1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Rödiger, M.; Heinitz, A.; Bürgers, R.; Rinke, S. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional
impressions—A clinical comparative study. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2017, 21, 579–587. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pjetursson, B.E.; Thoma, D.; Jung, R.; Zwahlen, M.; Zembic, A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of
implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Implants Res.
2012, 23 (Suppl. 6), 22–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Le, M.; Papia, E.; Larsson, C. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A
systematic review. J. Oral Rehabil. 2015, 42, 467–480. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sahin, S.; Cehreli, M.C. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: Current status. Implant Dent. 2001,
10, 85–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kan, J.Y.; Rungcharassaeng, K.; Bohsali, K.; Goodacre, C.J.; Lang, B.R. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J.
Prosthet. Dent. 1999, 81, 7–13. [CrossRef]
Flügge, T.; van der Meer, W.J.; Gonzalez, B.G.; Vach, K.; Wismeijer, D.; Wang, P. The accuracy of different dental impression
techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2018, 29
(Suppl. 16), 374–392. [CrossRef]
Baig, M.R. Multi-unit implant impression accuracy: A review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 2014, 45, 39–51. [CrossRef]
Mangano, F.G.; Hauschild, U.; Veronesi, G.; Imburgia, M.; Mangano, C.; Admakin, O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral
scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2019, 19, 101.
[CrossRef]
Schepke, U.; Meijer, H.J.; Kerdijk, W.; Cune, M.S. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar
implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2015, 114, 403–406.e401. [CrossRef]
Ahlholm, P.; Sipilä, K.; Vallittu, P.; Jakonen, M.; Kotiranta, U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A
review. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 27, 35–41. [CrossRef]
Arcuri, L.; Pozzi, A.; Lio, F.; Rompen, E.; Zechner, W.; Nardi, A. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on
the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial. J. Prosthodont Res. 2020, 64, 128–136. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Panayotov, I.V.; Orti, V.; Cuisinier, F.; Yachouh, J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.
2016, 27, 118. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
˙ A.; Masiliunait
˙ V.; Šulcaite,
˙ G.; Žilinskas, J. PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. A
Skirbutis, G.; Dzingute,
e,
review. Stomatologija 2018, 20, 54–58.
Papathanasiou, I.; Kamposiora, P.; Papavasiliou, G.; Ferrari, M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review.
BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 217. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rahmitasari, F.; Ishida, Y.; Kurahashi, K.; Matsuda, T.; Watanabe, M.; Ichikawa, T. PEEK with reinforced materials and modifications for dental implant applications. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 35. [CrossRef]
Najeeb, S.; Zafar, M.S.; Khurshid, Z.; Siddiqui, F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and
prosthodontics. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2016, 60, 12–19. [CrossRef]
Sawyers, J.; Baig, M.R.; El-Masoud, B. Effect of multiple use of impression copings and on implant cast accuracy. Int. J. Oral
Maxillofac. Implants 2019, 34, 891–898. [CrossRef]
Kanawati, A.; Richards, M.W.; Becker, J.J.; Monaco, N.E. Measurement of clinicians' ability to hand torque dental implant
components. J. Oral Implantol. 2009, 35, 185–188. [CrossRef]
Spaulding, E.H.; Rettger, L.F. The fusobacterium genus: I. biochemical and serological classification. J. Bacteriol. 1937, 34, 535–548.
[CrossRef]
Kelsey, J.C. Sterilization by ethylene oxide. J. Clin. Pathol. 1961, 14, 59–61. [CrossRef]
Chia, V.A.; Esguerra, R.J.; Teoh, K.H.; Teo, J.W.; Wong, K.M.; Tan, K.B. In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant
impressions: The effect of implant angulation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2017, 32, 313–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kanda, Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013,
48, 452–458. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kumar, A.; Yap, W.T.; Foo, S.L.; Lee, T.K. Effects of sterilization cycles on PEEK for medical device application. Bioengineering
2018, 5, 18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 2022, 15, 7717
24.
25.
26.
27.
10 of 10
Basgul, C.; Yu, T.; MacDonald, D.W.; Siskey, R.; Marcolongo, M.; Kurtz, S.M. Does annealing improve the interlayer adhesion and
structural integrity of FFF 3D printed PEEK lumbar spinal cages? J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater 2020, 102, 103455. [CrossRef]
˙ A.; Al-Haj Husain, N.; Pletkus, J.; Barauskis, D.; Jegeleviˇcius, D.; Özcan, M. Effect of additional
Rutkunas,
V.; Gedrimiene,
reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study. J. Prosthet.
Dent. 2021, in press. [CrossRef]
Imburgia, M.; Logozzo, S.; Hauschild, U.; Veronesi, G.; Mangano, C.; Mangano, F.G. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral
implantology: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2017, 17, 92. [CrossRef]
Buda, M.; Bratos, M.; Sorensen, J.A. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive
casts. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2018, 120, 913–918. [CrossRef]
...
論文の公開元へ
