1）Acosta-Martínez V, Tabatabai MA (2000) Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 31, 85–91
2）Aldén L, Demoling F, Bååth E (2001) Rapid method of determining factors limiting bacterial growth in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67, 1830–1838
3） Allison C, Macfarlane GT (1990) Regulation of protease production in Clostridium sporogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 3485–3490
4）Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 937–944
5） Allison SD, Gartner TB, Holland K, Weintraub M, Sinsabaugh RL (2007a) Soil enzymes: linking proteomics and ecological processes. In Manual of Environmental Microbiology, 3rd ed., (Ed.) CJ Hurst, pp. 704–711, ASM Press, Washington, DC
6） Allison VJ, Condron LM, Peltzer DA, Richardson SJ, Turner BL (2007b) Changes in enzyme activities and soil microbial community composition along carbon and nutrient gradients at the Franz Josef chronosequence, New Zealand. Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 1770–1781
7）Allison SD, Weintraub MN, Gartner TB, Waldrop MP (2011) Evolutionary-economic principles as regulators of soil enzyme production and ecosystem function. In Soil Enzymology, (Ed.) G Shukla, A Varma, pp. 229–243, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
8）Atkinson MR, Fisher SH (1991) Identification of genes and gene products whose expression is activated during nitrogenlimited growth in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol., 173, 23–27
9）Averill C (2014) Divergence in plant and microbial allocation strategies explains continental patterns in microbial allocation and biogeochemical fluxes. Ecol. Lett., 17, 1202–1210
10） Bach H-J, Hartmann A, Schloter M, Munch JC (2001) PCR primers and functional probes for amplification and detection of bacterial genes for extracellular peptidases in single strains and in soil. J. Microbiol. Meth., 44, 173–182
11） Baligar VC, Wright RJ, Smedley MD (1988) Acid phosphatase activity in soils of the Appalachian region. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1612–1616
12） Bárta J, Šlajsová P, Tahovská K, Picek T, Šantrůčková H (2014) Different temperature sensitivity and kinetics of soil enzymes indicate seasonal shfts in C, N and P nutrient stoichiometry in acid forest soil. Biogeochemistry, 117, 525–537
13） Beegle D (2005) Assessing soil phosphorus for crop production by soil testing. In Phosphorus: Agriculture and the Environment, (Ed.) JT Sims, AN Sharpley, pp. 123–143, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin
14） Beier S, Bertilsson S (2013) Bacterial chitin degradation— mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies. Front. Microbiol., 4, 149
15） Bergkemper F, Schöler A, Engel M, Lang F, Krüger J, Schloter M, Schulz S (2016) Phosphorus depletion in forest soils shapes bacterial communities towards phosphorus recycling systems. Environ. Microbiol., 18, 1988–2000
16） Berlemont R, Martiny AC (2013) Phylogenetic distribution of potential cellulases in bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79, 1545–1554
17） Binkley D, Fisher RF (2013) Ecology and Management of Forest Soils, fourth edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
18） Binkley D, Vitousek P (1989) Soil nutrient availability. In Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation, (Ed.) RW Pearcy, JR Ehleringer, HA Mooney, PW Rundel, pp. 75–96, Chapman and Hall, London
19） Bowles TM, Acosta-Martínez V, Calderón F, Jackson LE (2014) Soil enzyme activities, microbial communities, and carbon and nitrogen availability in organic agroecosystems across an intensively-managed agricultural landscape. Soil Biol. Biochem., 68, 252–262
20）Burns RG (1978) Enzyme activity in soil: some theoretical and practical considerations. In Soil Enzymes, (Ed.) RG Burns, pp. 295–340, Academic Press, London
21） Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Stromberger ME, Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN, Zoppini A (2013) Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol. Biochem., 58, 216–234
22）Carreiro MM, Sinsabaugh RL, Repert DA, Parkhurst DF (2000) Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology, 81, 2359–2365
