リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics : clinical and experimental study (本文)」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics : clinical and experimental study (本文)

太田, 友香 慶應義塾大学

2021.03.08

概要

Purpose: To evaluate differences in subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) using echelette optics, and the effect of the light wavelength used during examinations.

Methods: In the prospective study, subjective and objective refractions of 128 eyes of 64 patients were examined 3 months after implantation of the EDOF IOLs (ZXR00V, Johnson & Johnson Surgival Vision). Objective refractions were measured using an autorefractor with a near-infrared (NIR) light source. Clinical differences in the spherical, cylindrical and spherical equivalent (SE) refractions between the subjective and objective refractions were evaluated. Then, lens powers of monofocal, EDOF and diffractive bifocal IOLs in the use of a 850-nm light source were measured experimentally for using a lensmeter, and the differences from the monofocal IOLs were calculated.

Results: The mean objective refractions were more myopic (p < 0.001) than the subjective refractions; the differences in the spherical, cylindrical and SE refractions were —0.71, —0.26 and —0.84 dioptre, respectively. Experimental investigation resulted that there was the mean difference of 0.83 D with the EDOF from monofocal IOLs at 850 nm, while the difference was —0.20 D with bifocal IOLs.

Conclusions: The diffractive EDOF IOLs using echelette gratings inherently induced constant differences in the subjective and objective refractions, which arose from the chromatic difference in IOL powers for the visible and NIR lights.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

Albarr´an-Diego C, Mun~oz G & Ferrer-Blasco T (2011): Subjective refraction before LASIK enhancement in bioptics procedures with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 27: 556–557.

Bissen-Miyajima H, Minami K, Yoshino M, Nishimura M & Oki S (2010): Autorefrac- tion after implantation of diffractive multi- focal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 36: 553–556.

Bissen-Miyajima H, Ota Y, Nakamura K, Hirasawa M & Minami K (2019): Binocular visual function with staged implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with three add powers. Am J Ophthalmol 199: 223–229.

Bland J & Altman D (1999): Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8: 135–160.

Bullimore MA, Fusaro RE & Adams CW (1998): The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction. Optom Vis Sci 75: 617– 622.

Davidson N, Friesem AA & Hasman E (1993): Analytic design of hybrid diffractive-refrac- tive achromats. Appl Opt 32: 4770–4774.

Flores A, Wang MR & Yang JJ (2004): Achromatic hybrid refractive-diffractive lens with extended depth of focus. Appl Opt 43: 5618–5630.

Haddad JS, Gouvea L, Ferreira JL, Ambro´sio R Jr, Waring GO 4th & Rocha KM (2020): Impact of a chromatic aberration-correcting intraocular lens on automated refraction. J Refract Surg. 36: 334–339.

Hartmann J (1900): Bemerkungen uber den Bau und die Justirung von Spektrographen. Z. Instrumentenkd 20: 17–27.

Kinge B, Midelfart A & Jacobsen G (1996): Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor. Br J Ophthalmol 80: 35–39.

Kohnen T, Bo€hm M, Hemkeppler E, Scho€nbrunn S, DeLorenzo N, Petermann K & Herzog M (2019): Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection. Eye 33: 1556– 1563.

van der Linden JW, Vrijman V, Al-Saady R, van der Meulen IJ, Mourits MP & Lapid- Gortzak R (2014): Autorefraction versus subjective refraction in a radially asymmet- ric multifocal intraocular lens. Acta Oph- thalmol 92: 764–768.

Mill´an MS & Vega F (2017): Extended depth of focus intraocular lens: chromatic perfor- mance. Biomed Opt Express 8: 4294–4309.

Mun~oz G, Albarr´an-Diego C & Sakla HF (2007): Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 1573–1578.

Mun~oz G, Albarr´an-Diego C & Sakla HF (2007): Autorefraction after multifocal IOLs. Ophthalmology 114: 2100.

Ravikumar S, Bradley A & Thibos LN (2014): Chromatic aberration and polychromatic image quality with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 40: 1192–1204.

Rementer´ıa-Capelo LA, Garc´ıa-P´erez JL, Contreras I, Bl´azquez V & Ruiz-Alcocer J (2020): Automated refraction after trifocal and trifocal toric intraocular lens implanta- tion. Eur J Ophthalmol. in press

Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DE & Tassignon MJ (2005): Clinical comparison of 6 aberrome- ters. Part 1: Technical specifications. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 1114–1127.

Sudhir RR, Dey A, Bhattacharrya S & Bahu- layan A (2019): AcrySof IQ PanOptix intraocular lens versus extended depth of focus intraocular lens and trifocal intraocu- lar lens: a clinical overview. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 8: 335–349.

Weeber HA, Meijer ST & Piers PA (2015): Extending the range of vision using diffrac- tive intraocular lens technology. J Cataract Refract Surg 41: 2746–2754.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る