Search for non-resonant Higgs-pair production in the bb̄bb̄ final state with the ATLAS detector

[1] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard

Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29,

arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex].

[2] CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with

the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex].

[3] G. Aad et al., The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Journal of

Instrumentation 3 (2008) S08003–S08003.

[4] S. Chatrchyan et al., The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, Journal of Instrumentation 3 (2008)

S08004–S08004.

¯ b¯

[5] ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for pair production of Higgs bosons in the bbb

final state using proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Journal of High

Energy Physics 2019 (2019) 30, arXiv:1804.06174 [hep-ex].

¯ b¯ process via vector-boson fusion

[6] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for the HH → bbb

production using proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Journal of

High Energy Physics 2020 (2020) 108, arXiv:2001.05178 [hep-ex].

¯ b¯ process via

[7] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Erratum to: Search for the HH → bbb

vector-boson fusion production using proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS

detector (Journal of High Energy Physics, (2020), 2020, 7, (108), 10.1007/JHEP07(2020)108),

Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 (2021).

[8] K. Agashe, H. Davoudiasl, G. Perez, and A. Soni, Warped Gravitons at the LHC and Beyond,

Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 036006, arXiv:hep-ph/0701186.

[9] A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, L. Randall, and L.-T. Wang, Searching for the Kaluza-Klein Graviton

in Bulk RS Models, JHEP 09 (2007) 013, arXiv:hep-ph/0701150.

[10] T. D. Lee, A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1226–1239.

[11] G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Theory and

phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1–102, arXiv:1106.0034

[hep-ph].

212

213

[12] P. Bagnaia et al., Evidence for Z 0 → e+ e− at the CERN pp collider, Physics Letters B 129 (1983)

130–140.

[13] UA2 Collaboration, M. Banner et al., Observation of Single Isolated Electrons of High Transverse

Momentum in Events with Missing Transverse Energy at the CERN anti-p p Collider, Phys. Lett. B

122 (1983) 476–485.

[14] D0 Collaboration, S. Abachi et al., Observation of the top quark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995)

2632–2637, arXiv:hep-ex/9503003.

[15] S. L. Glashow, Partial Symmetries of Weak Interactions, Nucl. Phys. 22 (1961) 579–588.

[16] S. Weinberg, A Model of Leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264–1266.

[17] A. Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions, Conf. Proc. C 680519 (1968) 367–377.

[18] T. D. Lee and C.-N. Yang, Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions, Phys. Rev. 104

(1956) 254–258.

[19] C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson, Experimental Test of

Parity Conservation in β Decay, Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1413–1414.

[20] F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.

13 (1964) 321–323.

[21] P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964)

132–133.

[22] ATLAS Collaboration„ A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten

years after the discovery, Nature 607 (2022) 52–59, arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex].

[23] CMS Collaboration„ A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the

discovery, Nature 607 (2022) 60–68, arXiv:2207.00043 [hep-ex].

[24] D. B. Kaplan, H. Georgi, and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs Scalars, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984)

187–190.

[25] G. Panico and A. Wulzer, The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs, vol. 913. Springer, 2016.

arXiv:1506.01961 [hep-ph].

[26] C. T. Hill, Is the Higgs Boson Associated with Coleman-Weinberg Dynamical Symmetry

Breaking?, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 073003, arXiv:1401.4185 [hep-ph].

[27] A. J. Helmboldt, P. Humbert, M. Lindner, and J. Smirnov, Minimal conformal extensions of the

Higgs sector, JHEP 07 (2017) 113, arXiv:1603.03603 [hep-ph].

[28] K. Hashino, S. Kanemura, and Y. Orikasa, Discriminative phenomenological features of scale

invariant models for electroweak symmetry breaking, Phys. Lett. B 752 (2016) 217–220,

arXiv:1508.03245 [hep-ph].

214

[29] J. Galloway, M. A. Luty, Y. Tsai, and Y. Zhao, Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and

Supersymmetric Naturalness, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 075003, arXiv:1306.6354 [hep-ph].

