Cheng, L., Sit, J.W.H., Choi, K.C., Chair, S.Y., Li, X., Wu, Y., Long, J., Tao, M.,
2018. Effectiveness of a patient-centred, empowerment-based intervention
programme among patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomised
11
controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 79 43–51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.021.
Chiba, R., 2008. Development of a Japanese version of the recovery assessment
scale for people with mental illness and a study on factors related to recovery.
2008 Home Health Care, Yuumi Memorial Foundation Home Health Care (public
subscription) Completion report, 1–57. (in Japanese)
Fukuchi, T., et al. 2015. Chapter 8 Psychiatric care：Section 3 Treatment ・ Others,
in: Seishin Hoken Iryou Fukushi Hakusho Henshu Iinkai (Eds.), White Paper on
Mental Health and Medical Welfare 2016 Cooperation between Psychiatric Care
and Mental Health Welfare. Chuo Hoki Shuppan, Tokyo, p. 171. (in Japanese)
Gelder, M., Harrison, P., Cowen, P., 2006. Shorter Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry,
fifth ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Goldman, D.L., 1990. Two pioneers of today’s partial hospital and their ideas. Int.
J. Partial. Hosp. 6 181–188.
Hiruta, G., 2011. Behavioral Characteristics of Patients with Schizophrenia：The
Support and ICF. Kongou Shuppan, Tokyo. (in Japanese)
Igarashi, Y., Oki, Y., 2018. Survey report. The Journal of the Japanese Society for
Day Care Treatment 22 60–68. (in Japanese)
Ikebuchi, E., Iwasaki, S., Miyauchi, M., Oshima, I., Sugimoto, T., 1995.
Relationship between disability and psychiatric symptoms: analysis of social life
assessment scale for the mentally ill (LASMI). Clin. Psychiatry. 371041–371048.
(in Japanese)
Ishitani, N., 1997. Psychiatric Occupational Therapy, revision, Seiwa shyoten,
Tokyo. (in Japanese)
Kawanori, Y., Kambara, M., 2010. The improvement of the mental and life
symptoms and Duration of Untreated Psychosis in schizophrenia patients at day
care centers. Research Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Chiba University. 58
305–309. (in Japanese)
Kayama, A., Kobayashi, M., 2010. Basic practical theory of occupational therapy,
in: Tomioka, N., Kobayashi, M. (Eds.), Occupational Therapy, 5th volume Mental
Disorder, third revised ed. Kyodo Isho Shuppansya, Tokyo, pp. 87–129. (in
Japanese)
Kobayashi, M., 2010. Theories, models and techniques related to psychiatric
occupational therapy, in: Tomioka, N., Kobayashi, M. (Eds.), Occupational
12
Therapy Complete, 5th volume Mental Disorder, third revised ed. Kyodo Isho
Shuppansya, Tokyo, pp. 287–324. (in Japanese)
Koda, M., 2009. Practice of employment support by disabilities：Mental disorders,
in: Hiraga, A., Iwase, Y. (Eds.), Occupational Therapy, 12th volume Work-related
Activities, third revised ed. Kyodo Isho Shuppansya, Tokyo, pp. 77–95. (in
Japanese)
Kuwaharada, M., Yamashita, Y., Takekawa, Y., 2013. Empowerment and discharge
support skills for patients with strong anxiety about death. J. Jp. Soc. Resp. Care
Rehab. 23 318–322. (in Japanese)
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2003. The Global Assessment of
Functioning. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2003/11/dl/s1111-2a.pdf (accessed 19
June 2016).
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2009. About psychiatric daycare.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2009/06/dl/s0604-7b.pdf (accessed 26 February
2020).
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2013. Individual matters 2 about
psychiatric care. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/05-Shingikai-12404000Hokenkyoku-Iryouka/0000031076.pdf (accessed 26 February 2020).
Priebe, S., McCabe, R., Schützwohl, M., Kiejna, A., Nawka, P., Raboch, J.,
Reininghaus, U., Wang, D., Kallert, T.W. 2011. Patient characteristics predicting
better treatment outcomes in day hospitals compared with inpatient wards.
Psychiatr. Serv. 62 278-84.
Someya, T., Anzai, N., Ikebuchi, E., Ozawa, M., Harada, S., Ueda, S., Kano, Y.,
Nakagome, K., Iwanami, A., Kumagai, N., Miyauchi, M., 1986. Negative
symptoms and the course of social adjustment in schizophrenia. Seishin Igaku.
28(11) 1229–1236. (in Japanese)
Song, H.Y., Nam, K.A., 2015. Effectiveness of a stroke risk self-management
intervention for adults with prehypertension. Asian Nurs. Res. 9 328–335.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.002.
Takano, Y., Kato, M., Tsukahara, T., Kasahara, T., Suzuki, T., Hara, T., 1995. The
improvement of psychiatric symptoms of schizophrenic patients during day
care treatment. Seishin Igaku. 37(4) 369–376. (in Japanese)
Tajima, A., Kato, T., Yuasa, S., Eguma, Y., 1967. Approach to people with
schizophrenia in social life. Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica 69 323–351. (in
13
Japanese)
Tsushima, E., 2011. Statistical methods used in research in the field of
rehabilitation. Journal of the Society of Biomechanics. 35(1) 67–75. (in Japanese)
Ueda, S., Tsurumi, K., 2003. Essence from Dialogue: Suggestion from Patient’s
view, Intrinsic Rehabilitation. Fujiwara Shoten, Tokyo. (in Japanese)
Ueno, T., 2015. Treatment and rehabilitation of mental disorders：Social therapy
and rehabilitation, in: Ueno, T. (Ed.), Standard Physical Therapy and
Occupational Therapy Specialization: Psychiatry, fourth ed. Igakushoin, Tokyo, pp.
