リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Intelligent Prediction of Air Conditioning System Performance using Artificial Neural Network」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Intelligent Prediction of Air Conditioning System Performance using Artificial Neural Network

Sholahudin 早稲田大学

2021.08.03

概要

Energy provision and the control of the emissions related to energy consumption have arisen as major global issues in the last decade. The largest share of the global energy provision still relies on depletable fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and gas, which are non-renewable and becoming very limited. The large-scale fossil fuels usage leads to the raising of potential supply difficulties and critical environmental impacts such as greenhouse gas emission, climate change, ozone layer depletion, etc. The energy consumption reduction and environmental safety of energy conversion systems are issues currently targeted by many researchers in the world, especially in building sector. The statistical data show that residential buildings account for the second largest share of energy consumption after the industrial sector. The energy consumption in buildings is steadily increasing. The main reasons contributing to this fact include the population growth, larger demand for building services, more advanced thermal comfort standards, and longer permanence of the occupants inside buildings. These circumstances forewarn the rising of the related energy demand in the future. Accordingly, improving energy efficiency in the building sector has recently become the main concern for policy makers and stakeholders. Today, the air conditioning systems have become a necessity in buildings. The recent change of lifestyle, which has brought many people to spend most of their time inside the building, pushes AC to work for long time, in different conditions, and different climates. In these modern days, people are estimated to spend approximately 80-90% of their time in conditioned indoor spaces. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that 1.9 billion units of air conditioning (AC) systems are operating all over the world in 2020. This number is projected to experience an increase of as much as 50% by 2030. A more extensive use of air conditioners is caused by stricter standard requirements of thermal comfort, the established development of this technology (large number of experienced manufactures providing systems at affordable price) and economic welfare in developing countries. Moreover, the systems used by consumers are most likely to demonstrate less than half of best available efficiency of this technology. As a result, the growth in energy demand for AC systems tends to increase continuously and, if not operated properly, the related environmental footprint could become a substantial cause for unsustainable greenhouse emissions. As the AC systems are responsible for the largest energy demand in the building sector, there are large opportunities to reduce the energy consumption in the building sector through efficiency improvement of these systems and their operation strategy.

A vapor compression technology is most commonly applied for AC systems in residential building applications. In order to increase the systems efficiency several works have been conducted to develop advanced control strategies and improve component efficiency. However, these efforts improved the system performance only slightly due to technical limitations of each system component. On the other hand, the optimal operation management can be an effective measure to substantially reduce the energy consumption of AC systems. The system cooling capacity represents the main extensive indicator of the system performance, response to the external disturbances and internal load. This quantity is generally related to the input driving energy to evaluate the system performance in terms of first and second law thermodynamic efficiency. Ideally, the system should be working to deliver appropriate cooling capacity in response to the instantaneous cooling load at the potentially maximum efficiency. According to the investigation presented in previous research, the optimal operation of AC systems can be achieved in range of 50-70% of the nominal capacity. To this purpose, a reliable prediction method for actual system performance is necessary for defining advanced operation strategies, adapting the available capacity with the load of a facility, and establishing system efficiency monitoring techniques. As billions of these systems have already been installed in different types of buildings, capacity sizes, grids, and climates and encountered performance degradation over time due to fouling of the heat exchanger surface, pipe leakage, improper refrigerant mass charge, etc., the actual system performance during operation is generally unknown. This suggests the fundamental necessity of a cost-effective, accurate, and non-intrusive method for predicting the AC system performance for better system operation management.

Due to the several issues that should be considered in a performance prediction method for air conditioners, such as accessibility for input measurement, cost, reliability and applicability, an effective method is presently not available. In practice, the systems operate in various dynamic conditions and there are only few parameters that can be measured using inexpensive and non- intrusive sensor as input of prediction. Moreover, installed systems have different size, manufactures, configurations, and characteristics. The above mentioned issues have so far represented overwhelming obstacles to the development of a physical model, to the measurement of the required input parameters, and to the implementation of the method in field tests. Among the several approaches to estimate system performances, direct measurement, statistics, physical model, and machine learning are mostly adopted.