[30] S. Chang, J. Galloway, M. Luty, E. Salvioni, and Y. Tsai, Phenomenology of Induced Electroweak

Symmetry Breaking, JHEP 03 (2015) 017, arXiv:1411.6023 [hep-ph].

[31] P. Agrawal, D. Saha, L.-X. Xu, J.-H. Yu, and C. P. Yuan, Determining the shape of the Higgs

potential at future colliders, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 075023, arXiv:1907.02078 [hep-ph].

[32] M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 214–215.

[33] A. D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,

Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5 (1967) 32–35.

[34] D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Electroweak baryogenesis, New J. Phys. 14 (2012)

125003, arXiv:1206.2942 [hep-ph].

[35] A. Katz and M. Perelstein, Higgs Couplings and Electroweak Phase Transition, JHEP 07 (2014)

108, arXiv:1401.1827 [hep-ph].

[36] P. Huang, A. J. Long, and L.-T. Wang, Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition with Higgs

Factories and Gravitational Waves, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 075008, arXiv:1608.06619

[hep-ph].

[37] V. C. Rubin and J. Ford, W. Kent, Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey

of Emission Regions, The Astrophysical Journal 159 (1970) 379.

[38] V. C. Rubin, J. Ford, W. K., and N. Thonnard, Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large

range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc)., The

Astrophysical Journal 238 (1980) 471–487.

[39] S. P. Martin, A Supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18 (1998) 1–98,

arXiv:hep-ph/9709356.

[40] L. Wu, J. M. Yang, C.-P. Yuan, and M. Zhang, Higgs self-coupling in the MSSM and NMSSM after

the LHC Run 1, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 378–389, arXiv:1504.06932 [hep-ph].

[41] K. Lane and E. Pilon, Phenomenology of the new light Higgs bosons in Gildener-Weinberg

models, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 055032, arXiv:1909.02111 [hep-ph].

[42] V. Barger, T. Han, P. Langacker, B. McElrath, and P. Zerwas, Effects of genuine dimension-six

Higgs operators, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 115001, arXiv:hep-ph/0301097.

[43] L. Di Luzio, R. Gröber, and M. Spannowsky, Maxi-sizing the trilinear Higgs self-coupling: how

large could it be?, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 788, arXiv:1704.02311 [hep-ph].

[44] L. Di Luzio, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Nardecchia, Implications of perturbative unitarity for scalar

di-boson resonance searches at LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 30, arXiv:1604.05746

[hep-ph].

215

[45] J. Alison et al., Higgs boson potential at colliders: Status and perspectives, Rev. Phys. 5 (2020)

100045, arXiv:1910.00012 [hep-ph].

[46] G. P. Salam, Elements of QCD for hadron colliders, arXiv:1011.5131 [hep-ph].

[47] J. Gao, L. Harland-Lang, and J. Rojo, The Structure of the Proton in the LHC Precision Era, Phys.

Rept. 742 (2018) 1–121, arXiv:1709.04922 [hep-ph].

[48] M. Grazzini, G. Heinrich, S. Jones, S. Kallweit, M. Kerner, J. M. Lindert, and J. Mazzitelli, Higgs

boson pair production at NNLO with top quark mass effects, JHEP 05 (2018) 059,

arXiv:1803.02463 [hep-ph].

[49] ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Observation of Higgs boson production in association

with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 173–191,

arXiv:1806.00425 [hep-ex].

[50] CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Observation of ttH production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120

(2018) 231801, arXiv:1804.02610 [hep-ex].

[51] M. Gouzevitch and A. Carvalho, A review of Higgs boson pair production, Rev. Phys. 5 (2020)

100039.

[52] W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor

Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621–653.

[53] C. N. Leung, S. T. Love, and S. Rao, Low-Energy Manifestations of a New Interaction Scale:

Operator Analysis, Z. Phys. C 31 (1986) 433.