23） Cezairliyan B, Ausubel FM (2017) Investment in secreted enzymes during nutrient-limited growth is utility dependent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, E7796–E7802
24）Chapuis-Lardy L, Brossard M, Quiquampoix H (2001) Assessing organic phosphorus status of Cerrado oxisols (Brazil) using 31P-NMR spectroscopy and phosphomonoesterase activity measurement. Can. J. Soil Sci., 81, 591–601
25） Chen H, Li D, Zhao J, Xiao K, Wang K (2018) Effects of nitrogen addition on activities of soil nitrogen acquisition enzymes: A meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 252, 126–131
26） Chróst RJ (1990) Microbial ectoenzymes in aquatic environments. In Aquatic Microbial Ecology: Biochemical and Molecular Approaches, (Ed.) J Overbeck, RJ Chróst, pp. 47–78, Springer-Verlag, New York
27） Chróst RJ (1991) Environmental control of the synthesis and activity of aquatic microbial ectoenzymes. In Microbial Enzymes in Aquatic Environments, (Ed.) RJ Chróst, pp. 29–59, Springer, New York
28） Colvan SR, Syers JK, O’Donnell AG (2001) Effect of long-term fertilizer use on acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase and phosphodiesterase activities in managed grassland. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 34, 258–263
29） Dunlop PC, Roon RJ (1975) L-asparaginase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an extracellular enzyme. J. Bacteriol., 122, 1017– 1024.
30）Dunlop PC, Meyer GM, Roon RJ (1980) Reactions of asparaginase II of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem., 255, 1542–1546
31） Ekenler M, Tabatabai MA (2004) Arylamidase and amidohydrolases in soils as affected by liming and tillage systems. Soil Till. Res., 77, 157–168
32） Fanin N, Moorhead D, Bertrand I (2016) Eco-enzymatic stoichiometry and enzymatic vectors reveal differential C, N, P dynamics in decaying litter along a land-use gradient. Biogeochemistry, 129, 21–36
33） Fatemi FR, Fernandez IJ, Simon KS, Dail DB (2016) Nitrogen and phosphorus regulation of soil enzyme activities in acid forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 98, 171–179
34）Fisher SH, Sonenshein AL (1991) Control of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 45, 107–135
35） Fisher SH, Wray LV Jr (2002) Bacillus subtilis 168 contains two differentially regulated genes encoding L-asparaginase. J. Bacteriol., 184, 2148–2154
36） Fraser TD, Lynch DH, Bent E, Entz MH, Dunfield KE (2015) Soil bacterial phoD gene abundance and expression in response to applied phosphorus and long-term management. Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 137–147
37） Fraser TD, Lynch DH, Gaiero J, Khosla K, Dunfield KE (2017) Quantification of bacterial non-specific acid (phoC) and alkaline (phoD) phosphatase genes in bulk and rhizosphere soil from organically managed soybean fields. Appl. Soil Ecol., 111, 48–56
38） Fujita K, Kunito T, Moro H, Toda H, Otsuka S, Nagaoka K (2017) Microbial resource allocation for phosphatase synthesis reflects the availability of inorganic phosphorus across various soils. Biogeochemistry, 136, 325–339
39） Fujita K, Kunito T, Matsushita J, Nakamura K, Moro H, Yoshida S, Toda H, Otsuka S, Nagaoka K (2018) Nitrogen supply rate regulates microbial resource allocation for synthesis of nitrogenacquiring enzymes. PLoS ONE, 13, e0202086
40）Fujita K, Miyabara Y, Kunito T (2019) Microbial biomass and ecoenzymatic stoichiometries vary in response to nutrient availability in an arable soil. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 91, 1–8
41） Geisseler D, Horwath WR (2008) Regulation of extracellular protease activity in soil in response to different sources and concentrations of nitrogen and carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem., 40, 3040–3048
42）Geisseler D, Horwath WR (2009) Relationship between carbon and nitrogen availability and extracellular enzyme activities in soil. Pedobiologia, 53, 87–98
43） Gianfreda L, Ruggiero P (2006) Enzyme activities in soil. In Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Soil, (Ed.) P Nannipieri, K Smalla, pp. 257–311, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
44）Golden KJ, Bernlohr RW (1985) Nitrogen catabolite repression of the L-asparaginase of Bacillus licheniformis. J. Bacteriol., 164, 938–940.
