[1] Adnan, F., and Yasukawa, H., 2008. Experimental investigation of wave-induced motions of an obliquely moving ship. In Proceedings of the 2nd Regional Conference on Vehicle Engineering and Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp. 15-16.
[2] Anderson, W.K., Thomas, J.L. and Van Leer, B., 1986. Comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equations. AIAA journal, 24(9), pp.1453-1460.
[3] Araki, M., Umeda, N., Hashimoto, H. and Matsuda, A., 2011. An improvement of broaching prediction with a nonlinear 6 degrees of freedom model. Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, 14, pp.85-96.
[4] Ayaz, Z., Vassalos, D. and Spyrou, K.J., 2006. Manoeuvring behaviour of ships in extreme astern seas. Ocean Engineering, 33(17-18), pp.2381-2434.
[5] Bailey, P.A., 1997. A unified mathematical model describing the maneuvering of a ship travelling in a seaway. Trans RINA, 140, pp.131-149.
[6] Bonci, M., De Jong, P., Van Walree, F., Renilson, M.R. and Huijsmans, R.H.M., 2019. The steering and course keeping qualities of high-speed craft and the inception of dynamic instabilities in the following sea. Ocean Engineering, 194, p.106636.
[7] Broglia, R., Dubbioso, G., Durante, D. and Di Mascio, A., 2013. Simulation of turning circle by CFD: analysis of different propeller models and their effect on manoeuvring prediction. Applied Ocean Research, 39, pp.1-10.
[8] Broglia, R., Dubbioso, G., Durante, D. and Di Mascio, A., 2015. Turning ability analysis of a fully appended twin screw vessel by CFD. Part I: Single rudder configuration. Ocean engineering, 105, pp.275-286.
[9] Carrica, P.M., Ismail, F., Hyman, M., Bhushan, S. and Stern, F., 2013. Turn and zigzag maneuvers of a surface combatant using a URANS approach with dynamic overset grids. Journal of Marine Science and technology, 18(2), pp.166-181.
[10] Carrica, P.M., Mofidi, A. and Martin, E., 2015. Progress toward direct CFD simulation of manoeuvres in waves. In MARINE VI: proceedings of the VI International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering. pp.327-338.
[11] Carrica, P.M., Wilson, R.V., Noack, R.W. and Stern, F., 2007. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Computers & fluids, 36(9), pp.1415-1433.
[12] Choi, J., and Yoon, S.B., 2009. Numerical simulations using momentum source wave-maker applied to RANS equation model. Coastal Engineering, 56(10), pp.1043-1060.
[13] Chorin, A.J., 1967. The numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible fluid. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 73(6), pp.928-931.
[14] Cummins, W. E. 1962. The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions. Schiffstechnik, 9, 101-109.
[15] Davidson, J., Karimov, M., Szelechman, A., Windt, C. and Ringwood, J., 2019, July. Dynamic mesh motion in OpenFOAM for wave energy converter simulation. In Proceedings of the 14th OpenFOAM Workshop, Duisburg, Germany. pp.23-26.
[16] Dubbioso, G., Durante, D. and Broglia, R., 2013. Zig-zag maneuver simulation by CFD for a tanker like vessel. In MARINE V: proceedings of the V International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (pp. 711-722). CIMNE.
[17] Dubbioso, G., Durante, D., Di Mascio, A. and Broglia, R., 2016. Turning ability analysis of a fully appended twin screw vessel by CFD. Part II: Single vs. twin rudder configuration. Ocean engineering, 117, pp.259-271.
[18] El Moctar, O., Lantermann, U., Mucha, P., Höpken, J. and Schellin, T.E., 2014. RANS-based simulated ship maneuvering accounting for hull-propulsor-engine interaction. Ship technology research, 61(3), pp.142-161.
[19] EMSA, 2021. Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents.
[20] Fujino, M., Yamasaki, K. and Ishii, Y., 1982. On the Stability Derivatives of a Ship Travelling in the Following Wave. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 152, pp.167-179.
