リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Preoperative frailty affects postoperative complications, exercise capacity, and home discharge rates after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Preoperative frailty affects postoperative complications, exercise capacity, and home discharge rates after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Komaki, Kodai Yoshida, Naofumi Satomi-Kobayashi, Seimi Tsuboi, Yasunori Ogawa, Masato Wakida, Kumiko Toba, Takayoshi Kawamori, Hiroyuki Otake, Hiromasa Omura, Atsushi Yamanaka, Katsuhiro Inoue, Takeshi Yamashita, Tomoya Sakai, Yoshitada Izawa, Kazuhiro P. Okada, Kenji Hirata, Ken-ichi 神戸大学

2021.08

概要

Assessment of frailty is important for risk stratification among the elderly with severe aortic stenosis (AS) when considering interventions such as surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, evidence of the impact of preoperative frailty on short-term postoperative outcomes or functional recovery is limited. This retrospective study included 234 consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent SAVR or TAVR at Kobe University Hospital between Dec 2013 and Dec 2019. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, postoperative 6-min walking distance (6MWD), and home discharge rates. The mean age was 82 ± 6.6 years. There were 169 (SAVR: 80, TAVR: 89) and 65 (SAVR: 20, TAVR: 45) patients in the non-frail and frail groups, respectively (p = 0.02). The postoperative complication rates in the frail group were significantly higher than those in the non-frail group [30.8% (SAVR: 35.0%, TAVR: 28.9%) vs. 10.7% (SAVR: 15.0%, TAVR: 6.7%), p < 0.001]. The home discharge rate in the non-frail group was significantly higher than that in the frail group [85.2% (SAVR: 81.2%, TAVR: 88.8%) vs. 49.2% (SAVR: 55.0%, TAVR: 46.7%), p < 0.001]. The postoperative 6MWD in the non-frail group was significantly longer than that in the frail group [299.3 ± 87.8 m (SAVR: 321.9 ± 90.8 m, TAVR: 281.1 ± 81.3 m) vs. 141.9 ± 92.4 m (SAVR: 167.8 ± 92.5 m, TAVR: 131.6 ± 91.3 m), p < 0.001]. The TAVR group did not show a decrease in the 6MWD after intervention, regardless of frailty. We report for the first time that preoperative frailty was strongly associated with postoperative complications, 6MWD, and home discharge rates following both SAVR and TAVR. Preoperative frailty assessment may provide useful indications for planning better individualized therapeutic interventions and supporting comprehensive intensive care before and after interventions.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. Lindman BR, Clavel M-A, Mathieu P, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Otto CM, Pibarot

P (2016) Calcific aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16006

2. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Levang OW,

Tornos P, Vanoverschelde J-L, Vermeer F, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian

A. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe

(2003) The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J

24:1231-1243

3. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu

EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA,

Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ,

Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S (2010) Transcatheter Aortic-Valve

Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery. N

Engl J Med 363:1597-1607

4. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK,

Thourani VH, Tuzcu EM, Miller DC, Herrmann HC, Doshi D, Cohen DJ,

Pichard AD, Kapadia S, Dewey T, Babaliaros V, Szeto WY, Williams MR,

Kereiakes D, Zajarias A, Greason KL, Whisenant BK, Hodson RW, Moses

28

JW, Trento A, Brown DL, Fearon WF, Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Jaber WA,

Anderson WN, Alu MC, Webb JG (2016) Transcatheter or Surgical AorticValve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 374:16091620

5. Grimaldi A, Figini F, Maisano F, Montorfano M, Chieffo A, Latib A, Pappalardo

F, Spagnolo P, Cioni M, Vermi AC, Ferrarello S, Piraino D, Cammalleri V,

Ammirati E, Sacco FM, Arendar I, Collu E, La Canna G, Alfieri O, Colombo A

(2013) Clinical outcome and quality of life in octogenarians following

transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Int J Cardiol 168:281-286