45） Harrison AF (1983) Relationship between intensity of phosphatase activity and physico-chemical properties in woodland soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 15, 93–99
46）早野恒一（1997）土の酵素，In 土の環境圏，岩田進午・ 喜田大三 監修，pp. 229–233，フジ・テクノシステム， 東京
47）早野恒一・都留信也・金沢晋二郎（1981）土壌酵素 2． 存在状態とその起原，化学と生物，19, 330–334
48）Hedley MJ (2008) Techniques for assessing nutrient bioavailability in soils: current and future issues. In Chemical Bioavailability in Terrestrial Environments (Developments in Soil Science Vol. 32), (Ed.) R Naidu, pp. 283–327, Elsevier, Amsterdam
49） Hedley HJ, Stewart JWB, Chauhan BS (1982) Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46, 970–976
50）Heilmann E, Leinweber P, Ollesch G, Meißner R (2005) Spatial variability of sequentially extracted P fractions in a silty loam. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 168, 307–315
51） Hill BH, Elonen CM, Jicha TM, Bolgrien DW, Moffett MF (2010) Sediment microbial enzyme activity as an indicator of nutrient limitation in the great rivers of the Upper Mississippi River basin. Biogeochemistry, 97, 195–209
52） Howard JB, Carpenter FH (1972) L-asparaginase from Erwinia carotovora. J. Biol. Chem., 247, 1020–1030
53） Jian S, Li J, Chen J, Wang G, Mayes MA, Dzantor KE, Hui D, Luo Y (2016) Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: A meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem., 101, 32–43
54）金沢晋二郎（1994）土壌酵素，In 土壌生化学，pp. 52–72， 朝倉書店，東京
55）金沢晋二郎・早野恒一・都留信也（1981）土壌酵素 1． 土壌の炭素・窒素・燐循環．化学と生物，19, 235–242
56） Keyhani NO, Roseman S (1999) Phyiological aspects of chitin catabolism in marine bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1473, 108–122
57）國頭 恭・唐澤敏彦（2019）土壌酵素と土壌の質，In 実践土壌学シリーズ 3 土壌生化学，犬伏和之 編， pp. 117–127，朝倉書店，東京
58） Kunito T, Tsunekawa M, Yoshida S, Park H-D, Toda H, Nagaoka K, Saeki K (2012a) Soil properties affecting phosphorus forms and phosphatase activities in Japanese forest soils: Soil microorganisms may be limited by phosphorus. Soil Sci., 177, 39–46
59） Kunito T, Tobitani T, Moro H, Toda H (2012b) Phosphorus limitation in microorganisms leads to high phosphomonoesterase activity in acid forest soils. Pedobiologia, 55, 263–270
60）Kunito T, Isomura I, Sumi H, Park H-D, Toda H, Otsuka S, Nagaoka K, Saeki K, Senoo K (2016) Aluminum and acidity suppress microbial activity and biomass in acidic forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 97, 23–30
61） Kunito T, Shiroma T, Moro H, Sumi H (2018) Annual variation in soil enzyme activity in a paddy field: soil temperature and nutrient availability are important for controlling enzyme activities. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci., 2018, 4093219
62） Lidbury IDEA, Fraser TD, Murphy ARJ, Scanlan DJ, Bending GD, Jones AME, Moore JD, Goodall A, Tibbett M, Hammond JP, Wellington EMH (2017) The ‘known’ genetic potential for microbial communities to degrade organic phosphorus is reduced in low-pH soils. MicrobiologyOpen, 6, e474
63） Margalef O, Sardans J, Fernández-Martínez M, MolownyHoras R, Janssens IA, Ciais P, Goll D, Richter A, Obersteiner M, Asensio D, Peñuelas J. (2017) Global patterns of phosphatase activity in natural soils. Sci. Rep., 7, 1337
64）Marklein AR, Houlton BZ (2012) Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol., 193, 696–704
65） McCarty GW, Shogren DR, Bremner JM (1992) Regulation of urease production in soil by microbial assimilation of nitrogen. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 12, 261–264
66）McGill WB, Cole CV (1981) Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma, 26, 267–286.
