1.
The Japanese Association for The Surgery of Trauma. "Japan Trauma Data Bank Report
2022 (2019.1-2021.12)". Japan Trauma Data Bank. 2023-01-16.
https://www.jtcr-jatec.org/traumabank/dataroom/data/JTDB2022.pdf, (reference
2023-01-23)
2.
Yokota H. The Problems for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury: from the Joint
Symposium of Annual Meeting of JNST 2014 and JAST 2014. Jpn J Neurosurg. 23:
942-950, 2014.
3.
Karibe H, Hayashi T, Hirano T, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Problems of Traumatic
Brain Injury in the Elderly. Jpn J Neurosurg. 23: 965-972, 2014.
4.
Marshall LF, Toole BM, Bowers SA. The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 2:
Patients who talk and deteriorate: Implications for treatment. J Neurosurg. 59(2): 285-288,
1983.
5.
Rockswold GL, Leonard RL, Nagib MG. Analysis of management in thirty-three closed
head injury patients who "talked and deteriorated". Neurosurgery. 21(1): 51-55, 1987.
6.
Lobato RD, Rivas JJ, Gomez PA, et al. Head-injured patients who talk to and become
comatose Analysis of 211 cases studied using computerized tomography. J Neurosurg.
75(2): 256-261, 1991.
7.
Tan JE, Ng I, Lim J, et al. Patients who talk and deteriorate: a new look at an old problem.
21
Ann Acad Med Singap. 33(4): 489-493, 2004.
8.
Goldschlager T, Rosenfeld JV, Winter CD. 'Talk and die' patients presenting to a major
trauma centre over a 10 year period: a critical review. J Clin Neurosci. 14(7): 618-623,
2007.
9.
Kawamata T, Katayama Y. Head-injured patients who talk and deteriorate: Analysis of 86
cases registered on the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. Neurotraumatology. 25(3):
205-209, 2003.
10. Bouma GJ, Muizelaar JP, Choi SC, et al. Cerebral circulation and metabolism after severe
traumatic brain injury: the elusive role of ischemia. J Neurosurg. 75: 685-693, 1991.
11. Robertson CS, Contant CF, Gokaslan ZL, et al. Cerebral blood flow, arteriovenous oxygen
difference, and outcome in head injured patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 55:
594-603, 1992.
12. Oettingen GV, Bergholt B, Gyldensted C, et al. Blood flow and ischemia within traumatic
cerebral contusions. Neurosurgery. 50: 781-790, 2002.
13. Tokutomi T. Pathophysiology and Critical Care Management of Traumatic Brain Injury.
Jpn J Neurosurg. 14: 425-431, 2005.
14. Nakae R, Takayama Y, Ogawa F, et al. D-dimer as a prognostic marker for head injury
patients who talk and deteriorate. Nihon Kyukyu Igakukai Zasshi. 25(6): 247-253, 2014.
15. Dunn LT, Fitzpatrick MO, Beard D, et al. Patients with a head injury who "talk and die" in
22
the 1990s. J Trauma. 54(3): 497-502, 2003.
16. Umezawa K, Kimura S, Ogita S, et al. Analysis of 469 cases of acute subdural hematoma:
the characteristics of “talk and deteriorate” patients. Neurotraumatology. 34(2): 132-138,
2011.
17. Kaufman HH, Moake JL, Olson JD, et al. Delayed and recurrent intracranial hematomas
related to disseminated intravascular clotting and fibrinolysis in head injury. Neurosurgery.
7(5): 445-449, 1980.
18. Isayama K, Nakazawa S, Kobayashi S, et al. Patients with Severe Head Trauma Who Talk
and Then Deteriorate. Progress in computerized tomography. 9(4): 449-455, 1987.
19. Ohno K, Suzuki R, Masaoka H, et al. A Clinical Study on Head Injuries in the Aged. No
Shinkei Geka. 15(6): 607-611, 1987.
20. Faden AI, Demediuk P, Panter SS, et al. The role of excitatory amino acids and NMDA
receptors in traumatic brain injury. Science. 244(4906): 798-800, 1989.
21. Ikeda Y, Long DM. Molecular basis of brain injury and edema: The role of oxygen free
radicals. Neurosurgery. 27(1): 1-11, 1990.
