1. Condic, M. L. Totipotency: what it is and what it is not. Stem Cells Dev. 23, 796– 812 (2014). doi:10.1089/scd.2013.0364
2. Lu, F. & Zhang, Y. Cell totipotency: molecular features, induction, and maintenance. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2, 217–225 (2015). doi:10.1093/nsr/nwv009
3. Baker, C. L. & Pera, M. F. Capturing totipotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 22, 25– 34 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.stem.2017.12.011
4. Silva, J. & Smith, A. Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132, 532–536 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.006
5. Young, R. A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144, 940–954 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.032
6. Tee, W. W. & Reinberg, D. Chromatin features and the epigenetic regulation of pluripotency states in ESCs. Development 141, 2376–2390 (2014). doi:10.1242/dev.096982
7. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
8. Yamanaka, S. & Blau, H. M. Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature 465, 704–712 (2010). doi:10.1038/nature09229
9. Macfarlan, T. S. et al. Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity. Nature 487, 57–63 (2012). doi:10.1038/nature11244
10. Yang, Y. et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells with in vivo embryonic and extraembryonic potency. Cell 169, 243–257, e225 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.005
11. Yang, J. et al. Establishment of mouse expanded potential stem cells. Nature 550, 393–397 (2017). doi:10.1038/nature24052
12. Tarkowski, A. K. Experiments on the development of isolated blastomers of mouse eggs. Nature 184, 1286–1287 (1959). doi:10.1038/1841286a0
13. Matsumoto, K., Miyake, M., Utsumi, K. & Iritani, A. Production of identical twins by separating two-cell rat embryos. Gamete Res. 22, 257–263 (1989). doi:10.1002/mrd.1120220303
14. Allen, W. R. & Pashen, R. L. Production of monozygotic (identical) horse twins by embryo micromanipulation. J. Reprod. Fertil. 71, 607–613 (1984). doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0710607
15. Johnson, W. H., Loskutoff, N. M., Plante, Y. & Betteridge, K. J. Production of four identical calves by the separation of blastomeres from an in vitro derived four-cell embryo. Vet. Rec. 137, 15–16 (1995). doi:10.1136/vr.137.1.15
16. Chan, A. W. et al. Clonal propagation of primate offspring by embryo splitting. Science 287, 317–319 (2000). doi:10.1126/science.287.5451.317
17. Moore, N. W., Adams, C. E. & Rowson, L. E. Developmental potential of single blastomeres of the rabbit egg. J. Reprod. Fertil. 17, 527–531 (1968). doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0170527
18. Willadsen, S. M. The development capacity of blastomeres from 4- and 8-cell sheep embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 65, 165–172 (1981).
19. Saito, S. & Niemann, H. Effects of extracellular matrices and growth factors on the development of isolated porcine blastomeres. Biol. Reprod. 44, 927–936 (1991). doi:10.1095/biolreprod44.5.927
20. Agresti, A., Bini, M., Bertaccini, B. & Ryu, E. Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters. Biometrics 64, 1270–1275 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.00990.x
21. Marikawa, Y. & Alarcon, V. B. Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76, 1019–1032 (2009). doi:10.1002/mrd.21057
22. Palmieri, S. L., Peter, W., Hess, H. & Scholer, H. R. Oct-4 transcription factor is differentially expressed in the mouse embryo during establishment of the first two extraembryonic cell lineages involved in implantation. Dev. Biol. 166, 259–267 (1994). doi:10.1006/dbio.1994.1312
23. Strumpf, D. et al. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 132, 2093– 2102 (2005). doi:10.1242/dev.01801
24. Tarkowski, A. K. & Wroblewska, J. Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4- and 8-cell stage. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 18, 155–180 (1967).
25. Fiser, P. S. & MacPherson, J. W. Experimental production of identical twins in the mouse. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 56, 33–36 (1976).
