リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Relationship of muscle strength, body composition and incident prediabetes among adults」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Relationship of muscle strength, body composition and incident prediabetes among adults

MANDA, Chrispin Mahala 筑波大学 DOI:10.15068/0002000730

2021.07.28

概要

Introduction: Global prevalence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is rising rapidly. Early intervention in prediabetic individuals significantly reduces the risk of progression to T2DM. Thus, identifying individuals at higher risk of prediabetes would provide the best opportunity to implement preventive strategies. Shared risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as obesity, are well reported. However, contrary to data from western populations, studies from Sub-Saharan Africa (SAA) and Asia show that a substantial proportion of people with diabetes are not overweight or obese. One possible explanation might relate to the limitation of body mass index (BMI) since it lacks sensitivity for assessing disease risks, especially in people with normal or mildly elevated body weight. Low muscle strength has recently been suggested as another modifiable risk factor for T2DM. However, some studies do not report such an association, while others suggest reverse causation. Furthermore, no studies investigated the relationship between muscle strength and incident prediabetes to the best of my knowledge.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between muscle strength, body composition, and incident prediabetes among adults. I, therefore, conducted studies in two different populations with the specific objectives outlined below.

Summary of study 1
Objective: To examine the longitudinal relationship of handgrip strength, a measure of muscle strength, with incident prediabetes among adults in Japan.

Methods: This was a cohort study instituted under the Center of Innovation (COI) program of Japan, aiming to improve the population's health status. The study was conducted in Ibaraki prefecture, whose capital city, Mito, is situated about 125 kilometers north-east of Tokyo. Most of the study participants belonged to the Japan Agriculture Cooperative of Ibaraki (JA Ibaraki). Participants were invited to attend annual medical examinations organized in partnership with JA at the regional hospital (Mito-Kyodo Hospital) and outreach services in the area or attend medical examinations organized by employers, with an annual attendance of 5000 individuals.

The study recruited individuals without prediabetes and diabetes attending lifestyle-related medical examinations between April 2016 and March 2017 (n = 2054). A standardized self- administered questionnaire of 22 items recommended by the Japan Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare was used to collect lifestyle-related information and medical history. After that, anthropometric measures, blood pressure fasting blood samples, and handgrip strength measures were taken. Individuals who came for the follow-up medical examinations between April 2018 and March 2019 were included in the analysis (n = 1075).

Results: One hundred sixty-nine individuals (15.7%) developed prediabetes after a mean follow- up of 24.2 months (SD = 1.9 months). Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of new prediabetes cases were calculated using Cox regression. Higher baseline relative handgrip strength predicted a lower risk (aHR [95% CI] = 0.38 [0.21–0.71] of prediabetes incidence among adults. Importantly, relative handgrip strength predicted new prediabetes cases among normal-weight individuals (aHR [95% CI] = 0.39 [0.16–0.96]).

Summary of study 2
Objective: To assess the association of body composition, muscle strength, and quality with prediabetes and T2DM among adults in Malawi.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study nested in a follow-up study of prediabetic and prehypertensive individuals identified during an extensive NCDs survey in Malawi, which enrolled adults from two defined geographical areas within Karonga District and Lilongwe city. The Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU) conducted the baseline NCDs survey between May 16, 2013, and Feb 8, 2016. In the follow-up study, participants were interviewed, had anthropometry, handgrip strength, blood pressure measured, and had fasting blood samples collected. A total of 261 participants were recruited between November 2018 and February 2019.

Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 49.7 (13.6) years, and 54.0% were between 40 and 59 years. The mean (SD) absolute handgrip strength and relative handgrip strength were 28.8 (7.3) kg and 1.16 (0.40) kg/BMI, respectively, and the mean relative handgrip strength differed significantly (p<0.001) by T2DM status. Relative handgrip strength was well correlated with anthropometric and body composition measures such as waist circumference (r=-0.510, P<0.001), hip circumference (r=-0.572, P<0.001), body fat (r=-0.501, P<0.001), muscle mass (r=-0.521, P=<0.001), and muscle quality (r=0.215, P=0.037). In the unadjusted model, the odds ratio (OR) of prediabetes and T2DM per unit increase of relative handgrip strength was 0.12 [95% CI; 0.04- 0.33]. The result remained significant after adjusting for age (continuous), sex, place of study, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and level of education (AOR [95% CI]; 0.19 [0.03-0.95]).

Discussion:
This study found that lower baseline relative handgrip strength predicts a higher risk of prediabetes incidence among adults in Japan. This study's important finding was that relative handgrip strength predicted a lower and significant risk of prediabetes incidence among individuals with normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2). This study continued to demonstrate this association among participants from the urban and rural areas of Malawi, where it was found that relative handgrip strength is associated with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The findings demonstrated the utility of handgrip strength measurements among sub-Saharan Africa populations.