22. Stein SC, Young GS, Talucci RC, et al. Delayed brain injury after head trauma:
significance of coagulopathy. Neurosurgery. 30(2): 160-165, 1992.
23. Stein SC, Spettell C, Young G, et al. Delayed and progressive brain injury in closed-head
trauma: radiological demonstration. Neurosurgery. 32(1): 25-30, 1993.
23
24. Nakamura H, Watanabe Y, Fukuda K. Analysis of 94 Patients who Talk and Deteriorate
into Coma. Neurotraumatology. 15: 181-186, 1992.
25. Harhangi BS, Kompanje EJO, Leebeek FWG, et al. Coagulation disorders after traumatic
brain injury. Acta Neurochir. 150(2): 165-175, 2008.
26. Wafaisade A, Lefering R, Tjardes T, et al. Acute coagulopathy in isolated blunt traumatic
brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 12(2): 211-219, 2010.
27. Shabani S, Nguyen HS, Doan N, et al. Case Report and Review of Literature of Delayed
Acute Subdural Hematoma. World Neurosurg. 96: 66-71, 2016.
28. Suehiro E, Suzuki M. Corresponding to Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients
taking Antithrombotic Agent. Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery. 28(10): 614-620, 2019.
29. Sawauchi S, Yuhki K, Abe T. The Relationship Between Delayed Traumatic Intracranial
hematoma and Coagulopathy in Patients Diagnosed with a Traumatic Subarachnoid
Hemorrhage. No Shinkei Geka. 29(2): 131-137. 2001.
30. Itshayek E, Rosenthal G, Fraifeld S, et al. Delayed posttraumatic acute subdural
hematoma in elderly patients on anticoagulation. Neurosurgery. 58(5): 851-856, 2006.
31. Chieregato A. Noto A, Tanfani A, et al. Hyperemia beneath an evacuated acute subdural
hematoma is frequent and prolonged in patients with an unfavorable outcome: a
xe-computed tomographic study. Neurosurgery. 64(4): 705-717, 2009.
32. Kubota Y, Nakamoto H, Kawamata T. Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the
24
Neurosurgical Setting. Neurol Med Chir. 56(10): 626-631, 2016.
33. Takahashi H, Urano T, Takada Y, et al. Fibrinolytic parameters as an admission prognostic
marker of head injury in patients who talk and deteriorate. J Neurosurg. 86(5): 768-772,
1997.
34. Kuo JR, TsChou T, Chio C. Coagulopathy as a parameter to predict outcomes in patients
with head injury: analysis of 61 cases. J Clin Neurosci. 11(7): 710-714, 2004.
35. Sakakibara Y, Ito H, Uchida M, et al. Analysis of patients with traumatic acute subdural
hematoma on pre-injury antiplatelets and/or anticoagulants. Neurotraumatology. 35:
147-151, 2012.
36. Tokutomi T, Miyagi T, Ogawa T, et al. Age-associated increases in poor outcomes after
traumatic brain injury: a report from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. Neurotrauma.
25(12): 1407-1414, 2008.
37. Laroche M, Kutcher ME, Huang MC, et al. Coagulopathy after traumatic brain injury.
Neurosurgery. 70(6): 1334-1345, 2012.
38. Sakakibara Y, Taguchi Y, Nakamura H, et al. Analysis of talk and deteriorating patients:
report of our own cases and review of the literature. Neurotraumatology. 39: 27-31, 2016.
39. Shabani S, Nguyen HS, Doan N, et al. Case Report and Review of Literature of Delayed
Acute Subdural Hematoma. World Neurosurg. 96: 66-71, 2016.
40. Karibe H, Narisawa A, Saito H, et al. An overview of post-traumatic coagulopathy in
25
elderly patients with traumatic brain injury who suffer from “talk and deteriorate.”
Neurosurg Emerg. 25(2): 187-194, 2020.
41. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining,
Inference, and Prediction [Second Edition]. New York: Springer Science & Business
Media. 2009.
42. Abu-Mostafa YS, Magdon-Ismail /MLin H. Learning From Data. New York: AMLBook.
2012.
43. Deo RC. Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation. 132(20): 1920-1930, 2015.
44. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine Learning in Medicine. N Engl J Med. 380(14):
1347-1358, 2019.
45. Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat
Med. 25(1): 24-29, 2019.