26. Marikawa, Y. & Alarcon, V. B. Creation of trophectoderm, the first epithelium, in mouse preimplantation development. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 55, 165–184 (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30406-4_9
27. Cockburn, K. & Rossant, J. Making the blastocyst: lessons from the mouse. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 995–1003 (2010). doi:10.1172/JCI41229
28. Suwinska, A., Czolowska, R., Ozdzenski, W. & Tarkowski, A. K. Blastomeres of the mouse embryo lose totipotency after the fifth cleavage division: expression of Cdx2 and Oct4 and developmental potential of inner and outer blastomeres of 16- and 32-cell embryos. Dev. Biol. 322, 133–144 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.019
29. Tarkowski, A. K., Suwinska, A., Czolowska, R. & Ozdzenski, W. Individual blastomeres of 16- and 32-cell mouse embryos are able to develop into foetuses and mice. Dev. Biol. 348, 190–198 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.09.022
30. Rossant, J. Postimplantation development of blastomeres isolated from 4- and 8- cell mouse eggs. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 36, 283–290 (1976).
31. Morris, S. A., Guo, Y. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Developmental plasticity is bound by pluripotency and the Fgf and Wnt signaling pathways. Cell Rep. 2, 756–765 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.029
32. Yekani, F. et al. Enhancing developmental rate and quality of mouse single blastomeres into blastocysts using a microplatform. J. Cell. Physiol. 233, 9070– 9076 (2018). doi:10.1002/jcp.26879
33. Ieda, S. et al. A microwell culture system that allows group culture and is compatible with human single media. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 35, 1869–1880 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10815-018-1252-z
34. Suzuki, H., Togashi, M., Adachi, J. & Toyoda, Y. Developmental ability of zona- free mouse embryos is influenced by cell association at the 4-cell stage. Biol. Reprod. 53, 78–83 (1995). doi:10.1095/biolreprod53.1.78
35. Katayama, M., Ellersieck, M. R. & Roberts, R. M. Development of monozygotic twin mouse embryos from the time of blastomere separation at the two-cell stage to blastocyst. Biol. Reprod. 82, 1237–1247 (2010). doi:10.1095/biolreprod.109.082982
36. Nichols, J., Silva, J., Roode, M. & Smith, A. Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo. Development 136, 3215–3222 (2009). doi:10.1242/dev.038893
37. Yekani, F., Azarnia, M., Esfandiari, F., Hassani, S. N. & Baharvand, H. Enhanced development of mouse single blastomeres into blastocysts via the simultaneous inhibition of TGF-β and ERK pathways in microdroplet culture. J. Cell. Biochem. 119, 7621–7630 (2018). doi:10.1002/jcb.27106
38. Mulnard, J. G. Manipulation of cleaving mammalian embryo with special reference to time-lapse cinematographic analysis of centrifuged and fused mouse eggs. Adv. Biosci. 6, 255–274 (1970).
39. Burgoyne, P. S. & Ducibella, T. Changes in the properties of the developing trophoblast of preimplantation mouse embryos as revealed by aggregation studies. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 40, 143–155 (1977).
40. Wang, H. & Dey, S. K. Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 185–199 (2006). doi:10.1038/nrg1808
41. Hashimshony, T. et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA- Seq. Genome Biol. 17, 77 (2016). doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0938-8
42. Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015). doi:10.1038/nmeth.3317
43. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015). doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
44. Grun, D., Kester, L. & van Oudenaarden, A. Validation of noise models for single- cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 11, 637–640 (2014). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2930
45. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014). doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
46. Deng, Q., Ramskold, D., Reinius, B. & Sandberg, R. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells. Science 343, 193–196 (2014). doi:10.1126/science.1245316
47. Biase, F. H., Cao, X. & Zhong, S. Cell fate inclination within 2-cell and 4-cell mouse embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Genome Res. 24, 1787– 1796 (2014). doi:10.1101/gr.177725.114
48. Piras, V., Tomita, M. & Selvarajoo, K. Transcriptome-wide variability in single embryonic development cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 7137 (2014). doi:10.1038/srep07137
