1.
The United Nations. World Population Ageing.
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Hig
hlights.pdf Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020
2.
”公的介護保険制度の現状と今後の役割“ 厚生労働省
2018
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/0000213177.pdf Accessed: 1 Sep, 2020.
“Long-term Care Insurance System of Japan. November 2016, Ministry of Health,
Labour and Welfare, Japan. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/carewelfare-elderly/dl/ltcisj_e.pdf Accessed: 1 Sep, 2020.
4.
“ 要介護者等の状況“
平成 22 年度国民生活基礎調査. 厚生労働省 2010.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa10/4-2.html Accessed: 2 Sep,
2020.
Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020.
5.
Izumida R. Locomotive Sydrome and aging society. Japanese Journal of Occupational
Medicine and Traumatology, 2014;62(5):304-311 (in Japanese).
6.
“ロコモティブシンドローム 生活者意識全国調査“ ロコモチャレンジ推進協
議会 2012. https://locomo-joa.jp/news/upload_images/locomo_survey120319.pdf
Accessed: 2 Mar 2020.
7.
“ 要介護者等の状況“
平成 13 年度国民生活基礎調査. 厚生労働省
2001.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa01/3-2.html Accessed: 2 Mar,
2020.
8.
“ 要介護者等の状況“
平成 16 年度国民生活基礎調査. 厚生労働省 2004.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa04/4-2.html Accessed: 2 Mar,
2020.
56
9.
“ 要介護者等の状況“
平成 19 年度国民生活基礎調査. 厚生労働省 2007.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa07/4-2.html Accessed: 2 Mar,
2020.
10.
“ 要介護者等の状況“
平成 25 年度国民生活基礎調査. 厚生労働省 2013.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa13/index.html Accessed: 2 Mar,
2020.
11.
Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived
with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a
systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet.
2012;380(9859):2163-96.
12.
Locomotive syndrome. In: Council LC, editor. https://locomo-
joajp/assets/pdf/index_englishpdf Accessed June 4, 2019. Locomotive syndrome pamphlet
2015 ed. Tokyo: Japanese Orthopaedic Association; 2015.
13.
Nakamura K. Locomotive syndrome: disability-free life expectancy and locomotive
organ health in a "super-aged" society. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(1):1-2.
14.
Nakamura K. The concept and treatment of locomotive syndrome: its acceptance and
spread in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(5):489-91.
15.
Nakamura K, Ogata T. Locomotive Syndrome: Definition and Management. Clin Rev
Bone Miner Metab. 2016;14:56-67.
16.
Akune T, Muraki S, Oka H, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi H, Tokimura F, et al. Incidence of
certified need of care in the long-term care insurance system and its risk factors in the elderly
of Japanese population-based cohorts: the ROAD study. Geriatr Gerontol Int.
2014;14(3):695-701.
17.
Takamiya T, Inoue S. Trends in Step-determined Physical Activity among Japanese
Adults from 1995 to 2016. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(9):1852-9.
57
18.
” 第３章
身体活動・運動及び睡眠に関する状況“平成 29 年度国民健康・栄
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10904750/000351576.pdf Accessed: 2 Mar,
養調査
2020.
19.
World Health Orgnization. World health report 2002:57-9
https://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/whr02_en.pdf?ua=1 Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020.
20.
Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, et al. The
pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294305.
21.
Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC, et al. Scaling up
physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get
people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337-48.
22.
Nakamura K. A "super-aged" society and the "locomotive syndrome". J Orthop Sci.
2008;13(1):1-2.
23.
Sugiyama K, Tomata Y, Takemi Y, Tsushita K, Nakamura M, Hashimoto S, et al.
Awareness and health consciousness regarding the national health plan "Health Japan 21"
(2nd edition) among the Japanese population in 2013 and 2014. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi.
2016;63(8):424-31.
24.
”厚生労働省告知第四百三十号
国民の健康の増進の総合的な推進を図るため
の基本的な方針“ 厚生労働省 2012.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/dl/kenkounippon21_01.pdf Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020.
25.
“ロコモ認知度”公益社団法人
運動器の健康・日本協会.
https://sloc.or.jp/?page_id=159 Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020.
26.
Ogata T, Muranaga S, Ishibashi H, Ohe T, Izumida R, Yoshimura N, et al.
Development of a screening program to assess motor function in the adult population: a
cross-sectional observational study. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20(5):888-95.
58
27.
Muranaga S. Evaluation of the muscular strength of the lower extremities using the
standing movement and clinical application. J Showa Med Assoc. 2001;61(3):362-7 (in
Japanese).
