Sub-GeV領域における水-ニュートリノ荷電カレント反応の精密測定

[1] W. Pauli. Dear radioactive ladies and gentlemen. Phys. Today, 31N9:27, 1978.

[2] F. Reines and C. L. Cowan. Detection of the free neutrino. Phys. Rev., 92:830–831, 1953.

[3] G. Danby, J. M. Gaillard, K. A. Goulianos, L. M. Lederman, N. B. Mistry, M. Schwartz, and J.

Steinberger. Observation of High-Energy Neutrino Reactions and the Existence of Two Kinds

of Neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett., 9:36–44, 1962.

[4] D. DeCamp et al. (ALEPH Collaboration). Determination of the Number of Light Neutrino

Species. Phys. Lett. B, 231:519–529, 1989.

[5] S. Schael et al. (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD

Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group). Precision electroweak measurements on the

Z resonance. Phys. Rept., 427:257–454, 2006.

[6] K. Kodama et al. (DONUT Collaboration). Observation of tau neutrino interactions. Phys.

Lett. B, 504:218–224, 2001.

[7] B. Pontecorvo. Mesonium and anti-mesonium. Sov. Phys. JETP, 6:429, 1957.

[8] B. Pontecorvo. Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge. Zh. Eksp. Teor.

Fiz., 34:247, 1957.

[9] Ziro Maki, Masami Nakagawa, and Shoichi Sakata. Remarks on the unified model of elementary

particles. Prog. Theor. Phys., 28:870–880, 1962.

[10] Y. Fukuda et al. Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:1562–

1567, 1998.

[11] N, Agafonova et al. (OPERA Collaboration). Observation of a first ντ candidate in the OPERA

experiment in the CNGS beam. Phys. Lett. B, 691:138–145, 2010.

[12] N, Agafonova et al. (OPERA Collaboration). Discovery of τ Neutrino Appearance in the

CNGS Neutrino Beam with the OPERA Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(12):121802, 2015.

[13] N, Agafonova et al. (OPERA Collaboration). Final Results of the OPERA Experiment on ντ

Appearance in the CNGS Neutrino Beam. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(21):211801, 2018. [Erratum:

217

Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 139901 (2018)].

[14] Ivan Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, Thomas Schwetz, and Albert Zhou.

The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations. JHEP, 09:178,

2020.

[15] NuFIT 5.1, 2021. www.nu-fit.org.

[16] K. Abe et al. (Hyper Kamiokande Proto-Collaboration). Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report.

5 2018.

[17] R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration). Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep

Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual Design Report, Volume 2: The

Physics Program for DUNE at LBNF. 12 2015.

[18] A. Alekou et al. Updated physics performance of the ESSnuSB experiment: ESSnuSB collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(12):1130, 2021.

[19] Christophe Bronner. Accelerator neutrino i recent results from t2k, June 2022.

[20] A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (LSND Collaboration). Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the

observation of ν¯e appearance in a ν¯µ beam. Phys. Rev. D, 64:112007, 2001.

[21] A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. Updated MiniBooNE neutrino oscillation results with increased

data and new background studies. Phys. Rev. D, 103(5):052002, 2021.

[22] P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE collaboration). Search for an Excess of Electron Neutrino

Interactions in MicroBooNE Using Multiple Final State Topologies. 10 2021.

[23] N. Agafonova et al. (OPERA collaboration). Final results of the search for νµ → νe oscillations

with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam. JHEP, 06:151, 2018.

[24] S. Ajimura et al. Technical Design Report (TDR): Searching for a Sterile Neutrino at J-PARC

MLF (E56, JSNS2). 5 2017.

[25] K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration). Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating

phase in neutrino oscillations. Nature, 580(7803):339–344, 2020. [Erratum: Nature 583, E16

(2020)].

[26] M. A. Acero et al. (NOνA Collaboration). First Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters using Neutrinos and Antineutrinos by NOvA. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(15):151803, 2019.

