1. Horton W. 1999 Drift waves and transport. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 735–778. (doi:10.1103/
RevModPhys.71.735)
2. Horton W. 2012 Turbulent transport in magnetized plasmas. Singapore: World Scientific.
3. Wesson J, Campbell DJ. 2004 Tokamaks, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Coppy B. 1988 Transfer matrix method for a semi-infinite layered electron gas. Phys. Lett. A
128, 198–202. (doi:10.1016/0375-9601(88)90909-7)
5. Ryter F et al. 2001 Confinement and transport studies of conventional scenarios in ASDEX
Upgrade. Nucl. Fusion 41, 537–550. (doi:10.1088/0029-5515/41/5/307)
6. Gabert X et al. 2004 Profile stiffness and global confinement. Plasma Phys. Control Fusion 46,
1351. (doi:10.1088/0741-3335/46/9/002)
7. Dnestrovskij YN et al. 2010 Application of canonical profiles transport model to the H-mode
shots in tokamaks. Plasma, Phys. Rep. 36, 645–658. (doi:10.1134/S1063780X10080015)
8. Baiocchi B et al. 2012 Numerical analysis of the impact of the ion threshold, ion stiffness
and temperature pedestal on global confinement and fusion performance in JET and in ITER
plasmas. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 54, 085020. (doi:10.1088/0741-3335/54/8/085020)
9. Urano H et al. 2013 Hydrogen isotope effects on ITG scale length, pedestal and confinement
in JT-60 H-mode plasmas. Nucl. Fusion 53, 083003. (doi:10.1088/0029-5515/53/8/083003)
10. Sauter O et al. 2014 On the non-stiffness of edge transport in L-mode tokamak plasmas. Phys.
Plasmas 21, 055906. (doi:10.1063/1.4876612)
11. Kim JY, Han HS, Terzolo L. 2017 Physics-based integrated modeling of the energy
confinement time scaling laws for the H- and L-modes in the KSTAR-type tokamak model.
Nucl. Fusion 57, 076012. (doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aa623b)
12. Kishimoto Y et al. 1996 Self-organized critical gradient transport and shear flow effects for
ion temperature gradient (ITG) mode in toroidal plasmas, Nuclear Fusion Supplement. In
Proc. of 15th Int. Conf. on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Vol. 3, pp.
299–307. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
13. Hasegawa A, Wakatani M. 1987 Self-organization of electrostatic turbulence in a cylindrical
plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1581–1584. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1581)
14. Chen L et al. 2000 Excitation of zonal flow by drift waves in toroidal plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 7,
3129–3132. (doi:10.1063/1.874222)
15. Diamond PH et al. 2005 Zonal flows in plasma—a review. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47,
R35.
16. Li JQ, Kishimoto Y. 2005 Role of magnetic shear in large-scale structure formation in electron
temperature gradient driven turbulence. Phys. Plasmas 12, 054505. (doi:10.1063/1.1897386)
17. Hallatschek K, Biskamp D. 2001 Transport control by coherent zonal flows in the core/edge
transitional regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1223–1226. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1223)
...............................................................
Data accessibility. This article has no additional data.
Authors’ contributions. Y.K.: project administration, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing; K.I.:
18
royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381: 20210231
the core temperature despite the stronger constraint in the core region. As the physical mechanism
to weaken the constraint in high input power regime, we considered the slower time scale
evolution of E × B shear layers downward, which transfers the density perturbation across the
knee to outer region and enhances the effective shearing rate there. The effect of input power
on the dynamics of E × B shear layers is of specific importance and more detailed study for how
micro-scale and/or meso-scale dynamics of E × B shear layers impact the global profile formation
and relaxation.
...............................................................
Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 04 June 2023
19
royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381: 20210231
18. Miyato N et al. 2004 Global structure of zonal flow and electromagnetic ion temperature
gradient driven turbulence in tokamak plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 11, 5557–5564. (doi:10.1063/
1.1811088)
19. Kim EJ, Diamond P. 2003 Mean shear flows, zonal flows, and generalized Kelvin–Helmholtz
modes in drift wave turbulence: a minimal model for L→H transition. Phys. Plasmas 10,
1698–1704. (doi:10.1063/1.1559006)
20. Hahm TS, Diamond PH. 2018 Mesoscopic transport events and the breakdown of Fick’s law
for turbulent fluxes. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 73, 747–792. (doi:10.3938/jkps.73.747)
21. Hahm TS, Diamond PH, Lin Z, Itoh K, Itoh SI. 2004 Turbulence spreading into the
linearly stable zone and transport scaling. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 46, A323–A333.
