1 Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol
2014;14:329–42.
2 Shen Z-H, Zhu C-X, Quan Y-S, et al. Relationship between intestinal microbiota
and ulcerative colitis: mechanisms and clinical application of probiotics and fecal
microbiota transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:5–14.
3 Atreya I, Atreya R, Neurath MF. NF-kappaB in inflammatory bowel disease. J Intern
Med 2008;263:591–6.
4 Cohn HM, Dave M, Loftus EV. Understanding the cautions and contraindications of
immunomodulator and biologic therapies for use in inflammatory bowel disease.
Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017;23:1301–15.
5 Karin M, Greten FR. NF-kappaB: linking inflammation and immunity to cancer
development and progression. Nat Rev Immunol 2005;5:749–59.
6 O’Connor PM, Lapointe TK, Beck PL, et al. Mechanisms by which inflammation may
increase intestinal cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis
2010;16:1411–20.
7 Ruland J. Return to homeostasis: downregulation of NF-κB responses. Nat Immunol
2011;12:709–14.
8 Derrien T, Johnson R, Bussotti G, et al. The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long
noncoding RNAs: analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome
Res 2012;22:1775–89.
9 Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome
annotation for the encode project. Genome Res 2012;22:1760–74.
10 Diederichs S. The four dimensions of noncoding RNA conservation. Trends Genet
2014;30:121–3.
11 Chen J, Shishkin AA, Zhu X, et al. Evolutionary analysis across mammals reveals
distinct classes of long non-coding RNAs. Genome Biol 2016;17:19.
12 Garber M, Yosef N, Goren A, et al. A high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation
approach reveals principles of dynamic gene regulation in mammals. Mol Cell
2012;47:810–22.
13 Barish GD, Yu RT, Karunasiri M, et al. Bcl-6 and NF-kappaB cistromes mediate
opposing regulation of the innate immune response. Genes Dev 2010;24:2760–5.
14 Schmidt SF, Larsen BD, Loft A, et al. Acute TNF-induced repression of cell identity
genes is mediated by NFκB-directed redistribution of cofactors from super-enhancers.
Genome Res 2015;25:1281–94.
15 Jin F, Li Y, Dixon JR, et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin
interactome in human cells. Nature 2013;503:290–4.
16 Rogler G, Brand K, Vogl D, et al. Nuclear factor kappaB is activated in
macrophages and epithelial cells of inflamed intestinal mucosa. Gastroenterology
1998;115:357–69.
17 Schreiber S, Nikolaus S, Hampe J. Activation of nuclear factor kappa B inflammatory
bowel disease. Gut 1998;42:477–84.
18 Zhang R, Ito S, Nishio N, et al. Dextran sulphate sodium increases splenic Gr1(+)
CD11b(+) cells which accelerate recovery from colitis following intravenous
transplantation. Clin Exp Immunol 2011;164:417–27.
Akıncılar SC, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
19 Trottier MD, Irwin R, Li Y, et al. Enhanced production of early lineages of
monocytic and granulocytic cells in mice with colitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2012;109:16594–9.
20 Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets
with distinct migratory properties. Immunity 2003;19:71–82.
21 Bain CC, Scott CL, Uronen-Hansson H, et al. Resident and pro-inflammatory
macrophages in the colon represent alternative context-dependent fates of the same
Ly6Chi monocyte precursors. Mucosal Immunol 2013;6:498–510.
22 Zigmond E, Varol C, Farache J, et al. Ly6C hi monocytes in the inflamed colon give rise
to proinflammatory effector cells and migratory antigen-presenting cells. Immunity
2012;37:1076–90.
23 Youssif C, Cubillos-Rojas M, Comalada M, et al. Myeloid p38α signaling promotes
intestinal IGF-1 production and inflammation-associated tumorigenesis. EMBO Mol
Med 2018;10.
24 Mayle A, Luo M, Jeong M, et al. Flow cytometry analysis of murine hematopoietic
stem cells. Cytometry A 2013;83:27–37.
