1. Kono, Y. et al. Secondary prevention of new vascular events with lifestyle intervention in patients with noncardioembolic mild
ischemic stroke: A single-center randomized controlled trial. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 36, 88–97 (2013).
2. Kono, Y. et al. Predictive impact of daily physical activity on new vascular events in patients with mild ischemic stroke. Int. J. Stroke.
10, 219–223 (2015).
3. Loprinzi, P. D. & Addoh, O. Accelerometer-determined physical activity and all-cause mortality in a national prospective cohort
study of adults post-acute stroke. Am. J. Health. Promot. 32, 24–27 (2018).
4. Askim, T. et al. Efficacy and safety of individualized coaching after stroke: The LAST Study (Life After Stroke): A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Stroke 49, 426–432 (2018).
5. Ahmadi, M. et al. A support programme for secondary prevention in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke
(INSPiRE-TMS): An open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Neurol. 19, 49–60 (2020).
6. Saunders, D. H., Greig, C. A. & Mead, G. E. Physical activity and exercise after stroke: Review of multiple meaningful benefits.
Stroke 45, 3742–3747 (2014).
7. Thilarajah, S. et al. Factors associated with post-stroke physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med.
Rehabil. 99, 1876–1889 (2018).
8. Sallis, J. F. et al. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu. Rev. Public. Health. 27, 297–322 (2006).
9. Kanai, M. et al. Association of perceived built environment attributes with objectively measured physical activity in communitydwelling ambulatory patients with stroke. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 16, 3908. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203908
(2019).
10. Peters, M. et al. Measuring the association of objective and perceived neighborhood environment with physical activity in older
adults: Challenges and implications from a systematic review. Int. J. Health Geogr. 19, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-
00243-z (2020).
11. Kikuchi, H. et al. Objectively measured neighborhood walkability and change in physical activity in older Japanese adults: A fiveyear cohort study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 15, 1814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091814 (2018).
12. Koohsari, M. J. et al. Validity of Walk Score® as a measure of neighborhood walkability in Japan. Prev. Med. Rep. 9, 114–117 (2018).
13. Koohsari, M. J. et al. Built environment correlates of objectively-measured sedentary behaviours in densely-populated areas. Health
Place. 66, 102447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102447 (2020).
14. Koohsari, M. J. et al. Walking-friendly built environments and objectively measured physical function in older adults. J. Sport.
Health Sci. 9, 651–656 (2020).
Scientific Reports |
(2022) 12:3475 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07467-y
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
15. Chen, B. I., Hsueh, M. C., Rutherford, R., Park, J. H. & Liao, Y. The associations between neighborhood walkability attributes and
objectively measured physical activity in older adults. PLoS One. 14, e0222268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222268
(2019).
16. Miller, A., Pohlig, R. T. & Reisman, D. S. Social and physical environmental factors in daily stepping activity in those with chronic
stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 28, 161–169 (2021).
17. Fini, N. A., Holland, A. E., Keating, J., Simek, J. & Bernhardt, J. How physically active are people following stroke? Systematic
review and quantitative synthesis. Phys. Ther. 97, 707–717 (2017).
18. Kleindorfer, D. O. et al. 2021 Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline
from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 52, e364–e467 (2021).
19. Amagasa, S. et al. Associations of neighborhood walkability with intensity- and bout-specific physical activity and sedentary
behavior of older adults in Japan. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 19, 861–867 (2019).
20. Twardzik, E. et al. Walk Score and objectively measured physical activity within a national cohort. J. Epidemiol. Community Health.
73, 549–556 (2019).
21. van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J. & van Gijn, J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of
handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19, 604–607 (1988).
22. Lyden, P. et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke 25,
2220–2226 (1994).
23. Sato, S. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale Score predicting outcome in anterior and posterior circulation strokes. Neurology 70, 2371–2377
(2008).
24. Dean, C. M., Richards, C. L. & Malouin, F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin.
Rehabil. 15, 415–421 (2001).
25. Hui, J. et al. Validity of the Fitbit One for measuring activity in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Physiother. Can. 70, 81–89
(2018).
26. Hartman, S. J., Nelson, S. H. & Weiner, L. S. Patterns of Fitbit use and activity levels throughout a physical activity intervention:
Exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 6, e29. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8503
(2018).
27. https://www.walkscore.com. (accessed 11 Aug 2021).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all of the staff and the study participants at Itami Kousei Neurosurgical Hospital.
Author contributions
M.K. designed the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. K.P.I. designed the project and helped
with writing-review and editing. H.K. conducted data curation and analyzed the data. M.N. provided the
resources and analyzed the data. S.S. was responsible for supervision and project administration. All authors
read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K23276. The funder had no role in this study.
Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.P.I.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
© The Author(s) 2022
Scientific Reports |
Vol:.(1234567890)
(2022) 12:3475 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07467-y
...
論文の公開元へ