[21] Gu, X., Ma, N., Xu, J., and Zhu, D., 2015. A simplified simulation model for a ship steering in regular waves. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, pp. 14–19.
[22] Hamamoto M., 1971. On the hydrodynamic derivatives for the directional stability of ships in following seas. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan. 130, pp.83-94.
[23] Hamamoto M., 1973. On the Hydrodynamic Derivatives for the Directional Stability of Ships in Following Seas (Part 2). Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan. 133, pp.133-42.
[24] Hamamoto, M. and Kim, Y.S., 1993. A new coordinate system and the equations describing manoeuvring motion of a ship in waves. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1993(173), pp.209-220.
[25] Hasnan, M.A.A., Yasukawa, H., Hirata, N., Terada, D. and Matsuda, A., 2020. Study of ship turning in irregular waves. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 25(4), pp.1024-1043.
[26] He, S., Kellett, P., Yuan, Z., Incecik, A., Turan, O. and Boulougouris, E., 2016. Manoeuvring prediction based on CFD generated derivatives. Journal of hydrodynamics, 28(2), pp.284-292.
[27] Hino, T., 1999. An interface capturing method for free surface flow computations on unstructured grids. Journal of the society of Naval Architects of Japan, 186, pp.177-183.
[28] Hirano, M., Takashina, J., Takaishi, Y. and Saruta, T., 1980. Ship turning trajectory in regular waves. Publication of: West Japan Society of Naval Architects, (60) pp17-31.
[29] Inoue, S. and Murahashi, T., 1965. A calculation of turning motion in regular waves. Transactions of the west-Japan society of naval architects, vol 31, pp 77-99.
[30] IMO., 2002a. Standards for ship manoeuvrability. Resolution MSC.137(76), International Maritime Organization.
[31] IMO, 2002b. Explanatory notes to the standards for ship manoeuvrability. MSC/Circ. 1053, International Maritime Organization.
[32] IMO., 2013. Interim Guidelines for Determining Minimum Propulsion Power to Maintain the Manoeuvrability in Adverse Conditions. MEPC.232(65), International Maritime Organization.
[33] ITTC., 2008. The manoeuvring committee Final report and recommendations to the 25th ITTC. In: Proceedings of 25th international towing tank conference, Fukuoka, Japan.
[34] ITTC., 2011. The manoeuvring committee Final report and recommendations to the 26th ITTC. In: Proceedings of 26th international towing tank conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
[35] ITTC., 2014. The manoeuvring committee Final report and recommendations to the 27th ITTC. In: Proceedings of 27th international towing tank conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
[36] ITTC., 2017a. ITTC Quality System Manual Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: Uncertainty Analysis in CFD: Verification and Validation, Methodology and Procedures. International Towing Tank Conference.
[37] ITTC., 2017b. The manoeuvring committee Final report and recommendations to the 28th ITTC. In: Proceedings of 28th international towing tank conference, Wuxi, China.
[38] ITTC., 2021. The specialist committee on manoeuvring in waves Final report and recommendations to the 29th ITTC. In: Proceedings of 29th international towing tank conference, Virtual.
[39] Jameson, A., 1991, June. Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings. In 10th Computational fluid dynamics conference (p. 1596).
[40] Kawamura, T., Miyata, H. and Mashimo, K., 1997. Numerical simulation of the flow about self-propelling tanker models. Journal of marine science and technology, 2(4), pp.245-256.
[41] Kim, D., Song, S., Jeong, B. and Tezdogan, T., 2021a. Numerical evaluation of a ship's manoeuvrability and course keeping control under various wave conditions using CFD. Ocean Engineering, 237, p.109615.
[42] Kim, D., Song, S. and Tezdogan, T., 2021b. Free running CFD simulations to investigate ship manoeuvrability in waves. Ocean Engineering, 236, p.109567. [43] Kim, J., O’sullivan, J., and Read, A., 2012. Ringing analysis of a vertical cylinder by Euler overlay method. In 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. pp.855-866.
