[1] Newbury D E 1986 Electron beam-specimen interactions in the analytical electron microscope (Chapter 1 (1-26) in Joy D C et al Principles of analytical electron microscopy: New York:Springer) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2037-9_1
[2] Joy D C 1995 Monte Carlo modeling for electron microscopy and microanalysis (New York: Oxford)
[3] Reimer L and Lodding B 1984 Calculation and tabulation of Mott cross-sections for large- angle electron scattering Scanning 6 128-151 https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950060303
[4] Czyzewski Z et al 1990 Calculations of Mott scattering cross section Journal of Applied Physic. 68 3066-3072 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.346400
[5] Suzuki M et al 2018 Modeling of electron-specimen interaction in scanning electron microscope for e-beam metrology and inspection: challenges and perspectives Proc. SPIE 10585, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXII, pp.1058517 1- 14 doi: 10.1117/12.2301383
[6] Murata K, Kyser D F and Ting C H 1981 Monte Carlo simulation of fast secondary electron production in electron beam resists Journal of Applied Physics 52 4396-4405 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.329366
[7] Joy D C, Newbury D E and Myklebust R L 1982 The role of fast secondary electrons in degrading spatial resolution in the analytical electron microscope Journal of Microscopy 128 RP1-RP2 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00442.x
[8] Bethe H A 1930 Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie. Annalen der Physik 5 325–400
[9] Ferrell R A 1956 Angular dependence of the characteristic energy loss of electrons passing through metal foils Physical Review 101 554-563 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.101.554
[10] Hirsch P B et al 1965 Electron microscopy of thin crystals (London: Butterworths)
[11] Reimer L 1985 Scanning electron microscopy: physics of image formation and microanalysis (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag)
[12] Bongeler R et al 1993 Electron-specimen interactions in low-voltage scanning electron microscopy SCANNING 15 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950150102
[13] Niedrig H 1978 Physical background of electron backscattering SCANNING 1 17-34 https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950010103
[14] Seiler H 1983 Secondary electron emission in the scanning electron microscope Journal of Applied Physics 54 R1-R18 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.332840
[15] Joy D C and Joy C S 1996 Low voltage scanning electron microscopy Micron 27 247-263 https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-4328(96)00023-6
[16] Menzel E and Kubalek E 1979 Electron beam test system for VLSI circuit inspection Proc. SEM Conference, edited by Johari O Vol. I, pp. 297-304.
[17] Fujioka H, Nakamae K and Ura K 1985 Signal-to-noise ratio in the stroboscopic scanning electron microscope Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments 18 598-603
[18] Nakamae K, Fujioka H and Ura K 1981 Local field effects on voltage contrast in the scanning electron microscope Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 14 1939-1960
[19] Echlin P 2009 Handbook of Sample Preparation for Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis (Springer) DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-85731-2
[20] Takemasa Y et al 2018 Advanced CD-SEM imaging methodology for EPE measurements Proc. SPIE 10585, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXII, pp.1058522 1-10 doi: 10.1117/12.2298393
[21] Kessel L van, Hagen C W and Kruit P 2019 Surface effects in simulations of scanning electron microscopy images Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII, pp.109590V 1-15 doi: 10.1117/12.2514824
[22] Arat K T, Klimpel T and Hagen C W 2019 Model improvements to simulate charging in scanning electron microscope J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 18 044003 1-13 doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.18.4.044003.