28.
Muranaga S, Hirano K. Development of a convenient way to predict ability to walk,
using a two-step test. J Showa Med Assoc. 2003;63(3):301-8 (in Japanese).
29.
Seichi A, Hoshino Y, Doi T, Akai M, Tobimatsu Y, Iwaya T. Development of a
screening tool for risk of locomotive syndrome in the elderly: the 25-question Geriatric
Locomotive Function Scale. J Orthop Sci. 2012;17(2):163-72.
30.
Miyatake N, Fujii M, Nishikawa H, Wada J, Shikata K, Makino H, et al. Clinical
evaluation of muscle strength in 20-79-years-old obese Japanese. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.
2000;48(1):15-21.
31.
Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Tanaka S, Ogata T, Kawaguchi H, et al. Association
between new indices in the locomotive syndrome risk test and decline in mobility: third
survey of the ROAD study. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20(5):896-905.
32.
Yamada K. Challenging decreased mobility leading to disability in a super-aging
society. J Occup Health. 2019;61(4):267-8.
33.
Ferrucci L, Cooper R, Shardell M, Simonsick EM, Schrack JA, Kuh D. Age-Related
Change in Mobility: Perspectives From Life Course Epidemiology and Geroscience. J
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(9):1184-94.
34.
McKay MJ, Baldwin JN, Ferreira P, Simic M, Vanicek N, Burns J, et al. Normative
reference values for strength and flexibility of 1,000 children and adults. Neurology.
2017;88(1):36-43.
35.
Sato Y. Exercise prescription for the elderly, clinical guidelines. Tokyo: Nankodo;
2002, p1-32 (in Japanese).
59
36.
Gallagher D, Visser M, De Meersman RE, Sepúlveda D, Baumgartner RN, Pierson
RN, et al. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity. J Appl
Physiol (1985). 1997;83(1):229-39.
37.
Tanimoto Y, Watanabe M, Kono R, Hirota C, Takasaki K, Kono K. Aging changes in
muscle mass of Japanese. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2010;47(1):52-7 (in Japanese).
38.
Shimokata H, Ando F. Association of daily physical performance with muscle volume
and strength. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2012;49(2):195-8 (in Japanese).
39.
Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity
function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J
Med. 1995;332(9):556-61.
40.
Giampaoli S, Ferrucci L, Cecchi F et al. Hand‐grip strength predicts incident
disability in non‐disabled older men. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 283–288.
41.
Onder G, Penninx BW, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, Pahor M. Measures of
physical performance and risk for progressive and catastrophic disability: results from the
Women's Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60: 74–79.
42.
Vermeulen J, Neyens JC, van Rossum E, Spreeuwenberg MD, de Witte LP.
Predicting ADL disability in community‐dwelling elderly people using physical frailty
indicators: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2011; 11: 33.
43.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The outline of the
results of physical strength and sporting ability 2018. Available at
https://www.mext.go.jp/prev_sports/comp/b_menu/other/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/10/15/142
1922_3.pdf. Accessed: 23 Sep, 2020.
44.
Yoshimura N, Oka H, Muraki S, Akune T, Hirabayashi N, Matsuda S, Nojiri T,
Hatanaka K, Ishimoto Y, Nagata K, Yoshida M, Tokimura F, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K.
Reference values for hand grip strength, muscle mass, walking time, and one-leg standing
60
time as indices for locomotive syndrome and associated disability: the second survey of the
ROAD study. J Orthop Sci. 2011 Nov;16(6):768-77.
45.
Massy-Westropp NM, Gill TK, Taylor AW, Bohannon RW, Hill CL. Hand Grip
Strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study. BMC Res
Notes. 2011 Apr 14;4:127.
46.
Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bartels EM, Bülow PM, Lund H, Stockmarr A, Holm CC, et
al. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to
age and gender. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2009;197 Suppl 673:1-68.
47.
Suetta C, Haddock B, Alcazar J, Noerst T, Hansen OM, Ludvig H, et al. The
Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study: lean mass, strength, power, and physical function in a Danish
cohort aged 20-93 years. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019; Dec;10(6):1316-29.
48.
Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79
years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):15-9.
49.
Kim H, Park I, Lee H, Lee O. The reliability and validity of gait speed with different
walking pace and distances against general health, physical function, and chronic disease in
aged adults. J Exerc Nutr Biochem 2016. Sep;20:46–50
50.