46. Gan G, Ma C, Wu J. Data Clustering: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Philadelphia:
Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics. 2020.
47. Xu R, Wunsch DC. Clustering algorithms in biomedical research: a review. IEEE Rev
Biomed Eng. 3: 120-154, 2010.
48. Ulfenborg B, Karlsson A, Riveiro M, et al. Multi-assignment clustering: Machine learning
from a biological perspective. J Biotechnol. 326: 1-10, 2021
49. Pretorius ME, Kaufman HH. Rapid onset of delayed traumatic intracerebral haematoma
26
with diffuse intravascular coagulation and fibrinolysis. Acta Neurochirurgica. 65: 103-109,
1982.
50. Bullock R, Hanemann CO, Murray L, et al. Recurrent hematomas following craniotomy
for traumatic intracranial mass. J Neurosurg. 72(1): 9-14, 1990.
51. Yamakami I, Yamaura A, Isobe K. Pathogenesis and management of secondary neural
damage in head trauma patients: analysis of patients who talk and deteriorate
"fulminantly". No Shinkei Geka. 21(2): 129-133, 1993.
52. Sawauchi W, Taya K, Hashimoto T, et al. Progressive Brain Injury. No Shinkei Geka.
31(7): 749-755, 2003.
53. Maas AIR, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, et al. Prognostic value of computerized tomography
scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J
Neurotrauma. 24(2): 303-314, 2007
54. Davis DP, Kene M, Vilke GM, et al. Head-injured patients who "talk and die": the San
Diego perspective. J Trauma. 62(2): 277-281, 2007.
55. Suehiro E, Koizumi H, Fujiyama Y, et al. Predictors of deterioration indicating a
requirement for surgery in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg.
127: 97-100, 2014.
56. Uccella L, Zoia C, Bongetta D, et al. Are Antiplatelet and Anticoagulants Drugs A Risk
Factor for Bleeding in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury?. World Neurosurg. 110: e339-e345,
27
2018.
57. Gejyo F, Narita I. Current clinical and pathogenetic understanding of beta2-m amyloidosis
in long-term haemodialysis patients. Nephrology. 8: 45-49, 2003.
58. Goodman WG, London G, Amann K, et al. Vascular calcification in chronic kidney
disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 43(3): 572-579, 2004.
59. Sakakibara Y, Onodera H, Tanaka Y, et al. Traumatic acute subdural hematoma in patients
undergoing intermittent renal hemodialysis: Vulnerability of the dialytic brain and
mechanisms of head injury. Neurotraumatology. 34(2): 145-150, 2011.
60. Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Velmahos G, et al. Effect on outcome of early intensive
management of geriatric trauma patients. Br J Surg. 89(10): 1319-1322, 2002.
61. Grossman MD, Miller D, Scaff DW, et al. When is an elder old? Effect of preexisting
conditions on mortality in geriatric trauma. J Trauma. 52(2): 242-246, 2002.
62. Deiner S, Silverstein JH, Abrams KJ. Management of trauma in the geriatric patient. Curr
Opin Anaesthesiol. 17(2): 165-170, 2004.
63. Yilmaz S, Karcioglu O, Sener S. Impact of associated diseases on etiology, course, and
mortality in geriatric trauma patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 13(5): 295-298, 2006.
64. Kim J, Kemp S, Kullas K, et al. Injury patterns in patients who "talk and die". J Clin
Neurosci. 20(12): 1697-1701, 2013.
65. Ge X, Zhu L, Li M. et al. A Novel Blood Inflammatory Indicator for Predicting
28
Deterioration Risk of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Aging Neurosci. 26(14): 878484,
2022.