(doi:10.1088/0741-3335/46/5A/036)
22. Lin Z, Ethier S, Hahm TS, Tang WM. 2002 Size scaling of turbulent transport in magnetically
confined plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 195004. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.195004)
23. Yi S, Kwon JM, Diamond PH, Hahm TS. 2015 Turbulence spreading as a non-local mechanism
of global confinement degradation and ion temperature profile stiffness. Nucl. Fusion 55,
092002. (doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/9/092002)
24. Carreras BA, Newman D, Lynch VE, Diamond PH. 1996 A model realization of self-organized
criticality for plasma confinement. Phys. Plasmas 3, 2903–2911. (doi:10.1063/1.871650)
25. Idomura Y, Urano H, Aiba N, Tokuda S. 2009 Study of ion turbulent transport and
profile formations using global gyrokinetic full-f Vlasov simulation. Nucl. Fusion 49, 065029.
(doi:10.1088/0029-5515/49/6/065029)
26. Sarazin Y et al. 2010 Large scale dynamics in flux driven gyrokinetic turbulence. Nucl. Fusion
50, 054004. (doi:10.1088/0029-5515/50/5/054004)
27. Pan O O et al. 2015 Evidence of enhanced self-organized criticality (SOC) dynamics during
the radially non-local transient transport in the HL-2A tokamak. Nucl. Fusion 55, 113010.
(doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/11/113010)
28. Choi MJ et al. 2019 Experimental observation of the non-diffusive avalanche-like electron heat
transport events and their dynamical interaction with the shear flow structure. Nucl. Fusion
59, 086027. (doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab247d)
29. Wang W, Kishimoto Y, Imadera K, Liu HR, Li JQ, Yagi M, Wang ZX. 2020 Statistical study
for ITG turbulent transport in flux-driven tokamak plasmas based on global gyro-kinetic
simulation. Nucl. Fusion 60, 066010. (doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab7892)
30. Dif-Pradalier G et al. 2010 On the validity of the local diffusive paradigm in turbulent plasma
transport. Phys. Rev. E 82, 025401. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.025401)
31. Dif-Pradalier G et al. 2015 Finding the elusive: E×B staircase in magnetized plasmas. Phys.
Rev. Lett. 114, 085004. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.085004)
32. Qi L, Choi MJ, Kwon JM, Hahm TS. 2021 Role of zonal flow staircase in electron
heat avalanches in KSTAR L-mode plasmas. Nucl. Fusion 61, 026010. (doi:10.1088/17414326/abc976)
33. Wang W, Kishimoto Y, Imadera K, Li JQ, Wang ZX. 2018 A mechanism for the formation
and sustainment of the self-organized global profile and<missing element: E×B staircase in
tokamak plasmas. Nucl. Fusion 58, 056005. (doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aab032)
34. Milovanov AV, Rasmussen JJ, Dif-Pradalier G. 2021 Self-consistent model of the plasma
staircase and nonlinear Schrödinger equation with subquadratic power nonlinearity. Phys.
Rev. E 103, 052218. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.052218)
35. Choi MC, Park SY. 2022 Hybrid improper ferroelectricity in A-cation ordered perovskite
BaSrBi2 O6 . J. Korean Phys. Soc. 81, 790–795. (doi:10.1007/s40042-022-00616-6)
36. Ashourvan A, Diamond PH. 2016 How mesoscopic staircases condense to macroscopic
barriers in confined plasma turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 94, 051202. (doi:10.1103/
PhysRevE.94.051202)
37. Terry PW, Diamond PH, Hahm TS. 1990 The structure and dynamics of electrostatic and
magnetostatic drift holes. Phys. Fluids B 2, 2048. (doi:10.1063/1.859426)
38. Lesur M, Diamond PH, Kosuga Y. 2014 Nonlinear current-driven ion-acoustic instability
driven by phase-space structures. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 56, 075005. (doi:10.1088/
0741-3335/56/7/075005)
39. Kishimoto Y et al. 2016 Characteristics of turbulent transport in flux-driven toroidal plasmas.
In Proc. of 26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 17–22 October 2016. New York, NY:
42.
Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 04 June 2023
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
...............................................................
41.
20
royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381: 20210231
40.
IAEA. (https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/fusionportal/Shared%20Documents/FEC%202016/
fec2016-preprints/preprint0601.pdf)
Obrejan K, Imadera K, Li J, Kishimoto Y. 2017 Development of a new zonal flow equation
solver by diagonalisation and its application in non-circular cross-section tokamak plasmas.
Comput. Phys. Commun. 216, 8–17. (doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.02.010)
Imadera K et al. 2016 ITB formation in gyrokinetic flux-driven ITG turbulence.
In Proc. of 26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Kyoto, Japan 17–22, October 2016.
New York, NY: IAEA. (https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/fusionportal/Shared%20Documents/
FEC%202016/fec2016-preprints/preprint0586.pdf)
Kikuchi M, Azumi M. 2012 Steady-state tokamak research: core physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84,
1807–1854. (doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1807)
Imadera K, Kishimoto Y, Li J. 2010 Global profile relaxation and entropy dynamics in
turbulent transport. Plasma Fusion Res. 5, 019. (doi:10.1585/pfr.5.019)
Muto M, Imadera K, Kishimoto Y. 2021 Gyrokinetic entropy balances and dynamics in
toroidal flux-driven ITG turbulence. Phys. Plasmas 28, 082304. (doi:10.1063/5.0056058)
Gorler T, White AE, Told D, Jenko F, Holland C, Rhodes TL. 2014 A flux-matched gyrokinetic
analysis of DIII-D L-mode turbulence. Phys. Plasmas 21, 122307. (doi:10.1063/1.4904301)
Nakata M, Honda M, Yoshida M, Urano H, Nunami M, Maeyama S, Watanabe
TH, Sugama H. 2016 Validation studies of gyrokinetic ITG and TEM turbulence
simulations in a JT-60U tokamak using multiple flux matching. Nucl. Fusion 56, 086010.
(doi:10.1088/0029-5515/56/8/086010)
Rhodes TL et al. 2011 L-mode validation studies of gyrokinetic turbulence simulations via
multiscale and multifield turbulence measurements on the DIII-D tokamak. Nucl. Fusion 51,
063022. (doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/6/063022)
Imadera K et al. 2014 Global profile relaxation coupled with E x B staircase in toroidal fluxdriven ITG turbulence. In Proc. of 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Saint Petersburg, Russia,
13–18 October 2014. New York, NY: IAEA. (http://www-naweb.iaea.org/napc/physics/
FEC/FEC2014/fec2014-preprints/410_THP58.pdf).
Kim JY, Kishimoto Y, Wakatani M, Tajima T. 1996 Poloidal shear flow effect on toroidal
ion temperature gradient mode: a theory and simulation. Phys. Plasmas 3, 3689–3695.
(doi:10.1063/1.871939)
Kishimoto Y, Kim JY, Horton W, Tajima T, LeBrun MJ, Shirai H. 1999 Toroidal mode structure
in weak and reversed magnetic shear plasmas and its role in the internal transport barrier.
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 41, A663–A678. (doi:10.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/060)
Connor JW, Hastie RJ, Taylor JB. 1978 Shear, periodicity, and plasma ballooning modes. Phys.
Rev. Lett. 40, 396–399. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.396)
Camenen1 Y, Idomura Y, Jolliet S, Peeters AG. 2011 Consequences of profile shearing on
toroidal momentum transport. Nucl. Fusion 51, 073039. (doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/7/073039)
Kishimoto Y, Tajima T, Horton W, LeBrun MJ, Kim JY. 1996 Theory of self-organized critical
transport in tokamak plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 3, 1289–1307. (doi:10.1063/1.871754)
Imadera K, Kishimoto Y. 2020 Spontaneous ITB formation in gyrokinetic flux-driven
ITG/TEM turbulence. In Proc. of 28th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Virtual Event, 10–15 May
2021. New York, NY: IAEA. (https://conferences.iaea.org/event/214/contributions/17062/
contribution.pdf).
Ishizawa A, Imadera K, Nakamura Y, Kishimoto Y. 2019 Global gyrokinetic simulation
of turbulence driven by kinetic ballooning mode. Phys. Plasmas 26, 082301. (doi:10.1063/
1.5100308)
...