Graham JE, Ostir GV, Kuo YF, Fisher SR, Ottenbacher KJ. Relationship between test
methodology and mean velocity in timed walk tests: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
2008;89:865–872.
51.
中谷 敏昭, 灘本 雅一, 三村 寛一, 廣藤 千代子, 近藤 純子, 鞘本 佳代, 伊藤 稔「30
秒椅子立ち上がりテスト(CS-30 テスト)成績の加齢変化と標準値の作成」
臨床スポーツ医学 20 巻 3 号 349-355 頁(2003)
52.
Long-term care, health and welfare services for the elderly.
http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/index.html: Ministry
of Health, Labour and Welfare. Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020.
61
53.
Arai Y, Zarit SH, Kumamoto K, Takeda A. Are there inequities in the assessment of
dementia under Japan's LTC insurance system? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18(4):346-52.
54.
Chen W, Fukutomi E, Wada T, Ishimoto Y, Kimura Y, Kasahara Y, et al.
Comprehensive geriatric functional analysis of elderly populations in four categories of the
long-term care insurance system in a rural, depopulated and aging town in Japan. Geriatr
Gerontol Int. 2013;13(1):63-9.
55.
Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK. Adequacy of Sample Size in Health
Studies. Chichester: published on behalf of WHO by Wiley;1990 p1-4.
56.
Seichi A, Kimura A, Konno S, Yabuki S. Epidemiologic survey of locomotive
syndrome in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2016;21(2):222-5.
57. “都道府県、男女別人口及び人口性比―総人口、日本人人口（平成 30 年 10 月 1
日現在”国勢調査 総務省統計局. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/statsearch/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00200524&tstat=000000090001&cycle=7&ye
ar=20180&month=0&tclass1=000001011679
58.
Accessed: 21 Mar, 2019.
Critchlow DE, Fligner MA. On Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons in the One-
Way Analysis of Variance. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods. 1991:127–
39.
59.
Pizer SM. Numerical Computing and Mathematical Analysis. Chicago 1975.
60.
”第 2 部
厚生労働省
身体状況調査の結果 第 13 表“ 平成 28 年度国民健康・栄養調査.
2016.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/dl/h28-houkoku-05.pdf
Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020
61.
Majer IM, Nusselder WJ, Mackenbach JP, Klijs B, van Baal PH. Mortality risk
associated with disability: a population-based record linkage study. Am J Public Health.
2011;101(12):e9-15.
62
62.
Wu LW, Chen WL, Peng TC, Chiang ST, Yang HF, Sun YS, et al. All-cause
mortality risk in elderly individuals with disabilities: a retrospective observational study.
BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e011164.
63.
“高齢者人口と要介護認定率 （年齢階級別、2009 年）” 厚生労働省.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2010/05/dl/s0531-13d_0007.pdf Accessed: 2 Mar, 2020.
64.
Nishiwaki T, Nakamura K, Ueno K, Fujino K, Yamamoto M. Health characteristics
of elderly Japanese requiring care at home. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005;205(3):231-9.
65.
Baldwin JN, McKay MJ, Hiller CE, Moloney N, Nightingale EJ, Burns J.
Relationship between physical performance and self-reported function in healthy individuals
across the lifespan. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;30:10-7.
66.
Harada ND, Chiu V, Stewart AL. Mobility-related function in older adults:
assessment with a 6-minute walk test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(7):837-41.
67.
Kikawa. Kigawa A, Yamamoto T, Koyama Y, et al.: Evaluation of knee extensor
strength for prevention of sports injury. Jpn J Orthop Sports Med, 1987, 6: 141–145 (in
Japanese).
68.
Feder G, Cryer C, Donovan S, Carter Y. Guidelines for the prevention of falls in
people over 65. The Guidelines' Development Group. Bmj. 2000;321(7267):1007-11.
69.
Rantakokko M, Mänty M, Rantanen T. Mobility decline in old age. Exerc Sport Sci
Rev. 2013;41(1):19-25.
70.
House JS, Lepkowski JM, Kinney AM, Mero RP, Kessler RC, Herzog AR. The social
stratification of aging and health. J Health Soc Behav. 1994;35(3):213-34.
