1. Chapman, A.J.; McLellan, B.; Tezuka, T. Residential solar PV policy: An analysis of impacts, successes and failures in the Australian case. Renew. Energy 2016, 86, 1265–1279. [CrossRef]
2. Agora Energiewede. 12 Insights on Germany’s Energiewende 12 Insights on Germany’s. 2013. Available online: https://www. agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin2/Projekte/2012/12-Thesen/Agora_12_Insights_on_Germanys_Energiewende_web.pdf (ac- cessed on 15 December 2020).
3. Kusumaningdyah, W.; McLellan, B.; Tezuka, T. Designing and Evaluating Energy Product-Service Systems for Energy Sector (EPSS) in Liberalized Energy Market: A Case Study in Space Heating Services for Japan Household. Challenges 2019, 10, 18. [CrossRef]
4. Allcott, H. Paternalism and Energy Efficiency: An Overview. Paternalism Energy Effic. Overv. 2014, 8, 145–176. [CrossRef]
5. Sovacool, B.K. Contestation, contingency, and justice in the Nordic low-carbon energy transition. Energy Policy 2017, 102, 569–582. [CrossRef]
6. Vadén, T.; Majava, A.; Toivanen, T.; Järvensivu, P.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J. To continue to burn something? Technological, economic and political path dependencies in district heating in Helsinki, Finland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019, 58, 101270. [CrossRef]
7. Trencher, G.; Rinscheid, A.; Duygan, M.; Truong, N.; Asuka, J. Revisiting carbon lock-in in energy systems: Explaining the perpetuation of coal power in Japan. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 69, 101770. [CrossRef]
8. Bouznit, M.; del Pablo-Romero, M.; Sánchez-Braza, A. Measures to promote renewable energy for electricity generation in Algeria.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1468. [CrossRef]
9. Lu, Y.; Khan, Z.A.; Alvarez-Alvarado, M.S.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Imran, M. A critical review of sustainable energy policies for the promotion of renewable energy sources. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5078. [CrossRef]
10. Li, H.X.; Edwards, D.J.; Hosseini, M.R.; Costin, G.P. A review on renewable energy transition in Australia: An updated depiction.
J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118475. [CrossRef]
11. Poruschi, L.; Ambrey, C.L.; Smart, J.C. Revisiting feed-in tariffs in Australia: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018,
82, 260–270. [CrossRef]
12. García-Alvarez, M.T.; Mariz-Pérez, R.M. Analysis of the Success of Feed-in Tariff for Renewable Energy Promotion Mechanism in the EU: Lessons from Germany and Spain. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 65, 52–57. [CrossRef]
13. Zhang, Q.; Wang, G.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; McLellan, B.; Chen, S. Substitution effect of renewable portfolio standards and renewable energy certificate trading for feed-in tariff. Appl. Energy 2018, 227, 426–435. [CrossRef]
14. REN21. Renewables 2012 Global Status Report; REN21 Secretariat: Paris, France, 2012; pp. 1–172.
15. Dehmer, D. The German Energiewende: The First Year. Electr. J. 2013, 26, 71–78. [CrossRef]
16. Cheung, G.; Davies, P.J.; Bassen, A. In the transition of energy systems: What lessons can be learnt from the German achievement?
Energy Policy 2019, 132, 633–646. [CrossRef]
17. Di Lucia, L.; Ericsson, K. Low-carbon district heating in Sweden—Examining a successful energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
2014, 4, 10–20. [CrossRef]
18. Poullikkas, A. A review of net metering mechanism for electricity renewable energy sources. Int. J. Energy Environ. 2013,
4, 975–1002.
