リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Cine magnetic resonance imaging provides novel predictors of early continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: Assessment of the dynamics of pelvic floor muscles」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Cine magnetic resonance imaging provides novel predictors of early continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: Assessment of the dynamics of pelvic floor muscles

志村 寛史 山梨大学 DOI:info:doi/10.34429/00005155

2022.03.18

概要

(Aims)
Postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) is a major complication of prostatectomy. Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) can successfully treat PPI, evidence for how muscle movement affects continence recovery is lacking. Cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides dynamic information as consecutive images with high accuracy and high reproducibility. It would be suitable for monitoring the pelvic floor muscle motion. We evaluated dynamic factors of prostatectomy patients using cine MRI to identify risk factors for PPI and reveal the contribution of pelvic floor muscles to continence recovery.

(Methods)
A total of 128 prostate cancer patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery were enrolled. Cine MRI was performed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Continence was defined as pad-free or use of safety pads. During scanning, we measured some parameters at resting phase, voiding phase, and PFMT phase. We newly defined the bladder neck elevation distance during pelvic floor muscle training as the bladder elevation distance (BED). Other static or dynamic parameters were also measured. Patients with continence recovery within 1 month comprised the continence group (n=48); other patients comprised the incontinence group (n=80). We analyzed the parameters between two groups using Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square test, and between pre-post operations using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Preoperative parameters were also analyzed using multivariable analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was also applied for preoperative BED.

(Results)
In the two groups, there was no significant difference in any parameters of patient characteristics, perioperative data, pathological results and with or without nerve-sparing technique. In the continence group, preoperative BED was significantly longer than in the incontinence group (10.4 vs 8.2 mm; P<0.001). Postoperative BED of the continence group also tended to be longer (9.9 vs 8.0 mm; P=0.057). Only in postoperative state, posterior urethrovesical angle (PUVA) of the continence group was significantly smaller than the incontinence group at both resting and voiding phase (130 vs 135 °; P=0.005, 138 vs 143 °; P=0.026). Postoperative membranous urethral length (MUL) of the continence group was significantly longer (14.5 vs 12.4 mm; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative BED significantly contributed to getting recovery of continence (HR=0.96; P=0.016). Patients with longer preoperative BED (>8.5mm) got recovery of continence significantly faster than patients with shorter (<8.5mm) (log-rank test; P=0.038).

(Discussion)
Preoperative BED could be a great predictor for early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. This parameter is acquired from dynamic and highly accurate data of cine MRI. Moreover, cine MRI could detect not only anatomical features, but also actual function of pelvic floor muscle. We and the patient can consider his own risk of PPI using cine MRI. Moreover, long BED might indicate better PFMT, and PFMT biofeedback using cine MRI has a potential to achieve early recovery of continence. Some reports demonstrated that smaller PUVA made recovery of continence earlier, and the results of the present study supported the theory. Surgical effort to preserve MUL would also result in preventing PUVA opened.

(Conclusion)
A novel dynamic parameter of BED was strongly related to recovery of early continence after radical prostatectomy. This is the first study to show that cine MRI is useful for digitizing the level of PMFT skill and predicting the risk of PPI.

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

参考文献

1. Costello AJ. Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(3): 177‐188.

2. Namiki S, Kaiho Y, Mitsuzuka K, et al. Long‐term quality of life after radical prostatectomy: 8‐year longitudinal study in Japan. Int J Urol. 2014;21(12):1220‐1226.

3. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta‐ analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405‐417.

4. Sammon JD, Sharma P, Trinh QD, Ghani KR, Sukumar S, Menon M. Predictors of immediate continence following robot‐ assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2013;27(4):442‐446.

5. Mungovan SF, Sandhu JS, Akin O, Smart NA, Graham PL, Patel MI. Preoperative membranous urethral length mea- surement and continence recovery following radical prosta- tectomy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):368‐378.

6. Song W, Kim CK, Park BK, et al. Impact of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length measured by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on urinary continence re- covery after robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(3‐4):E93‐E99.

7. Ko YH, Huynh LM, See K, Lall C, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Impact of surgically maximized versus native membranous ure- thral length on 30‐day and long‐term pad‐free continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Int. 2020;8(2):55‐61.

8. Chang JI, Lam V, Patel MI. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise and postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):460‐467.

9. Yoshida M, Matsunaga A, Igawa Y, et al. May perioperative ultrasound‐guided pelvic floor muscle training promote early recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy? Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(1):158‐164.

10. Doorbar‐Baptist S, Adams R, Rebbeck T. Ultrasound‐based motor control training for the pelvic floor pre‐ and post‐ prostatectomy: Scoring reliability and skill acquisition. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(4):296‐302.

11. Huh JS, Kim YJ, Kim SD, Park KK. The effectiveness of cystography‐measured bladder neck elevation at predicting the return of continence after robot‐assisted radical prosta- tectomy. Int Neurourol J. 2019;23(3):234‐239.

12. Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Janssen U, Grosch E, Pellengahr C, Anthuber C. Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine‐MRI: which reference line should be used? Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(1):33‐37.

13. Colaiacomo MC, Masselli G, Polettini E, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):e35.

14. Fujisaki A, Shigeta M, Shimoinaba M, Yoshimura Y. Influence of adequate pelvic floor muscle contraction on the movement of the coccyx during pelvic floor muscle training. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(4):544‐548.

15. Suskind AM, DeLancey JO, Hussain HK, Montgomery JS, Latini JM, Cameron AP. Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post‐radical prostatectomy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(3):312‐315.

16. Satake Y, Kaiho Y, Saito H, et al. Estimated minimal re- sidual membranous urethral length on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can be a new predictor for continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2018;112: 138‐144.

17. Kitamura K, China T, Kanayama M, et al. Significant asso- ciation between urethral length measured by magnetic re- sonance imaging and urinary continence recovery after robot‐ assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Int. 2019;7(2):54‐59.

18. Pontbriand‐Drolet S, Tang A, Madill SJ, et al. Differences in pelvic floor morphology between continent, stress urinary incontinent, and mixed urinary incontinent elderly women: An MRI study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(4):515‐521.

19. Kojima Y, Hamakawa T, Kubota Y, et al. Bladder neck sling suspension during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early return of urinary continence: a comparative analysis. Urology. 2014;83(3):632‐639.

20. Matsushita K, Kent MT, Vickers AJ, et al. Preoperative pre- dictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2015;116(4):577‐583.

21. Pavlovich CP, Rocco B, Druskin SC, Davis JW. Urinary con- tinence recovery after radical prostatectomy ‐ anatomical/re- constructive and nerve‐sparing techniques to improve outcomes. BJU Int. 2017;120(2):185‐196.

22. Nakane A, Kubota H, Noda Y, et al. Improvement in early urinary continence recovery after robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy based on postoperative pelvic anatomic fea- tures: a retrospective review. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):87.

23. Mariotti G, Salciccia S, Innocenzi M, et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy using early vs late pelvic floor electrical stimulation and biofeedback‐associated treatment. Urology. 2015;86(1):115‐120.

24. Fernandez‐Cuadros ME, Nieto‐Blasco J, Geanini‐Yaguez A, Ciprian‐Nieto D, Padilla‐Fernandez B, Lorenzo‐Gomez MF. Male urinary incontinence: associated risk factors and elec- tromyography biofeedback results in quality of life. Am J Men's Health. 2016;10(6):NP127‐NP135.

25. Sugi M, Kinoshita H, Yoshida T, et al. The narrow vesicour- ethral angle measured on postoperative cystography can pre- dict urinary incontinence after robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol. 2018;52(2):151‐156.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る