リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「A Lie algebra-based approach to asymptotic symmetries in general relativity」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

A Lie algebra-based approach to asymptotic symmetries in general relativity

Tomitsuka Takeshi 東北大学

2022.03.25

概要

In this Ph.D thesis, we propose a useful approach to construct integrable and non-gauge charges in general spacetime shown in Chapter 4. Our approach may significantly reduce the effort involved in finding proper asymptotic conditions by trials and errors in the conventional approach.

Our approach has two key ingredients. One of them is to use Eq. (4.1.5) to find an algebra of symmetries with a non-vanishing Poisson bracket at the background metric ¯gµν. The metrics connected to the background metric through a diffeomorphism generated by the Lie algebra A satisfying Eq. (4.1.5) can be physically distinguished from each other since the Poisson brackets do not vanish. In our analysis, we have investigated a set of metrics which are connected to a fixed background metric by diffeomorphisms generated by a Lie algebra of vector fields. Since all the metrics are diffeomorphic to the background metric, it is possible to investigate the properties of the asymptotic symmetries of the background spacetime. The set in our approach is different from that in the conventional approach, where the set of metrics are defined by their asymptotic behaviors. The other key ingredient of our approach is making use of Eqs. (4.2.23) to check the integrability. As we have seen in Sec. 4.2.1, Eq. (4.2.23) provides a sufficient condition for the charges to be integrable, which can be checked at the background metric. This saves the efforts of calculating all the diffeomorphisms generated by A. In addition, the Poisson brackets of the charges can be calculated at the background metric and hence the algebra of the charges can be fully identified without calculating the diffeomorphisms generated by A explicitly. Our approach contains two cases depending on the purpose. One of them is used to obtain the charges themselves, and is shown in Fig. 4.4. The other one is used to get only the algebra of charges, and is shown in Fig. 4.5. In particular, in the latter case, we can carry out all the steps only for a background metric.

As a demonstration of our approach, we have investigated asymptotic symmetries on a Rindler horizon and that of spacetimes with the Killing horizon with metrics given in Eq. (4.3.33). In both cases, we found a new asymptotic symmetry, which we term superdilatation. In the former case, we got the expression of charges explicitly. In the latter case, we obtained the algebra of charges and found that it is a central extension of vector fields algebra A. We expect that our approach will be helpful to investigate other important spacetimes with non-Killing horizon. Although our approach can be applied to any spacetime as long as we consider diffeomorphisms which do not shift the boundary on which charges are defined, there may be asymptotic symmetries which cannot be found in our approach since Eqs. (4.1.5) and (4.2.23) are sufficient conditions for the charges to be integrable and form a non-trivial algebra. Therefore we will explore the possibility of extending our approach to identify all the asymptotic symmetries as the future work. One possibility is to derive a condition under which Eq. (4.1.3) holds at a particular metric gµν but not at the background metric ¯gµν. In our approach, we have started with two vector fields satisfying Eq. (4.1.5) and constructed a minimal Lie algebra A spanned by the vector fields and their commutators. To proceed the classification of the symmetry in general relativity, it will be quite interesting to investigate how the charge algebra changes by adding other elements to A.

As we have introduced in Chapter 1, in order to get the BH entropy, we must identify the number of microstates generated by asymptotic symmetries on a horizon. The representation of the algebra of charges is required to construct the Hilbert space of the corresponding quantum system. As we have seen in Eqs. (4.3.66) and (4.3.67), in general, the algebra of charges is an infinite dimensional Lie algebra. Thus we need the representation theory of an infinite dimensional Lie algebra, which is more difficult to treat than finite dimensional one. To the author’s knowledge, this task has been done for only a few cases, e.g. Virasoro like asymptotic symmetries. We hope that mathematicians and physicists will tackle this problem together.

参考文献

[1] J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and the second law”, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985) 4, 737 (1972).

[2] S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes”, Communications in Mathematical Physics 43, 199 (1975).

[3] R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “Republication of: the dynamics of general relativity”, General Relativity and Gravitation 40, 1997 (2008).

[4] G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752 (1977).

[5] W. Israel, “Event horizons in static vacuum space-times”, Phys. Rev. 164, 1776 (1967).

[6] W. Israel, “Event horizons in static electrovac space-times”, Communications in Mathematical Physics 8, 245 (1968).

[7] B. Carter, “Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 331 (1971).

[8] L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee, and R. D. Sorkin, “Quantum source of entropy for black holes”, Phys. Rev. D 34, 373 (1986).

[9] M. Srednicki, “Entropy and area”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 666 (1993).

[10] L. Susskind and J. Uglum, “Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory”, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2700 (1994).

[11] T. M. Fiola, J. Preskill, A. Strominger, and S. P. Trivedi, “Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two dimensions”, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3987 (1994).

[12] R. Emparan, “Black hole entropy as entanglement entropy: a holographic derivation”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2006, 012 (2006).

[13] T. Azeyanagi, T. Nishioka, and T. Takayanagi, “Near extremal black hole entropy as entanglement entropy via ads2/cft1”, Physical Review D 77 (2008).

[14] A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the bekenstein-hawking entropy”, Physics Letters B 379, 99 (1996).

[15] S. Carlip, “Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2828 (1999).

[16] M. Hotta, K. Sasaki, and T. Sasaki, “Diffeomorphism on the horizon as an asymptotic isometry of the schwarzschild black hole”, English, Classical and Quantum Gravity 18, 1823 (2001).

[17] M. Hotta, “Holographic charge excitation on a horizontal boundary”, Phys. Rev. D 66, 124021 (2002).