25 Waddell A, Ahrens R, Tsai Y-T, et al. Intestinal CCL11 and eosinophilic inflammation is
regulated by myeloid cell-specific RelA/p65 in mice. J Immunol 2013;190:4773–85.
26 Otsuka M, Kang YJ, Ren J, et al. Distinct effects of p38alpha deletion in myeloid
lineage and gut epithelia in mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease.
Gastroenterology 2010;138:1255–65. 65 e1-9.
27 Bain CC, Mowat AM. Macrophages in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation.
Immunol Rev 2014;260:102–17.
28 Gschwandtner M, Derler R, Midwood KS. More than just attractive: how CCL2
influences myeloid cell behavior beyond chemotaxis. Front Immunol 2019;10:2759.
29 Chew J, Biswas S, Shreeram S, et al. WIP1 phosphatase is a negative regulator of NF-
kappaB signalling. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:659–66.
30 Kim C, Sano Y, Todorova K, et al. The kinase p38 alpha serves cell type-specific
inflammatory functions in skin injury and coordinates pro- and anti-inflammatory
gene expression. Nat Immunol 2008;9:1019–27.
31 Donehower LA. Phosphatases reverse p53-mediated cell cycle checkpoints. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:7172–3.
32 Feng S, Ollivier JF, Soyer OS. Enzyme sequestration as a tuning point in controlling
response dynamics of signalling networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2016;12:e1004918.
33 Taniguchi CM, Emanuelli B, Kahn CR. Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights
into insulin action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006;7:85–96.
34 Blüthgen N, Bruggeman FJ, Legewie S, et al. Effects of sequestration on signal
transduction cascades. Febs J 2006;273:895–906.
35 Schonthaler HB, Guinea-Viniegra J, Wagner EF. Targeting inflammation by modulating
the Jun/AP-1 pathway. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70(Suppl 1):i109–12.
36 Oeckinghaus A, Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Crosstalk in NF-κB signaling pathways. Nat
Immunol 2011;12:695–708.
37 Zhang Q, Zhang C, Chang F, et al. Wip 1 inhibits intestinal inflammation in
inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Immunol 2016;310:63–70.
38 Gorjifard S, Goldszmid RS. Microbiota-myeloid cell crosstalk beyond the gut. J Leukoc
Biol 2016;100:865–79.
39 Sartor RB. Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative
colitis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;3:390–407.
40 Verma A, Deb DK, Sassano A, et al. Activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein
kinase mediates the suppressive effects of type I interferons and transforming growth
factor-beta on normal hematopoiesis. J Biol Chem 2002;277:7726–35.
41 Geest CR, Buitenhuis M, Laarhoven AG, et al. p38 MAP kinase inhibits neutrophil
development through phosphorylation of C/EBPalpha on serine 21. Stem Cells
2009;27:2271–82.
42 Medzhitov R, Horng T. Transcriptional control of the inflammatory response. Nat Rev
Immunol 2009;9:692–703.
43 Bradbury CM, Markovina S, Wei SJ, et al. Indomethacin-induced radiosensitization and
inhibition of ionizing radiation-induced NF-kappaB activation in HeLa cells occur via a
mechanism involving p38 MAP kinase. Cancer Res 2001;61:7689–96.
44 Tergaonkar V, Bottero V, Ikawa M, et al. Ikappab kinase-independent IkappaBalpha
degradation pathway: functional NF-kappaB activity and implications for cancer
therapy. Mol Cell Biol 2003;23:8070–83.
45 Shin EM, Hay HS, Lee MH, et al. Dead-Box helicase DP103 defines metastatic
potential of human breast cancers. J Clin Invest 2014;124:3807–24.
46 Noda T, Sakurai N, Nozawa K, et al. Nine genes abundantly expressed in the
epididymis are not essential for male fecundity in mice. Andrology 2019;7:644–53.
47 Tokuhiro K, Ikawa M, Benham AM, et al. Protein disulfide isomerase homolog PDILT
is required for quality control of sperm membrane protein ADAM3 and male fertility
[corrected]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:3850–5.