[44] Kobayashi, H. and Kodama, Y., 2015. Developing spline based overset grid assembling approach and application to unsteady flow around a moving body. In MARINE VI: proceedings of the VI International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering. pp.838-849.
[45] Kodama, Y., Ohashi, K., Umezaki, Y. and Hirata, N., 2012. Development of UP_GRID, and Overset Grid System for Computing Flows past Ship Hulls with Appendages. In Proceedings of the 26th Computational Fluid Dynamics Symposium, D08-1.
[46] Ma, C., Ma, N., and Gu, X., 2019. Time Domain Simulations of Ship Maneuvering and Roll Motion in Regular Waves Based on a Hybrid Method. In 38th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
[47] Ma, C., Ma, N., Gu, X. and Feng, P., 2021. Numerical Study on Hydrodynamic Forces and Course Stability of a Ship in Surf-Riding Condition Based on Planar Motion Mechanism Tests. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 143(6).
[48] Mofidi, A. and Carrica, P.M., 2014. Simulations of zigzag maneuvers for a container ship with direct moving rudder and propeller. Computers & fluids, 96, pp.191-203.
[49] Motora, S., Fujino, M., Koyanagi, M., Ishida, S., Shimada, K. and Maki, T., 1981. A Consideration on the Mechanism of Occurrence of the Broaching-to Phenomenon. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1981(150), pp.211-222.
[50] MSC 93/21/5, 2014, Safety evaluation of the interim guidelines for determining minimum propulsion power to maintain the manoeuvrability of ships under adverse weather conditions. International Maritime Organization
[51] MSC 93/INF.13, 2014, Safety evaluation of the interim guidelines for determining minimum propulsion power to maintain the manoeuvrability of ships under adverse weather conditions. International Maritime Organization.
[52] MEPC 67/INF.22, 2014, Japanese activity on "Minimum propulsion power to maintain the manoeuvrability of ships in adverse conditions". International Maritime Organization.
[53] MEPC 67/4/16, 2014, Comments on documents MSC 93/21/5 and MSC 93/INF.13 and consideration on the requirement of minimum propulsion power needed to maintain the manoeuvrability of a ship under adverse conditions. International Maritime Organization.
[54] Nishimura K., Hirayama T., 2003. Maneuvering and Motion Simulation of a Small Vessel in Waves. In: International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Maneuverability, MARSIM'03, Kanazawa, Japan.
[55] Nonaka K. 1990. On the manoeuvring motion of a ship in waves. Transactions of the West-Japan Society of Naval Architects, 80: 73-86.
[56] Ohashi, K., 2018. Development of numerical method to simulate flows around a ship at propulsion conditions in regular waves coupling with the ship propulsion plant model. Applied Ocean Research, 73, pp.141-148.
[57] Ohashi, K., Hino, T., Kobayashi, H., Onodera, N. and Sakamoto, N., 2019. Development of a structured overset Navier–Stokes solver with a moving grid and full multigrid method. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 24(3), pp.884- 901.
[58] Ohmori, T., 1998. Finite-volume simulation of flows about a ship in maneuvering motion. Journal of marine science and technology, 3(2), pp.82-93.
[59] Orihara, H. and Miyata, H., 2003. Evaluation of added resistance in regular incident waves by computational fluid dynamics motion simulation using an overlapping grid system. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 8(2), pp.47-60.
[60] Papanikolaou, A., Zaraphonitis, G., Bitner-Gregersen, E., Shigunov, V., El Moctar, O., Soares, C.G., Reddy, D.N. and Sprenger, F., 2015, November. Energy efficient safe ship operation (SHOPERA). In SNAME 5th World Maritime Technology Conference. OnePetro.
[61] Patankar, S.V., 1981. A calculation procedure for two-dimensional elliptic situations. Numerical heat transfer, 4(4), pp.409-425.
[62] Phillips, A.B., Turnock, S.R. and Furlong, M., 2009. Evaluation of manoeuvring coefficients of a self-propelled ship using a blade element momentum propeller model coupled to a Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes flow solver. Ocean Engineering, 36(15-16), pp.1217-1225.