245–251. (in Japanese)
Yokoyama, H., 2005．Considering the way of recovery of self-determination for
people with mental disabilities. Kouteki Fujyo Kenkyu 38 34–36. (in Japanese)
Figure Legends
Figure 1. Areas of daily life activities
The two figures show the first and second pages of the “Areas of daily life
activities.” When the participants wrote down the areas that fitted their goal on
the goal sheet, they chose one from seven of the listed areas on Page 1. When it
was difficult for them to think of any daily goals, they wrote down their goals in
reference to the set examples of the seven areas provided to them. Page 2 shows
examples of concrete goals for the area of health management. These were
developed based on input from authors and day hospital professionals.
Figure 2. CONSORT diagram
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for this study. Of the 66 eligible
participants, 57 were included in the study sample. Subsequently, 29 were
randomly allocated to the intervention group and 28 to the control group. Three
months later, 24 patients in the intervention group and 25 in the control group
had participated for the full study period, and their data were included for
analysis.
14
Table 1. Characteristics of the participants
Intervention group (n＝24)
Control group（n=25）
n(%) Mean±SD
n(%) Mean±SD
Age(years)
50.83±10.06
46.16±10.12
Sex
male/female
0.11
0.68
18/6
20/5
Education
0.39
Junior high school
High school
14
17
Technical school
Technical college
Junior college
University
Work experience (%）
21（87.5）
23(92.0)
Duration of illness (months)
Total length of admissions (months)
Number of admissions
Intellectual disability (%)
p-value
0.48
242.25±143.54
225.24±130.63
0.67
26.83±30.48
29.4±55.23
0.84
3.42±2.54
2.68±2.36
0.30
2（8.3）
2（8.0）
0.68
Age at first participation of day hospital
(years)
42.92±11.58
39.32±10.74
0.27
Period of use of day hospital (months）
92.46±83.63
82.6±68.42
0.65
4.25±0.90
3.88±1.13
0.21
504.79±352.35
700.15±556.55
0.15
1.08±1.02
1.00±1.2３
0.80
Frequency of day hospital use (days/week)
Medication (CPZ equiv, mg/day）
Number of housemates
Pearson's chi-square test (p < 0.05) for gender.
Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05) for education, working experience, and intellectual disability.
Non paired t-test (p < 0.05) for other items.
The items of work experience and intellectual disability show the ratio.
Medication and the number of the housemates are data at baseline.
Table 2．GAF, PANSS, and RAS scores in the intervention and control groups
Intervention group (n＝24)
Control group (n= 25)
Mean±SD
Mean±SD
59.91±11.70
61.08±11.21
η2
0.12
.730
.003
F(interaction) <0.01
.990
<.001
GAF
T1
T2
F(group)
61.33±13.14
62.48±10.44
F(time)
8.82
<.005
.158
66.38±24.85
70.56±19.74
F(group)
0.44
.510
.009
F(interaction) <0.01
.950
<.001
PANSS
T1
T2
64.29±24.56
68.56±19.85
F(time)
9.48
<.004
.168
87.43±13.20
81.625±11.77
F(group)
0.76
.390
.017
F(interaction)
3.28
.077
.068
F(time)
1.75
.190
.040
RAS
T1
T2
86.74±14.41
86.08±14.99
GAF: Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (total score).
RAS: Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale.
T1: baseline, T2: post-intervention.
Analysis were conducted using a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA.
Areas of daily life activities
Area of daily life
Content
Pa
age
Health
management
Management of medication,,
health condition, and nutrition
Წ
Daily life
performance
Performance of tasks, such as
eating, bathing, shopping, and
cleaning
Ჭ
Daily liife
management
Management of
other valuables
Ხ
Social
interaction
Study/Work
Reesource
utilization
Leisure
activity
money
and
Interaction with friends and
colleagues in the workplace
Ჯ
Continuing school,, retturning to
school or work, and
em
mployment
Ჰ
Using public
transportation
Ჱ
facilities
and
Rest, hobby, and amusement
Health
management
Ex
xample of concrete goals
ũI go to the hospital regularly..
ũI keep taking medication.
ũI wake up in the morning and
go to bed at night.
ũI manage my physical and
nutritional condition.
I eat well balanced meals.
I don’t overeat my favorite food.ͤ
I take a rest when I feel tired.
ͤ e.g., alcohol, coffee, chocolate.
Ჱ
Figure 1. Area list of daily life activities
Assessed for eligibility (n=66)
Enrollment
Excluded (n=9)
Did not meet inclusion criteria (n=6)
Declined to participate (n=3)
Randomized (n=57)
Allocation
Allocated to intervention group (n=29)
Received
Did
allocated intervention (n=28)
not receive allocated intervention
- reason: hospital admission (n=1)
Allocated to control group (n=28)
Received treatment as usual (n=26)
Did not receive treatment as usual
-reason: poor physical condition (n=1)
-reason: did not participate regularly (n=1)
Follow-Up
Lost to follow-up (with reason) (n=1)
Discontinued intervention; reason: long absence (n=1)
Lost to follow-up (with reason) (n=1)
Discontinued intervention; reason: admission (n=1)
Analysis
Analyzed (n=24)
Excluded from analysis (with reason) (n=3)
- reason: admission (n=1)
- reason: excessive number of intervention (n=2)
Figure 2.
Analyzed (n=25)
Excluded
CONSORT diagram
from analysis (with reason) (n=0)
...
論文の公開元へ