48 Helke K, Angel P, Lu P, et al. Ceramide synthase 6 deficiency enhances inflammation in
the DSS model of colitis. Sci Rep 2018;8:1627.
49 Macartney KK, Baumgart DC, Carding SR, et al. Primary murine small intestinal
epithelial cells, maintained in long-term culture, are susceptible to rotavirus infection.
J Virol 2000;74:5597–603.
50 Ishii KJ, Koyama S, Nakagawa A, et al. Host innate immune receptors and beyond:
making sense of microbial infections. Cell Host Microbe 2008;3:352–63.
15
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980 on 25 November 2020. Downloaded from http://gut.bmj.com/ on February 2, 2021 at Osaka U Seimeikagaku c/o KWE/ACCESS. Protected
by copyright.
Gut immunity
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Supplemental material
Gut
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE LEGENDS -/-
-/-
Sup. Figure 1: Validation of NFκB KO MEF cells. A) Western blot analysis of p65 , Ikkβ
-/-
and Ikkγ immortalized MEFs with indicated antibodies. B) EMSA was performed using either
NFκB or AP1 consensus sequence radiolabelled probes as indicated using protein extracts from
-/-
-/-
WT, p65 , Ikkβ
-/-
and Ikkγ immortalized MEFs treated with TNFα for the indicated time
-/-
-/-
points. C) RNA-seq analysis of Gm16685 expression in WT, p65 and Ikkβ immortalized
MEFs exposed to TNFα for indicated duration. D) RT-qPCR analysis of Gm16685 expression
-/-
-/-
-/-
in WT, p65 , Ikkβ and Ikkγ immortalized MEFs exposed to TNFα for indicated duration. E)
RT-qPCR analysis of Gm16685 expression in immortalized WT MEFs exposed to LPS
-/-
(100ng/ml) for indicated time points. F) RT-qPCR analysis of IL7 expression in WT, p65 ,
-/-
-/-
IKKβ and IKKγ immortalized MEFs exposed to TNFα for indicated time points. Error bars
indicate mean ± SD of three independent experiments. P values were calculated using Student's
t-test method (**, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001).
Sup. Figure 2: Conservation and analysis of Gm16685 lncRNA. A) Multiple sequence
alignment using promoter sequence of the mouse Gm16685 and sequence of 31 other species
at the same region with reference to UCSC comparative genomic track. Clustal Omega was
used for the alignment. B) Promoter motifs enrichment analysis by using Homer-v4.1.0
package. Top 10 most enriched motifs are shown. C) Prediction of different RBPs that can bind
to
Gm16685
or
loc105375914
was
performed
using
RBPmap
server
(http://rbpmap.technion.ac.il/). Venn diagram representing numbers of overlapping predicted
RBPs that can bind both Gm16685 and loc105375914 is shown. D) ChIP-seq analysis of p65
(RelA) binding in mouse dendritic and macrophage cells exposed to LPS for 2 hours based on
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
published data (GSE36099 and GSE93736 or GSE93602). E) ChIP-seq analysis of RelA and
Pol2 signal in human adipocyte and IMR90 fibroblasts exposed to TNFα for 1hour based on
published data (GSE60462 and GSE43070). F) Bar plot shows the coding probability of seven
NAIL (Loc105375914 for human and Gm16685 for mouse) transcript sequences (six hNAIL
isoforms and one mNAIL) together with a known lncRNA sequence, TERC and actin gamma
1 (ACTG1) mRNA sequence as positive and negative control. Coding probability was
calculated with CPC2 tools which indicate the closeness to the coding classification hyperplane in the trained support vector machine (SVM) model. G) 293T cells were transfected with
Flag, NAIL-Flag and PKR-Flag (Protein kinase R) vectors. Total cell lysates were resolved in
SDS-PAGE gel and immunoblotted for Flag and Hsp90 proteins.