[54] I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019)

1–98, arXiv:1706.08945 [hep-ph].

[55] R. Alonso, M. B. Gavela, L. Merlo, S. Rigolin, and J. Yepes, The Effective Chiral Lagrangian for

a Light Dynamical ”Higgs Particle”, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 330–335, arXiv:1212.3305

[hep-ph], [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 726, 926 (2013)].

[56] G. Buchalla, O. Catà, and C. Krause, Complete Electroweak Chiral Lagrangian with a Light

Higgs at NLO, Nucl. Phys. B 880 (2014) 552–573, arXiv:1307.5017 [hep-ph], [Erratum:

Nucl.Phys.B 913, 475–478 (2016)].

[57] B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard

Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085, arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph].

[58] M. Capozi and G. Heinrich, Exploring anomalous couplings in Higgs boson pair production

through shape analysis, JHEP 03 (2020) 091, arXiv:1908.08923 [hep-ph].

[59] LHC Machine, JINST 3 (2008) S08001.

[60] E. Mobs, The CERN accelerator complex in 2019. Complexe des accélérateurs du CERN en 2019,

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2684277, General Photo.

216

[61] ATLAS Collaboration„ Public ATLAS Luminosity Results for Run-2 of the LHC, https:

//twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/LuminosityPublicResultsRun2.

[62] J. Pequenao and P. Schaffner, How ATLAS detects particles: diagram of particle paths in the

detector, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1505342.

[63] T. Kawaguchi, Search for the dimuon decay of the Higgs boson in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at

s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector., https://cds.cern.ch/record/2754084.

[64] ATLAS Collaboration„ ATLAS magnet system: Technical design report,.

[65] K. Potamianos, The upgraded Pixel detector and the commissioning of the Inner Detector tracking

of the ATLAS experiment for Run-2 at the Large Hadron Collider, PoS EPS-HEP2015 (2015) 261,

arXiv:1608.07850 [physics.ins-det].

[66] G. Ripellino, The alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector in Run-2, PoS LHCP2016 (2016) 196.

[67] ATLAS Collaboration„ ATLAS liquid-argon calorimeter: Technical Design Report,

https://cds.cern.ch/record/331061.

[68] M. INOKUTI, Inelastic Collisions of Fast Charged Particles with Atoms and Molecules—The

Bethe Theory Revisited, Rev. Mod. Phys. 43 (1971) 297–347,

https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.43.297.

[69] ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Performance of the ATLAS Trigger System in 2015, Eur.

Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex].

[70] R. Achenbach et al., The ATLAS level-1 calorimeter trigger, JINST 3 (2008) P03001.

[71] ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Performance of the ATLAS Track Reconstruction

Algorithms in Dense Environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 673,

arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex].

[72] A. Rosenfeld and J. L. Pfaltz, Sequential Operations in Digital Picture Processing, J. ACM 13

(1966) 471–494, https://doi.org/10.1145/321356.321357.

[73] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., A neural network clustering algorithm for the ATLAS silicon

pixel detector, JINST 9 (2014) P09009, arXiv:1406.7690 [hep-ex].

[74] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its

performance in LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 490, arXiv:1603.02934 [hep-ex].

[75] ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Reconstruction of primary vertices at the ATLAS

experiment in Run 1 proton–proton collisions at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 332,

arXiv:1611.10235 [physics.ins-det].

[76] ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow

with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex].

217

[77] M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063,

arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph].

[78] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton

collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 689,

arXiv:2007.02645 [hep-ex].

[79] M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The Catchment Area of Jets, JHEP 04 (2008) 005,

arXiv:0802.1188 [hep-ph].

[80] ATLAS Collaboration„ Tagging and suppression of pileup jets,.