This simple muscle strength measure is also well correlated with anthropometric and body composition measures among the participants. Additionally, relative handgrip strength was associated with other cardiovascular disease biomarkers. Body mass index alone has a limitation in assessing body composition since it lacks sensitivity for assessing disease risks, especially in people who have normal or mildly elevated BMI. Therefore, handgrip grip strength measurement would provide an opportunity for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes risk screening. Handgrip strength testing is cheap, non-invasive, and is easy to conduct in fieldwork, which would make its adoption in health examinations effortless. Furthermore, like body mass index, participants quickly understood their handgrip strength measurement outcome, which would motivate them to change their lifestyle.

Conclusions:
The use of handgrip strength, a simple measure of muscle strength, may have utility in identifying individuals at high risk of prediabetes who can then be targeted for intervention. Muscle strength may be uniquely important in stratifying prediabetes and type 2 diabetes risk among normal-weight adults considering BMI limitations. Participants of medical examinations could be motivated to improve muscle strength after understanding the risk that lower relative handgrip strength may indicate future prediabetes incidence and risk of type 2 diabetes.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;138: 271–281. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023.

2. Uehara A, Kurotani K, Kochi T, Kuwahara K, Eguchi M, Imai T, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes among workers: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Elsevier BV; 2014;106: 118–127. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.07.013.

3. Urakami T, Kuwabara R, Yoshida K. Economic Impact of Diabetes in Japan. Current Diabetes Reports. Current Medicine Group LLC 1; 2019. pp. 1–4. doi:10.1007/s11892-019- 1122-9.

4. Msyamboza KP, Ngwira B, Dzowela T, Mvula C, Kathyola D, Harries AD, et al. The Burden of Selected Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases and Their Risk Factors in Malawi: Nationwide STEPS Survey. Su Z, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2011;6: e20316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020316.

5. Price AJ, Crampin FFPHM AC, Branson K, Glynn JR, Nyirenda M, Smeeth FMedSCi L, et al. Prevalence of obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, and cascade of care in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional, population-based study in rural and urban Malawi. www.thelancet.com/diabetes-endocrinology. 2018;6: 208–230. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30432-1.

6. Bommer C, Heesemann E, Sagalova V, Manne-Goehler J, Atun R, Bärnighausen T, et al. The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20–79 years: a cost-of-illness study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5: 423–430. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30097-9.

7. Heianza Y, Arase Y, Fujihara K, Tsuji H, Saito K, Hsieh SD, et al. Screening for prediabetes to predict future diabetes using various cut-off points for HbA1c and impaired fasting glucose: the Toranomon Hospital Health Management Center Study 4 (TOPICS 4). Diabet Med. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2012;29: e279–e285. doi:10.1111/j.1464- 5491.2012.03686.x.

8. Tabák AG, Herder C, Rathmann W, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development. Lancet (London, England). NIH Public Access; 2012;379: 2279–90. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60283-9.

9. Heianza YR, Saito K, Fujiwara K, Kodama S, Shimano H, Yamada N, et al. HbA 1c 5.7- 6.4% and impaired fasting plasma glucose for diagnosis of prediabetes and risk of progression to diabetes in Japan (topics 3): A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378: 147–155. doi:10.1016/S0140.

10. Ligthart S, van Herpt TTW, Leening MJG, Kavousi M, Hofman A, Stricker BHC, et al. Lifetime risk of developing impaired glucose metabolism and eventual progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4: 44–51. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00362-9.

11. Atun R, Davies JI, Gale EAM, Bärnighausen T, Beran D, Kengne AP, et al. Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: from clinical care to health policy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5: 622–667. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30181-X.

12. Sugiura Y, Tanimoto Y, Watanabe M, Tsuda Y, Kimura M, Kusabiraki T, et al. Handgrip strength as a predictor of higher-level competence decline among community-dwelling Japanese elderly in an urban area during a 4-year follow-up. 2013; doi:10.1016/j.archger.2013.06.006.

13. Kawamoto R, Ninomiya D, Kasai Y, Kusunoki T, Ohtsuka N, Kumagi T, et al. Handgrip strength is associated with metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and elderly community-dwelling persons. Clin Exp Hypertens. Informa UK Limited; 2016;38: 245–251. doi:10.3109/10641963.2015.1081232.

14. Ishii S, Tanaka T, Akishita M, Ouchi Y, Tuji T, Iijima K, et al. Metabolic syndrome, sarcopenia and role of sex and age: cross-sectional analysis of Kashiwa cohort study. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2014;9: e112718. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112718.

15. Li JJ, Wittert GA, Vincent A, Atlantis E, Shi Z, Appleton SL, et al. Muscle grip strength predicts incident type 2 diabetes: Population-based cohort study. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2016.03.011.