6. Arnold SV, Reynolds MR, Lei Y, Magnuson EA, Kirtane AJ, Kodali SK,

Zajarias A, Thourani VH, Green P, Rodés-Cabau J, Beohar N, Mack MJ, Leon

MB, Cohen DJ (2014) Predictors of Poor Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic

Valve Replacement. Circulation 129:2682-2690

7. Hiltrop N, Belmans A, Claes M, Hornikx M, Peeters B, Flamaing J,

Adriaenssens T, De Praetere H, Herregods M-C, Herijgers P, Dubois C (2016)

Functional performance and quality of life in high-risk comorbid patients

undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for symptomatic aortic

29

valve stenosis. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2:184-192

8. Mehilli J, Chandrasekhar J, Sartori S, Chieffo A, Petronio AS, Lefèvre T,

Presbitero P, Capranzano P, Tchetche D, Iadanza A, Sardella G, Van

Mieghem NM, Meliga E, Dumonteil N, Fraccaro C, Trabattoni D, Jochheim D,

Zadrozny M, Mikhail GW, Sharma S, Ferrer MC, Naber C, Kievit P, Moalem

K, Baber U, Snyder C, Sharma M, Morice MC, Mehran R (2019) Impact of

Discharge Location After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on 1-Year

Outcomes in Women: Results From the WIN-TAVI Registry. Can J Cardiol

35:199-207

9. Li Z, Dawson E, Moodie J, Martin J, Bagur R, Cheng D, Kiaii B, John-Baptiste

A (2019) Frailty in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation:

a protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 9:e024163-e024163

10. Ogawa M, Satomi-Kobayashi S, Yoshida N, Tsuboi Y, Komaki K, Wakida K,

Gotake Y, Izawa KP, Sakai Y, Okada K (2019) Effects of Acute Phase

Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation on Unplanned Readmissions After Cardiac

Surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.069

11. Kleczynski P, Dziewierz A, Bagienski M, Rzeszutko L, Sorysz D, Trebacz J,

Sobczynski R, Tomala M, Stapor M, Dudek D (2017) Impact of frailty on

30

mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 185:52-58

12. Afilalo J, Lauck S, Kim DH, Lefèvre T, Piazza N, Lachapelle K, Martucci G,

Lamy A, Labinaz M, Peterson MD, Arora RC, Noiseux N, Rassi A, Palacios

IF, Généreux P, Lindman BR, Asgar AW, Kim CA, Trnkus A, Morais JA,

Langlois Y, Rudski LG, Morin J-F, Popma JJ, Webb JG, Perrault LP (2017)

Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTYAVR Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:689-700

13. Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, Calhoon JH, Desai MY, Kaul S, Lee

JC, Ruiz CE, Vassileva CM (2017) 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision

Pathway for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Management of

Adults With Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology

Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol

69:1313-1346

14. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA,

O’Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM, Thomas JD (2014)

2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular

Heart Disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American

Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 129:e521-

31

e643

15. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B,

Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Muñoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos

Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Group

ESD (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular

heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739-2791

16. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA,

Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O’Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM, Thompson

A (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline

for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on

Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135:e1159-e1195

17. Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR,

Lockowandt U (2012) EuroSCORE II†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41:734-745

18. Shahian DM, Jacobs JP, Badhwar V, Kurlansky PA, Furnary AP, Cleveland

JC, Lobdell KW, Vassileva C, Wyler von Ballmoos MC, Thourani VH, Rankin

JS, Edgerton JR, D’Agostino RS, Desai ND, Feng L, He X, O’Brien SM (2018)

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models:

32

Part 1—Background, Design Considerations, and Model Development. Ann

Thorac Surg 105:1411-1418

19. O’Brien SM, Feng L, He X, Xian Y, Jacobs JP, Badhwar V, Kurlansky PA,

Furnary AP, Cleveland JC, Lobdell KW, Vassileva C, Wyler von Ballmoos MC,

Thourani VH, Rankin JS, Edgerton JR, D’Agostino RS, Desai ND, Edwards

FH, Shahian DM (2018) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult

Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2—Statistical Methods and Results. Ann