Sup. Figure 3: No difference in IL-7 expression and induction in mNAILΔNFκB mice. A)
Gene expression profiles of mouse IL7 across different mouse tissues. All the raw FPKM
values were obtained from Mouse ENCODE transcriptome data in NCBI (BioProject:
PRJNA66167, Publication: PMID 25409824). B) Gene expression analysis was performed by
RT-qPCR for mouse IL7 in the thymus tissues of mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB mice (n=3). C)
Total protein lysates isolated from the thymus tissues of mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB mice were
analysed for mouse IL7 by western blot. Actin was used for normalization. Graph shows the
quantification of IL7 western blot band intensity. D-F) Wild-type MEFs were transfected with
si-Control, mouse IL7 siRNA#1 or mouse IL7 siRNA#2. After 48h post-transfection, cells
were treated with or without TNFα and harvested for gene expression analysis or western blot.
Graphs show the gene expression analysis of D) IL7 and E) TNFα by RT-qPCR. Actin was
used as a control. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of three independent experiments. P values
were calculated using Student's t-test method (*, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****,
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Supplemental material
Gut
p<0.0001; n.s., not significant). F) Cells lysate were analysed via western blot for the indicated
proteins.
Sup. Figure 4: No difference in stem cells and precursor cells between mNAILWT and
mNAILΔNFκB mice. A-E) Bone marrow cells were isolated from mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB
mice (n=7) and treated with or without DSS at day 8. Cells were stained for Lineage marker
cocktail, CD34, IL7ra, c-KIT, Sca-1 and CD16/32 cell surface markers. A) Cells were analysed
by FACS and firstly gated as LIN- cells. LIN- cells were further gated as KL, KSL and K-low
S-low cells based on the c-KIT and Sca-1 expression. KL cells were further gated into MEP,
CMP and GMP according to CD16/32 and CD34 expression. K-low and S-low cells were gated
for CLP population based on the IL7ra expression. Representative FACS data was shown for
mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB mice treated with or without DSS. Quantification of B) GMP, C)
CMP, D) MEP and E) CLP cells. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of 3 UT and 7 DSS treated
samples. P values were calculated using Student's t-test method (n.s., not significant).
Sup. Figure 5: Genome editing process did not cause non-specific global transcriptome
changes. A) RNA-seq was performed with colon tissues obtained at Day 8 from mNAILWT and
mNAILΔNFκB mice treated with or without DSS. Venn diagram representing numbers of
overlapping differentially expressed genes between different experimental groups is shown. B)
GO analysis was performed from the genes that are differentially expressed between mNAILWT
and mNAILΔNFκB mice treated with DSS.
Sup. Figure 6: mNAILΔNFκB mice are protected from DSS induced colitis. A, B) Colon
sections of the DSS treated mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB mice (n=3) at day 8 were stained with
mNAIL specific FISH probe (Quasar570), F4/80 (AF647) and p-p38 (AF488) antibodies.
Tissue slides were analysed for the indicated molecules by LSM800 confocal microscopy.
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Representative images for co-staining of A) mNAIL,
F4/80 and p-p38 is shown. Quantification of B) F4/80, mNAIL and p-p38 positive cells is shown
as bar graphs. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of three independent fields examined per mouse
(n=3 per group). *, p < 0.05; ****, p < 0.0001. p-values were calculated by two-tailed student’s
t-test method based on three independent experiments. C) Representative H & E staining and
D) quantification of histology scores of colon sections from DSS treated mNAILWT and
mNAILΔNFκB mice at day 8. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of three independent experiments
(n=9 for UT, n=15 for DSS treated samples)
Sup. Figure 7: NAIL alters phosphorylation of p65 and p38 but not upstream molecules.