The direct measurement method cannot be extensively applied as the measurement of mass flow rate and pressure of the refrigerant is intrusive and requires high investment cost. Physical models have a good approximation capability and can be reliable to extrapolate the system behavior outside the validation range. Unfortunately, to the accurate knowledge of the numerous input parameters required for calculation, such as component geometry, refrigerant properties, system specifications, etc. are commonly not available far installed systems. On the other hand, statistics method can be proposed evaluate system performance on the basis of a set of recorded data. However, these data are not presently able to capture the extensive variability of the system performances, dynamic behavior, and operating conditions. Alternatively, machine learning technique can be used to predict the system performance without requiring the complex mathematical functions as used in physical model. This method has been proven to be able to approximate the input output data accurately when the sufficient training data are available. Regarding to the complexity of AC systems phenomena, this method offers the possibility for simplification of cooling capacity estimation. In physical model, the relationship between the physical phenomena and system performance is established using the complex mathematical functions based on first principle theory. Instead of using the mathematical model, an ANN black box model can be developed to learn the physical phenomena using few, indirectly related input parameters (non-intrusive and inexpensive) to predict the system performance. This method can be developed using relevant input parameters that are non-intrusive, inexpensive to measure and generally represent system performance behavior.

The application of ANN to predict AC system performances have been investigated in previous works. It is generally shown that the performance of a given AC system can be well predicted by ANN model within the training range of the representative data used for training. However, ANN models were mostly developed using input parameters that are intrusive to measure (refrigerant mass charge, compressor speed, valve opening) or affected by high location variance (air-side temperatures and velocity), which could hinder their actual implementation in operative systems. Moreover, the predictions were carried out using the training and testing data generated from the same system, in the same structural condition. Therefore, the developed ANN model in previous studies cannot be applied in various systems with different rated capacity.

The present study aims to develop reliable ANN model that can be generally used to predict cooling capacity of different AC systems, in diverse operating conditions, while using non-intrusive and cost effective input parameters. The research is conducted under the hypothesis that system performance can be predicted by properly teaching ANN the physics of air conditioning cycle. The method adopted involves few input parameters representing the air conditioning cycle and easily measurable in actual operative conditions. Specifically, the method is demonstrated by utilizing an ANN model exclusively based on four input refrigerant temperatures that are easily accessible from the outdoor unit. A scaling method with data normalization is introduced to predict the system with different nominal capacity and from different manufacturers.

The ANN model is developed using a multilayer perceptron model to predict the cooling capacity of the systems. It is trained and tested with different data and optimized by a varying number of neurons and hidden layers. The training and testing data for the prediction are generated by five different systems using AC simulator and experimental facility. The simulator has been validated and designed to meet the system characteristics in close resemblance of the actual system performance in either steady or steady conditions. The three systems developed by a numerical simulator include 50 kW, 7.1 kW, and 2.5 kW nominal capacity, respectively. While the two actual machines used in experimental facility have nominal capacity of 33.5 kW and 28 kW, respectively. In order to comprehensively cover the realistic range of operation of AC systems, the performance behaviors are characterized in various operating conditions with varying cooling load, indoor and outdoor temperatures.

The applicability of different sets of inputs, including air temperatures, controllable parameters, and refrigerant temperatures, representing different categories of the influent parameters for system performance prediction, is investigated. The data generated from the numerical models of two AC systems with nominal capacity of 7.1 kW and 2.5 kW are used to train and test the ANN models using different input parameters for performance prediction. The investigation is conducted by testing the developed ANN model in different possible case: on data simulated within the range of training scenarios, on data outside the range of training, and on data obtained from the simulation of a different system with a different nominal capacity. The investigation indicate that the refrigerant temperatures at the inlet and outlet of evaporator and condenser are selected as the best option for an intelligent prediction method of AC systems as they meet the following criteria: inexpensive to measure, non-intrusive, relatively low uncertainty, represent air-conditioning cycle, scalable for different systems with different rated capacity and manufacturer, and sensitive to cooling capacity and external disturbances.