[81] A. Hoecker, P. Speckmayer, J. Stelzer, J. Therhaag, E. von Toerne, H. Voss, M. Backes, T. Carli,

O. Cohen, A. Christov, D. Dannheim, K. Danielowski, S. Henrot-Versille, M. Jachowski,

K. Kraszewski, A. Krasznahorkay, M. Kruk, Y. Mahalalel, R. Ospanov, X. Prudent, A. Robert,

D. Schouten, F. Tegenfeldt, A. Voigt, K. Voss, M. Wolter, and A. Zemla, TMVA - Toolkit for

Multivariate Data Analysis,.

[82] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., ATLAS b-jet identification performance and efficiency

measurement with tt¯ events in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 970,

arXiv:1907.05120 [hep-ex].

[83] ATLAS Collaboration, C. Magliocca, Measurement of the track impact parameters resolution with

the ATLAS experiment at LHC using 2016-2018 data, Nuovo Cim. C 44 (2021) 55.

[84] ATLAS Collaboration„ Identification of Jets Containing b-Hadrons with Recurrent Neural

Networks at the ATLAS Experiment,.

[85] ATLAS Collaboration„ Topological b-hadron decay reconstruction and identification of b-jets

with the JetFitter package in the ATLAS experiment at the LHC,.

[86] R. Fruhwirth, Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A

262 (1987) 444–450.

[87] ATLAS Collaboration„ Expected performance of the 2019 ATLAS b-taggers,

http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PLOTS/FTAG-2019-005, Accessed

on Nov. 2022.

[88] ATLAS Collaboration„ Calibration of the ATLAS b-tagging algorithm in tt¯ semi-leptonic events,.

[89] A. D. Bukin, Fitting function for asymmetric peaks,.

[90] D. J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462 (2001)

152–155.

[91] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C 70

(2010) 823–874, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det].

218

[92] GEANT4 Collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4–a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.

A 506 (2003) 250–303.

[93] P. Nason, A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP 11

(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146.

[94] S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower

simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph].

[95] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations

in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581

[hep-ph].

[96] J. Butterworth et al., PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001,

arXiv:1510.03865 [hep-ph].

[97] T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O.

Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191

(2015) 159–177, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph].

[98] A. Buckley, ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to 7 TeV data,.

[99] R. D. Ball et al., Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B 867 (2013) 244–289,

arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph].

[100] M. Bahr et al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 639–707,

arXiv:0803.0883 [hep-ph].

[101] S. Gieseke, C. Rohr, and A. Siodmok, Colour reconnections in Herwig++, Eur. Phys. J. C 72

(2012) 2225, arXiv:1206.0041 [hep-ph].

[102] L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski, and R. S. Thorne, Parton distributions in the

LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 204, arXiv:1412.3989 [hep-ph].

[103] J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer,

P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order

differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079,

arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph].

[104] F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Pair Production at N3 LO, Phys. Rev.

D 98 (2018) 114016, arXiv:1811.07906 [hep-ph].

[105] J. Baglio, A. Djouadi, R. Gröber, M. M. Mühlleitner, J. Quevillon, and M. Spira, The

measurement of the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC: theoretical status, JHEP 04 (2013) 151,

arXiv:1212.5581 [hep-ph].

[106] L.-S. Ling, R.-Y. Zhang, W.-G. Ma, L. Guo, W.-H. Li, and X.-Z. Li, NNLO QCD corrections to

Higgs pair production via vector boson fusion at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 073001,

arXiv:1401.7754 [hep-ph].

219

[107] F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, Fully differential Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Pair Production at

Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 074028, arXiv:1811.07918 [hep-ph].

[108] C. Degrande, G. Durieux, F. Maltoni, K. Mimasu, E. Vryonidou, and C. Zhang, Automated

one-loop computations in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021)

096024, arXiv:2008.11743 [hep-ph].

[109] ATLAS Collaboration„ Validation of signal Monte Carlo event generation in searches for Higgs

boson pairs with the ATLAS detector,.

[110] T. Kanamori, S. Hido, and M. Sugiyama, A Least-squares Approach to Direct Importance

Estimation, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10 (2009) 1391–1445.