Thorac Surg 105:1419-1428

20. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE, Drazner MH, Fonarow

GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC,

Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJV, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B,

Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WHW, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL (2013) 2013

ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. Circulation

128:e240-e327

21. Yoshida N, Yamamoto H, Shinke T, Otake H, Kuroda M, Terashita D,

Takahashi H, Sakaguchi K, Hirota Y, Emoto T, Amin HZ, Mizoguchi T, Hayashi

T, Sasaki N, Yamashita T, Ogawa W, Hirata K-i (2017) Impact of

CD14(++)CD16(+) monocytes on plaque vulnerability in diabetic and non-

33

diabetic patients with asymptomatic coronary artery disease: a crosssectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 16:96

22. Teramoto T, Sasaki J, Ishibashi S, Birou S, Daida H, Dohi S, Egusa G, Hiro

T, Hirobe K, Iida M, Kihara S, Kinoshita M, Maruyama C, Ohta T, Okamura T,

Yamashita S, Yokode M, Yokote K (2014) Diagnosis of Atherosclerosis

Executive Summary of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines

for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases

in Japan―2012 Version. J Atheroscler Thromb 21:296-298

23. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J,

Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health

Study Collaborative Research Group (2001) Frailty in Older AdultsEvidence

for a Phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146-156.

24. Ogawa M, Izawa KP, Satomi-Kobayashi S, Tsuboi Y, Komaki K, Gotake Y,

Sakai Y, Tanaka H, Okita Y (2017) Impact of delirium on postoperative frailty

and long term cardiovascular events after cardiac surgery. PLoS One

12:e0190359

25. Thomas R, Talbot (2005) Diabetes mellitus and cardiothoracic surgical site

infections. Am J Infect Control 33(6):353-9.

34

26. Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, Molitoris BA, Ronco C, Warnock DG, Levin

A, Network AKI (2007) Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to

improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 11:R31

27. Bäck C, Hornum M, Olsen PS, Møller CH (2019) 30-day mortality in frail

patients undergoing cardiac surgery: the results of the frailty in cardiac

surgery (FICS) copenhagen study. Scand Cardiovasc J 53:348-354

28. Okoh AK, Chauhan D, Kang N, Haik N, Merlo A, Cohen M, Haik B, Chen C,

Russo MJ (2017) The impact of frailty status on clinical and functional

outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians with

severe aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 90:1000-1006

29. Huded CP, Huded JM, Friedman JL, Benck LR, Lindquist LA, Holly TA, Sweis

RN, Ricciardi MJ, Malaisrie SC, Davidson CJ, Flaherty JD (2016) Frailty

Status and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J

Cardiol 117:1966-1971

30. Boxer RS, Wang Z, Walsh SJ, Hager D, Kenny AM (2008) The utility of the 6minute walk test as a measure of frailty in older adults with heart failure. Am

J Geriatr Cardiol 17:7-12

31. Yamada S, Kamiya K, Kono Y (2015) Frailty may be a risk marker for adverse

35

outcome in patients with congestive heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2:168-170

32. Boxer R, Kleppinger A, Ahmad A, Annis K, Hager D, Kenny A (2010) The 6minute walk is associated with frailty and predicts mortality in older adults with

heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 16:208-13

33. Waite I, Deshpande R, Baghai M, Massey T, Wendler O, Greenwood S (2017)

Home-based preoperative rehabilitation (prehab) to improve physical

function and reduce hospital length of stay for frail patients undergoing

coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 12:91

34. Russo N, Compostella L, Tarantini G, Setzu T, Napodano M, Bottio T,

D'Onofrio A, Isabella G, Gerosa G, Iliceto S, Bellotto F (2014) Cardiac

rehabilitation after transcatheter versus surgical prosthetic valve implantation

for aortic stenosis in the elderly. Eur J Prev Cardiol 21:1341-8

35. Eichler S, Salzwedel A, Reibis R, Nothroff J, Harnath A, Schikora M, Butter

C, Wegscheider K, Völler H (2017) Multicomponent cardiac rehabilitation in

patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Predictors of functional

and psychocognitive recovery. Eur J Prev Cardiol 24:257-264

36. Fauchère I, Weber D, Maier W, Altwegg L, Lüscher TF, Grünenfelder J,

Nowak A, Tüller D, Genoni M, Falk V, Hermann M (2014) Rehabilitation after

36

TAVI compared to surgical aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiol 173:564-6