[63] Phillips, A.B., Turnock, S.R. and Furlong, M., 2010. Accurate capture of propeller- rudder interaction using a coupled blade element momentum-rans approach. Ship technology research, 57(2), pp.128-139.
[64] Queutey, P., Deng, G., Wackers, J., Guilmineau, E., Leroyer, A. and Visonneau, M., 2012. Sliding grids and adaptive grid refinement for RANS simulation of ship- propeller interaction. Ship technology research, 59(2), pp.44-57.
[65] Rameesha, T.V. and Krishnankutty, P., 2019. Numerical study on the manoeuvring of a container ship in regular waves. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(2), pp.141- 152.
[66] Reed A. M. and Beck R. F., 2018. Mathematical models of maneuvering in waves: historical perspectives and the state of the art. In: Proceeding of the 13th International conference on stability of ships and ocean vehicles. 16-21 September, Kobe, Japan.
[67] Renilson, M. R. and Driscoll, A., 1982., Broaching - An Investigation into the Loss of Directionary Control in Severe Following Seas, Read at Spring Meeting of R. I. N. A.
[68] Roe, P.L., 1986. Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 18(1), pp.337-365.
[69] Sadat-Hosseini, H., Carrica, P., Stern, F., Umeda, N., Hashimoto, H., Yamamura, S. and Mastuda, A., 2011. CFD, system-based and EFD study of ship dynamic instability events: Surf-riding, periodic motion, and broaching. Ocean Engineering, 38(1), pp.88-110.
[70] Sakamoto, N., Carrica, P.M. and Stern, F., 2012a. URANS simulations of static and dynamic maneuvering for surface combatant: part 1. Verification and validation for forces, moment, and hydrodynamic derivatives. Journal of marine science and technology, 17(4), pp.422-445.
[71] Sakamoto, N., Carrica, P.M. and Stern, F., 2012b. URANS simulations of static and dynamic maneuvering for surface combatant: part 2. Analysis and validation for local flow characteristics. Journal of marine science and technology, 17(4), pp.446- 468.
[72] Sanada, Y., Tanimoto, K., Takagi, K., Gui, L., Toda, Y. and Stern, F., 2013. Trajectories for ONR Tumblehome maneuvering in calm water and waves. Ocean Engineering, 72, pp.45-65.
[73] Seo M G, Kim Y., 2011. Numerical analysis on ship maneuvering coupled with ship motion in waves. Ocean Engineering, 38(17–18): 1934-1945.
[74] Seo, J.H., Seol, D.M., Lee, J.H. and Rhee, S.H., 2010. Flexible CFD meshing strategy for prediction of ship resistance and propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2(3), pp.139-145.
[75] Shen, Z., Wan, D. and Carrica, P.M., 2015. Dynamic overset grids in OpenFOAM with application to KCS self-propulsion and maneuvering. Ocean Engineering, 108, pp.287-306.
[76] Shigunov, V., El Moctar, O., Papanikolaou, A., Potthoff, R. and Liu, S., 2018. International benchmark study on numerical simulation methods for prediction of manoeuvrability of ships in waves. Ocean Engineering, 165, pp.365-385.
[77] Simonsen, C.D., Otzen, J.F., Klimt, C., Larsen, N.L. and Stern, F., 2012, August. Maneuvering predictions in the early design phase using CFD generated PMM data. In 29th symposium on naval hydrodynamics (pp. 26-31).
[78] Skejic, R. and Faltinsen, O.M., 2008. A unified seakeeping and maneuvering analysis of ships in regular waves. Journal of marine science and technology, 13(4), pp.371-394.
[79] Son, K.H. and Nomoto, K., 1982. On the coupled motion of steering and rolling of a ship in following seas. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1982(152), pp.180-191.
[80] Stern, F., Kim, H.T., Patel, V.C. and Chen, H.C., 1988. A viscous-flow approach to the computation of propeller-hull interaction. Journal of Ship Research, 32(04), pp.246-262.
