling (RSW) as an indicator to select patients relevant for internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, to prevent postoperative visual decline due to epiretinal membrane growth.

Methods: This was a prospective, interventional case series of 78 consecutive eyes that underwent initial vitrectomy to repair rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and were followed for 6 months. The presence/absence of RSW was evaluated presurgically on en face optical coherence tomographic images. The internal limiting membrane was peeled if RSW was identified. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of postsurgical epiretinal membrane growth that caused a visual decline of 0.2 or more in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution unit.

Results: The internal limiting membrane was peeled for RSW appearance in 22 eyes (28.2%). Mild epiretinal membranes developed in 8 of the 56 internal limiting membrane– unpeeled eyes (10.3% of total, 6 eyes at stage 1 in the classification of Govetto); however, visual decline occurred in none of them with the mean visual acuity of these 8 eyes maintained at 20.08 ± 0.11 in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (≈20/16).

Conclusion: Visual decline due to epiretinal membrane growth after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair was entirely prevented by peeling the internal limiting membrane in about 30% of cases selected for the presence of RSW.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

1. Aras C, Arici C, Akar S, et al. Peeling of internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy for complicated retinal detach- ment prevents epimacular membrane formation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:619–623.

2. Rao RC, Blinder KJ, Smith BT, Shah GK. Internal limiting membrane peeling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detach- ment repair. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1102–1103.e1–2.

3. Nam KY, Kim JY. Effect of internal limiting membrane peel- ing on the development of epiretinal membrane after pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 2015;35:880–885.

4. Akiyama K, Fujinami K, Watanabe K, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling to prevent post-vitrectomy epiretinal mem- brane development in retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;171:1–10.

5. Forlini M, Date P, Ferrari LM, et al. Comparative analysis of retinal reattachment surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling to prevent postoperative macular pucker. Retina 2018;38:1770–1776.

6. Eissa M, Abdelhakim M, Macky TA, et al. Functional and structural outcomes of ilm peeling in uncomplicated macula- off rrd using microperimetry & en-face oct. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256:249–257.

7. Fallico M, Russo A, Longo A, et al. Internal limiting mem- brane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018;13:e0201010.

8. Garweg JG, Deiss M, Pfister IB, Gerhardt C. Impact of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual recovery after vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involving the fovea. Retina 2019;39:853–859.

9. Kumar V, Dubey D, Kumawat D, et al. Role of internal lim- iting membrane peeling in the prevention of epiretinal mem- brane formation following vitrectomy for retinal detachment: a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2020;104:1271–1276.

10. Ishida Y, Iwama Y, Nakashima H, et al. Risk factors, onset, and progression of epiretinal membrane after 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Oph- thalmol Retina 2020;4:284–288.

11. Weng CY, Gregori NZ, Moysidis SN, et al. Visual and ana- tomical outcomes of macular epiretinal membrane peeling after previous rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 2015;35:125–135.

12. Akiyama K, Fujinami K, Watanabe K, et al. Validity and effi- cacy of internal limiting membrane peeling during initial vit- rectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: visual outcomes in macula-sparing cases. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2018. 10.1097/ICB.0000000000000758.

13. Spaide RF. “Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance” after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dim- pling. Retina 2012;32:1719–1726.

14. Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 2001;108: 2279–2283.

15. Mitamura Y, Ohtsuka K. Relationship of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance to internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1766–1770.

16. Lee JW, Kim IT. Outcomes of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane removal with and without internal limiting mem- brane peeling: a comparative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010;54: 129–134.

17. Tadayoni R, Svorenova I, Erginay A, et al. Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1513–1516.

18. Ripandelli G, Scarinci F, Piaggi P, et al. Macular pucker: to peel or not to peel the internal limiting membrane? A micro- perimetric response. Retina 2015;35:498–507.

19. Deltour JB, Grimbert P, Masse H, et al. Detrimental effects of active internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery: microperimetric analysis. Retina 2017;37: 544–552.

20. Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, et al. Focal macular ergs in eyes after removal of macular ilm during macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:229–234.

21. Hisatomi T, Tachibana T, Notomi S, et al. Incomplete repair of retinal structure after vitrectomy with internal limiting mem- brane peeling. Retina 2017;37:1523–1528.

22. Roth AM, Foos RY. Surface wrinkling retinopathy in eyes enucleated at autopsy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryng- ol 1971;75:1047–1058.

23. Machemer R, Aaberg TM, Freeman HM, et al. An updated classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreore- tinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112:159–165.

24. Di Lauro S, Kadhim MR, Charteris DG, Pastor JC. Classifica- tions for proliferative vitreoretinopathy (pvr): an analysis of their use in publications over the last 15 years. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:7807596.

25. Govetto A, Lalane RA III, Sarraf D, et al. Insights into epi- retinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;175:99–113.

26. Kunikata H, Nishida K. Visual outcome and complications of 25-gauge vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; 84 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond) 2010;24:1071–1077.

27. Katira RC, Zamani M, Berinstein DM, Garfinkel RA. Inci- dence and characteristics of macular pucker formation after primary retinal detachment repair by pars plana vitrectomy alone. Retina 2008;28:744–748.

28. Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Distefano L, et al. Epiretinal membrane after pars plana vitrectomy for primary pseudo- phakic or aphakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: inci- dence and outcomes. Retina 2012;32:1350–1355.

29. Cho EH, Ku HC, Il W, Lee EK. Residual vitreous cortex at the fovea during vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 2018;38:1549–1555.

30. Foveau P, Leroy B, Berrod JP, Conart JB. Internal limiting membrane peeling in macula-off retinal detachment compli- cated by grade b proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthal- mol 2018;191:1–6.

参考文献をもっと見る