[27] P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group). Review of Particle Physics. PTEP, 2020(8):083C01,

2020.

[28] C. H. Slwellyn Smith. Neutrino Reactions at Accelerator Energies. Phys. Rept., 3:261–379,

1972.

[29] R. G. Sachs. High-Energy Behavior of Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors. Phys. Rev.,

218

126:2256–2260, 1962.

[30] M. Gourdin. Weak and Electromagnetic Form-Factors of Hadrons. Phys. Rept., 11:29, 1974.

[31] J. Liu et al. Determination of the Axial-Vector Weak Coupling Constant with Ultracold

Neutrons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:181803, 2010.

[32] D. Mund, B. Maerkisch, M. Deissenroth, J. Krempel, M. Schumann, H. Abele, A. Petoukhov,

and T. Soldner. Determination of the Weak Axial Vector Coupling from a Measurement of the

Beta-Asymmetry Parameter A in Neutron Beta Decay. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:172502, 2013.

[33] Veronique Bernard, Latifa Elouadrhiri, and Ulf-G. Meissner. Axial structure of the nucleon:

Topical Review. J. Phys. G, 28:R1–R35, 2002.

[34] Stephen L. Adler. Tests of the Conserved Vector Current and Partially Conserved Axial-Vector

Current Hypotheses in High-Energy Neutrino Reactions. Phys. Rev., 135:B963–B966, 1964.

[35] P. Adamson et al. (MINOS+ Collaboration). Precision Constraints for Three-Flavor Neutrino

Oscillations from the Full MINOS+ and MINOS Dataset. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(13):131802,

2020.

[36] M. A. Acero et al. (NOνA Collaboration). An Improved Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation

Parameters by the NOvA Experiment. 8 2021.

[37] A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE collaboration). First Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Charged Current Quasielastic Double Differential Cross Section. Phys. Rev. D, 81:092005,

2010.

[38] K. S. Egiyan et al. Observation of nuclear scaling in the A(e, e-prime) reaction at x(B) greater

than 1. Phys. Rev. C, 68:014313, 2003.

[39] K. S. Egiyan et al. Measurement of 2- and 3-nucleon short range correlation probabilities in

nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:082501, 2006.

[40] R. Shneor et al. Investigation of proton-proton short-range correlations via the C-12(e, e-prime

pp) reaction. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:072501, 2007.

[41] A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, and M. E. Christy. Neutrino Quasielastic Scattering on Nuclear Targets:

Parametrizing Transverse Enhancement (Meson Exchange Currents). Eur. Phys. J. C, 71:1726,

2011.

[42] J. Nieves, I. R. Simo, and M. J. V. Vacas. Inclusive Charged–Current Neutrino–Nucleus

Reactions. Phys. Rev. C, 83:045501, 2011.

[43] M. Martini, M. Eficson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau. A Unified approach for nucleon knockout, coherent and incoherent pion production in neutrino interactions with nuclei. Phys. Rev.

C, 80:065501, 2009.

219

[44] G. D. Megias, J. E. Amaro, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, T. W. Donnelly, and I. Ruiz Simo.

Charged-current neutrino-nucleus reactions within the superscaling meson-exchange current

approach. Phys. Rev. D, 94(9):093004, 2016.

[45] J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas. The nucleon axial mass and the MiniBooNE

Quasielastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering problem. Phys. Lett. B, 707:72–75, 2012.

[46] R. Acciarri et al. Detection of Back-to-Back Proton Pairs in Charged-Current Neutrino Interactions with the ArgoNeuT Detector in the NuMI Low Energy Beam Line. Phys. Rev. D,

90(1):012008, 2014.

[47] X. G. Lu et al. (MINERvA Collaboration). Measurement of final-state correlations in neutrino

muon-proton mesonless production on hydrocarbon at ⟨Eν ⟩ = 3 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett.,

121(2):022504, 2018.