[23] Lee C, Yokosuka T and Kazumi H 2018 Developing a flexible model of electron scattering in solid for charging analysis Proc. SPIE 10585, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXII pp.105852E 1-14 doi: 10.1117/12.2297371
[24] Goldstein J et al 1992. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis (New York: Plenum Press) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6676-9
[25] Zach J and Haider M 1995 Aberration correction in a low voltage SEM by a multipole corrector Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 363 316-325 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)00056-9
[26] Cheng Z H et al 2019 Application of aberration corrected low voltage SEM for metrology Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII, pp.1095922 1-9 doi: 10.1117/12.2516017
[27] ISO/TS 24597 2011 Microbeam analysis – scanning electron microscopy - methods of evaluating image sharpness, ISO(the International Organization for Standardization)
[28] Diebold A C 2001 Silicon Semiconductor Metrology (in chapter 1, Handbook of Silicon Semiconductor Metrology (edited by Diebold A C, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc))
[29] Wells O C 1974 Scanning Electron Microscopy (New York: McGraw-Hill Inc)
[30] Nakagaki R, Honda T and Nakamae K 2009 Automatic recognition of defect areas on a semiconductor wafer using multiple scanning electron microscope images Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 pp.075503 1-12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/7/075503
[31] Konvalina I et al 2019 In-Lens Band-Pass Filter for Secondary Electrons in Ultrahigh Resolution SEM Materials 12 pp.2307 1-13 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12142307
[32] Suri A et al 2020 Analysis and detection of low-energy electrons in scanning electron microscopes using a Bessel box electron energy analyser Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 241 pp.146823 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2019.02.002
[33] Niedrig H 1982 Electron backscattering from thin films Journal of Applied Physics 53 R15-R49 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.331005
[34] Lin W R et al 2018 Fabrication and characterization of a high-performance multi-annular backscattered electron detector for desktop SEM Sensors, 18 pp.3093 1-13 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18093093
[35] Rau E I, Karaulov V Y and Zaitsev S V 2019 Backscattered electron detector for 3D microstructure visualization in scanning electron microscopy Review of Scientific Instruments 90 pp.023701 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054746
[36] Radlička T, Unčovský M and Oral M 2018 In lens BSE detector with energy filtering Ultramicroscopy 189 102-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.03.015
[37] Timischl F, Date M and Nemoto S 2012 A statistical model of signal–noise in scanning electron microscopy SCANNING 34 137-144 DOI 10.1002/sca.20282
[38] Sakakibara M et al 2019 Impact of secondary electron emission noise in SEM Microscopy 68 279–288 doi: 10.1093/jmicro/dfz 009
[39] Bunday B D 2020 Noise fidelity in SEM simulation Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV, pp.113250R 1-9 doi: 10.1117/12.2559631
[40] Lenthe W C 2018 Advanced detector signal acquisition and electron beam scanning for high resolution SEM imaging Ultramicroscopy 195 93-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.08.025
[41] Papavieros G and Constantoudis V 2017 Line edge roughness measurement through SEM images: effects of image digitization and their mitigation 33rd European Mask and Lithography Conference , pp. 104460K 1-11 doi: 10.1117/12.2294060
[42] Roy V 2013 Spatial and transform domain filtering method for image de-noising: a review I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science 5 41–49 DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2013.07.05
[43] Mack C A, Roey F V and Lorusso G F 2019 Unbiased roughness measurements: subtracting out SEM effects, part 3 Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII pp.109590P 1-10 doi: 10.1117/12.2515898
[44] Mack C A and Bunday B D 2016 Improvements to the analytical linescan model for SEM metrology Metrology, Proc. SPIE 9778, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXX pp.97780A 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2218443
[45] Giannatou E et al 2019 Deep learning nanometrology of line edge roughness Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII pp.1095920 1-11 doi: 10.1117/12.2520941
[46] Zhang K et al 2017 Beyond a gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26 3142-3155 DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206
[47] Midoh Y and Nakamae K 2019 Image quality enhancement of a CD-SEM image using conditional generative adversarial networks Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII pp.109590B 1-10 doi: 10.1117/12.2515152
[48] Isola P et al 2017 Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition pp.5967-5976 DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.632
[49] Yu L et al 2020 SEM image quality enhancement: an unsupervised deep learning approach Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV pp.1132527 1-9 doi: 10.1117/12.2552883
[50] Lehtinen J et al 2018 Noise2Noise: Learning image restoration without clean data PMLR 80 pp.2965-2974
[51] Iida S et al 2016 Investigation of defect detectability for extreme ultraviolet patterned mask using two types of high-throughput electron-beam inspection systems J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 15, pp.013510 1-7 doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.15.1.013510
[52] Ma E 2018 Multiple beam technology development and application for defect inspection on EUV wafer/mask Proc. SPIE 10810, Photomask Technology 2018 pp.1081014 1-9 doi: 10.1117/12.2503857
[53] Liang T et al 2020 EUV mask infrastructure and actinic pattern mask inspection Proc. SPIE 11323, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography XI pp.1132310 1-13 doi: 10.1117/12.2554496
[54] Nakagaki R, Takagi Y and Nakamae K 2010 Automatic recognition of circuit patterns on semiconductor wafers from multiple scanning electron microscope images Measurement Science and Technology 21 pp.085501 1-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957- 0233/21/8/085501
[55] Harada M, Obara K and Nakamae K 2017 A robust SEM auto-focus algorithm using multiple band-pass filters Measurement Science and Technology. 28 pp.015403 1-10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/28/1/015403
[56] Harada M, Minekawa Y and Nakamae K 2019 Defect detection techniques robust to process variation in semiconductor inspection Measurement Science and Technology 30 pp.035402 1- 10 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aafd77
[57] Ouchi M et al A trainable die-to-database for fast e-Beam inspection: learning normal images to detect defects Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV pp.113252F 1-9 doi: 10.1117/12.2551456
[58] Chawla N V et al 2002 SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16 321-357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953
[59] Lee P et al 2020 Automated semiconductor wafer defect classification dealing with imbalanced data Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV pp.1132526 1-7 doi: 10.1117/12.2552838
[60] Fukuda H et al 2018 Measurement of pattern roughness and local size variation using CD- SEM J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 17 pp.041004 1-9 doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.17.4.041004.