67） Mise K, Fujita K, Kunito T, Senoo K, Otsuka S (2018) Phosphorusmineralizing communities reflect the nutrient-rich characteristics in Japanese arable Andisols. Microbes Environ., 33, 282– 289
68）Mobley HLT, Hausinger RP (1989) Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbiol. Rev., 53, 85–108
69） Mobley HLT, Island MD, Hausinger RP (1995) Molecular biology of microbial ureases. Microbiol. Rev., 59, 451–480
70） Moorhead DL, Rinkes ZL, Sinsabaugh RL, Weintraub MN (2013) Dynamic relationships between microbial biomass, respiration, inorganic nutrients and enzyme activities: informing enzyme-based decomposition models. Front. Microbiol., 4, 223
71） Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Weintraub MN (2016) Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem., 93, 1–7
72） Mori T, Imai N, Yokoyama D, Kitayama K (2018) Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on the ratio of activities of carbon-acquiring to nitrogen-acquiring enzymes in a primary lowland tropical rainforest in Borneo, Malaysia. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 64, 554–557
73） Moro H, Kunito T, Saito T, Yaguchi N, Sato T (2014) Soil microorganisms are less susceptible than crop plants to potassium deficiency. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 60, 1807–1813
74） Moro H, Kunito T, Sato T (2015) Assessment of phosphorus bioavailability in cultivated Andisols from a long-term fertilization field experiment using chemical extractions and soil enzyme activities. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 61, 1107–1123
75） Nannipieri P, Giagnoni L, Landi L, Renella G (2011) Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil. In Phosphorus in Action: Biological Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling, Soil Biology 26, (Ed.) EK Bünemann, A Oberson, E Frossard, pp. 215–243, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
76） Nannipieri P, Giagnoni L, Renella G, Puglisi E, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Fornasier F, Moscatelli MC, Marinari S (2012) Soil enzymology: classical and molecular approaches. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 48, 743–762
77） Nannipieri P, Trasar-Cepeda C, Dick RP (2018) Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 54, 11–19
78） Neal AL, Blackwell M, Akkari E, Guyomar C, Clark I, Hirsch PR (2018) Phylogenetic distribution, biogeography and the effects of land management upon bacterial non-specific acid-phosphatase gene diversity and abundance. Plant Soil, 427, 175–189
79） North MJ (1982) Comparative biochemistry of the proteinases of eucaryotic microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev., 46, 308–340
80）Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry, 49, 175–190
81） Pathan SI, Ceccherini MT, Hansen MA, Giagnoni L, Ascher J, Arenella M, Sørensen SJ, Pietramellara G, Nannipieri P, Renella G (2015) Maize lines with different nitrogen use efficiency select bacterial communities with different β-glucosidase-encoding genes and glucosidase activity in the rhizosphere. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 51, 995–1004
82） Pócsi I, Pusztahelyi T, Bogáti MS, Szentirmai A (1993) The formation of N-acetyl-β-D-hexosaminidase is repressed by glucose in Penicillium chrysogenum. J. Basic Microbiol., 33, 259–267
83） Qin S, Hu C, Wang Y, Li X, He X (2010) Tillage effects on intracellular and extracellular soil urease activities determined by an improved chloroform fumigation method. Soil Sci., 175, 568–572
84）Ragot SA, Kertesz MA, Bünemann EK (2015) phoD alkaline phosphatase gene diversity in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 81, 7281–7289
85） Ragot SA, Kertesz MA, Mészáros É, Frossard E, Bünemann EK (2017) Soil phoD and phoX alkaline phosphatase gene diversity responds to multiple environmental factors. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 93, fiw212
86） Redel Y, Rubio R, Godoy R, Borie F (2008) Phosphorus fractions and phosphatase activity in an Andisol under different forest ecosystems. Geoderma, 145, 216–221