37. Tarro Genta F, Tidu M, Bouslenko Z, Bertolin F, Salvetti I, Comazzi F,

Giannuzzi P (2017) Cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve

implantation compared to patients after valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Med

(Hagerstown) 18:114-120

38. Tamuleviciute-Prasciene E, Drulyte K, Jurenaite G, Kubilius R, BjarnasonWehrens B (2018) Frailty and Exercise Training: How to Provide Best Care

after Cardiac Surgery or Intervention for Elder Patients with Valvular Heart

Disease. Biomed Res Int 2018:9849475

39. Ogawa M, Izawa P.K, Kitamura A, Satomi-seimi K, Tsuboi Y, Komaki K, Sakai

Y, Tanaka H, Okita Y (2017) Changes in exercise capacity and psychosocial

factors in hospitalized cardiac surgery patients. Res in Cardiovasc Med 6:3844

40. Ofori-Asenso R, Chin KL, Mazidi M, Zomer E, Ilomaki J, Zullo AR, Gasevic D,

Ademi Z, Korhonen MJ, LoGiudice D, Bell JS, Liew D (2019) Global Incidence

of Frailty and Prefrailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open: 2:e198398e198398

37

Figure legends

Figure 1 Incidence of postoperative complications among four groups

Data are shown as percentages (%). AKI, acute kidney injury; PMI, pacemaker

implantation; PVM, prolonged ventilator management; SAVR, surgical aortic

valve replacement; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Figure 2 Change in the pre- and postoperative 6MWD

6MWD, 6-min walking distance; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVR,

transcatheter aortic valve replacement *p <0.01, **p <0.001.

Figure 3 Home discharge rate among four groups

Data are shown as percentages (%). SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement;

TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Figure 4 Data of additional outcomes

ICU, intensive care unit; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVR,

transcatheter aortic valve replacement

38

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and laboratory data of the study

population

P value

All,

SAVR all,

TAVR all,

n = 100

n = 134

P value

SAVR all

Variables

n = 234

SAVR

TAVR

P value

SAVR non-frail

non-frail

frail

n = 80

n = 20

vs.

TAVR non-frail

non-frail

frail

n = 89

n = 45

vs.

TAVR all

vs.

SAVR frail

TAVR frail

Age, years

82.0 ± 6.6

77.3 ± 6.5

85.5 ± 4.2

<0.001

76.5 ± 6.0

80.6 ± 7.4

0.01

85.5 ± 3.7

85.6 ± 5.0

0.9998

BMI, kg/m

22.7 ± 3.7

23.1 ± 3.7

22.4 ± 3.7

0.196

23.2 ± 3.8

22.5 ± 3.3

0.880

23.0 ± 3.5

21.3 ± 3.9

0.052

Female, n (%)

149 (63.7)

51 (52.0)

98 (73.1)

<0.001

38 (47.5)

13 (65.0)

0.161

64 (71.9)

34 (75.6)

0.653

Single living, n (%)

66 (31.6)

17 (17.0)

49 (36.6)

<0.001

11 (13.7)

6 (30.0)

0.084

32 (36.0)

17 (37.8)