[61] Zhigang W et al 2019 What is prevalent CD-SEM's role in EUV era? Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII pp.1095914 1-10 doi: 10.1117/12.2514697
[62] Bizen D et al 2019 CD metrology for EUV resist using high-voltage CD-SEM: shrinkage, image sharpness, repeatability, and line edge roughness J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 18 pp.034004 1-6 doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.18.3.034004.
[63] Pu L et al 2019 Analyze line roughness sources using power spectral density (PSD) Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII pp.109592W 1- 8 doi:10.1117/12.2516570
[64] Kessel L, Huisman T and Hagen C W 2020 Understanding the influence of 3D sidewall roughness on observed line-edge roughness in scanning electron microscopy images Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV pp.113250Z 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2550240
[65] Han J H 2018 Advanced technique for ultra-thin residue inspection with sub-10nm thickness using high-energy back-scattered electrons Proc. SPIE 10585, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXII pp.1058521 1-6 doi: 10.1117/12.2296982
[66] Nishihata T et al 2019 Depth measurement technique for extremely deep holes using back- scattered electron images with high voltage CD-SEM Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII pp.109591B 1-9 doi: 10.1117/12.2514799
[67] Sun W et al 2019 High voltage CD-SEM based metrology for 3D-profile measurement using depth-correlated BSE signal Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII pp.1095915 1-8 doi: 10.1117/12.2511272
[68] Tu L et al 2020 3D-NAND wafer process monitoring using high voltage SEM with auto e- beam tilt technology Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV pp.113250L 1-8 doi: 10.1117/12.2551610
[69] Sun W et al 2020 Accuracy improvement of 3D-profiling for HAR features using deep learning Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV pp.113250N 1-8 doi: 10.1117/12.2551458
[70] Taftia A P et al Recent advances in 3D SEM surface reconstruction Micron 78 54–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2015.07.005
[71] Villarrubia J S Tondare V N and Vladar A E 2016 Virtual rough samples to test 3D nanometer- scale scanning electron microscopy stereo photogrammetry Proc. SPIE 9778, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXX; pp.1-19 doi:10.1117/12.2219777.
[72] Valade C et al 2019 Tilted beam scanning electron microscopy, 3-D metrology for microelectronics industry J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 18 pp.034001 1-13 doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.18.3.034001.
[73] Neumann J T et al 3D analysis of high-aspect ratio features in 3D-NAND Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV pp,113250M 1-11 doi:10.1117/12.2552006
[74] Overlay control Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlay_control
[75] Inoue O and Hasumi K 2019 Review of scanning electron microscope-based overlay measurement beyond 3-nm node device J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 18 pp.021206 1- 15 doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.18.2.021206.
[76] Abramovitz Y et al 2020 Accelerating on-device overlay metrology accuracy verification Proc. SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV, pp.1132515 1-7 doi: 10.1117/12.2568682
[77] Babu M R et al 2020 Foundry approach for layout risk assessment through comprehensive pattern harvesting and large-scale data analysis Proc. SPIE 11328, Design-Process- Technology Co-optimization for Manufacturability XIV pp.113280H 1-9 doi: 10.1117/12.2551939
[78] Ura K 1981 Address error of electron beam by local electric field Optik 58 281-284
[79] Nakamae K, Fujioka H and Ura K Measurements of deep penetration of low‐energy electrons into metal‐oxide‐semiconductor structure Journal of Applied Physics 52, 1306-1308 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.329756