[48] K. Abe et al. Measurement of neutrino and antineutrino oscillations by the T2K experiment including a new additional sample of νe interactions at the far detector. Phys. Rev. D,

96(9):092006, 2017. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 98, 019902 (2018)].

[49] R. A. Smith and E. J. Moniz. NEUTRINO REACTIONS ON NUCLEAR TARGETS. Nucl.

Phys. B, 43:605, 1972. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 101, 547 (1975)].

[50] J. Nieves, E. Oset, and C. Garcia-Recio. A Theoretical approach to pionic atoms and the

problem of anomalies. Nucl. Phys. A, 554:509–553, 1993.

[51] B. Bourguille, J. Nieves, and F. S´anchez. Inclusive and exclusive neutrino-nucleus cross sections

and the reconstruction of the interaction kinematics. JHEP, 04:004, 2021.

[52] M. Valverde, Jose Enrique Amaro, and J. Nieves. Theoretical uncertainties on quasielastic

charged-current neutrino-nucleus cross sections. Phys. Lett. B, 638:325–332, 2006.

[53] O. Benhar, A. Fabrocini, S. Fantoni, and I. Sick. Spectral function of finite nuclei and scattering

of GeV electrons. Nucl. Phys. A, 579:493–517, 1994.

[54] Omar Benhar and Adelchi Fabrocini. Two nucleon spectral function in infinite nuclear matter.

Phys. Rev. C, 62:034304, 2000.

[55] Roger D. Woods and David S. Saxon. Diffuse Surface Optical Model for Nucleon-Nuclei Scattering. Phys. Rev., 95:577–578, 1954.

[56] Yoshinari Hayato and Luke Pickering. The NEUT neutrino interaction simulation program

library. Eur. Phys. J. ST, 230(24):4469–4481, 2021.

[57] L. Alvarez-Ruso et al. NuSTEC White Paper: Status and challenges of neutrino–nucleus

scattering. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 100:1–68, 2018.

[58] L. L. Salcedo, E. Oset, M. J. Vincente-Vacas, and C. Garcia-Recio. Computer Simulation of

220

Inclusive Pion Nuclear Reactions. Nucl. Phys. A, 484:557–592, 1988.

[59] H. W. Bertini. Nonelastic interactions of nucleons and pi mesons with complex nuclei at

energies below 3 gev. Phys. Rev. C, 6:631–659, 1972.

[60] V Lyubushkin et al. A Study of quasi-elastic muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering in the

NOMAD experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C, 63:355–381, 2009.

[61] K. Abe et al. (T2K collaboration). T2K ND280 Upgrade - Technical Design Report. 1 2019.

[62] C. M. G. Lattes, H. Muirhead, G. P. S. Occhialini, and C. F. Powell. PROCESSES INVOLVING CHARGED MESONS. Nature, 159:694–697, 1947.

[63] K. Niu, E. Mikumo, and Y. Maeda. A Possible decay in flight of a new type particle. Prog.

Theor. Phys., 46:1644–1646, 1971.

[64] K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration). T2K neutrino flux prediction. Phys. Rev. D, 87(1):012001,

2013. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 019902 (2013)].

[65] T. Fukuda et al. First neutrino event detection with nuclear emulsion at J-PARC neutrino

beamline. PTEP, 2017(6):063C02, 2017.

[66] A. Hiramoto et al. (NINJA Collaboration). First measurement of ν µ and νµ charged-current

inclusive interactions on water using a nuclear emulsion detector. Phys. Rev. D, 102(7):072006,

2020.

[67] H. Oshima et al. (NINJA Collaboration). First measurement using a nuclear emulsion detector of the νµ charged-current cross section on iron around the 1 GeV energy region. PTEP,

2021(3):033C01, 2021.

[68] H. Oshima et al. Measurements of protons and charged pions emitted from νµ charged-current

interactions on iron at a mean neutrino energy of 1.49 GeV using a nuclear emulsion detector.

Phys. Rev. D, 106(3):032016, 2022.