66. Molnar C. Interpretable Machine Learning. North Carolina: Lulu.com. 2020
29
【10】 図
図 1 Japan Trauma Data Bank Report 2022 - 損傷部位別症例数
Japan Trauma Data Bank Report 2022 で示された損傷部位別症例数を示す。2019 年 1
月から 2021 年 12 月までの期間に登録された全外傷登録 88,817 例中、頭部外傷は
29,311 例(33.0 %)を占めており、下肢外傷(42.4 %)に次いで多かった。
30
図 2 Talk and Deteriorate の概念
Talk and Deteriorate(T&D)の概念を示す。T&D は、一次性脳損傷が軽症でありな
がら、二次性脳損傷が重症であることを意味している。頭蓋内血腫の遅発性増大が
T&D の主な原因であるが、そればかりでなく、脳浮腫、脳虚血、てんかん、水頭症
などの病態も関与し得る。
31
図 3 症例の選択基準
症例の選択基準を示す。702 例が選択基準を満たしたが、データ欠損のために 22
例が除外され、最終的に解析対象となったのは 680 例であった。このうち、T&D 症
例は 89 例あり、全体の 13.1 %を占めていた。
32
図 4 Brute Force Analysis と Machine Learning-assisted Brute Force Analysis
680 症例のデータセットから「T&D ratio が 50 %以上となる複合条件」の抽出を行
った。データセットからの直接的な網羅的探索(Brute Force Analysis)は計算量が膨
大となり、実行不能であった(図左)。この問題を解決するため、Machine
Learning-assisted Brute Force Analysis を採用した(図右)。まず、データセットから T&D
ratio が 3 %未満の症例のサブグループを除外した。次いで生成されたサブセットに対
してクラスタリングを行うことで、
「T&D ratio が 50 %以上となる複合条件」の候補パ
ターンを抽出した。最後に、この候補パターンに対して網羅的探索を行うことで、94
通りの「T&D ratio が 50 %以上となる複合条件」を抽出した。
33
表 1 データセットの基本的な特徴
age
[years old]
male sex
Total
T&D
non-T&D
( n=680 )
( n=89 )
( n=591 )
P-value
Cut off
T&D
ratio
67.4±18.8
70.4±16.6
67.0±19.0
0.080
≧ 70
15.0 %
[%]
63.4
76.4
61.4
0.006
male
15.8 %
HD
[%]
4.4
11.2
3.4
< 0.001
HD (+)
33.3 %
AC
[%]
9.3
19.1
7.8
0.001
AC (+)
27.0 %
AP
[%]
19.1
19.1
19.1
0.997
AP (+)
13.1 %
sBP
[mmHg]
152.2±28.1
155.4±31.0
151.7±27.6
0.293
≧ 162
15.7 %
dBP
[mmHg]
88.2±17.2
90.4±16.6
87.9±17.3
0.186
≧ 84
14.8 %
mBP
[mmHg]
109.6±18.7
112.1±19.1
109.2±18.6
0.192
≧ 106
15.3 %
HR
[bpm]
82.6±16.5
82.8±16.4
82.6±16.5
0.917
≧ 82
13.9 %
BT
[℃]
36.5±0.7
36.5±0.8
36.5±0.7
0.361
≦ 36.3
16.6 %
Fx
[%]
37.1
53.9
34.5
< 0.001
Fx (+)
19.0 %
contusion
[%]
38.1
52.8
35.9
0.002
contusion (+)
18.1 %
tSAH
[%]
64.9
59.6
65.7
0.261
tSAH (+)
12.0 %
DAI
[%]
5.0
3.4
5.2
0.449
DAI (+)
8.8 %
AEDH
[mm]
1.5±4.8
3.5±7.9
1.2±4.0
0.009
≧ 7.0
19.6 %
cASDH
[mm]
3.2±4.1
6.9±5.5
2.6±3.6
< 0.001
≧ 5.0
19.7 %
tASDH
[mm]
1.2±2.3
2.6±3.9
0.9±1.8
< 0.001
≧ 2.0
21.1 %
CTR
[%]
54.6±8.3
56.2±8.8
54.4±8.2
0.073
≧ 53.0
15.5 %
D-dimer
[µg/mL]
24.0±42.5
51.5±69.6
19.5±34.1
< 0.001
≧ 21.9
26.3 %
1.1±0.4
1.3±0.7
1.1±0.3
0.015
≧ 1.02
18.0 %
PT-INR
APTT
[sec]
28.6±5.8
30.5±8.1
28.3±5.3
0.015
≧ 29.3
18.7 %
WBC
[/µL]
9,500±4,000
10,300±5,400
9,300±3,800
0.104
≧ 14.7
29.7 %
Hb
[g/dL]
13.0±2.0
12.5±2.1
13.1±2.0
0.013
≦ 12.0
19.7 %
Plt
[×104/µL]
20.2±10.8
18.1±6.6
20.5±11.3
0.004
≦ 17.6
18.0 %
Cr
[mg/dL]
1.1±1.4
1.6±2.1
1.0±1.2
0.016
≧ 0.97
22.2 %
Na
[mEq/L]
140.2±3.7
139.2±3.6
140.3±3.7
0.007
≦ 140.0
16.8 %
[mEq/L]
4.0±0.5
3.9±0.6
4.0±0.5
0.342
≦ 3.4
23.5 %
値は平均±標準偏差を表す。
表中の略語は以下の通り。
AC; use of anticoagulants, AEDH; thickness of acute epidural hematoma, AP; use of
antiplatelets, APTT; activated partial thromboplastin time, BT; body temperature, cASDH;
34
thickness of convexity acute subdural hematoma, CTR; cardiothoracic ratio, contusion;
presence of cerebral contusion, Cr; creatinine, DAI; presence of diffuse axonal injury, dBP;
diastolic blood pressure, Fx; presence of skull fracture, Hb; hemoglobin, HD; hemodialysis,
HR; heart rate, K; potassium, mBP; mean blood pressure, Na; sodium, PT-INR; prothrombin
time-international normalized ratio, Plt; platelet count, sBP; systolic blood pressure, tASDH;