49. Shi, J. et al. Dynamic transcriptional symmetry-breaking in pre-implantation mammalian embryo development revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Development 142, 3468–3477 (2015). doi:10.1242/dev.123950
50. Qiu, X. et al. Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat. Methods 14, 309–315 (2017). doi:10.1038/nmeth.4150
51. Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012). doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0118
52. Sutherland, A. E., Calarco, P. G. & Damsky, C. H. Expression and function of cell surface extracellular matrix receptors in mouse blastocyst attachment and outgrowth. J. Cell Biol. 106, 1331–1348 (1988). doi:10.1083/jcb.106.4.1331
53. Li, Y., Seah, M. K. & O’Neill, C. Mapping global changes in nuclear cytosine base modifications in the early mouse embryo. Reproduction 151, 83–95 (2016). doi:10.1530/REP-15-0207
54. Artus, J., Piliszek, A. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The primitive endoderm lineage of the mouse blastocyst: sequential transcription factor activation and regulation of differentiation by Sox17. Dev. Biol. 350, 393–404 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.12.007
55. Saiz, N. & Plusa, B. Early cell fate decisions in the mouse embryo. Reproduction 145, R65–R80 (2013). doi:10.1530/REP-12-0381
56. Saiz, N., Grabarek, J. B., Sabherwal, N., Papalopulu, N. & Plusa, B. Atypical protein kinase C couples cell sorting with primitive endoderm maturation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 140, 4311–4322 (2013). doi:10.1242/dev.093922
57. Chazaud, C. & Yamanaka, Y. Lineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo. Development 143, 1063–1074 (2016). doi:10.1242/dev.128314
58. Czechanski, A. et al. Derivation and characterization of mouse embryonic stem cells from permissive and nonpermissive strains. Nat. Protoc. 9, 559–574 (2014). doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.030
59. Ying, Q. L. et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519–523 (2008). doi:10.1038/nature06968
60. Gerbe, F., Cox, B., Rossant, J. & Chazaud, C. Dynamic expression of Lrp2 pathway members reveals progressive epithelial differentiation of primitive endoderm in mouse blastocyst. Dev. Biol. 313, 594–602 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.10.048
61. Messerschmidt, D. M. & Kemler, R. Nanog is required for primitive endoderm formation through a non-cell autonomous mechanism. Dev. Biol. 344, 129–137 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.04.020
62. Tsunoda, Y. & McLaren, A. Effect of various procedures on the viability of mouse embryos containing half the normal number of blastomeres. J. Reprod. Fertil. 69, 315–322 (1983). doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0690315
63. Wang, M., Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. Effect of several factors on the monozygotic twin production in the mouse. J. Reprod. Dev. 43, 91–95 (1997). doi:10.1262/jrd.43.91
64. Sotomaru, Y., Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. Production of monozygotic twins after freezing and thawing of bisected mouse embryos. Cryobiology 37, 139–145 (1998). doi:10.1006/cryo.1998.2111
65. Casser, E. et al. Totipotency segregates between the sister blastomeres of two-cell stage mouse embryos. Sci. Rep. 7, 8299 (2017). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08266-6
66. Torres-Padilla, M. E., Parfitt, D. E., Kouzarides, T. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo. Nature 445, 214–218 (2007). doi:10.1038/nature05458
67. Plachta, N., Bollenbach, T., Pease, S., Fraser, S. E. & Pantazis, P. Oct4 kinetics predict cell lineage patterning in the early mammalian embryo. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 117–123 (2011). doi:10.1038/ncb2154
68. White, M. D. et al. Long-lived binding of Sox2 to DNA predicts cell fate in the four-cell mouse embryo. Cell 165, 75–87 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.032
69. Goolam, M. et al. Heterogeneity in Oct4 and Sox2 targets biases cell fate in 4-cell mouse embryos. Cell 165, 61–74 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.047
70. Burton, A. et al. Single-cell profiling of epigenetic modifiers identifies PRDM14 as an inducer of cell fate in the mammalian embryo. Cell Rep. 5, 687–701 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.044
71. Wang, J. et al. Asymmetric expression of LincGET biases cell fate in two-cell mouse embryos. Cell 175, 1887–1901, e1818 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.039
72. Hupalowska, A. et al. CARM1 and paraspeckles regulate pre-implantation mouse embryo development. Cell 175, 1902–1916, e1913 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.027
論文の公開元へ
