リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Evaluation of seismic residual capacity ratio for reinforced concrete structures」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Evaluation of seismic residual capacity ratio for reinforced concrete structures

Alex Shegay 前田 匡樹 Masaki Maeda 東京工業大学 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2023.02.004

2023.03.02

概要

Damage assessments of buildings are critical following strong earthquakes to determine whether they are structurally safe for immediate
reoccupation or are in need of repairs. The ‘seismic residual capacity
ratio’ (hereinafter ‘residual capacity ratio’) of the structure, that is, the
seismic capacity of the damaged structure as a fraction of its undamaged capacity, is a useful metric for quantifying the extent of structural
damage and provide an insight into the building’s performance in future
earthquakes. Existing experimental studies on seismic residual capacity
of reinforced concrete (RC) structures is generally limited to component
level studies (e.g., columns [1,2], beams [3,4] walls [5]). In such experimental programs, components are tested to quantify the effect of varying initial damage conditions on the component’s overall performance. ...

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

[18] Baggio C, Bernardini A, Colozza R, Corazza L, Della Bella M, Di Pasquale G, et al.

Field manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term

countermeasures (AeDES), Ispra, Italy: Reseach Center; 2007. EUR 22868 EN - 2007.

[19] Maeda M, Matsukawa K, Ito Y. Revision of guideline for post-earthquake damage

evaluation of RC buildings In Japan. In: Proceedings of the NCEE 10th US national

conference on earthquake engineering: frontiers of earthquake engineering; 2014.

[20] Maeda M, Al-Washali H, Matsukawa K. An overview of post earthquake damage and

residual capacity evaluation for reinforced concrete buildings in Japan. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering methods in structural dynamics and earthquake

engineering; 2019. p. 930–43. doi:10.7712/120119.6969.19228.

[21] Maeda M, Honda Y, Kang D. Post-earthquake damage level and repair cost for reinforced concrete school buildings. In: Proceedings of the 11th Japanese association of

earthquake engineering symposium. Japanese Association of Earthquake Engineering; 2002.

[22] Maeda M, Nakano Y, Lee KS. Post-earthquake damage evaluation for R/C buildings.

In: Proceedings of the council on tall buildings and urban habitat, Seoul, Korea;

2004. Ocober 10-13.

[23] Polese M, Di Ludovico M, Marcolini M, Prota A, Manfredi G. Assessing repairability: simple tools for estimation of costs and performance loss of earthquake damaged reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2015;44:1539–57.

doi:10.1002/eqe.

[24] Nakano Y, Maeda M, Kuramoto H, Murakami M. Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings in Japan. In: Proceedings of the

13th world conference on earthquake engineering; 2004.

[25] Building Center of Japan The building standard law of Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Building

Center of Japan; 2016.

[26] Architectural Institute of Japan Design guidelines for earthquake resistant reinforced

concrete buildings based on inelastic displacement concept. Tokyo, Japan: Architectural Institute of Japan; 1999.

[27] AIJ standard for structural calculation of reinforced concrete structures (in

Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Architectural Institute of Japan; 2018.

[28] Otani S, Sozen MA. Behavior of Multistory Reinforced Concrete Frames During

Earthquakes. Structural Research Series No. 392, University of Illinois, Urbana;

1972.

[29] Laughery L. Response of high-strength reinforced concrete structures to simulated

earthquakes. Purdue University; 2016. Ph.D thesis.

[30] Cecen H. Response of ten storey, reinforced concrete model frames to simulated

earthquakes. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 1979. Ph.D thesis.

[31] Shegay AV, Miura K, Akira M, Maeda M, Seki M. Performance recovery of a repaired

4-storey reinforced concrete structure subjected to shake-table testing. Earthquake

Eng Struct Dyn 2023:1–21. doi:10.1002/eqe.3818.

[32] Miura K, Fujita K, Tabata Y, Maeda M, Shegay A, Yonezawa K. Shake-table test of a 4storey frame-wall RC strcture to investigate the collapse mechanism and safety limit

(in Japanese). J Struct Constr Eng 2021;86(780):247–57. doi:10.3130/aijs.86.247.

[33] Maeda M, Kang DE. Post-earthquake damage evaluation of reinforced concrete

buildings. J Adv Concr Technol 2009;7(3):327–35. doi:10.3151/jact.7.327.

[34] Fujita K, Miura K, Tabata Y, Maeda M, Shegay AV, Seki M. Post-earthquake capacity

evaluation of RC frame structures with multi-story flexural walls (in Japanese). J

Struct Constr Eng 2021;86(785):1084–94. doi:10.3130/aijs.86.1084.

[35] Kozo Systems Corporation Stuructral nonlinear analysis program (SNAP) ver.7. Kozo

Systems Corporation; 2019.

[1] Nojavan A. Performance of full-scale reinforced concrete columns subjected to extreme earthquake loading. University of Minnesota; 2015. Ph.D thesis.

