リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Potential Benefits of Bevacizumab Combined With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Potential Benefits of Bevacizumab Combined With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation

Tanaka, Ichidai Morise, Masahiro Miyazawa, Ayako Kodama, Yuta Tamiya, Yutaro Gen, Soei Matsui, Akira Hase, Tetsunari Hashimoto, Naozumi Sato, Mitsuo Hasegawa, Yoshinori 名古屋大学

2020.05

概要

Background: Oncogenic EGFR signaling has been shown to upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression involved in tumor angiogenesis. However, the clinical benefits of bevacizumab plus cytotoxic chemotherapy for EGFR mutation–positive patients remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate VEGFA messenger RNA expression in patients with EGFR mutation, and to further compare the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy between EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients. Patients and Methods: Gene expression of various proangiogenic factors was analyzed in nonsquamous, non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Additionally, clinical data of patients receiving carboplatin and pemetrexed (CPem; n = 104) or bevacizumab plus CPem (BevCPem; n = 55) at Nagoya University hospital were retrospectively assessed for progression-free survival and best overall response rate (ORR). Results: Among various proangiogenic factors, only VEGFA expression was significantly higher in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR mutation compared to wild-type patients (P = .0476). Progression-free survival in the BevCPem group was significantly longer in patients with EGFR mutation than in wild-type patients (10.5 vs. 6.6 months; Wilcoxon P = .0278), while the difference in the CPem group was not significant (6.6 vs. 4.5 months; Wilcoxon P = .1822). The ORRs in the BevCPem group were 54.5% and 36.4% for EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients, respectively, and the ORRs in the CPem group were 35.5% and 28.8 % in EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients, respectively. Conclusion: VEGFA messenger RNA expression was significantly increased in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation, and BevCPem provided better clinical benefits to patients with EGFR mutation than wild-type carriers.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1.

Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence

and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2018.

2.

Chen Z, Fillmore CM, Hammerman PS, Kim CF, Wong KK. Non-small-cell lung

cancers: a heterogeneous set of diseases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:535-546.

3.

Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth

factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129-2139.

4.

Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, et al. Clinical and biological features associated

with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer

Inst. 2005;97:339-346.

5.

Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor

mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:169-181.

6.

Gazdar AF. Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung

cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene.

2009;28 Suppl 1:S24-31.

7.

Pao W, Chmielecki J. Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:760-774.

8.

Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab

for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2542-2550.

9.

Inoue M, Hager JH, Ferrara N, Gerber HP, Hanahan D. VEGF-A has a critical,

nonredundant role in angiogenic switching and pancreatic beta cell carcinogenesis.

Cancer Cell. 2002;1:193-202.

10.

De Palma M, Biziato D, Petrova TV. Microenvironmental regulation of tumour

angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:457-474.

11.

Altorki NK, Markowitz GJ, Gao D, et al. The lung microenvironment: an important

regulator of tumour growth and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:9-31.

12.

Barlesi F, Scherpereel A, Gorbunova V, et al. Maintenance bevacizumab-pemetrexed

after first-line cisplatin-pemetrexed-bevacizumab for advanced nonsquamous

nonsmall-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of the AVAPERL (MO22089)

randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1044-1052.

13.

Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, et al. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine

with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-smallcell lung cancer: AVAil. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1227-1234.

14.

Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, et al. Overall survival with cisplatin-gemcitabine

and bevacizumab or placebo as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell

lung cancer: results from a randomised phase III trial (AVAiL). Ann Oncol.

2010;21:1804-1809.

15.

Gautschi O, Mach N, Rothschild SI, et al. Bevacizumab, Pemetrexed, and Cisplatin,

or Bevacizumab and Erlotinib for Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung

Cancer Stratified by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation: Phase II Trial

SAKK19/09. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015;16:358-365.

16.

West

HL,

Moon

J,

Wozniak

AJ,

et

al.

Paired

Phase

II

Studies

of

Erlotinib/Bevacizumab for Advanced Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma or Never

Smokers With Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S0635 and S0636

Trials. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19:84-92.

17.

Zhao B, Zhang W, Yu D, Xu J, Wei Y. Erlotinib in combination with bevacizumab has

potential benefit in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials. Lung Cancer. 2018;122:10-21.

18.

Casanova ML, Larcher F, Casanova B, et al. A critical role for ras-mediated,

epidermal

growth

factor

receptor-dependent

angiogenesis

in

mouse

skin

carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3402-3407.

19.

Lichtenberger BM, Tan PK, Niederleithner H, Ferrara N, Petzelbauer P, Sibilia M.

Autocrine VEGF signaling synergizes with EGFR in tumor cells to promote epithelial

cancer development. Cell. 2010;140:268-279.

20.

Tanaka I, Morise M, Kodama Y, et al. Potential for afatinib as an optimal treatment

for advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma in patients with uncommon EGFR

mutations. Lung Cancer. 2019;127:169-171.

21.

Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung

adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;511:543-550.