[69] C. Giganti (for the T2K Collaboration). T2K (E-11) status and plans for T2K-II (E-65) and

Near Detector Upgrade. 30th J-PARC PAC meeting, 2020.

[70] A. Hiramoto. PhD thesis, Kyoto University, 2021.

[71] A. Konaka. The Hyper-Kamiokande project. J-PARC Symposium 2019, 2019.

[72] T. Odagawa et al. Momentum reconstruction of charged particles using multiple Coulomb

scatterings in a nuclear emulsion detector. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., 2022(11):113H01, 2022.

[73] V. L. Highland. Some Practical Remarks on Multiple Scattering. Nucl. Instrum. Meth.,

129:497, 1975.

[74] G. R. Lynch, and O. I. Dahl. Approximations to multiple Coulomb scattering. Nucl. Instrum.

Meth. B, 58:6–10, 1991.

221

[75] K. Kodama et al. Momentum measurement of secondary particle by multiple Coulomb scattering with emulsion cloud chamber in DONuT experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 574:192–198,

2007.

[76] N. Agafonova et al. (OPERA Collaboration).

Momentum measurement by the Multiple

Coulomb Scattering method in the OPERA lead emulsion target. New J. Phys., 14:013026,

2012.

[77] K. Kodama et al. A Micro Segment Chamber for the cosmic-ray balloon experiment. Adv.

Space Res., 37:2120–2124, 2006.

[78] S. Takahashi et al. Time stamp technique using a nuclear emulsion multi-stage shifter for

gamma-ray telescope. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 620:192–195, 2010.

[79] S. Takahashi et al. GRAINE 2015, a balloon-borne emulsion γ-ray telescope experiment in

Australia. PTEP, 2016(7):073F01, 2016.

[80] S. Takahashi, S. Aoki et al. (GRAINE Collaboration). GRAINE project, prospects for scientific

balloon-borne experiments. Adv. Space Res., 62:2945–2953, 2018.

[81] H. Rokujo et al. Multi-stage shifter for subsecond time resolution of emulsion gamma-ray

telescopes. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 701:127–132, 2013.

[82] H. Rokujo et al. First demonstration of gamma-ray imaging using a balloon-borne emulsion

telescope. PTEP, 2018(6):063H01, 2018.

[83] K. Yamada et al. First demonstration of an emulsion multi-stage shifter for accelerator neutrino

experiments in J-PARC T60. PTEP, 2017(6):063H02, 2017.

[84] Takahiro Odagawa, Tsutomu Fukuda, Ayami Hiramoto, Hiroaki Kawahara, Tatsuya Kikawa,

Akihiro Minamino, Tsuyoshi Nakaya, Osamu Sato, Yosuke Suzuki, and Kenji Yasutome. Design

and performance of a scintillation tracker for track matching in nuclear-emulsion-based neutrino

interaction measurement. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 1034:166775, 2022.

[85] A. Ajmi et al. Baby MIND detector first physics run. In Prospects in Neutrino Physics, 4

2020.

[86] K. Abe et al. T2K neutrino flux prediction. Phys. Rev. D, 87(1):012001, 2013. [Addendum:

Phys.Rev.D 87, 019902 (2013)].

[87] S. Agostinelli et al. GEANT4–a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 506:250–303,

2003.

[88] John Allison et al. Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 53:270,

2006.

[89] J. Allison et al. Recent developments in Geant4. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 835:186–225, 2016.

222

[90] T. T. B¨ohlen, F. Cerutti, M. P. W. Chin, A. Fass`o, A. Ferrari, P. G. Ortega, A. Mairani, P. R.

Sala, G. Smirnov, and V. Vlachoudis. The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for

High Energy and Medical Applications. Nucl. Data Sheets, 120:211–214, 2014.

[91] N Abgrall et al. Measurements of Cross Sections and Charged Pion Spectra in Proton-Carbon

Interactions at 31 GeV/c. Phys. Rev. C, 84:034604, 2011.