Consequently, the performance prediction of actual AC systems, represented by the experimental data collected in actual machines of 33.5 kW and 28 kW, is attempted. The training data are generated through the simulation of the 50 kW multi-evaporator systems. This investigation aims to verify the generalization capability of the fundamental hypothesis underlying this method for actual implementation. The hypothesis guiding this research effort is that, although AC systems have different configuration and size, and the specific data characteristics of simulation and experiments differ in the specific response determined by the control package, the training data obtained via a reliable simulator still provide a fundamental representation of the refrigerant cycle realized in actual systems. If such hypothesis is proved true and the simulator could reliably approximate the data behavior of actual AC systems, the ANN model can learn the system cycle from simulation data with a much broader variability of conditions, configurations and climates, which could be impossible (in terms of time, cost, and measuring method) to collect experimentally. This will reduce the time, cost, and complexity of data generation. Additionally, the simulator can be flexible and could provide the data that are difficult to generate in experimental facility. The results revealed that the ANN model has successfully predicted on smooth data characteristics. However, larger deviations appear when applied on high fluctuation testing data characteristics (due to the intermittent operation occurring at low partial loads) since this kind of data behavior are not presently available in the simulation training data. Therefore, due to the lack of information provided by the simulation data during such circumstances, the ANN model trained with simulation data could not well recognize the intermittent (on/off) or strongly dynamic experimental data. .

In order to demonstrate the possibility of higher accuracy prediction results by relying on the suggested method, the prediction of air conditioners’ performance on different systems is investigated by using experimental data for both training and testing. This aims to teach ANN a higher data variability especially during intermittent operation of the actual machine. The training and testing data are generated from experimental facility with the system of 33.5 kW and 28 kW, respectively. The ANN prediction includes the inputs from the previous time steps to capture the system dynamic behavior. The prediction results yield good agreement between predicted and experimental values. The inclusion of intermittent data characteristics in the training improves the data variability and generalization ability of the ANN model. This result suggests that the ANN model could be applied to predict the performance of different systems using sufficiently representative training data from a reference system.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. Electricity Final Cnsumption by Sector [https://www.iea.org/data-and- statistics?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20consumption&indicator=ElecConsBySector]

2. Chua KJ, Chou SK, Yang WM, Yan J: Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning – A review of technologies and strategies. Applied Energy 2013, 104:87-104.

3. Pérez-Lombard L, Ortiz J, Pout C: A review on buildings energy consumption information.Energy and Buildings 2008, 40(3):394-398.

4. Ruparathna R, Hewage K, Sadiq R: Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: A critical review of commercial and institutional buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016, 53:1032-1045.

5. Klepeis NE, Nelson, W.C., Ott, W.R., Robinson, J.P., Tsang, A.M., Switzer, P., Behar, J.V., Hern, S.C., Engelmann, W.H.: The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001, 11(3):231-352.

6. Geng Y, Ji W, Lin B, Zhu Y: The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity. Building and Environment 2017, 121:158-167.

7. The Future of Cooling [https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-cooling]

8. Ahn B-L, Yoo S, Kim J, Jeong H, Leigh S-B, Jang C-Y: Thermal management of LED lighting integrated with HVAC systems in office buildings. Energy and Buildings 2016, 127:1159-1170.

9. Scott MJ, Huang, Y.J., Annex, A.: Technical note: methods for estimating energy consumption in buildings in effects of climate change on energy production and use in the United States. In: A Report by the US climate change science program and the subcommittee on global change research. Washington (DC); 2007.

10. Lubis A, Jeong J, Saito K, Giannetti N, Yabase H, Idrus Alhamid M, Nasruddin: Solar- assisted single-double-effect absorption chiller for use in Asian tropical climates. Renewable Energy 2016, 99:825-835.

11. Xu S, Niu J, Cui Z, Ma G: Experimental research on vapor-injected heat pump using injection subcooling. Applied Thermal Engineering 2018, 136:674-681.

12. Tang R, Wang S, Shan K, Cheung H: Optimal control strategy of central air-conditioning systems of buildings at morning start period for enhanced energy efficiency and peak demand limiting. Energy 2018, 151:771-781.

13. Li N, Xia L, Shiming D, Xu X, Chan M-Y: Dynamic modeling and control of a direct expansion air conditioning system using artificial neural network. Applied Energy 2012, 91(1):290-300.

14. Duprez M-E, Dumont E, Frère M: Modeling of scroll compressors – Improvements.International Journal of Refrigeration 2010, 33(4):721-728.

15. Li Z, Aute V, Ling J: Tube-fin heat exchanger circuitry optimization using integer permutation based Genetic Algorithm. International Journal of Refrigeration 2019, 103:135-144.