[81] Tahara, Y., Longo, J. and Stern, F., 2002. Comparison of CFD and EFD for the Series 60 CB= 0.6 in steady drift motion. Journal of marine science and technology, 7(1), pp.17-30.
[82] Triantafyllou, M.S., 1982. A consistent hydrodynamic theory for moored and positioned vessels. Journal of Ship Research, 26(02), pp.97-105.
[83] Ueno, M., Nimura, T., and Miyazaki, H., 2003. Experimental study on manoeuvring motion of a ship in waves. In: International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Maneuverability, MARSIM'03, Kanazawa, Japan.
[84] Wang J, Zou L, Wan D. 2017. CFD simulations of free running ship under course keeping control. Ocean engineering. 2017 Sep 1; 141:450-64.
[85] Wang J, Wan D. 2018. CFD investigations of ship maneuvering in waves using naoe-FOAM-SJTU Solver. Journal of Marine Science and Application. 2018 Sep;17(3):443-58.
[86] Wang J, Zou L, Wan D. 2018. Numerical simulations of zigzag maneuver of free running ship in waves by RANS-Overset grid method. Ocean Engineering. 2018 Aug 15; 162:55-79.
[87] Windt, C., Davidson, J., Chandar, D.D., Faedo, N. and Ringwood, J.V., 2020. Evaluation of the overset grid method for control studies of wave energy converters in OpenFOAM numerical wave tanks. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy, 6(1), pp.55-70.
[88] Xu, J., 2015. Study on 6-DOF Numerical Model of Ship Maneuvering Motions in Waves. Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
[89] Xu, Y., Bao, W., Kinoshita, T. and Itakura, H., 2007. A PMM experimental research on ship maneuverability in waves. In: International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE).
[90] Xu, Y., Kinoshita, T., Bao, W. and Itakura, H., 2011. Wave Drift Forces Affecting on Maneuverability Derivatives. In: International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE), pp. 877-884.
[91] Yasukawa, H., 2006. Simulations of Ship Maneuvering in Waves (1st report: turning motion). Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, 4, pp.127-136.
[92] Yasukawa, H., 2008. Simulations of ship maneuvering in waves: 2nd report: zig- zag and stopping maneuvers. Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, 7(0), pp.163-170.
[93] Yasukawa, H., Hasnan, M.A.A. and Matsuda, A., 2021. Validation of 6-DOF motion simulations for ship turning in regular waves. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 26(4), pp.1096-1111.
[94] Yasukawa, H., Hirata, N., Matsumoto, A., Kuroiwa, R. and Mizokami, S., 2019. Evaluations of wave-induced steady forces and turning motion of a full hull ship in waves. Journal of marine science and technology, 24(1), pp.1-15.
[95] Yoon, H.Y., 2009. Force/moment and phase-averaged stereo PIV flow measurements for surface combatant in PMM maneuvers. Ph. D. thesis, The University of Iowa.
[96] Yoon, H., Simonsen, C.D., Benedetti, L., Longo, J., Toda, Y. and Stern, F., 2015a. Benchmark CFD validation data for surface combatant 5415 in PMM maneuvers– Part I: Force/moment/motion measurements. Ocean Engineering, 109, pp.705-734.
[97] Yoon, H., Longo, J., Toda, Y. and Stern, F., 2015b. Benchmark CFD validation data for surface combatant 5415 in PMM maneuvers–Part II: Phase-averaged stereoscopic PIV flow field measurements. Ocean engineering, 109, pp.735-750.
[98] Yu, L., Wang, S. and Ma, N., 2021. Study on wave-induced motions of a turning ship in regular and long-crest irregular waves. Ocean Engineering, 225, p.108807.
[99] Zhang, W., Zou, Z.J. and Deng, D.H., 2017. A study on prediction of ship maneuvering in regular waves. Ocean engineering, 137, pp.367-381.
[100] Zhu, D., 2016. Study on Ship Maneuvering and Rolling Prediction and Course- Keeping Control in Waves. Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
論文の公開元へ