[2] Kawashima KK, Koyama T. Effect of number of loading of cycles reinforced columns

on dynamic characteristics concrete. Struct Eng Earthq Eng 1988;5(1):183–91.

[3] Marder KJ, Motter CJ, Elwood KJ, Clifton GC. Effects of variation in loading protocol on the strength and deformation capacity of ductile reinforced concrete beams.

Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2018;47(11):2195–213. doi:10.1002/eqe.3064.

[4] Sarrafzadeh M. Residual capacity and repairability of moderately-damaged ductile

reinforced concrete ductile frame structures. The University of Auckland; 2021. Ph.D

thesis.

[5] Alwashali H, Maeda M, Ogata Y, Aizawa N, Tsurugai K. Residual seismic

performance of damaged reinforced concrete walls. Eng Struct 2021;243(January):112673. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112673.

[6] Ito T, Suzuki Y, Maeda M. Evaluation of residual seismic capacity of damaged RC

buildings based on deterioration of strength, deformation and damping performance

of damaged members (in Japanese). Proc Jpn Concr Inst Conf 2015;37(2):787–92.

[7] FEMA 307 Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings.

Redwood City, CA: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1998.

[8] Di Ludovico M, Polese M, Gaetani d’Aragona M, Prota A, Manfredi G. A proposal for

plastic hinges modification factors for damaged RC columns. Eng Struct 2013;51:99–

112. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.009.

[9] Chiu CK, Sung HF, Chi KN, Hsiao FP. Experimental quantification on the residual seismic capacity of damaged RC column members. Int J Concr Struct Mater

2019;13(1):3–22. doi:10.1186/s40069-019-0338-z.

[10] Chiu CK, Sung HF, Chiou TC. Post-earthquake preliminary seismic assessment

method for low-rise RC buildings in Taiwan. J Build Eng 2022;46:103709.

doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103709.

[11] FEMA 306. Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings, basic procedures manual. Redwood City, CA: Federal Emergency Management

Agency; 1998.

[12] Kusunoki K, Hinata D, Hattori Y, Tasai A. A new method for evaluating the

real-time residual seismic capacity of existing structures using accelerometers:

structures with multiple degrees of freedom. Jpn Archit Rev 2018;1(1):77–86.

doi:10.1002/2475-8876.1010.

[13] Kusunoki K. Experimental study on the damage classification method with the performance curves of R\C structures derived from recorded accelerations. J Struct

Constr Eng 2020;85(774):1055–65. doi:10.3130/aijs.85.1055.

[14] Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association Guidelines for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Japan

Building Disaster Prevention Association; 2015.

[15] Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment Field guide: rapid post disaster

building usability assessment - earthquakes. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of

Business Innovation and Employment; 2014.

[16] Applied Technology Council Procedures for postearthquake safety evaluation of

buildings (ATC-20). Redwood City, California: Applied Technology Council; 1989.

[17] National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) Technology handbook for seismic evaluation and retrofit of school buildings. 2nd

ed. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE); 2009.

doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1962.tb08661.x.

44

A.V. Shegay, K. Miura, K. Fujita et al.

Resilient Cities and Structures 2 (2023) 28–45

[36] Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. J Struct Div 1970;96(12):2557–73. doi:10.1061/JSDEAG.0002765.

[37] Tripathi M, Dhakal RP, Dashti F, Massone LM. Low-cycle fatigue behaviour of

reinforcing bars including the effect of inelastic buckling. Constr Build Mater

2018;190:1226–35. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.192.

[38] Hagiwara H, Nakayama T, Igarashi K. Bidirectional shaking table tests of a one–

fourth scale reinforced concrete space frame. In: Proceedings of the 12th World

Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand; 2000. Paper No.

0645.

[39] FEMA P-2012 Assessing seismic performance of buildings with configuration irregularities. Redwood City, CA: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2018.

[40] Shegay AV, Motter CJ, Elwood KJ, Henry RS, Lehman DE, Lowes LN. Impact of axial

load on the seismic response of rectangular walls. J Struct Eng 2018;144(8):1–32.

doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002122.

[41] Segura CL Jr, Wallace JW. Seismic performance limitations and detailing of slender reinforced concrete walls. ACI Struct J 2018;115(3):849–59.

doi:10.14359/51701918.

[42] Lu Y, Gultom RJ, Ma QQ, Henry RS. Experimental validation of minimum vertical reinforcement requirements for ductile concrete walls. ACI Struct J 2018;115(4):1115–

30. doi:10.14359/51702048.

[43] Miura K, Maeda M. Evaluation method of contribution factor of structural components for seismic capacity assuming invariable inter-story drift before and after damaged and investigation of applicability to RC frames with beam yielding mechanism

(in Japanese). J Struct Constr Eng 2018;83(747):727–37. doi:10.3130/aijs.83.727.

[44] The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association Standard for seismic evaluation

of existing reinforced concrete buildings (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: The Japan

Building Disaster Prevention Association; 2001.

45

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る