16. Lazzarin R, Noro M: Experimental comparison of electronic and thermostatic expansion valves performances in an air conditioning plant. International Journal of Refrigeration 2008, 31(1):113-118.

17. Sholahudin, Ohno K, Giannetti N, Yamaguchi S, Saito K: Dynamic modeling of room temperature and thermodynamic efficiency for direct expansion air conditioning systems using Bayesian neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering 2019, 158:113809.

18. Nasruddin, Sholahudin S, Giannetti N, Arnas: Optimization of a cascade refrigeration system using refrigerant C3H8 in high temperature circuits (HTC) and a mixture of C2H6/CO2 in low temperature circuits (LTC). Applied Thermal Engineering 2016, 104:96- 103.

19. Matsumoto K, Ohno K, Yamaguchi S, Saito K: Numerical analysis of control characteristics of variable refrigerant flow heat-pump systems focusing on the effect of expansion valve and indoor fan. International Journal of Refrigeration 2019, 99:440-452.

20. Park C, Lee H, Hwang Y, Radermacher R: Recent advances in vapor compression cycle technologies. International Journal of Refrigeration 2015, 60:118-134.

21. Nishijima D: Product lifetime, energy efficiency and climate change: A case study of air conditioners in Japan. Journal of environmental management 2016, 181:582-589.

22. Jain N, Alleyne A: Exergy-based optimal control of a vapor compression system. Energy Conversion and Management 2015, 92:353-365.

23. Miyaoka Y: Study on energy saving of air conditioning in the mass merchandising store. Mie University; 2017.

24. Qureshi BA, Zubair SM: Performance degradation of a vapor compression refrigeration system under fouled conditions. International Journal of Refrigeration 2011, 34(4):1016- 1027.

25. Qureshi BA, Zubair SM: Predicting the impact of heat exchanger fouling in refrigeration systems. International Journal of Refrigeration 2014, 44:116-124.

26. Qureshi BA, Zubair SM: The impact of fouling on the condenser of a vapor compression refrigeration system: An experimental observation. International Journal of Refrigeration 2014, 38:260-266.

27. Yoo JW, Hong SB, Kim MS: Refrigerant leakage detection in an EEV installed residential air conditioner with limited sensor installations. International Journal of Refrigeration 2017, 78:157-165.

28. Kim W, Braun JE: Evaluation of the impacts of refrigerant charge on air conditioner and heat pump performance. International Journal of Refrigeration 2012, 35(7):1805-1814.

29. Fan C, Ding Y: Cooling load prediction and optimal operation of HVAC systems using a multiple nonlinear regression model. Energy and Buildings 2019, 197:7-17.

30. Kim J, Hong T, Jeong J, Lee M, Lee M, Jeong K, Koo C, Jeong J: Establishment of an optimal occupant behavior considering the energy consumption and indoor environmental quality by region. Applied Energy 2017, 204:1431-1443.

31. Gaetani I, Hoes P-J, Hensen JLM: Estimating the influence of occupant behavior on building heating and cooling energy in one simulation run. Applied Energy 2018, 223:159- 171.

32. Hoes P, Hensen JLM, Loomans MGLC, de Vries B, Bourgeois D: User behavior in whole building simulation. Energy and Buildings 2009, 41(3):295-302.

33. Yau YH, Pean HL: The performance study of a split type air conditioning system in the tropics, as affected by weather. Energy and Buildings 2014, 72:1-7.

34. Yin X, Wang X, Li S, Cai W: Energy-efficiency-oriented cascade control for vapor compression refrigeration cycle systems. Energy 2016, 116:1006-1019.

35. Type of air conditioning plant [https://hmhub.me/types-of-air-conditioning-plants/ ]

36. Luo B, Zou P: Performance analysis of different single stage advanced vapor compression cycles and refrigerants for high temperature heat pumps. International Journal of Refrigeration 2019, 104:246-258.

37. Cecchinato L, Mancini F: An intrinsically mass conservative switched evaporator model adopting the moving-boundary method. International Journal of Refrigeration 2012, 35(2):349-364.

38. Zhou S, Gong L, Liu X, Shen S: Mathematical modeling and performance analysis for multi-effect evaporation/multi-effect evaporation with thermal vapor compression desalination system. Applied Thermal Engineering 2019, 159:113759.