87） Renz TE, Neufeldt H, Ayarza MA, da Silva JE, Zech W (1999) Acid monophosphatase: an indicator of phosphorus mineralization or of microbial activity? A case study from the Brazilian Cerrados. In Sustainable Land Management for the Oxisols of the Latin American Savannas: Dynamics of Soil Organic Matter and Indicators of Soil Quality, (Ed.) R Thomas, MA Ayarza, pp. 173–186, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia
88） Rosinger C, Rousk J, Sandén H (2019) Can enzymatic stoichiometry be used to determine growth-limiting nutrients for microorganisms?—A critical assessment in two subtropical soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 128, 115–126
89） Rossolini GM, Schippa S, Riccio ML, Berlutti F, Macaskie LE, Thaller MC (1998) Bacterial nonspecific acid phosphohydrolases: physiology, evolution and use as tools in microbial biotechnology. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 54, 833–850
90）Sakurai M, Wasaki J, Tomizawa Y, Shinano T, Osaki M (2008) Analysis of bacterial communities on alkaline phophatase genes in soil supplied with organic matter. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 54, 62–71
91） Santos-Beneit F (2015) The Pho regulon: a huge regulatory network in bacteria. Front. Microbiol., 6, 402
92）Satti P, Mazzarino MJ, Roselli L, Crego P (2007) Factors affecting soil P dynamics in temperate volcanic soils of southern Argentina. Geoderma, 139, 229–240
93） Schimel J, Becerra CA, Blankinship J (2017) Estimating decay dynamics for enzyme activities in soils from different ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem., 114, 5–11
94）Sims GK, Wander MM (2002) Proteolytic activity under nitrogen or sulfur limitation. Appl. Soil Ecol., 19, 217–221
95） Sinsabaugh RL (1994) Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 17, 69–74
96） Sinsabaugh RL, Follstad Shah JJ (2012) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and ecological theory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 43, 313–343
97） Sinsabaugh RL, Linkins AE (1993) Statistical modeling of litter decomposition from integrated cellulase activity. Ecology, 74, 1594–1597
98） Sinsabaugh RL, Moorhead DL (1994) Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem., 26, 1305–1311
99） Sinsabaugh RL, Antibus RK, Linkins AE, McClaugherty CA, Rayburn L, Repert D, Weiland T (1993) Wood decomposition: nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in relation to extracellular enzyme activity. Ecology, 74, 1586–1593
100） Sinsabaugh RL, Carreiro MM, Alvarez S (2002) Enzyme and microbial dynamics of litter decomposition. In Enzymes in the Environment: Activity, Ecology, and Applications, (Ed.) RG Burns, RP Dick, pp. 249–265, Marcel Dekker, New York
101） Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol. Lett., 11, 1252–1264
102） Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature, 462, 795–798
103） Sinsabaugh RL, Follstad Shaw JJ, Hill BH, Elonen CM (2012) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of stream sediments with comparison to terrestrial soils. Biogeochemistry, 111, 455–467
104） Smith MS, Rice CW, Paul EA (1989) Metabolism of labeled organic nitrogen in soil: regulation by inorganic nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 768–773
105） Speir TW, Cowling JC (1991) Phosphatase activities of pasture plants and soils: relationship with plant productivity and soil P fertility indices. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 12, 189–194
106） Spohn M, Kuzyakov Y (2013a) Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by microbial need for carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem., 61, 69–75
107） Spohn M, Kuzyakov Y (2013b) Distribution of microbial- and root-derived phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere depending on P availability and C allocation—Coupling soil zymography with 14C imaging. Soil Biol. Biochem., 67, 106–113
108） Steenbergh AK, Bodelier PLE, Hoogveld HL, Slomp CP, Laanbroek HJ (2011) Phosphatases relieve carbon limitation of microbial activity in Baltic Sea sediments along a redox-gradient. Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 2018–2026
