1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
FAOSTAT. 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 20 September 2019).
Goto, T.; Fernandes, A.F.A.; Tsudzuki, M.; Rosa, G.J.M. Causal phenotypic networks for egg traits in an F2
chicken population. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hunger Map. 2018. Available online: https://www.wfp.org/content/2018-hunger-map (accessed on
20 September 2019).
Kralik, G.; Kralik, Z. Poultry products enriched with nutricines have beneficial effects on human health.
Med. Glas. 2017, 14, 1–7. [CrossRef]
Laudodio, V.; Lorusso, V.; Lastella, N.M.B.; Dhama, K.; Karthik, K.; Tiwari, R.; Alam, G.M.; Tufarelli, V.
Enhancement of nutraceutical value of table eggs through poultry feeding strategies. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 11,
201–212. [CrossRef]
Rajasekaran, A.; Kalaivani, M. Designer foods and their benefits: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50,
1–16. [CrossRef]
Zaheer, K. An updated review on chicken eggs: Production, consumption, management aspects and
nutritional benefits to human health. Food Nutr. Sci. 2015, 6, 1208–1220. [CrossRef]
Metabolites 2019, 9, 224
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
11 of 12
Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; Dhama, K.; Patra, A. Nutritional significance and health benefits of designer
eggs. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 317–330. [CrossRef]
Roberts, J. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 41,
161–177. [CrossRef]
Wilson, P.B. Recent advances in avian egg science: A review. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 3747–3754. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Goto, T.; Tsudzuki, M. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for egg production and egg quality traits in
chickens: A review. J. Poult. Sci. 2017, 54, 0160121. [CrossRef]
Wolc, A.; White, I.M.S.; Hill, W.G.; Olori, V.E. Inheritance of hatchability in broiler chickens and its relationship
to egg quality traits. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2334–2340. [CrossRef]
Wolc, A.; Arango, J.; Settar, P.; O’Sullivan, N.P.; Olori, V.E.; White, I.M.S.; Hill, W.G.; Dekkers, J.C.M. Genetic
parameters of egg defects and egg quality in layer chickens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 1292–1298. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Zhang, L.C.; Ning, Z.H.; Xu, G.Y.; Hou, Z.C.; Yang, N. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations
of egg quality traits in brown-egg dwarf layers. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 1209–1213. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fraeye, I.; Bruneel, C.; Lemahieu, C.; Buyse, J.; Muylaert, K.; Foubert, I. Dietary enrichment of eggs with
omega-3 fatty acids: A review. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 961–969. [CrossRef]
Surai, P.F.; Sparks, N.H.C. Designer eggs: From improvement of egg composition to functional food. Trends.
Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 7–16. [CrossRef]
Yin, J.D.; Shang, X.G.; Li, D.F.; Wang, F.L.; Guan, Y.F.; Wang, Z.Y. Effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on
the fatty acid profile and cholesterol content of egg yolks from different breeds of layers. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87,
284–290. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mori, H.; Takaya, M.; Nishimura, K.; Goto, T. Breed and feed affect amino acid contents of egg yolk and
eggshell color in chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019. [CrossRef]
Weckwerth, W. Metabolomics in systems biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 669–689. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Griffiths, W.J.; Koal, T.; Wang, Y.; Kohl, M.; Enot, D.P.; Deigner, H.P. Targeted metabolomics for biomarker
discovery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 26, 5426–5445. [CrossRef]
Li, B.; He, X.; Jia, W.; Li, H. Novel applications of metabolomics in personalized medicine: A mini-review.
Molecules 2017, 22, 1173. [CrossRef]
Wishart, D.S. Metabolomics: Applications to food science and nutrition research. Trends Food Sci. Technol.
2008, 19, 482–493. [CrossRef]
Cubero-Leon, E.; Peñalver, R.; Maquet, A. Review on metabolomics for food authentication. Food Res. Int.
2014, 60, 95–107. [CrossRef]
Bundy, J.G.; Davey, M.P.; Viant, M.R. Environmental metabolomics: A critical review and future perspectives.
Metabolomics 2009, 5, 3. [CrossRef]
Macel, M.; Van Dam, N.M.; Keurentjes, J.J. Metabolomics: The chemistry between ecology and genetics.
Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 583–593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goto, T.; Kubota, Y.; Toyoda, A. Plasma and liver metabolic profiles in mice subjected to subchronic and mild
social defeat stress. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 1025–1032. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goto, T.; Tomonaga, S.; Toyoda, A. Effects of diet quality and psychosocial stress on the metabolic profiles of
mice. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 1857–1867. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goldansaz, S.A.; Guo, A.C.; Sajed, T.; Steele, M.A.; Plastow, G.S.; Wishart, D.S. Livestock metabolomics and
the livestock metabolome: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177675. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Takemoto, S.; Tomonaga, S.; Funaba, M.; Matsui, T. Effect of long-distance transportation on serum metabolic
profiles of steer calves. Anim. Sci. J. 2017, 88, 1970–1978. [CrossRef]
Tomonaga, S.; Okuyama, H.; Tachibana, T.; Makino, R. Effects of high ambient temperature on plasma
metabolomic profiles in chicks. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 448–455. [CrossRef]
Wishart, D.S.; Feunang, Y.D.; Marcu, A.; Guo, A.C.; Liang, K.; Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Sajed, T.; Johnson, D.;
Li, C.; Karu, N.; et al. HMDB 4.0: The human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acid Res. 2017, 46,
D608–D617. [CrossRef]
Goto, T.; Ishikawa, A.; Nishibori, M.; Tsudzuki, M. A longitudinal quantitative trait locus mapping of chicken
growth traits. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 294, 243–252. [CrossRef]
Metabolites 2019, 9, 224
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
12 of 12
Goto, T.; Ishikawa, A.; Yoshida, M.; Goto, N.; Umino, T.; Nishibori, M.; Tsudzuki, M. Quantitative trait loci
mapping for external egg traits in F2 chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2014, 51, 118–129. [CrossRef]
Goto, T.; Shiraishi, J.I.; Bungo, T.; Tsudzuki, M. Characteristics of egg-related traits in the Onagadori (Japanese
Extremely Long Tail) breed of chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2015, 52, 81–87. [CrossRef]
Sirri, F.; Zampiga, M.; Berardinelli, A.; Meluzzi, A. Variability and interaction of some egg physical and
eggshell quality attributes during the entire laying hen cycle. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 1818–1823. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Grembecka, M. Sugar alcohols—their role in the modern world of sweeteners: A review. Eur. Food Res. Technol.
2015, 241, 1–14. [CrossRef]
Wisselink, H.W.; Weusthuis, R.A.; Eggink, G.; Hugenholtz, J.; Grobben, G. Mannitol production by lactic acid
bacteria: A review. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 151–161. [CrossRef]
Bernt, W.O.; Borzelleca, J.F.; Flamm, G.; Munro, I.C. Erythritol: A review of biological and toxicological
studies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1996, 24, S191–S197. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Malcicka, M.; Visser, B.; Ellers, J. An evolutionary perspective on linoleic acid synthesis in animals. Evol. Biol.
2018, 45, 15–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Abedi, E.; Sahari, M.A. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid sources and evaluation of their nutritional
and functional properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 443–463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stanislaus, A.; Guo, K.; Li, L. Development of an isotope labeling ultra-high performance liquid
chromatography mass spectrometric method for quantification of acylglycines in human urine.
Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 750, 161–172. [CrossRef]
Cermáková,
M.; Pelantová, H.; Neprašová, B.; Šedivá, B.; Maletínská, L.; Kuneš, J.; Tomášová, P.; Železná, B.;
Kuzma, M. Metabolomic study of obesity and its treatment with palmitoylated prolactin-releasing peptide
analog in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 1735–1750. [CrossRef]
Lai, Z.; Tsugawa, H.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Mehta, S.; Mueller, M.; Zheng, Y.; Ogiwara, A.; Meissen, J.;
Showalter, M.; Takeuchi, K.; et al. Identifying metabolites by integrating metabolome databases with mass
spectrometry cheminformatics. Nat. Methods 2018, 15, 53–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tsugawa, H.; Kanazawa, M.; Ogiwara, A.; Arita, M. MRMPROBS suite for metabolomics using large-scale
MRM assays. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2379–2380. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Olejnik, S.; Algina, J. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common
research designs. Psychol. Methods 2003, 4, 434–447. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Franz, V.H.; Loftus, G.R. Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: Generalizing
Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2012, 19,
395–404. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nikiforuk, A.; Potasiewicz, A.; Kos, T.; Popik, P. The combination of memantine and galantamine improves
cognition in rats: The synergistic role of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine and NMDA receptors. Behav. Brain Res.
2016, 313, 214–218. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
R Core Team. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing:
Vienna, Austria, 2019; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 20 September 2019).
Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to
multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 298–300. [CrossRef]
McClay, J.L.; Adkins, D.E.; Vunck, S.A.; Batman, A.M.; Vann, R.E.; Clark, S.L.; Beardsley, P.M.; van den
Oord, E.J. Large-scale neurochemical metabolomics analysis identifies multiple compounds associated with
methamphetamine exposure. Metabolomics 2013, 9, 392–402. [CrossRef]
Pedersen, H.K.; Gudmundsdottir, V.; Nielsen, H.B.; Hyotylainen, T.; Nielsen, T.; Jensen, B.A.; Forslund, K.;
Hildebrand, F.; Prifti, E.; Falony, G.; et al. Human gut microbes impact host serum metabolome and insulin
sensitivity. Nature 2016, 535, 376–381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
...
論文の公開元へ
