1) Deck, S.: Numerical Simulation of Transonic Buffet over a Supercritical Airfoil, AIAA J., Vol. 43, No. 7, 2005, pp.1556– 1566.
2) Sartor, F., and Timme, S.: Delayed Detached–Eddy Simulation of Shock Buffet on Half Wing–Body Configuration, AIAA J., Vol. 55, No. 4, 2017, pp.1230-1240.
3) Waldmann, A., Gansel, P.P., Lutz, T., and Krämer, E., “Unsteady Wake Flow Analysis of an Aircraft under low-speed Stall Conditions using DES and PIV”, AIAA 2015-1096, 2015.
4) Dandois, J., Mary I., and Brion, V.: Large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 850, 2018, pp.156-178.
5) Kouchi, T., Yamaguchi, S., Koike, S., Nakajima, T., Sato, M., Kanda, H. & Yanase, S., Wavelet analysis of transonic buffet on a two-dimensional airfoil with vortex generators, Exp. Fluids, Vol. 57, 2016, Article Number 166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2261-2
6) Spalart, P. R., Deck, S., Shur, M. L., Squires, K. D., Strelets, M. Kh., and Travin, A.: A New Version of Detached-Eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities, Theor. and Comput. Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 20, 2006, pp. 181-195.
7) Mohamed, K., Nadarajah, S., and Paraschivoiu, M.: Detached-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex at Dynamic Stall Conditions, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1302–1313.
8) Spalart, P., and Allmaras, S., “A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows,” AIAA 1992-439, 1992.
9) Rumsey, C. L.: Apparent Transition Behavior of Widely-used Turbulence Models, Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 28, 2007, pp. 1460–1471.
10) Dacles-Mariani, J., Kwak, D., and Zilliac, G.: On Numerical Errors and Turbulence Modeling in Tip Vortex Flow Prediction, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, Vol. 30, 1999, pp. 65-82.
11) Dacles-Mariani, J., Zilliac, G.G., Chow, J. and Bradshaw, P.: Numerical/Experimental Study of a Wingtip Vortex in the Near Field, AIAA J., Vol. 33, No. 9, 1995, pp. 1561–1568.
12) Lei, Z.: Effect of RANS Turbulence Models on Computation of Vortical Flow over Wing-Body Configuration, Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci., Vol. 48, No. 161, 2005, pp. 152-160.
13) NASA Langley Research Center, “Turbulence Modeling Resource” https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html (Accessed on May-03-2019)
14) Kwak, D., Ohira, K. and Rudnik, R.: Reynolds Number Effect on Vortex Dominant Flow of the SST Configurations, APISAT2014, Session 1-7-3, 2014.
15) Spalart P.R., Jou W.-H., Strelets M., and Allmaras S.R.: Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. In Advances in DNS/LES, ed. C Liu, Z Liu, 1997, pp. 137–47. Columbus, OH: Greyden Press
16) Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin A.: A hybrid RANS-LES model with delayed DES and wall-modeled LES capabilities, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, Vol. 29, 2008, pp. 1638–1649. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001
17) Tucker, P.G.: Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics in Aeronautics (Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. ISBN-13: 978-9402405743
18) Spalart, P.R., Detached-Eddy Simulation, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 41, pp.181-202, 2009. 10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165130
19) Vatsa, V.N., Lockard, D.P., and Spalart, P.R.: Grid Sensitivity of SA-Based Delayed-Detached-Eddy-Simulation Model for Blunt-Body Flows, AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 8, 2017, pp.2842-2847. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055685
20) Molina, E., Zhou, B.Y., Alonso, J.J., Righi M., and Silva, R.G.: Flow and Noise Predictions Around Tandem Cylinders using DDES approach with SU2, AIAA 2019-0326, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 7-11 January 2019, San Diego, California.
21) Kitamura, K. and Hashimoto, A.: Reduced dissipation AUSM-family fluxes: HR-SLAU2 and HR-AUSM+-up for high resolution unsteady flow simulations, Computers and Fluids, Vol. 126, 2016, pp. 41–57.
22) Kitamura, K. and Shima, E.: Towards shock-stable and accurate hypersonic heating computations: A new pressure flux for AUSM-family schemes, J. Comput. Phys., Vol.245, 2013, pp.62-83.
23) Thornber, B.J.R. and Drikakis, D.: Numerical dissipation of upwind schemes in low Mach flow, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 56, No. 8, 2008, pp.1535-1541.
24) Roe, P.L.: Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., Vol. 18, 1986, pp. 337–365.
25) Winkler, C.M., Dorgany, A.J. and Mani, M.: A reduced dissipation approach for unsteady flows on unstructured grids. AIAA 2012-0570, 2012.