thickness of tentorial or interhemispheric acute subdural hematoma, tSAH; presence of
traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, WBC; white blood cell count
35
表 2 Talk and Deteriorate の発生に関与する因子
age, HD, AC, sBP, dBP, mBP, HR, BT,
Fx, contusion, tSAH, AEDH, cASDH, tASDH, CTR,
D-dimer, PT-INR, APTT, Hb, WBC, Cr, Na, K
表中の略語は以下の通り。
AC; use of anticoagulants, AEDH; thickness of acute epidural hematoma, APTT; activated
partial thromboplastin time, BT; body temperature, cASDH; thickness of convexity acute
subdural hematoma, CTR; cardiothoracic ratio, contusion; presence of cerebral contusion, Cr;
creatinine, dBP; diastolic blood pressure, Fx; presence of skull fracture, Hb; hemoglobin, HD;
hemodialysis, HR; heart rate, K; potassium, mBP; mean blood pressure, Na; sodium, PT-INR;
prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, sBP; systolic blood pressure, tASDH;
thickness of tentorial or interhemispheric acute subdural hematoma, tSAH; presence of
traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, WBC; white blood cell count
36
表 3 Talk and Deteriorate を高率に発生する主な条件
Multifactorial conditions
BT ≤ 36.0 ℃
T&D ratio
20 ( 2.9 % )
60.0 %
contusion (+)
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
Fx (+)
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
27 ( 4.0 % )
59.3 %
Fx (+)
K ≤ 3.2 mEq/L
22 ( 3.2 % )
50.0 %
Fx (+)
cASDH ≥ 2 mm
40 ( 5.9 % )
52.5 %
cASDH ≥ 11 mm
47 ( 6.9 % )
51.1 %
tASDH ≥ 6 mm
26 ( 3.8 % )
53.8 %
18 ( 2.6 % )
55.6 %
18 ( 2.6 % )
50.0 %
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
PT-INR ≥ 1.2
APTT ≥ 36.0 sec
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
HD (+)
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
AC (+)
Na ≤ 139 mEq/L
14 ( 2.1 % )
57.1 %
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
AC (+)
dBP ≥ 90 mmHg
15 ( 2.2 % )
53.3 %
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
Cr ≥ 1.0 mg/dL
sBP ≥ 160 mmHg
20 ( 2.9 % )
50.0 %
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
CTR ≥ 60.0 %
18 ( 2.6 % )
50.0 %
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
WBC ≥ 15,000 /µL
16 ( 2.4 % )
50.0 %
AEDH ≥ 3 mm
WBC ≥ 15,000 /µL
14 ( 2.1 % )
57.1 %
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
WBC ≥ 15,000 /µL
15 ( 2.2 % )
66.7 %
表中の略語は以下の通り。
AC; use of anticoagulants, AEDH; thickness of acute epidural hematoma, APTT; activated
partial thromboplastin time, BT; body temperature, cASDH; thickness of convexity acute
subdural hematoma, CTR; cardiothoracic ratio, contusion; presence of cerebral contusion, Cr;
creatinine, dBP; diastolic blood pressure, Fx; presence of skull fracture, HD; hemodialysis, K;
potassium, Na; sodium, PT-INR; prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, sBP;
systolic blood pressure, tASDH; thickness of tentorial or interhemispheric acute subdural
hematoma, WBC; white blood cell count
37
付録
Multifactorial conditions
T&D ratio
cASDH ≥ 11 mm
47
51.1 %
tASDH ≥ 6 mm
26
53.8 %
AC (+)
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
22
50.0 %
AEDH ≥ 10 mm
BT ≤ 36.4 ℃
16
50.0 %
AEDH ≥ 8 mm
K ≤ 3.6 mEq/L
20
50.0 %
AEDH ≥ 15 mm
WBC ≥ 9,000 /µL
14
57.1 %
AEDH ≥ 3 mm
WBC ≥ 15,000 /µL
14
57.1 %
APTT ≥ 30.0 sec
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
45
51.1 %
BT ≤ 36.2 ℃
