リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma

石橋 眞里佳 近畿大学

2022.02.28

概要

Background/aims
Car accidents caused by drivers unaware of their visual field (VF) defects under binocular vision have become an issue. We developed a simple self-check chart (CLOCK CHART binocular edition (CCBE)) to help patients with glaucoma recognise their abnormalities in the binocular VF and evaluated its usefulness.

Methods
The chart has four targets displayed at 10°, 15°, 20° and 25° eccentricities. The examinee gradually rotates the chart 360° clockwise. At every 30°, the examinee confirms the fixation and indicates if all four targets can be seen. This study enrolled 88 eyes of 44 patients with glaucoma (mean age, 64.4±13.1 years) and 64 eyes of 32 visually normal individuals (mean age, 32.0±8.4 years). Except the CCBE test, static VF testing using the Humphrey field analyser (HFA) Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm-Standard 30-2 and binocular Esterman programmes was also performed for the subjects with glaucoma.

Results
VF abnormality was defined as two or more contiguous points with a sensitivity of <10 dB within the central 30°. The CCBE test had sensitivities of 85% and 82% with respect to the HFA and Esterman results, respectively. We also used the British VF standards for Group 1 (car/motorcycle) drivers, and a sensitivity of 88% was obtained for the CCBE. The chart had a specificity of 100% for the visually normal subjects.

Conclusion
The CCBE test enables drivers with glaucoma to notice their VF abnormalities under binocular condition. The application of this simple selfcheck method appears promising for occasions such as driver licensing.

参考文献

1 Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389–93.

2 Tham Y-C, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2081–90.

3 Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73:115–21.

4 Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1641–8.

5 Parrish RKet al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1447–55.

6 Szlyk JP, Taglia DP, Paliga J, et al. Driving performance in patients with mild to moderate glaucomatous clinical vision changes. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;39:467–82.

7 McGwin G, Mays A, Joiner W, et al. Is glaucoma associated with motor vehicle collision involvement and driving avoidance? Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45:3934–9.

8 McGwin G, Xie A, Mays A, et al. Visual field defects and the risk of motor vehicle collisions among patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4437–- 41.

9 Haymes SA, Leblanc RP, Nicolela MT, et al. Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1149–55.

10 Tanabe S, Yuki K, Ozeki N, et al. The association between primary open-angle glaucoma and motor vehicle collisions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4177–81.

11 Murai H, Kiyosawa M, Mochizuki M, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of new eye check chart for Neuro-ophthalmological diseases. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006;50:383–6.

12 Shirato S, Adachi M, Hara T. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1991;35:273–81.

13 Adachi M, Shirato S. The usefulness of the Noise-Field test as a screening method for visual field defects. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1994;38:392–9.

14 Matsumoto C, Eura M, Okuyama S, et al. Clock chart: a novel multi-stimulus selfcheck visual field screener. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2015;59:187–93.

15 Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2212–21.

16 Mills RP, Drance SM. Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1986;93:371–8.

17 Nelson C. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci;000:87–185.

18 GOV.UK. Assessing fitness to drive - a guide for medical professionals. 2017. Available: www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive

19 Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:268–72.

20 Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, et al. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1059–67.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る