[18] S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry, and A. Strominger, “Soft hair on black holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 231301 (2016).

[19] D. Grumiller, A. P´erez, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Troncoso, and C. Zwikel, “Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041601 (2020).

[20] L.-Q. Chen, W. Z. Chua, S. Liu, A. J. Speranza, and B. de S. L. Torres, “Virasoro hair and entropy for axisymmetric Killing horizons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241302 (2020).

[21] H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Soft heisenberg hair on black holes in three dimensions”, Phys. Rev. D 93, 101503 (2016).

[22] M. Mirbabayi and M. Porrati, “Dressed hard states and black hole soft hair”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 211301 (2016).

[23] M. Hotta, J. Trevison, and K. Yamaguchi, “Gravitational memory charges of supertranslation and superrotation on rindler horizons”, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083001 (2016).

[24] P. Mao, X. Wu, and H. Zhang, “Soft hairs on isolated horizon implanted by electromagnetic fields”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 34, 055003 (2017).

[25] M. Ammon, D. Grumiller, S. Prohazka, M. Riegler, and R. Wutte, “Higher-spin flat space cosmologies with soft hair”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (2017).

[26] R. Bousso and M. Porrati, “Soft hair as a soft wig”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 34, 204001 (2017).

[27] M. Hotta, Y. Nambu, and K. Yamaguchi, “Soft-hair-enhanced entanglement beyond page curves in a black hole evaporation qubit model”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 181301 (2018).

[28] C.-S. Chu and Y. Koyama, “Soft hair of dynamical black hole and hawking radiation”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 (2018).

[29] S. Haco, S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry, and A. Strominger, “Black hole entropy and soft hair”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 (2018).

[30] G. Raposo, P. Pani, and R. Emparan, “Exotic compact objects with soft hair”, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104050 (2019).

[31] A. Averin, “Entropy counting from a schwarzschild/cft correspondence and soft hair”, Phys. Rev. D 101, 046024 (2020).

[32] T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals in the hamiltonian formulation of general relativity”, Annals of Physics 88, 286 (1974).

[33] C. Crnkovic and E. Witten, “Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories.”, in Three hundred years of gravitation (Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 676–684.

[34] C. Crnkovic, “Symplectic geometry of the convariant phase space”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 5, 1557 (1988).

[35] J. Kijowski and W. M. Tulczyjew, A symplectic framework for field theories (Springer, Germany, 1979).

[36] J. Lee and R. M. Wald, “Local symmetries and constraints”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 31, 725 (1990).

[37] R. M. Wald, “Black hole entropy is the noether charge”, Phys. Rev. D 48, R3427 (1993).

[38] V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of the noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy”, Phys. Rev. D 50, 846 (1994).

[39] V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Comparison of the noether charge and euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes”, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4430 (1995).

[40] R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, “General definition of “conserved quantities” in general relativity and other theories of gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084027 (2000).

[41] T. Tomitsuka, K. Yamaguchi, and M. Hotta, “A Lie algebra based approach to asymptotic symmetries in general relativity”, Classical and Quantum Gravity (2021).

[42] T. Tomitsuka and K. Yamaguchi, A modified Lie algebra based approach and its application to asymptotic symmetries on a Killing horizon, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.04807/, 2021.

[43] R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “Dynamical structure and definition of energy in general relativity”, Phys. Rev. 116, 1322 (1959).

[44] V. I. Arnold, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics (Springer, 1978).

[45] P. A. M. Dirac, “Generalized hamiltonian dynamics”, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 2, 129 (1950).

[46] J. L. Anderson and P. G. Bergmann, “Constraints in covariant field theories”, Phys. Rev. 83, 1018 (1951).

[47] P. A. M. Dirac, “Generalized hamiltonian dynamics”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 246, 326 (1958).

[48] P. A. M. Dirac, “The theory of gravitation in hamiltonian form”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 246, 333 (1958).

[49] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of gauge systems (Princeton University Press, 1992).

[50] R. E. Peierls, “The commutation laws of relativistic field theory”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 214, Full publication date: Aug. 21, 1952, 143 (1952).

[51] I. Khavkine, “Covariant phase space, constraints, gauge and the peierls formula”, International Journal of Modern Physics A 29, 1430009 (2014).

[52] G. Barnich and G. Comp`ere, “Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 49, 042901 (2008).

[53] G. Barnich, M. Henneaux, and C. Schomblond, “Covariant description of the canonical formalism”, Phys. Rev. D 44, R939 (1991).

[54] M. Forger and S. V. Romero, “Covariant poisson brackets in geometric field theory”, Communications in Mathematical Physics 256, 375 (2005).

[55] D. Harlow and J.-q. Wu, “Covariant phase space with boundaries”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2020, 146 (2020).

[56] J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity”, Comm. Math. Phys. 104, 207 (1986).

[57] M. Henneaux, “Energy-momentum, angular momentum, and supercharge in 2 + 1 supergravity”, Phys. Rev. D 29, 2766 (1984).

[58] S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and G. ’t Hooft, “Three-dimensional einstein gravity: dynamics of flat space”, Annals of Physics 152, 220 (1984).

[59] J. Maldacena, “The large n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity”, AIP Conference Proceedings 484, 51 (1999).

[60] N. K. Smolentsev, “Diffeomorphism groups of compact manifolds”, Journal of Mathematical Sciences 146, 6213 (2007).

[61] M. Wakimoto, Lectures on infinite-dimensional lie algebra (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001).

[62] Y. Matsushima, Differentiable manifolds (Shokabo, 1965).

参考文献をもっと見る