16. Wander PL, Boyko EJ, Leonetti DL, McNeely MJ, Kahn SE, Fujimoto WY. Greater hand- grip strength predicts a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes over 10 years in leaner Japanese Americans. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Elsevier BV; 2011;92: 261–264. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.01.007.

17. van der Kooi A-LLLFF, Snijder MB, Peters RJGG, van Valkengoed IGMM. The Association of Handgrip Strength and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Six Ethnic Groups: An Analysis of the HELIUS Study. PLoS One. Public Library of Science (PLoS); 2015;10: e0137739. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137739.

18. Volaklis KA, Halle M, Meisinger C. Muscular strength as a strong predictor of mortality: A narrative review. Eur J Intern Med. Elsevier BV; 2015;26: 303–310. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2015.04.013.

19. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Cohen DD, Gómez-Arbeláez D, Bosch J, Dyal L, Yusuf S, et al. Association of handgrip strength to cardiovascular mortality in pre-diabetic and diabetic patients: A subanalysis of the ORIGIN trial. Int J Cardiol. Elsevier BV; 2014;174: 458–461. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.013.

20. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum A, Orlandini A, et al. Articles Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386: 266–273. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(14)62000-6.

21. Beyer SE, Sanghvi MM, Aung N, Hosking A, Cooper JA, Paiva JM, et al. Prospective association between handgrip strength and cardiac structure and function in UK adults. PLoS One. 2018;13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193124.

22. Mainous III AG, Tanner RJ, Anton SD, Jo A. Grip Strength as a Marker of Hypertension and Diabetes in Healthy Weight Adults. 2015; doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.025.

23. Ashdown-Franks G, Stubbs B, Koyanagi A, Schuch F, Firth J, Veronese N, et al. Handgrip strength and depression among 34,129 adults aged 50 years and older in six low- and middle-income countries. J Affect Disord. Elsevier B.V.; 2019;243: 448–454. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.036.

24. Schlüssel MM, Antonio Dos Anjos L, Teixeira Leite De Vasconcellos M, Kac G. Reference values of handgrip dynamometry of healthy adults: A population-based study. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.004.

25. Larsen BA, Wassel CL, Kritchevsky SB, Strotmeyer ES, Criqui MH, Kanaya AM, et al. Association of Muscle Mass, Area, and Strength With Incident Diabetes in Older Adults: The Health ABC Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101: 1847. doi:10.1210/jc.2015- 3643.

26. Marques-Vidal P, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Jornayvaz FR. Grip strength is not associated with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in healthy adults: The CoLaus study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;132: 144–148. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.004.

27. Momma H, Sawada SS, Kato K, Gando Y, Kawakami R, Miyachi M, et al. Physical Fitness Tests and Type 2 Diabetes Among Japanese: A Longitudinal Study From the Niigata Wellness Study. 2019; 8–13.

28. Mainous AG, Tanner RJ, Anton SD, Jo A. Low Grip Strength and Prediabetes in Normal- Weight Adults. J Am Board Fam Med. American Board of Family Medicine; 2016;29: 280–2. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150262.

29. Hu S, Gu Y, Lu Z, Zhang Q, Liu L, Meng G, et al. Relationship Between Grip Strength and Prediabetes in a Large-Scale Adult Population. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56: 844–851. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2019.01.013.

30. Castorena CM, Arias EB, Sharma N, Bogan JS, Cartee GD. Fiber type effects on contraction-stimulated glucose uptake and GLUT4 abundance in single fibers from rat skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308: 223–230. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00466.2014.

31. Richter EA, Hargreaves M. Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiol Rev. 2013;93: 993–1017. doi:10.1152/physrev.00038.2012.

32. Reichkendler MH, Auerbach P, Rosenkilde M, Christensen AN, Holm S, Petersen MB, et al. Exercise training favors increased insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle in contrast to adipose tissue: a randomized study using FDG PET imaging. Am J Physiol Metab. American Physiological Society; 2013;305: E496–E506. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00128.2013.

33. Courtney Moore M, Cherrington A, Wasserman DH. Exercise, glut4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;17: 343–364. doi:10.1016/S1521-690X(03)00036-8.

34. Sénéchal M, Johannsen NM, Swift DL, Earnest CP, Lavie CJ, Blair SN, et al. Association between Changes in Muscle Quality with Exercise Training and Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measures in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from the HART-D Study. Reddy H, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0135057. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135057.

35. Ferrari F, Bock PM, Motta MT, Helal L. Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of glucose uptake stimulated by physical exercise in insulin resistance state: Role of inflammation [Internet]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia; 2019. pp., 1139–1148. doi:10.5935/abc.20190224.

36. Karstoft K, Pedersen BK. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: focus on metabolism and inflammation. Immunol Cell Biol. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;94: 146–150. doi:10.1038/icb.2015.101.

37. Ataklte F, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Taye B, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kengne AP. Burden of Undiagnosed Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa. Hypertension. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2015;65: 291–298. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04394.

参考文献をもっと見る