109） Sullivan BW, Alvarez-Clare S, Castle SC, Porder S, Reed SC, Schreeg L, Townsend AR, Cleveland CC (2014) Assessing nutrient limitation in complex forested ecosystems: alternatives to large-scale fertilization experiments. Ecology, 95, 668–681
110） Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Microbiological and Biochemical Properties, (Ed.) RW Weaver, S Angle, P Bottomley, D Bezdicek, S Smith, MA Tabatabai, A Wollum, pp. 775–833, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin
111） Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1, 301–307
112） Tan H, Barret M, Mooij MJ, Rice O, Morrissey JP, Dobson A, Griffiths B, O’Gara F (2013) Long-term phosphorus fertilisation increased the diversity of the total bacterial community and the phoD phosphorus mineraliser group in pasture soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 49, 661–672
113） Trasar-Cepeda MC, Gil-Sotres F (1987) Phosphatase activity in acid high organic matter soils in Galicia (NW Spain). Soil Biol. Biochem., 19, 281–287
114） Treseder KK, Lennon JT (2015) Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 79, 243–262
115） Turner BL, Haygarth PM (2005) Phosphatase activity in temperate pasture soils: potential regulation of labile organic phosphorus turnover by phosphodiesterase activity. Sci. Total Environ., 344, 27–36
116） Turner BL, Wright SJ (2014) The response of microbial biomass and hydrolytic enzymes to a decade of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium addition in a lowland tropical rain forest. Biogeochemistry, 117, 115–130
117） Vranova V, Rejsek K, Formanek P (2013) Proteolytic activity in soil: A review. Appl. Soil Ecol., 70, 23–32.
118） Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo M, Lauber C (2004) Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzymatic activity. Ecol. Appl., 14, 1172–1177
119） Wallenstein MD, Burns RG (2011) Ecology of extracellular enzyme activities and organic matter degradation in soil: a complex community-driven process. In Methods of Soil Enzymology, (Ed.) RP Dick, pp. 35–55, Soil Science Society of America, Madison
120） Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN (2008) Emerging tools for measuring and modeling the in situ activity of soil extracellular enzymes. Soil Biol. Biochem., 40, 2098–2106
121） Weedon JT, Aerts R, Kowalchuk GA, van Bodegom PM (2011) Enzymology under global change: organic nitrogen turnover in alpine and sub-Arctic soils. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 39, 309–314
122） Whooley MA, O’Callaghan JA, McLoughlin AJ (1983) Effect of substrate on the regulation of exoprotease production by Pseudomonas aerginosa ATCC 10145. J. Gen. Microbiol., 129, 981–988
123） Wiame J-M, Grenson M, Arst HN Jr (1985) Nitrogen catabolite repression in yeasts and filamentous fungi. Adv. Microb. Physiol., 26, 1–88
124）Wright AL, Reddy KR (2001) Phosphorus loading effects on extracellular enzyme activity in Everglades wetland soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 588–595
125） Xu Z, Yu G, Zhang X, He N, Wang Q, Wang S, Wang R, Zhao N, Jia Y, Wang C (2017) Soil enzyme activity and stoichiometry along the North-South Transect in eastern China (NSTEC). Soil Biol. Biochem., 104, 152–163
126） Yao Q, Li Z, Song Y, Wright SJ, Guo X, Tringe SG, Tfaily MM, Paša-Tolić L, Hazen TC, Turner BL, Mayes MA, Pan C (2018) Community proteogenomics reveals the systemic impact of phosphorus availability on microbial functions in tropical soil. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2, 499–509
127） Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Keiblinger KM, Mooshammer M, Peñuelas J, Richter A, Sardans J, Wanek W (2015) The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant–microbial–soil organic matter transformations. Ecol. Monogr., 85, 133–155
128） Zhou Z, Wang C, Jin Y (2017) Stoichiometric responses of soil microflora to nutrient additions for two temperate forest soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 53, 397–406
論文の公開元へ
