Multi-scalar theories of gravity with direct matter couplings and their parametrized post-Newtonian parameters

[1] C. Brans and R.H. Dicke, Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev.

124 (1961) 925 [INSPIRE].

[2] E. Witten, Dimensional Reduction of Superstring Models, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 151

[INSPIRE].

[3] H.P. Nilles, The Role of Classical Symmetries in the Low-energy Limit of Superstring Theories,

Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 240 [INSPIRE].

[4] C.P. Burgess, A. Font and F. Quevedo, Low-Energy Effective Action for the Superstring, Nucl.

Phys. B 272 (1986) 661 [INSPIRE].

[5] J.R. Ellis, A.B. Lahanas, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, No-Scale Supersymmetric Standard

Model, Phys. Lett. B 134 (1984) 429 [INSPIRE].

[6] C.P. Burgess et al., UV Shadows in EFTs: Accidental Symmetries, Robustness and No-Scale

Supergravity, Fortsch. Phys. 68 (2020) 2000076 [arXiv:2006.06694] [INSPIRE].

[7] S. Gottlober, H.J. Schmidt and A.A. Starobinsky, Sixth Order Gravity and Conformal

Transformations, Class. Quant. Grav. 7 (1990) 893 [INSPIRE].

[8] B. Ratra and P.J.E. Peebles, Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field,

Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3406 [INSPIRE].

[9] R.R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with

general equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 1582 [astro-ph/9708069] [INSPIRE].

[10] E.J. Copeland, A.R. Liddle and D. Wands, Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling

solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4686 [gr-qc/9711068] [INSPIRE].

[11] S. Tsujikawa, Quintessence: A Review, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214003

[arXiv:1304.1961] [INSPIRE].

[12] M. Cicoli et al., De Sitter vs Quintessence in String Theory, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800079

[arXiv:1808.08967] [INSPIRE].

[13] P. Jordan, Formation of the Stars and Development of the Universe, Nature 164 (1949) 637

[INSPIRE].

[14] C.M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel. 17

(2014) 4 [arXiv:1403.7377] [INSPIRE].

– 29 –

JCAP08(2023)054

Γi00

= γ (δij U,k + δik U,j − δjk U,i ) ,



∂ h

2γ +

Vi + Wi ,

= −U,i + i (β + γ)U − Φ −

∂x

∂t

(A.18)

[15] J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space,

Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 171104 [astro-ph/0309300] [INSPIRE].

[16] T. Damour and A.M. Polyakov, The string dilaton and a least coupling principle, Nucl. Phys. B

423 (1994) 532 [hep-th/9401069] [INSPIRE].

[17] K.A. Olive and M. Pospelov, Environmental dependence of masses and coupling constants, Phys.

Rev. D 77 (2008) 043524 [arXiv:0709.3825] [INSPIRE].

[18] A.I. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass, Phys. Lett. B 39 (1972) 393

[INSPIRE].

[20] C.P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, Axion homeopathy: screening dilaton interactions, JCAP 04

(2022) 007 [arXiv:2110.10352] [INSPIRE].

[21] P. Brax, C.P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, Light Axiodilatons: Matter Couplings, Weak-Scale

Completions and Long-Distance Tests of Gravity, arXiv:2212.14870 [INSPIRE].

[22] A.S. Eddington, The mathematical theory of relativity, Cambridge University Press (1923).

[23] H.P. Robertson, Relativity and Cosmology, in Space Age Astronomy, A.J. Deutsch and W.B.

Klemperer eds., LLC (1962), p. 228.

[24] L.I. Schiff, Comparison of theory and observation in general relativity, SITP-181 (1965)

[INSPIRE].

[25] C.M. Will, Theoretical Frameworks for Testing Relativistic Gravity. 2. Parametrized

Post-Newtonian Hydrodynamics, and the Nordtvedt Effect, Astrophys. J. 163 (1971) 611

[INSPIRE].

[26] C.M. Will and K. Nordtvedt Jr., Conservation Laws and Preferred Frames in Relativistic

Gravity. I. Preferred-Frame Theories and an Extended PPN Formalism, Astrophys. J. 177 (1972)

757 [INSPIRE].

[27] C.M. Will, Relativistic Gravity tn the Solar System. 111. Experimental Disproof of a Class of

Linear Theories of Gravitation, Astrophys. J. 185 (1973) 31 [INSPIRE].

[28] T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Tensor multiscalar theories of gravitation, Class. Quant.

Grav. 9 (1992) 2093 [INSPIRE].

[29] P.G. Bergmann, Comments on the scalar tensor theory, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1 (1968) 25

[INSPIRE].

[30] R.V. Wagoner, Scalar tensor theory and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970) 3209

[INSPIRE].

[31] K. Nordtvedt Jr., PostNewtonian metric for a general class of scalar tensor gravitational theories

and observational consequences, Astrophys. J. 161 (1970) 1059 [INSPIRE].

[32] C.M. Will, Theory and experiment in gravitational physics, Cambridge University Press (1993)

[INSPIRE].

[33] K. Lin, S. Mukohyama, A. Wang and T. Zhu, Post-Newtonian approximations in the

Hořava-Lifshitz gravity with extra U(1) symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 084022

[arXiv:1310.6666] [INSPIRE].

[34] D.M. Eardley, Observable effects of a scalar gravitational field in a binary pulsar, The

Astrophysical Journal 196 (1975) L59.

[35] K. Nordtvedt, Equivalence Principle for Massive Bodies. 2. Theory, Phys. Rev. 169 (1968) 1017

[INSPIRE].

– 30 –

JCAP08(2023)054

[19] P. Brax, Screening mechanisms in modified gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214005

[INSPIRE].

[36] P. Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1415 [Erratum

ibid. 52 (1984) 695] [INSPIRE].

[37] P. Sikivie, Axion Cosmology, Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (2008) 19 [astro-ph/0610440] [INSPIRE].

[38] P. Sikivie, Invisible Axion Search Methods, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021) 015004

[arXiv:2003.02206] [INSPIRE].

[39] S.B. Lambert and C. Le Poncin-Lafitte, Determination of the relativistic parameter gamma using

very long baseline interferometry, Astron. Astrophys. 499 (2009) 331 [arXiv:0903.1615]

[INSPIRE].

JCAP08(2023)054

– 31 –

...