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
18
66.7 %
BT ≥ 37.0 ℃
cASDH ≥ 8 mm
20
50.0 %
Cr ≥ 1.0 mg/dL
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
32
50.0 %
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
Fx (+)
27
59.3 %
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
27
51.9 %
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
WBC ≥ 15,000 /µL
15
66.7 %
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
age ≤ 70 years old
17
58.8 %
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
cASDH ≥ 8 mm
34
50.0 %
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
tASDH ≥ 4 mm
29
51.7 %
Fx (+)
K ≤ 3.2 mEq/L
22
50.0 %
Fx (+)
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
33
57.6 %
Fx (+)
tASDH ≥ 4 mm
19
63.2 %
HD (+)
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
18
50.0 %
Hb ≤ 14.0 g/dL
tASDH ≥ 6 mm
20
65.0 %
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 8 mm
18
50.0 %
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
tASDH ≥ 3 mm
20
50.0 %
PT-INR ≥ 1.2
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
23
52.2 %
WBC ≥ 15,000 /µL
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
16
50.0 %
cASDH ≥ 8 mm
contusion (+)
34
52.9 %
cASDH ≥ 8 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
48
50.0 %
mBP ≥ 110 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 5 mm
20
55.0 %
AC (+)
APTT ≥ 34.0 sec
BT ≥ 36.6 ℃
20
50.0 %
AC (+)
APTT ≥ 30.0 sec
D-dimer ≥ 5.0 µg/mL
21
52.4 %
AC (+)
APTT ≥ 30.0 sec
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
26
50.0 %
AC (+)
APTT ≥ 34.0 sec
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
14
50.0 %
AC (+)
D-dimer ≥ 5.0 µg/mL
K ≥ 4.0 mEq/L
19
52.6 %
AC (+)
D-dimer ≥ 5.0 µg/mL
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
20
50.0 %
38
AC (+)
Na ≤ 139 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
14
57.1 %
AC (+)
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
dBP ≥ 90 mmHg
15
53.3 %
AEDH ≥ 5 mm
BT ≤ 36.6 ℃
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
18
50.0 %
AEDH ≥ 7 mm
BT ≤ 36.6 ℃
K ≤ 4.0 mEq/L
21
52.4 %
AEDH ≥ 7 mm
BT ≤ 36.6 ℃
contusion (+)
20
55.0 %
AEDH ≥ 8 mm
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
K ≤ 4.0 mEq/L
15
53.3 %
AEDH ≥ 7 mm
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
WBC ≥ 10,000 /µL
16
56.3 %
AEDH ≥ 4 mm
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
contusion (+)
18
50.0 %
AEDH ≥ 6 mm
K ≤ 3.8 mEq/L
contusion (+)
17
52.9 %
APTT ≥ 30.0 sec
BT ≥ 36.2 ℃
cASDH ≥ 11 mm
18
72.2 %
APTT ≥ 30.0 sec
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
cASDH ≥ 6 mm
17
52.9 %
APTT ≥ 30.0 sec
Na ≤ 140 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 6 mm
28
53.6 %
APTT ≥ 36.0 sec
PT-INR ≥ 1.2
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
18
55.6 %
APTT ≥ 30.0 sec
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
36
50.0 %
APTT ≥ 36.0 sec
cASDH ≥ 2 mm
tSAH (-)
20
50.0 %
APTT ≥ 32.0 sec
mBP ≥ 110 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
19
52.6 %
BT ≤ 36.4 ℃
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
K ≤ 4.0 mEq/L
16
68.8 %
BT ≤ 36.6 ℃
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
WBC ≥ 15,000 /µL
20
55.0 %
BT ≤ 36.0 ℃
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
age ≤ 80 years old
19