[92] N. Abgrall et al. Measurement of Production Properties of Positively Charged Kaons in ProtonCarbon Interactions at 31 GeV/c. Phys. Rev. C, 85:035210, 2012.

[93] N. Abgrall et al. Measurements of π ± , K ± , KS0 , Λ and proton production in proton–carbon

interactions at 31 GeV/c with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS. Eur. Phys.

J. C, 76(2):84, 2016.

[94] N. Abgrall et al. Measurements of π ± differential yields from the surface of the T2K replica

target for incoming 31 GeV/c protons with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS.

Eur. Phys. J. C, 76(11):617, 2016.

[95] D. Rein and L. M. Sehgal. Neutrino Excitation of Baryon Resonances and Single Pion Production. Annals Phys., 133:79–153, 1981.

[96] C. Berger and L. M. Sehgal. Lepton mass effects in single pion production by neutrinos. Phys.

Rev. D, 76:113004, 2007.

[97] K. M. Graczyk, J. Zmuda,

and J. T. Sobczyk. Electroweak form factors of the ∆(1232)

resonance. Phys. Rev. D, 90(9):093001, 2014.

[98] C. Berger and L. M. Sehgal. PCAC and coherent pion production by low energy neutrinos.

Phys. Rev. D, 79:053003, 2009.

[99] M. Gl¨

uck, E. Reya, and A. Vogt. Dynamical parton distributions revisited. Eur. Phys. J. C,

5:461–470, 1998.

[100] A. Bodek, and U. K. Yang. Modeling neutrino and electron scattering cross-sections in the

few GeV region with effective LO PDFs. AIP Conf. Proc., 670(1):110–117, 2003.

[101] K. Niwa et al.

Auto scanning and measuring system for the emulsion chamber.

In

Proc. Int. Cosmic Ray Symp. High Energy Phenomena, page 149, 1974.

[102] S. Aoki, K. Hoshino, M. Nakamura, K. Niu, K. Niwa, and N. Torii. The Fully Automated

Emulsion Analysis System. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 51:466–472, 1990.

[103] 中野敏行. 原子核乾板の自動解析. PhD thesis, 名古屋大学, 1997.

[104] K. Morishima and T. Nakano. Development of a new automatic nuclear emulsion scanning

system, S-UTS, with continuous 3D tomographic image read-out. J. Instrum., 5:P04011, 2010.

[105] M. Yoshimoto, T. Nakano, R. Komatani, and H. Kawahara. Hyper-track selector nuclear

223

emulsion readout system aimed at scanning an area of one thousand square meters. Prog.

Theor. Exp. Phys., 2017(10):103H01, 2017.

[106] T. Fukuda, S. Fukunaga, H. Ishida, K. Kodama, T. Matsuo, S. Mikado, S. Ogawa, H. Shibuya,

and J. Sudo. Automatic scanning of nuclear emulsions with wide-angle acceptance for nuclear

fragment detection. JINST, 8:P01023, 2013.

[107] T. Fukuda et al. Automatic track recognition for large-angle minimum ionizing particles in

nuclear emulsions. J. Instrum., 9(12):P12017, 2014.

[108] T. Matsuo, H. Shibuya, S. Ogawa, T. Fukuda, and S. Mikado. Large angle tracking and high

discriminating tracking in nuclear emulsion. Radiat. Meas., 83:41, 2015.

[109] H. Ishida et al. Study of hadron interactions in a lead–emulsion target. PTEP, 2014(9):093C01,

2014.

[110] T. Toshito et al. Charge identification of highly ionizing particles in desensitized nuclear

emulsion using high speed read-out system. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 556:482–489, 2006.

[111] Y. Suzuki, T. Fukuda, H. Kawahara, R. Komatani, M. Naiki, T. Nakano, T. Odagawa, and

M. Yoshimoto. Wide angle acceptance and high-speed track recognition in nuclear emulsion.

PTEP, 2022(6):063H01, 2022.

...