19. Schelly, C.; Louie, E.P.; Pearce, J.M. Examining interconnection and net metering policy for distributed generation in the United States. Renew. Energy Focus 2017, 22–23, 10–19. [CrossRef]
20. Christoforidis, G.C.; Panapakidis, I.P.; Papadopoulos, T.A.; Papagiannis, G.K.; Koumparou, I.; Hadjipanayi, M.; Georghiou, G.E. A model for the assessment of different Net-Metering policies. Energies 2016, 9, 262. [CrossRef]
21. Hirsh, R.F.; Jones, C.F. History’s contributions to energy research and policy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2014, 1, 106–111. [CrossRef]
22. Goldthau, A. Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism. Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
2014, 1, 134–140. [CrossRef]
23. Geels, F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 2004, 33, 897–920. [CrossRef]
24. Verbong, G.; Geels, F. The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 2007, 35, 1025–1037. [CrossRef]
25. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2020—Analysis—IEA 2020. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook- 2020 (accessed on 18 February 2021).
26. Kraan, O.; Kramer, G.J.; Nikolic, I.; Chappin, E.; Koning, V. Why fully liberalised electricity markets will fail to meet deep decarbonisation targets even with strong carbon pricing. Energy Policy 2019, 131, 99–110. [CrossRef]
27. Engelken, M.; Römer, B.; Drescher, M.; Welpe, I.M.; Picot, A. Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for re-newable energies: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 795–809. [CrossRef]
28. Mont, O. Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J. Clean. Prod. 2002, 10, 237–245. [CrossRef]
29. Baines, T.S.; Lightfoot, H.W.; Evans, S.; Neely, A.; Greenough, R.; Peppard, J.; Roy, R.; Shehab, E.; Braganza, A.; Tiwari, A.; et al. State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2007, 221, 1543–1552. [CrossRef]
30. Ost Scherer, J.; Kloeckner, A.P.; Ribeiro, J.L.D.; Pezzotta, G.; Pirola, F. Product-Service System (PSS) design: Using Design Thinking and Business Analytics to improve PSS Design. Procedia Cirp 2016, 47, 341–346. [CrossRef]
31. Van Ostaeyen, J.; Van Horenbeek, A.; Pintelon, L.; Duflou, J.R. A refined typology of product–service systems based on functional hierarchy modeling. J. Clean Prod. 2013, 51, 261–276. [CrossRef]
32. Tukker, A.; Tischner, U. New Business for Old Europe: Product-Service Development, Competitiveness and Sustainability, 1st ed.; Greenleaf Publishing Ltd.: Sheffield, UK, 2006; 479p.
33. Lindkvist, L.; Sundin, E. The role of Product-service Systems Regarding Information Feedback Transfer in the Product Life-cycle Including Remanufacturing. Procedia Cirp 2016, 47, 311–316. [CrossRef]
34. Joskow, P.L. Lessons Learned from Electricity Market Liberalization. Energy J. 2008, 29, 9–42. [CrossRef]
35. Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER). CEER Report on Commercial Barriers to Supplier Switching in EU Retail Energy Markets. 2016. Ref: C15-CEM-80-04. Available online: https://www.ceer.eu/documents/104400/-/-/bd226e4b-5542-f12c-c21e- 4d5a078c765d (accessed on 7 May 2018).
36. Joskow, P.L. Deregulation and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electric Power Sector; Center of Energy and Environmental Policy Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000.
37. AEMC. 2017 AEMC Retail Energy Competition Review. Sydney, Australia. 2017. Available online: https://www.aemc.gov.au/ sites/default/files/content/006ad951-7c42-4058-9724-51fe114cabb6/2017-AEMC-Retail-Energy-Competition-Review-FINAL. pdf (accessed on 7 May 2018).
38. Morey, M.J.; Kirsch, L.D. Retail Choice in Electricity: What Have We Learned in 20 Years? 2016. Available online: https:
//hepg.hks.harvard.edu/files/hepg/files/retail_choice_in_electricity_for_emrf_final.pdf (accessed on 7 May 2018).
39. Von Der Fehr, N.H.M.; Hansen, P.V. Electricity Retailing in Norway. 2008, pp. 1–41. Available online: http://idei.fr/sites/default/ files/medias/doc/conf/eem/papers_2008/vonderfehr.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2020).
40. Defeuilley, C. Retail competition in electricity markets. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 377–386. [CrossRef]
41. Hortaçsu, A.; Madanizadeh, S.A.; Puller, S.L. Power to Choose? An Analysis of Consumer Inertia in the Residential Electricity Market. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 2017, 9, 192–226. [CrossRef]
42. Simon, H.A. Models of Bounded Rationality; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MS, USA, 1997; Volume 3.
