1.
Aras C, Arici C, Akar S, Muftuoglu G, Yolar M, Arvas S, et al. (2009) Peeling of internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy for complicated retinal detachment prevents epimacular membrane formation.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247: 619–623 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1025-y PMID:
19107502
2.
Nam KY, Kim JY (2015) Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on the development of epiretinal
membrane after pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 35:
880–885 https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000421 PMID: 25545479
3.
Akiyama K, Fujinami K, Watanabe K, Tsunoda K, Noda T (2016) Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling to
Prevent Post-vitrectomy Epiretinal Membrane Development in Retinal Detachment. Am J Ophthalmol
171: 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.015 PMID: 27544480
4.
Eissa M, Abdelhakim M, Macky TA, Khafagy MM, Mortada HA (2018) Functional and structural outcomes of ILM peeling in uncomplicated macula-off RRD using microperimetry & en-face OCT. Graefes
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256: 249–257 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3875-7 PMID: 29299741
5.
Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, Sipperley JO, Thach A, Sneed SR, et al. (2003) Macular pucker removal
with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology 110: 62–64 https://doi.
org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01440-9 PMID: 12511347
6.
Kwok A, Lai TY, Yuen KS (2005) Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 33: 379–385 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01015.x
PMID: 16033350
7.
Fallico M, Russo A, Longo A, Pulvirenti A, Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V, et al. (2018) Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 13: e0201010 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
0201010 PMID: 30024983
8.
Alkabes M, Salinas C, Vitale L, Bures-Jelstrup A, Nucci P, Mateo C (2011) En face optical coherence
tomography of inner retinal defects after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 8349–8355 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8043 PMID: 21862645
9.
Clark A, Balducci N, Pichi F, Veronese C, Morara M, Torrazza C, et al. (2012) Swelling of the arcuate
nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 32: 1608–1613 https://doi.org/10.
1097/IAE.0b013e3182437e86 PMID: 22495325
10.
Gelman R, Stevenson W, Prospero Ponce C, Agarwal D, Christoforidis JB (2015) Retinal Damage
Induced by Internal Limiting Membrane Removal. J Ophthalmol 2015: 939748 https://doi.org/10.1155/
2015/939748 PMID: 26425355
11.
Blanco-Teijeiro MJ, Bande Rodriguez M, Mansilla Cunarro R, Paniagua Fernandez L, Ruiz-Oliva Ruiz
F, Pineiro Ces A (2018) Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for macula-off
primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eur J Ophthalmol 28: 706–713 https://doi.org/10.1177/
1120672117750055 PMID: 29564916
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255827 August 5, 2021
9 / 10
PLOS ONE
Adverse effect of ILM peeling on VA in macula-off RRD
12.
Sakamoto T, Kawano S, Kawasaki R, Hirakata A, Yamashita H, Yamamoto S, et al. (2020) Japan-Retinal Detachment Registry Report I: preoperative findings in eyes with primary retinal detachment. Jpn J
Ophthalmol 64: 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-019-00702-6 PMID: 31768687
13.
Sousa K, Calvao-Santos G, Costa J, Ferreira L, Mendonca L, Gentil R, et al. (2020) Anatomical and
functional results of ILM peeling vs. non-peeling in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258: 2105–2110 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04775-9
PMID: 32488330
14.
Heussen N, Hilgers RD, Heimann H, Collins L, Grisanti S, group SPRs (2011) Scleral buckling versus
primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): multiple-event analysis of
risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4. Acta Ophthalmol 89: 622–628 https://doi.org/10.
1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01766.x PMID: 19909291
15.
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Michalewska Z, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal
Detachment Study G (2014) Clinical variables associated with failure of retinal detachment repair: the
European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report number 4. Ophthalmology 121: 1715–
1719 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.012 PMID: 24766870
16.
Heussen N, Feltgen N, Walter P, Hoerauf H, Hilgers RD, Heimann H, Group SPRS (2011) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249: 1129–1136
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1619-7 PMID: 21305315
17.
Cherfan GM, Michels RG, de Bustros S, Enger C, Glaser BM (1991) Nuclear Sclerotic Cataract After
Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes Causing Macular Pucker. American Journal of Ophthalmology 111: 434–438 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72377-3 PMID: 2012145
18.
Rao RC, Blinder KJ, Smith BT, Shah GK (2013) Internal limiting membrane peeling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology 120: 1102–1103 e1101-1102 https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.010 PMID: 23642744
19.
Rispoli M, Le Rouic JF, Lesnoni G, Colecchio L, Catalano S, Lumbroso B (2012) Retinal surface en
face optical coherence tomography: a new imaging approach in epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina
32: 2070–2076 https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182562076 PMID: 22842490
20.
Spaide RF (2012) "Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance" after internal limiting membrane
removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina 32: 1719–1726 https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.
0b013e3182671191 PMID: 23007669
21.
Tadayoni R, Svorenova I, Erginay A, Gaudric A, Massin P (2012) Decreased retinal sensitivity after
internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 96: 1513–1516 https://
doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035 PMID: 23077227
22.
Kusuhara S, Matsumiya W, Imai H, Honda S, Tsukahara Y, Negi A (2014) Evaluating dissociated optic
nerve fiber layer appearance using en face layer imaging produced by optical coherence tomography.
Ophthalmologica 232: 170–178 https://doi.org/10.1159/000364811 PMID: 25323920
23.
Sakimoto S, Ikuno Y, Fujimoto S, Sakaguchi H, Nishida K (2014) Characteristics of the retinal surface
after internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 158: 762–768 e761
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.024 PMID: 24997234
24.
Doyle E, Herbert EN, Bunce C, Williamson TH, Laidlaw DA (2007) How effective is macula-off retinal
detachment surgery. Might good outcome be predicted? Eye (Lond) 21: 534–540 https://doi.org/10.
1038/sj.eye.6702260 PMID: 16456590
25.
Ross WH (2002) Visual recovery after macula-off retinal detachment. Eye (Lond) 16: 440–446 https://
doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700192 PMID: 12101451
26.
Kim JD, Pham HH, Lai MM, Josephson JW, Minarcik JR, Von Fricken M (2013) Effect of symptom duration on outcomes following vitrectomy repair of primary macula-off retinal detachments. Retina 33:
1931–1937 https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182877a27 PMID: 23591530
27.
Arias L, Padron-Perez N, Flores-Moreno I, Giralt L, Cobos E, Lorenzo D, et al. (2019) INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS NONPEELING TO PREVENT EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE
DEVELOPMENT IN PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Swept-Source
Optical Coherence Tomography Study With a New Postoperative Classification System. Retina https://
doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002591 PMID: 31313717
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255827 August 5, 2021
10 / 10
...