39. Min Y, Chen Y, Yang H: A statistical modeling approach on the performance prediction of indirect evaporative cooling energy recovery systems. Applied Energy 2019, 255:113832.

40. Sholahudin, Giannetti N, Yamaguchi S, Saito K, Miyaoka Y, Tanaka K, Ogami H: Experimental implementation of artificial neural network for cost effective and non- intrusive performance estimation of air conditioning systems. Applied Thermal Engineering 2020, 181:115985.

41. Li B, Alleyne AG: A dynamic model of a vapor compression cycle with shut-down and start-up operations. International Journal of Refrigeration 2010, 33(3):538-552.

42. Kumar R, Aggarwal RK, Sharma JD: Energy analysis of a building using artificial neural network: A review. Energy and Buildings 2013, 65:352-358.

43. Mohanraj M, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C: Applications of artificial neural networks for refrigeration, air-conditioning and heat pump systems—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16(2):1340-1358.

44. Sholahudin S, Han H: Heating Load Predictions using The Static Neural Networks Method.International Journal of Technology 2015, 6(6):946.

45. Sholahudin S, Han H: Simplified dynamic neural network model to predict heating load of a building using Taguchi method. Energy 2016, 115:1672-1678.

46. Ding Y, Zhang Q, Yuan T, Yang F: Effect of input variables on cooling load prediction accuracy of an office building. Applied Thermal Engineering 2018, 128:225-234.

47. Nasruddin, Sholahudin, Idrus Alhamid M, Saito K: Hot water temperature prediction using a dynamic neural network for absorption chiller application in Indonesia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2018, 30:114-120.

48. Nasruddin, Aisyah N, Alhamid MI, Saha BB, Sholahudin S, Lubis A: Solar absorption chiller performance prediction based on the selection of principal component analysis. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 2019, 13:100391.

49. Nasruddin, Sholahudin, Satrio P, Mahlia TMI, Giannetti N, Saito K: Optimization of HVAC system energy consumption in a building using artificial neural network and multi- objective genetic algorithm. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2019, 35:48-57.

50. Kamar HM, Ahmad R, Kamsah NB, Mohamad Mustafa AF: Artificial neural networks for automotive air-conditioning systems performance prediction. Applied Thermal Engineering 2013, 50(1):63-70.

51. Tian Z, Qian C, Gu B, Yang L, Liu F: Electric vehicle air conditioning system performance prediction based on artificial neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering 2015, 89:101- 114.

52. Atik K, Aktaş A, Deniz E: Performance parameters estimation of MAC by using artificial neural network. Expert Systems with Applications 2010, 37(7):5436-5442.

53. Wu J, Lu B, Liang Z: Performance Prediction of Room Air Conditioners and Optimization of Control Strategy for Energy Conservation. Heat Transfer Engineering 2017, 39(17- 18):1616-1626.

54. Vinther K, Rasmussen H, Izadi-Zamanabadi R, Stoustrup J: Single temperature sensor superheat control using a novel maximum slope-seeking method. International Journal of Refrigeration 2013, 36(3):1118-1129.

55. Ohno K: Construction of General PurposeEnergy System Simulator and Global Simulation of Heat Pump. Doctoral Thesis. Waseda University: Waseda University; 2013.

56. Boeng J, Melo C: An innovative charge optimization process for capillary tube based cooling systems. International Journal of Refrigeration 2020, 118:202-209.

57. Eames IW, Milazzo A, Maidment GG: Modelling thermostatic expansion valves.International Journal of Refrigeration 2014, 38:189-197.

58. Knabben FT, Ronzoni AF, Hermes CJL: Application of electronic expansion valves in domestic refrigerators. International Journal of Refrigeration 2020, 119:227-237.

59. Knabben FT, Melo C, Hermes CJL: A study of flow characteristics of electronic expansion valves for household refrigeration applications. International Journal of Refrigeration 2020, 113:1-9.

60. Jackson B. Marcinichen JBM: Comparative Analysis Between a Capillary Tube and an Electronic Expansion Valve in a Household Refrigerator. In: International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. Purdue University: Purdue e-Pubs; 2006.

61. Sarfraz O, Bach CK, Bradshaw CR: Reduced order modeling for multi-circuit fin-and-tube heat exchangers with multiple identical circuit types. International Journal of Refrigeration 2019, 106:236-247.