0.836

LV dimension diastolic, mm

42.1 ± 6.9

42.8 ± 7.1

41.6 ± 6.7

0.209

43.3 ± 6.6

40.7 ± 8.4

0.417

41.8 ± 6.7

41.3 ± 6.7

0.982

LV Dimension systolic, mm

27.4 ± 6.8

27.2 ± 6.5

27.5 ± 7.1

0.762

27.4 ± 6.6

26.4 ± 6.1

0.940

27.1 ± 7.2

28.2 ± 68

0.839

LVEF, %

62.7 ± 12.3

63.6 ± 11.0

62.1 ± 13.2

0.352

64.3 ± 10.7

60.8 ± 11.7

0.669

63.1 ± 13.2

60.1 ± 13.2

0.531

4.6 ± 4.3

5.0 ± 5.5

4.4 ± 3.2

0.274

5.2 ± 6.1

4.2 ± 1.7

0.748

4.6 ± 3.7

3.8 ± 1.5

0.818

21.2 ± 10.6

20.6 ± 11.0

21.6 ± 10.3

0.520

19.5 ± 9.7

24.6 ± 14.4

0.262

21.1 ± 10.9

22.6 ± 9.0

0.912

Echocardiographic parameters

E/E

41.8 ± 7.3

41.3 ± 8.0

42.2 ± 6.8

0.334

41.4 ± 8.3

40.8 ± 6.9

0.988

41.6 ± 7.3

43.5 ± 5.7

0.500

0.6 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.2

0.992

0.7 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.2

0.527

0.7 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.2

0.505

Peak velocity, m/s

4.5 ± 0.6

4.4 ± 0.7

4.5 ± 0.6

0.372

4.5 ± 0.7

4.3 ± 0.8

0.537

4.5 ± 0.5

4.5 ± 0.6

0.963

Mean PG, mmHg

50.4 ± 16.3

51.3 ± 18.6

49.8 ± 14.7

0.509

52.5 ± 18.5

46.8 ± 18.5

0.523

50.5 ± 14.2

48.3 ± 15.6

0.880

Hypertension

104 (44.4)

42 (42.0)

62 (46.2)

0.516

35 (43.8)

7 (35.0)

0.478

41 (46.1)

21 (46.7)

0.948

Diabetes mellitus

74 (20.1)

32 (32.0)

42 (31.3)

0.915

26 (32.5)

6 (30.0)

0.830

24 (27.0)

18 (40.0)

0.124

Dyslipidemia

59 (25.2)

29 (29.0)

30 (22.3)

0.249

24 (30.0)

5 (25.0)

0.659

23 (25.8)

7 (15.6)

0.177

16 (6.8)

8 (8.0)

8 (6.0)

8 (10.0)

0 (0)

7 (7.9)

1 (2.2)

131 (56.0)

70 (70.0)

61 (45.5)

60 (75.0)

10 (50.0)

50 (56.2)

11 (24.4)

LAD, mm

AVA, cm

Comorbidities, n (%)

NYHA, n (%)

<0.001

0.003

<0.001

80 (34.2)

21 (21.0)

59 (44.0)

12 (15.0)

9 (45.0)

31 (34.8)

28 (62.2)

7 (3.0)

1 (1.0)

6 (4.5)

0 (0)

1 (5.0)

1 (1.1)

5 (11.1)