22.

Tanaka I, Sato M, Kato T, et al. eIF2beta, a subunit of translation-initiation factor

EIF2, is a potential therapeutic target for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci.

2018;109:1843-1852.

23.

Hegde PS, Jubb AM, Chen D, et al. Predictive impact of circulating vascular

endothelial growth factor in four phase III trials evaluating bevacizumab. Clin

Cancer Res. 2013;19:929-937.

24.

Donnem T, Andersen S, Al-Saad S, Al-Shibli K, Busund LT, Bremnes RM. Prognostic

impact of angiogenic markers in non-small-cell lung cancer is related to tumor size.

Clin Lung Cancer. 2011;12:106-115.

25.

Tian L, Goldstein A, Wang H, et al. Mutual regulation of tumour vessel normalization

and immunostimulatory reprogramming. Nature. 2017;544:250-254.

26.

Wei LH, Kuo ML, Chen CA, et al. Interleukin-6 promotes cervical tumor growth by

VEGF-dependent angiogenesis via a STAT3 pathway. Oncogene. 2003;22:1517-1527.

27.

Ancrile B, Lim KH, Counter CM. Oncogenic Ras-induced secretion of IL6 is required

for tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1714-1719.

28.

Ji H, Houghton AM, Mariani TJ, et al. K-ras activation generates an inflammatory

response in lung tumors. Oncogene. 2006;25:2105-2112.

29.

Caetano MS, Zhang H, Cumpian AM, et al. IL6 Blockade Reprograms the Lung

Tumor Microenvironment to Limit the Development and Progression of K-rasMutant Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3189-3199.

30.

Kumari N, Dwarakanath BS, Das A, Bhatt AN. Role of interleukin-6 in cancer

progression and therapeutic resistance. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:11553-11572.

31.

Laslett NF, Park S, Masters GA, et al. Phase II study of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and

bevacizumab in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Med.

2018.

32.

Park JH, Lee SH, Keam B, et al. EGFR mutations as a predictive marker of cytotoxic

chemotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:433-437.

33.

Wu SG, Yang CH, Yu CJ, et al. Good response to pemetrexed in patients of lung

adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Lung

Cancer. 2011;72:333-339.

34.

Miura Y, Sunaga N. Role of Immunotherapy for Oncogene-Driven Non-Small Cell

Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10.

35.

Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of

Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2288-2301.

36.

Reck M, Mok TSK, Nishio M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and

chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower150): key subgroup analyses of

patients with EGFR mutations or baseline liver metastases in a randomised, openlabel phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:387-401.

37.

Zappasodi R, Merghoub T, Wolchok JD. Emerging Concepts for Immune Checkpoint

Blockade-Based Combination Therapies. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:690.

Figure legends

Fig. 1. (A) mRNA expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) in nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor

receptor (EGFR) mutation with stage I (N=29), with stage II (N=17), with stage III (N=12), and

with stage IV (N=4) (B) mRNA expression levels of VEGFA in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR

wild-type with stage I (N=228), with stage II (N=96), with stage III (N=70), and with stage IV

(N=19). (C) mRNA expression levels of VEGFA and IL-6 in advanced non-squamous NSCLC

patients harboring EGFR mutation (N=16) and wild-type (N=89). p-values were calculated by

Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman correlation was used to assess the correlation between two

variables.

Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival (PFS) in the total number of patients (A),

in the patients treated with bevacizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy

(BevCPem) (B), and in the patients treated with carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy

(CPem) (C).

Supplementary Fig. 1. mRNA expression levels of ANGPT2, CXCL12, FGF2, IL-1B, IL-8,

PDGFB, PIGF, VEGFB, VEGFC, VEGFD, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 in advanced non-squamous

NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation (N=16) and wild-type (N=89). P-values were calculated

by Mann-Whitney U test. ANGPT2: angiopoietin 2, CXCL12: C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12,

FGF2: fibroblast growth factor 2, IL-1B: interleukin 1 beta, IL-8: interleukin 8, PDGFB: platelet

derived growth factor subunit B, PIGF: phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class F,

VEGFB: vascular endothelial growth factor B, VEGFC: vascular endothelial growth factor C,

VEGFD: vascular endothelial growth factor D, VEGFR1: vascular endothelial growth factor

receptor 1, and VEGFR2: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2

Supplementary Fig. 2.

Flowchart of patient selection in this cohort.

Supplementary Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival in the patients with stage IV, treated with bevacizumab plus

carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy (BevCPem), and carboplatin and pemetrexed

chemotherapy (CPem).

Supplementary Fig. 4.