[111] K. B. George V. Moustakides, Training Neural Networks for Likelihood/Density Ratio

Estimation, arXiv:1911.00405 [eess.SP].

[112] B. Efron, Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife, The Annals of Statistics 7 (1979) 1

– 26.

[113] ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Luminosity determination in pp collisions at s = 8

TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 653, arXiv:1608.03953

[hep-ex].

[114] LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration, D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC

Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, arXiv:1610.07922

[hep-ph].

[115] J. Baglio, F. Campanario, S. Glaus, M. Mühlleitner, J. Ronca, and M. Spira, gg → HH :

Combined uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 056002, arXiv:2008.11626 [hep-ph].

[116] B. Mellado Garcia, P. Musella, M. Grazzini, and R. Harlander, CERN Report 4: Part I Standard

Model Predictions, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2150771.

[117] G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests

of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, arXiv:1007.1727 [physics.data-an],

[Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)].

[118] ROOT Collaboration, K. Cranmer, G. Lewis, L. Moneta, A. Shibata, and W. Verkerke,

HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats,.

[119] J. Neyman and E. S. Pearson, On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical

Hypotheses, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 231 (1933) 289–337.

[120] G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Erratum to: Asymptotic formulae for

likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2501.

[121] J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, and T. You, Top, Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Fit

to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 04 (2021) 279, arXiv:2012.02779

[hep-ph].

220

[122] J. Ellis, C. W. Murphy, V. Sanz, and T. You, Updated Global SMEFT Fit to Higgs, Diboson and

Electroweak Data, JHEP 06 (2018) 146, arXiv:1803.03252 [hep-ph].

[123] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for Higgs boson pair production in the two bottom

quarks plus two photons final state in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 052001.

[124] ATLAS Collaboration„ Search for resonant and non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the

¯ + τ− decay channel using 13 TeV pp collision data from the ATLAS detector,

bbτ

arXiv:2209.10910 [hep-ex].

[125] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Combination of searches for Higgs boson pairs in pp

collisions at s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135103,

arXiv:1906.02025 [hep-ex].

[126] ATLAS Collaboration„ Combination of searches for non-resonant and resonant Higgs boson

¯ + τ− and bbb

¯ b¯ decay channels using pp collisions at √ s = 13 TeV

pair production in the bbγγ,

bbτ

with the ATLAS detector,.

[127] I. Zurbano Fernandez et al., High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical

design report,.

[128] ATLAS Collaboration„ Measurement prospects of the pair production and self-coupling of the

Higgs boson with the ATLAS experiment at the HL-LHC,.

[129] ATLAS, CMS Collaboration„ Addendum to the report on the physics at the HL-LHC, and

perspectives for the HE-LHC: Collection of notes from ATLAS and CMS, CERN Yellow Rep.

Monogr. 7 (2019) Addendum, arXiv:1902.10229 [hep-ex].

[130] ATLAS Collaboration Collaboration„ Projected sensitivity of Higgs boson pair production

¯ and bbτ

¯ + τ− final states with the ATLAS detector at the HL-LHC,

combining the bbγγ

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2802127.

[131] M. Cepeda et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC,

CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221–584, arXiv:1902.00134 [hep-ph].

[132] CMS Collaboration„ Prospects for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production measurement in

bbγγ final states in proton-proton collisions at s = 14 TeV at the High-Luminosity LHC,

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2803918.

[133] A. Ruiz-Martinez, J. Montejo Berlingen, D. Zanzi, T. J. Khoo, M. A. Owen, and S. Shaw, Run 3

trigger menu design, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2683881.

[134] G. Buchalla, M. Capozi, A. Celis, G. Heinrich, and L. Scyboz, Higgs boson pair production in

non-linear Effective Field Theory with full mt -dependence at NLO QCD, JHEP 09 (2018) 057,

arXiv:1806.05162 [hep-ph].

[135] W. Buttinger and M. Lefebvre, Formulae for Estimating Significance, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva,

2018. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2643488.

...