26) Hashimoto, A., Murakami, K., Aoyama, T., Yamamoto, K., Murayama, M. and Lahur, P. R.: Drag Prediction on NASA Common Research Model Using Automatic Hexahedra Grid-Generation Method, J. Aircraft, Vol.51, 2014, pp. 1172-1182.
27) Ito, Y., and Nakahashi, K.: Direct Surface Triangulation Using Stereolithography Data, AIAA J., Vol. 40, 2002, pp. 490-496.
28) Hashimoto, A., Murakami, K., Aoyama, T., Hishida, M., Sakashita, M., and Lahur, P.: Development of Fast UnstructuredGrid Flow Solver FaSTAR, Journal of Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 63, 2015, pp. 96-105 (in Japanese).
29) Kitamura, K., Aogaki, T., Inatomi, A., Fukumoto, K., Takahama, T., and Hashimoto, A.: Post Limiters and Simple Dirty-Cell Detection for Three-Dimensional, Unstructured, (Unlimited) Aerodynamic Simulations, AIAA J., Vol. 56, No. 8, 2018, pp. 3192-3204. doi:10.2514/1.J056683
30) Kanamori, M., Takahashi, T., Makino, Y., Naka, Y., and Ishikawa, H.: Comparison of Simulated Sonic Boom in Stratified Atmosphere with Flight Test Measurements, AIAA J., Vol. 56, No. 7, 2018, pp. 2743-2755.
31) Sutherland, W., LII.: The viscosity of gases and molecular force, Philosophical Magazine Series, Vol.5, No.36, 223, 1893, pp.507-531, DOI: 10.1080/14786449308620508
32) Baldwin, B. S., and Barth, T. J.: A One-Equation Transport Model for High Reynolds Number Wall-Bounded Flows," NASA TM 102847, Aug. 1990.
33) Strelets, M.: Detached Eddy Simulation of Massively Separated Flows, AlAA 2001-0879, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Jan. 08-11, 2001, Reno, NV.
34) Panaras, A. and Drikakis, D.: High-speed unsteady flows around spiked-blunt bodies, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 632, 2009, pp.69-96.
35) Aogaki, T., Kitamura, K., and Nonaka, S.: High Angle-of-Attack Pitching Moment Characteristics of Slender-Bodied Reusable Rocket, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 55, No. 6, 2018, pp.1476-1489. doi:10.2514/1.A34211
36) Takagi, Y., Aogaki, T., Kitamura, K., and Nonaka, S.: Numerical Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Slender-bodied Reusable Rockets Using Fins and Vortex Flaps at Very High Angles of Attack, Trans. JSASS, Aerospace Tech. Japan, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 149-158, 2020.
37) Weiss, J.M. and Smith, W.A.: Preconditioning Applied to Variable and Constant Density Flows, AIAA J., Vol. 33, 1995, pp. 2050-2057.
38) Venkatakrishnan, V.: Convergence to Steady State Solutions of the Euler Equations on Unstructured Grids with Limiters, J. Comput. Phys., Vol.118, 1995, pp.120-130.
39) Burg, C. O. E.: Higher Order Variable Extrapolation for Unstructured Finite Volume RANS Flow Solvers, 17th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, AIAA 2005-4999, 2005.
40) Harada, T., Kawauchi, K., Kitamura, K., and Nonaka, S.: Side Force Characteristics of Supersonic Flight Vehicle Equipped with Asymmetric Protuberance, AIAA 2019-0299, AIAA SciTech Forum 2019, San Diego, CA, Jan. 2019.
41) Kawauchi, K., Harada, T., Kitamura, K., and Nonaka, S.: Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Slender Body Side Force with Asymmetric Protuberances, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 56, No. 5, 2019, pp. 1346–1357. doi:10.2514/1.A34439
42) Mavriplis, D. J., “Revisiting the Least-Squares Procedure for Gradient Reconstruction on Unstructured Meshes,” AIAA 2003-3986, 2003.
43) Roe, P.L.: Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., Vol. 18, 1986, pp.337–365.
44) Van Leer, B.: Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. V. A Second-Order Sequel to Godunov’s Method, J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 32, 1979, pp.101-136.
45) Shima, E. and Kitamura, K.: Parameter Free, Simple, Low-dissipation AUSM-family Scheme for All Speeds, AIAA J., Vol.49, 2011, pp.1693-1709.
46) Jameson, A. and Turkel, E.: Implicit Schemes and LU Decompositions, Math. of Comput., Vol. 37, 1981, pp.385-397.
47) Hishida, M., Hashimoto, A., Murakami, K., and Aoyama, T., “A New Slope Limiter for Fast Unstructured CFD Solver FaSTAR,” JAXA-SP-10-012, JAXA, Tokyo, 2011, pp. 85–90 (in Japanese).
論文の公開元へ