43. Gigerenzer, G.; Selton, R. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox; Gigerenzer, G., Selton, R., Eds.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002.
44. OECD. Using behavioural insights to increase energy conservation and energy efficiency. In Tackling Environmental Problems with the Help of Behavioural Insight; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2017; pp. 45–89.
45. Simon, H.A. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Q. J. Econ. 1955, 69, 99–118. [CrossRef]
46. Simon, H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev. 1956, 63, 129–138. [CrossRef]
47. Cramton, P. Electricity market design. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2017, 33, 589–612. [CrossRef]
48. Waechter, S.; Sütterlin, B.; Siegrist, M. Desired and Undesired Effects of Energy Labels—An Eye-Tracking Study. PLoS ONE 2015,
10, e0134132. [CrossRef]
49. Hlaváˇcek, I.; Chleboun, J.; Babuška, I. Uncertain Input Data Problems and the Worst Scenario Method, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004.
50. Kraan, O.; Kramer, G.; Nikolic, I. Investment in the future electricity system—An agent-based modelling approach. Energy 2018,
151, 569–580. [CrossRef]
51. Barazza, E.; Strachan, N. The impact of heterogeneous market players with bounded-rationality on the electricity sector low- carbon transition. Energy Policy 2020, 138. [CrossRef]
52. Kraan, O.; Dalderop, S.; Kramer, G.J.; Nikolic, I. Jumping to a better world: An agent-based exploration of criticality in low-carbon energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019, 47, 156–165. [CrossRef]
53. Kwakkel, J.H.; Yücel, G. An Exploratory Analysis of the Dutch Electricity System in Transition. J. Knowl. Econ. 2012, 5, 670–685. [CrossRef]
54. Yücel, G.; van Daalen, C. A simulation-based analysis of transition pathways for the Dutch electricity system. Energy Policy 2012,
42, 557–568. [CrossRef]
55. Mefteh, W. Simulation-Based Design: Overview about related works. Math. Comput. Simul. 2018, 152, 81–97. [CrossRef]
56. Bossak, A.M. Simulation based design. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1998, 76, 8–11. [CrossRef]
57. Shephard, M.S.; Beall, M.W.; O’Bara, R.M.E.; Webster, B. Toward simulation-based design. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2004,
40, 1575–1598. [CrossRef]
58. Masad, D.; Kazil, J. Mesa: An Agent-Based Modeling Framework. In Proceedings of the 14th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2015), Austin, TX, USA, 6–12 July 2015; pp. 51–58.
59. Wieringa, J.E.; Verhoef, P.C. Understanding Customer Switching Behavior in a Liberalizing Service Market. J. Serv. Res. 2007,
10, 174–186. [CrossRef]
60. Yang, Y. Understanding household switching behavior in the retail electricity market. Energy Policy 2014, 69, 406–414. [CrossRef]
61. Frederiks, E.R.; Stenner, K.; Hobman, E.V. Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer deci-sion-making and behaviour. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 1385–1394. [CrossRef]
62. Zeng, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, K. Effects of conformity tendencies on households’ willingness to adopt energy utilization of crop straw: Evi-dence from biogas in rural China. Renew. Energy 2019, 138, 573–584. [CrossRef]
63. Du, F.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Yan, J.; Galloway, S.; Lo, K.L. Modelling the impact of social network on energy savings. Appl. Energy
2016, 178, 56–65. [CrossRef]
64. Fenaughty, K.; Parker, D. Evaluation of Air Conditioning Performance Degradation: Opportunities from Diagnostic Methods. 2018 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 2018. Available online: http://publications.energyresearch.ucf. edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/FSEC-PF-474-18.pdf (accessed on 27 August 2019).
65. Bertoldi, P.; Ricci, A.; Huenges Wajer, B. (Eds.) Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances. Energy Efficiency in House- hold Appliances. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances, Florence, Italy, 10–12 November 1997; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
論文の公開元へ