Laboratory data

3.6 ± 0.5

3.8 ± 0.4

3.5 ± 0.5

<0.001

3.9 ± 0.4

3.6 ± 0.5

0.064

3.6 ± 0.5

3.3 ± 0.4

0.003

11.6 ± 1.6

12.2 ± 1.6

11.2 ± 1.5

<0.001

12.3 ± 1.6

11.5 ± 1.6

0.182

11.4 ± 1.5

10.7 ± 1.4

0.041

49.4 ± 19.4

51.0 ± 20.0

48.3 ± 19.0

0.317

53.3 ± 18.9

41.9 ± 22.1

0.099

49.6 ± 17.8

45.8 ± 21.0

0.686

HbA1c, %

6.0 ± 0.7

6.1 ± 0.9

5.9 ± 0.6

0.112

6.1 ± 0.9

6.0 ± 0.7

0.939

6.0 ± 0.6

5.8 ± 0.7

0.923

AST, U/L

24.0 ± 12.6

24.7 ± 10.3

23.4 ± 14.0

0.433

25.1 ± 11.0

28.7 ± 25.2

0.760

23.5 ± 14.2

23.2 ± 13.8

0.999

ALT, U/L

16.7 ± 10.7

18.5 ± 12.2

13.3 ± 9.2

0.023

18.5 ± 12.0

18.8 ± 13.2

0.999

15.6 ± 9.5

14.8 ± 8.9

0.976

ALP, U/L

233.5 ± 91.7

232.7 ± 101.5

233.8 ± 84.1

0.122

224.5 ± 96.7

264.9 ± 115.6

0.288

222.0 ± 71.5

257.2 ± 101.6

0.339

γ-GTP, U/L

28.5 ± 24.3

31.4 ± 25.2

26.4 ± 23.5

0.924

32.1 ± 27.0

28.6 ± 16.2

0.941

24.1 ± 20.7

30.9 ± 28.0

0.151

Total bilirubin, mg/dL

0.7 ± 0.2

0.7 ± 0.2

0.7 ± 0.2

0.720

0.7 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.2

0.285

0.7 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.2

0.676

CRP, mg/dL

0.4 ± 1.0

0.5 ± 1.2

0.4 ± 0.9

0.339

0.4 ± 1.2

0.8 ± 1.4

0.523

0.3 ± 0.6

0.6 ± 1.3

0.980

T-Cho, mg/dL

172.5 ± 38.1

178.1 ± 40.8

168.5 ± 35.7

0.063

181.1 ± 35.6

165.4 ± 57.3

0.394

169.4 ± 36.7

166.7 ± 33.9

0.501

Triglycerides, mg/dL

116.9 ± 60.4

123.8 ± 64.8

111.9 ± 56.7

0.145

126.3 ± 66.3

113.0 ± 58.7

0.833

106.7 ± 57.5

122.3 ± 54.3

0.427

HDL, mg/dL

54.5 ± 16.3

57.2 ± 18.0

52.7 ± 14.8

0.044

57.8 ± 18.1

54.8 ± 17.8

0.894

54.7 ± 15.6

48.6 ± 12.3

0.018

LDL, mg/dL

104.0 ± 30.2

108.4 ± 32.2

101.0 ± 28.5

0.076

110.1 ± 32.6

101.4 ± 30.2

0.706

102.5 ± 29.3

98.1 ± 26.9

0.863

BNP, pg/mL

400.0 ± 625.1 381.0 ± 610.7 413.1 ± 636.8

0.706

348.5 ± 585.1 505.8 ± 703.5

0.760

333.0 ± 447.3 575.2 ± 891.8

Albumin, g/dL

Hemoglobin, g/dL

eGFR, ml/min/1.73m

0.152

Medications, n (%)

β-blocker

73 (31.2)

35 (35.0)

38 (28.4)

0.278

28(35.0)

7(35.0)

>0.999

26 (29.2)

12(26.7)

0.757

ACE-I

25 (10.7)

11 (11.0)

14 (10.5)

0.892

11(13.8)

0(0)

0.079

8(9.0)

6(13.3)

0.437

ARB

84 (35.9)

39 (39.0)

45 (33.6)

0.393

30(37.5)

9(45.0)

0.539

34(38.2)

11(24.4)

0.111

Statin

84 (35.9)

40 (40.0)

44 (32.8)

0.258

33(41.3)

7(35.0)

0.609

30(33.7)

14(31.1)

0.762

Calcium-channel blocker

103 (44.0)

42 (42.0)

61 (45.5)

0.591

33(41.3)

9(45.0)

0.761

40(44.9)

21(46.7)

0.850

Diuretics

92 (39.3)

33 (33.0)

59 (44.0)

0.088

23(28.8)

10(50.0)

0.071

34(38.2)

25(55.6)