A-B) Graphs show the gene expression analysis of A) mNAIL and B) TNFα by RT-qPCR in
intestinal epithelial cells isolated from colon tissues of mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB mice treated
with and without DSS for 8 days. Actin was used as a control. Error bars indicate mean ± SD
of 6 mice. P values were calculated using Student's t-test method (**, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001).
n.s., not significant. C) mNAILWT MEFs were transfected with si-Control or si-NAIL and after
48h post-transfection, cells were stimulated with TNFα for indicated time points. Cell lysates
were analyzed by western blot for the indicated proteins. D-E) Bone marrow cells isolated from
mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB mice (n=4) were differentiated into bone marrow derived
macrophages (BMDM) for 7 days. BMDM cells were treated with or without LPS (200ng/ml)
for 4 hours. p65 immunoprecipitation was performed. Total and co-immunoprecipitated
proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for indicated proteins. F) Graph
shows quantification of co-precipitated Wip1 from D-E. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of four
replicates. P values were calculated using Student's t-test method (**, p<0.01).
Sup. Figure 8: Wip1 is a key determinant of NAIL action. A-C) mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB
MEFs were transfected with control siRNA or Wip1 siRNA. After 48h post-transfection, cells
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Supplemental material
Gut
were treated with or without TNFα and harvested for gene expression analysis or western blot.
Graphs show the gene expression analysis of A) IL1β and B) TNFα by RT-qPCR. Actin was
used as a control. C) siRNA transfected and TNFα stimulated MEFs cell lysates were analysed
via western blot for the indicated proteins. D-F) mNAILWT and mNAILΔNFκB BMDMs were
transfected with control siRNA or Wip1 siRNA. After 48h post-transfection, cells were treated
with or without LPS and harvested for gene expression analysis or western blot. Graphs show
the gene expression analysis of D) IL1β and E) TNFα by RT-qPCR. Actin was used as a control.
Error bars indicate mean ± SD of three independent experiments. P values were calculated
using Student's t-test method (***, p<0.001). F) siRNA transfected and LPS stimulated
BMDM cell lysates were analysed via western blot for the indicated proteins.
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
Supplemental material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Gut
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Supplemental material
Gut
Sup-Table 1
REAGENT or RESOURCE
SOURCE
IDENTIFIER
anti-p-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) 3D7
Cell signalling
Cat #9215S
anti-p38
Cell signalling
Cat #9212
anti-p-p65 (Ser536)
Cell signalling
Cat #3031L
anti-p65
Santa Cruz
Cat #sc-8008
anti-Actin
Sigma
Cat #A2066
GAPDH (6C5)
Santa Cruz
Cat #sc-32233
p-IKKα/β (Ser176/180)
Cell signalling
Cat #2697S
IKKα/β (H-470)
Santa Cruz
Cat #sc-7607
IKKγ (FL-419)
Santa Cruz
Cat #sc-8330
anti-p65 (ChIP, IP)
Santa Cruz
Cat #sc-372
anti-Wip1 (RIP)
Cell signalling
Cat #11901
anti-Wip1(WB)
Santa Cruz
Cat # sc-376257
Dyskerin (H-300)
Santa Cruz
Cat #sc-48794
anti-IL7
R&Dsystems
Cat # AF407
P-SEK1/MKK4(T261)
Cell signalling
Cat # 9151S
anti-SEK1/MKK4
Cell signalling
Cat # 9152S
p-TAK1 (T187)
Cell signalling
Cat # 4536S
p-IkBα (S32)
Cell signalling
Cat # 2859L
p-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185)