(A) mRNA expression levels of IL-6 in NSCLC patients, characterized as non-smokers (N=75),

with current smokers (N=118), and with former smokers (N=301). (B) mRNA expression levels

of IL-6 in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR wild-type with non-smokers (N=41), with current

smokers (N=103), and with former smokers (N=260). p-values were calculated by Mann-Whitney

U test.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 159 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations or EGFR wild type

BevCPem

CPem

EGFR wild

n (%)

33 (60.0)

P‡

55

EGFR mutation

n (%)

22 (40.0)

EGFR wild

n (%)

73 (70.2)

P‡

104

EGFR mutation

n (%)

31 (29.8)

62.0

62.2 (47-74)

61.9 (41-80)

0.9095

65.3

67.8 (40-76)

64.2 (27-79)

0.0768

31

24

9 (29.0)

13 (54.2)

22 (71.0)

11 (45.8)

0.0954

71

33

12 (16.9)

19 (57.6)

59 (83.1)

14 (42.4)

<0.0001

12

25

18

4 (33.3)

9 (36.0)

9 (50.0)

8 (66.7)

16 (64.0)

9 (50.0)

0.5658

28

37

36

3 (10.7)

5 (13.5)

22 (61.1)

25 (89.3)

32 (86.5)

14 (38.9)

<0.0001

40

15

17 (42.5)

5 (33.3)

23 (57.5)

10 (66.7)

0.7582

57

47

21 (36.8)

10 (21.3)

36 (63.2)

37 (78.7)

0.0910

IIIA

IIIB

IV

Recurrence

34

18

1 (50.0)

0 (0.0)

16 (47.1)

5 (27.8)

1 (50.0)

1 (100.0)

18 (52.9)

13 (72.2)

0.4617

11

62

25

1 (16.7)

4 (36.4)

17 (27.4)

9 (36.0)

5 (83.3)

7 (63.6)

45 (72.6)

16 (64.0)

0.7177

53

22 (41.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

31 (58.5)

0 (0.0)

2 (10.0)

Not Available

91

10

31 (34.1)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

60 (65.9)

3 (100.0)

10 (100.0)

0.0427

Characteristic

Total

Total

Median Age (Range)

Total

Gender

Male

Female

Smoking status*

Current

Former

Never

PS

Stage

Subtype

Adenocarcinoma

Large cell carcinoma

NSCLC

‡P values were calculated by T-Test, Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square test.

*Information was not available for 3 cases

Table 2. Response to BevCPem or CPem in advanced NSCLC patients

BevCPem

EGFR mutation

N=22

CPem

EGFR wild

EGFR mutation

EGFR wild

N=33

N=31

N=73

Best response

CR

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.4

PR

12

54.5

12

36.4

11

35.5

22

27.4

SD

40.9

15

45.4

16

51.6

27

38.3

PD

4.5

18.2

12.9

23

32.9

ORRs

12

54.5

12

36.4

11

35.5

23

28.8

DCRs

21

95.5

27

81.8

27

87.1

50

67.1

CR; complete response, PR; partial response, SD; stable disease, PD; progression disease,

ORR; overall response rate, DCR; disease control rate

Figure 1

1A

Patients with EGFR mutation

VEGFA mRNA expression

p = 0.0009

r = 0.3901

p = 0.2217

p = 0.0012

II

III

IV

Stage

1B

Patients with EGFR wild-type

VEGFA mRNA expression

p = 0.9063

r = 0.02439

p = 0.2522

p = 0.6216

II

III

Stage

IV

IL-6 mRNA expression

VEGFA mRNA expression

Figure 1

1C

p = 0.0476

p = 0.0065

Figure 2

2A

N=55

N=104

p = 0.0028 (Wilcoxon)

p = 0.0485 (Log-rank)

2B

BevCPem

N=22

N=33

p = 0.0278 (Wilcoxon)

p = 0.0730 (Log-rank)

2C

CPem

N=31

N=73

p = 0.1822 (Wilcoxon)

p = 0.5081 (Log-rank)

IL-8 mRNA expression

PDGFB mRNA expression

PIGF mRNA expression

VEGFB mRNA expression

VEGFC mRNA expression

VEGFD mRNA expression

VEGFR2 mRNA expression

VEGFR1 mRNA expression

IL-1B mRNA expression

FGF2 mRNA expression

CXCL12 mRNA expression

ANGPT2 mRNA expression

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 2

Medical records of NSCLC patients

between January 2004 and June 2018 (N=1678)

Patients enrolled for this study were selected

based on the following Eligibility criteria (N=174)

(1) Diagnosed as having stage III/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC as confirmed by histological or

cytological examination

(2) Performance status 0–1

(3) Receiving BevCPem or CPem

Excluded: N=15

non-target region: N=6

no available data: N=9

BevCPem

N=55

EGFR mutation

N=22

EGFR wild

N=33

CPem

N=104

EGFR mutation

N=31

EGFR wild

N=73

Supplementary Figure 3

N=16

N=18

p = 0.7724 (Wilcoxon)

p = 0.8117 (Log-rank)

N=18

N=49

p = 0.2499 (Wilcoxon)

p = 0.2383 (Log-rank)

Supplementary Figure 4

IL-6 mRNA expression

4A

All cases

4B

EGFR wild

p = 0.0379

p = 0.1732

p = 0.0439

p = 0.2383

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る