52.6 %
BT ≤ 36.0 ℃
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
contusion (+)
20
60.0 %
BT ≤ 36.0 ℃
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
sBP ≤ 140 mmHg
14
50.0 %
BT ≤ 36.4 ℃
Fx (+)
cASDH ≥ 5 mm
38
52.6 %
BT ≤ 36.0 ℃
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
contusion (+)
14
57.1 %
BT ≥ 36.0 ℃
Na ≤ 140 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
45
55.6 %
BT ≥ 36.8 ℃
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
mBP ≤ 110 mmHg
20
55.0 %
CTR ≥ 60.0 %
D-dimer ≥ 5.0 µg/mL
cASDH ≥ 8 mm
21
57.1 %
CTR ≥ 60.0 %
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
18
50.0 %
CTR ≤ 50.0 %
Fx (+)
cASDH ≥ 5 mm
15
53.3 %
CTR ≤ 55.0 %
Na ≤ 137 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 6 mm
15
53.3 %
Cr ≥ 1.0 mg/dL
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
tASDH ≥ 3 mm
18
50.0 %
Cr ≥ 1.0 mg/dL
sBP ≥ 160 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
20
50.0 %
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
Fx (+)
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
31
51.6 %
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
Fx (+)
WBC ≥ 11,000 /µL
15
73.3 %
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
Fx (+)
cASDH ≥ 4 mm
42
52.4 %
D-dimer ≥ 80.0 µg/mL
Fx (+)
contusion (+)
20
75.0 %
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
Fx (+)
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
38
50.0 %
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
Hb ≤ 12.0 g/dL
tASDH ≥ 3 mm
21
57.1 %
D-dimer ≥ 20.0 µg/mL
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
contusion (+)
28
53.6 %
39
D-dimer ≥ 5.0 µg/mL
PT-INR ≥ 1.0
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
42
54.8 %
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
WBC ≥ 11,000 /µL
tASDH ≥ 3 mm
16
56.3 %
D-dimer ≥ 40.0 µg/mL
cASDH ≥ 5 mm
contusion (+)
39
51.3 %
D-dimer ≥ 5.0 µg/mL
cASDH ≥ 8 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
31
61.3 %
D-dimer ≥ 5.0 µg/mL
mBP ≥ 110 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 4 mm
24
54.2 %
Fx (+)
Hb ≤ 13.0 g/dL
cASDH ≥ 5 mm
30
53.3 %
Fx (+)
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 4 mm
21
57.1 %
Fx (+)
PT-INR ≥ 1.0
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
16
68.8 %
Fx (+)
cASDH ≥ 2 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
40
52.5 %
HR ≥ 80 bpm
cASDH ≥ 9 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
16
68.8 %
Hb ≤ 14.0 g/dL
K ≥ 4.0 mEq/L
tASDH ≥ 5 mm
14
64.3 %
Hb ≤ 14.0 g/dL
cASDH ≥ 3 mm
tASDH ≥ 6 mm
14
78.6 %
Hb ≤ 12.0 g/dL
sBP ≥ 140 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 4 mm
23
56.5 %
K ≤ 3.4 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 5 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
17
52.9 %
Na ≤ 139 mEq/L
PT-INR ≥ 1.0
cASDH ≥ 7 mm
26
53.8 %
Na ≤ 140 mEq/L
cASDH ≥ 5 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
41
51.2 %
PT-INR ≥ 1.0
cASDH ≥ 11 mm
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
16
75.0 %
WBC ≥ 12,000 /µL
sBP ≥ 160 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
14
50.0 %
cASDH ≥ 5 mm
contusion (+)
tASDH ≥ 2 mm
39
51.3 %
cASDH ≥ 4 mm
mBP ≥ 110 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 4 mm
23
56.5 %
cASDH ≥ 4 mm
sBP ≥ 160 mmHg
tASDH ≥ 4 mm
16
56.3 %
40
...