Cell signalling
Cat # 9251
anti-P-MKK3/MKK6 (Ser189/207)
Cell signalling
Cat # 9231
anti-Cleaved Caspase-3 (Asp175)
Cell signalling
Cat #9664L
PE-CD11b
BD
Cat #553311
FITC-Ly6G
Biolegend
Cat #127606
BV711-Ly6C
Biolegend
Cat #128037
PE-CD34
BD
Cat #551387
PeCy7-IL7RA
BD
Cat #560733
PercpCy5.5-c-kit
BD
Cat #560557
FITC-Sca1/Anti-Ly-6A/E
BD
Cat #553335
APCcy7-CD16/32
BD
Cat #560541
APC Mouse Lineage Antibody Cocktail
BD
Cat #558074
Antibodies
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Supplemental material
AF488-p-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) (93H1)
CST
Cat #4886
AF488-p -p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (3D7)
CST
Cat #41768
Recombinant Human TNF-alpha Protein 210
R&Dsystems
Cat #210-TA
Terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase
Promega
Cat #M1871
RQ1 RNase-Free DNase
Promega
Cat #M6101
Recombinant RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor
Promega
Cat #N2111
T7 RNA polymerase
Promega
Cat #P2075
10X Biotin RNA labelling mix
Roche
Cat #11685597910
Tak1 inhibitor 5Z-7-Oxozeaenol
Sigma
Cat #O9890-1MG
E. coli LPS
Sigma
Cat #L2654 and #L2630
Dextran sulfate sodium salt, colitis grade
MP Biomedicals
Cat # 9011-18-1
Disuccinimidyl glutarate (DSG)
Thermoe Fisher
Cat #20593
X-tremeGENE 9 DNA transfection reagent
Roche
Cat #6365779001
X-tremeGENE siRNA transfection reagent
Roche
Cat #4476093001
Mouse: wild-type: C57BL/6
Invivos
N/A
Mouse: wild type Balb/c
Invivos
N/A
Mouse: mNAIL∆NFκB
Masa’s group
This study
MEFs: WT, p65-/-, Ikkβ-/- and Ikkγ-/-
Tergaonkar et al., 2003
N/A
RT‐qPCR_Gm16685 Fw (CCCTACAGGAAGACCAACCA)
IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_Gm16685 Rv (CTAGGCCATCCTCTGCTACG)
IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mTNFa Fw (ACAGAAAGCATGATCCGCGAC)
IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mTNFa Rv (GAAGCCCCCCATCTTTTGG) IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mIL7 Fw (TGGAATTCCTCCACTGATCC) IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mIL7 Rv (TGGTTCATTATTCGGGCAAT) IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mActin Fw (CTGTATTCCCCTCCATCGTG) IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mActin Rv (CCTCGTCACCCACATAGGAG) IDT
N/A
Gut
Chemicals, recombinants proteins,
commercial kits
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
Oligonucleotides
Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance
placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s)
Supplemental material
RTqPCR_mCCL2 Fw (GCCCCTCCATGTATACCAGACT) IDT
N/A
RTqPCR_mCCL2 Rv (AGACCTCTCTCTTGAGCTTGGT ) IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mIL1β Fw (AAAGCTCTCCACCTCAATGG) IDT
N/A
RT‐qPCR_mIL1β Rv2 (TCTTCTTTGGGTATTGCTTGG) IDT
N/A
CRISPR Genotyping_Gm16685 Fw (GCATTCCCTTAGGTAGACCTCC) IDT
N/A
CRISPR Genotyping_Gm16685 Rv (GGGAGTGATTATGGGTGGTGAG) IDT
N/A
Gm16685 gRNA #1
(CACCTAGGGTTTAAAAGCGCATCC) IDT
N/A
Gm16685 gRNA #2
(CACCAGTCTGGGAGTTTCCGATCC) IDT
N/A
Gm16685 siRNA
(GGAATAATGATAGCAACTACT) IDT
N/A
Gm16685 siRNA
(CAACCTCTCTAATCAGTCTCTTTCT) IDT
N/A
Wip1 siRNA
(CTTGTGGGGTTTCATCAAGAAGCAG)
IDT
N/A
Mouse IL7 transcript variant 4 siRNA#1
(AGCTCAGAACTTCATGGAGAATGAA)
IDT
N/A
Mouse IL7 transcript variant 4 siRNA#1
(AAAGGACAGAUCAUUGGAAAACCCC)
IDT
N/A
Mouse IL7 siRNA#1
(GACAGGAACTGATAGTAAT)
IDT
N/A
Mouse IL7 siRNA#2
(GCATATGAGAGTGTACTGA)
IDT
N/A
pX458 –GFP Addgene
Cat #48138
pX458-DsRed Akincilar et al., 2016
N/A
Gut
Plasmids Akæ11lar SC
, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322980
...