62. Chisholm D: A theoretical basis for the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation for two-phase flow.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 1967, 10:1767-1778.

63. JSME: JSME Text Series Heat Transfer Engineering. In. Edited by Engineers JSoM; 2005: 83.

64. JSME: Revised Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Technology Handbook: Corona Publishing Co., Ltd; 2006.

65. Holman JP: Heat Transfer (10th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

66. Yoshida SN, K., Matsunaga, T., Nakata, H. : 冷媒の水平蒸発管内熱伝達に関する研究 ""Study on Heat Transfer in Horizontal Evaporation Pipe of Refrigerant"". Refrigeration 1983, 58(666):331-338.

67. Nozu S, Honda, H., Fuji., S.: 過熱蒸気の水平管内凝縮-熱伝達と圧力効果の式の提案— ""Condensation of superheated steam in a horizontal tube-Proposal of formula for heat transfer and pressure effect"". Refrigeration 1983, 58(669):659-668.

68. Fujii MaS, H: 低レイノルズ数域のプレートフィンチューブ熱交換器の性能(第 3 報,性能の統一的整理) ""Performance of Plate Fin Tube Heat Exchangers in the Low Reynolds Number Region (3rd Report, Unified Performance Arrangement)"". In: Proceedings of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (B): 1987; 1987: 1767-1772.

69. Ohno K, Saito, K., Yamaguchi, S., Kishimoto, T., Matsumoto, K.: Intermittent driving simulation of compression type heat pump- 1st report: Mathematical model and simulation of single-stage vapor compression type heat pump. Transactions of the JASRAE 2013, 30(2):107-122.

70. Ogata K: Modern Control Engineering: Prentice Hall; 2010.

71. Jani DB, Mishra M, Sahoo PK: Application of artificial neural network for predicting performance of solid desiccant cooling systems – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017, 80:352-366.

72. Jiao J, Zhao M, Lin J, Liang K: A comprehensive review on convolutional neural network in machine fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing 2020, 417:36-63.

73. Mohanraj M, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C: Applications of artificial neural networks for thermal analysis of heat exchangers – A review. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2015, 90:150-172.

74. Papantoniou S, Kolokotsa D-D: Prediction of outdoor air temperature using neural networks: Application in 4 European cities. Energy and Buildings 2016, 114:72-79.

75. Ng BC, Darus IZM, Jamaluddin H, Kamar HM: Application of adaptive neural predictive control for an automotive air conditioning system. Applied Thermal Engineering 2014, 73(1):1244-1254.

76. Martin T. Hagan HBD, Mark Hudson Beale, Orlando De Jesús: Neural Network Design 2nd Edition.

77. Heydecker BGaW, J.: Identification of Sites for Road Accident Remedial Work by Bayesian Statistical Methods: An Example of Uncertain Inference. Advances in Engineering Software 2001, 32:859-869.

78. Urresti A, Campos-Celador A, Sala JM: Dynamic neural networks to analyze the behavior of phase change materials embedded in building envelopes. Applied Thermal Engineering 2019, 158:113783.

79. Joudi KA, Al-Amir QR: Experimental Assessment of residential split type air-conditioning systems using alternative refrigerants to R-22 at high ambient temperatures. Energy Conversion and Management 2014, 86:496-506.

80. Hernandez AC, Fumo N: A review of variable refrigerant flow HVAC system components for residential application. International Journal of Refrigeration 2020, 110:47-57.

81. Norgaard M: Neural Networks for Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems: Springer; 2001.

82. Jayalakshmi TaS, A.: Statistical Normalization and Back Propagation for Classification. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering 2011, 3(1):1793-8201.

83. Testing facility [http://www.jatl.or.jp/en/testing-facilities.html]

84. Li X, Deng Z: Identification of Dynamic Loads Based on Second-Order Taylor-Series Expansion Method. Shock and Vibration 2016, 2016:1-9.

85. Coster: A Guide to Understanding HVAC Components and Control Systems In.; 2020.

86. Feng Y-c, Huang Y-c, Ma X-m: The application of Student’s t -test in internal quality control of clinical laboratory. Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine 2017, 1(3):125-128.

参考文献をもっと見る