63
補表 1 地域での年齢層、性別による参加者の分布
20304045年齢層（歳）
29
39
44
49
男性
5559
6064
6569
7074
7579
8089
総数
地域
北海道
東北
関東
中部
近畿
中国・四国
九州
総数
女性
5054
63
193
92
136
44
53
590
98
168
99
110
41
58
582
62
84
42
69
20
46
325
55
80
46
53
17
59
313
53
69
36
62
17
43
282
55
56
35
67
19
56
290
54
50
23
51
10
50
238
65
79
44
53
12
44
301
48
88
40
44
14
34
273
34
79
30
44
34
234
30
36
22
43
39
179
44
617
982
509
732
207
516
3607
10
10
16
27
19
11
112
74
275
79
156
71
59
724
97
203
97
106
51
64
625
67
159
61
72
37
61
457
56
200
63
70
26
56
472
58
147
51
61
25
50
396
70
105
50
70
28
44
377
69
111
48
62
23
55
375
83
174
55
88
37
64
517
53
182
53
56
45
61
477
29
128
43
45
36
70
370
30
89
21
44
30
59
284
686
1773
621
830
409
643
5074
地域
北海道
東北
関東
中部
近畿
中国・四国
九州
総数
64
補表 2 地域別人口（2018）で重み付けした 3 つのロコモ度テストの年代別代表値
年齢層 (歳) 20-29 30- 39 40-44
45-49
50-54
55- 59 60- 64
65- 69
70- 74
75-79
80-89
男性
人数
２ステップ値
平均
95%信頼区間
立ち上がりテスト
中央値
四分位範囲
ロコモ 25
中央値
四分位範囲
590
582
325
313
282
290
238
301
273
234
179
1.66
1.641.67
1.63
1.621.64
1.59
1.571.60
1.55
1.531.57
1.53
1.521.55
1.51
1.491.53
1.50
1.481.52
1.44
1.421.46
1.42
1.401.44
1.37
1.351.39
1.22
1.181.25
7-8
6-8
5-8
5-7
5-6
5-6
4-6
3-5
4-5
3-5
3-4
0-2
0-3
0-4
0-5
1-4
1-5
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-8
2-16
女性
人数
２ステップ値
平均
95%信頼区間
立ち上がりテスト
中央値
四分位範囲
ロコモ 25
中央値
四分位範囲
724
625
457
472
396
377
375
517
477
370
284
1.55
1.541.56
1.52
1.511.54
1.49
1.481.51
1.46
1.451.48
1.46
1.451.47
1.47
1.451.48
1.42
1.401.44
1.41
1.391.42
1.38
1.361.39
1.30
1.291.32
1.18
1.151.20
5-8
5-7
5-6
5-6
5-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
3-5
3-4
0-3
0-4
1-6
1-6
1-7
2-8
2-7
2-7
2-7
3-11
4-14
65
補表 3 地域差で調整した２ステップテストの平均値
年齢層 (歳)
20-29
30- 39
40-44
45-49
50-54
590
55- 59
60- 64
65- 69
70- 74
582
325
313
1.67
1.651.68
1.64
1.631.66
1.60
1.581.62
724
625
1.56
1.551.57
1.54
1.521.55
75-79
80-89
282
290
238
301
273
234
179
1.57
1.551.59
1.55
1.531.57
1.53
1.511.55
1.52
1.491.54
1.45
1.431.47
1.43
1.411.45
1.37
1.351.39
1.22
1.191.24
457
472
396
377
375
517
477
370
284
1.51
1.491.52
1.48
1.461.49
1.47
1.461.49
1.47
1.461.49
1.44
1.421.45
1.41
1.401.43
1.38
1.371.40
1.31
1.301.33
1.19
1.171.21
男性
人数
２ステップ値
平均
95%信頼区間
女性
人数
２ステップ値
平均
95%信頼区間
66
謝辞
本研究にあたり、御指導、御鞭撻をいただきました東京大学大学院医学系研究科
感覚・運動機能医学講座
整形外科学分野（整形外科学教室）田中栄教授、同教室
中村耕三名誉教授、ロコモチャレンジ！推進委員会
リハビリテーションセンター
大江隆史委員長、国立障害者
障害者健康増進・運動医科学支援センター
方徹センター長、亀田メディカルセンターリハビリテーション事業管理部
信吾部長、東京理科大学 工学部情報工学科
康データ科学研究センター
伊藤
村永
篠崎智大講師、 統計推理研究所
陽一センター長、データ収集にご協力いただ
いた方々に深謝申し上げます。また、本研究を支えていただきました東京大学大学
院医学系研究科
感覚・運動機能医学講座
整形外科学分野の教室関係者の方々、
ロコモチャレンジ！協議会関係者の方々、東京大学医学部附属病院
部の皆様に深く感謝いたします。
67
企画情報運営
...
論文の公開元へ