0.056

original logistic EuroSCORE

15.6 ± 10.3

13.5 ± 7.8

20.8 ± 13.5

0.001

STS risk score

8.1 ± 8.5

6.9 ± 3.9

11.7 ± 14.3

0.021

EuroSCORE II

10.2 ± 7.2

6.6 ± 4.0

12.8 ± 7.9

<0.001

6.2 ± 3.3

8.6 ± 6.0

0.450

11.6 ± 6.7

15.4 ± 9.6

0.006

Grip strength, kg

19.6 ± 7.6

23.2 ± 8.1

16.9 ± 6.0

<0.001

24.5 ± 7.9

17.8 ± 6.8

<0.001

19.0 ± 5.5

12.9 ± 4.8

<0.001

Gait speed, m/sec

0.9 ± 0.4

1.0 ± 0.2

0.8 ± 0.4

<0.001

1.1 ± 0.2

0.8 ± 0.3

0.004

0.9 ± 0.4

0.5 ± 0.2

<0.001

<0.001

372.8 ± 82.3

208.5 ± 100.3

<0.001

288.1 ± 94.2

136.3 ± 106.7

<0.001

Risk scoring

Pre-operative physical functions

6MWD, m

281.1 ± 126.6 339.9 ± 108.1 237.2 ± 121.7

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation, or %. The averages of continuous

variables were compared using either the two-tailed student’s t test. Fisher’s

exact test was used to compare the proportions of categorical variables between

groups. 6MWD, 6-minutes walking test distance; ACEI, angiotensin-converting

enzyme inhibitor; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase;

ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AVA, aortic

valve area; BMI, body mass index; BNP, Brain natriuretic peptide; BUN, blood

urea nitrogen; CRP, C-reactive protein; EF, ejection fraction; eGFR, estimated

glomerular filtration rate; γ-GTP, glutamyl transpeptidase; HbA1c, glycated

hemoglobin; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LAD, left atrial

diameter; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LV, left ventricle; NYHA,

New York Heart Association; PG, pressure gradient; SAVR, surgical aortic valve

replacement; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons; TAVR, transcatheter aortic

valve replacement; T-Cho, total cholesterol.

Table 2. Result of 6MWD of pre and post operation

Variables

pre

post

P value

Interaction

F value

P value

All patients

SAVR

339.9 ± 108.1

291.1 ± 109.8

<0.001

27.84

<0.001

TAVR

237.2 ± 121.7

230.9 ± 110.3

0.16

SAVR

non-frail

372.8 ± 82.3

321.9 ± 90.8

<0.001

0.376

0.541

frail

208.5 ± 100.3

167.8 ± 92.5

<0.001

TAVR

non-frail

288.1 ± 94.2

281.1 ± 81.3

0.202

0.057

0.812

frail

136.3 ± 106.7

131.6 ± 91.3

0.537

6MWD, 6-minute walking test distance; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement;

TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

a Significance

level for the hypothesis of no group effect.

Significance level for the hypothesis of time effect (pre vs. post in the same

group).

Significance level for the hypothesis of no time × group effect.

Table 3. Logistic regression model of home discharge

Univariable

Multivariable

Variable

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

Age

0.916 (0.866-0.963)

<0.001

0.895 (0.829-0.963)

0.003

Sex, (ref. female)

0.591 (0.301-1.115)

0.106

1.087 (0.463-2.521)

0.846

Intervention, (ref. SAVR)

1.077 (0.592-1.980)

0.809

0.382 (0.136-1.046)

0.061

albumin

2.471 (1.255-5.084)

0.008

1.276 (0.326-2.040)

0.603

CRP

0.762 (0.594-0.946)

0.013

0.764 (0.555-1.016)

0.066

frail

0.168 (0.087-0.319)

<0.001

0.131 (0.058-0.285)

<0.001

single living

0.401 (0.214-0.752)

0.004

0.378 (0.169-0.831)

0.016

CRP, C-reactive protein; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SAVR, surgical

aortic valve replacement.

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る