1. Sancho, M. et al. Competitive interactions eliminate unfit embryonic stem cells at the onset of differentiation. Dev. Cell 26, 19–30
(2013).
2. Clavería, C., Giovinazzo, G., Sierra, R. & Torres, M. Myc-driven endogenous cell competition in the early mammalian embryo.
Nature 500, 39–44 (2013).
3. Sasaki, A. et al. Obesity suppresses cell-competition-mediated apical elimination of RasV12-transformed cells from epithelial
tissues. Cell Rep. 23, 974–982 (2018).
4. Ellis, S. J. et al. Distinct modes of cell competition shape mammalian tissue morphogenesis. Nature 3, 497–502 (2019).
5. Villa Del Campo, C. et al. Myc overexpression enhances of epicardial contribution to the developing heart and promotes extensive
expansion of the cardiomyocyte population. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–12 (2016).
6. Yamaguchi, Y. & Miura, M. Programmed cell death in neurodevelopment. Dev. Cell 32, 478–490 (2015).
7. Muñoz-Espín, D. et al. XProgrammed cell senescence during mammalian embryonic development. Cell 155, 1104–1118 (2013).
8. Davaapil, H., Brockes, J. P. & Yun, M. H. Conserved and novel functions of programmed cellular senescence during vertebrate
development. Development 144, 106–114 (2017).
9. Brown, S. et al. Correction of aberrant growth preserves tissue homeostasis. Nature 548, 334–337 (2017).
10. Clavería, C. & Torres, M. Cell competition: mechanisms and physiological roles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 411–439 (2016).
Scientific Reports |
Vol:.(1234567890)
(2020) 10:18044 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74874-4
12
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
11. Martins, V. C. et al. Cell competition is a tumour suppressor mechanism in the thymus. Nature 509, 465–470 (2014).
12. Morata, G. & Ripoll, P. Minutes: mutants of Drosophila autonomously affecting cell division rate. Dev. Biol. 42, 211–221 (1975).
13. Oliver, E. R., Saunders, T. L., Tarlé, S. A. & Glaser, T. Ribosomal protein L24 defect in belly spot and tail (Bst), a mouse minute.
Development 131, 3907–3920 (2004).
14. Penzo-Méndez, A. I., Chen, Y. J., Li, J., Witze, E. S. & Stanger, B. Z. Spontaneous cell competition in immortalized mammalian cell
lines. PLoS ONE 10, 1–18 (2015).
15. Rhiner, C. et al. Flower forms an extracellular code that reveals the fitness of a cell to its neighbors in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 18,
985–998 (2010).
16. Portela, M. et al. Drosophila SPARC is a self-protective signal expressed by loser cells during cell competition. Dev. Cell 19, 562–573
(2010).
17. Li, W. & Baker, N. E. The active role of corpse engulfment pathways during cell competition. Fly (Austin) 1, 274–278 (2007).
18. Johnston, L. A. Socializing with MYC: cell competition in development and as a model for premalignant cancer. Cold Spring Harb.
Perspect. Med. 4, 1–15 (2014).
19. Moreno, E. & Basler, K. dMyc transforms cells into super-competitors. Cell 117, 117–129 (2004).
20. Hogan, C. et al. Characterization of the interface between normal and transformed epithelial cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 460–467
(2009).
21. Vidal, M., Larson, D. E. & Cagan, R. L. Csk-deficient boundary cells are eliminated from normal drosophila epithelia by exclusion,
migration, and apoptosis. Dev. Cell 10, 33–44 (2006).
22. Tamori, Y. & Deng, W. M. Tissue repair through cell competition and compensatory cellular hypertrophy in postmitotic epithelia.
Dev. Cell 25, 350–363 (2013).
23. Kadeer, A. et al. Plectin is a novel regulator for apical extrusion of RasV12-transformed cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–11 (2017).
24. Cox, A. D. & Der, C. J. Ras history: the saga continues. Small GTPases 1, 2–27 (2010).
25. Hobbs, G. A., Der, C. J. & Rossman, K. L. RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 129, 1287–1292 (2016).
26. Serrano, M., Lin, A. W., McCurrach, M. E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S. W. Oncogenic RAS provokes premature cell senescence associated
with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997).
27. Tano, A. et al. The juvenility-associated long noncoding RNA Gm14230 maintains cellular juvenescence. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs227801
(2019).
28. Kadota, Y. et al. Srsf7 establishes the juvenile transcriptome through age-dependent alternative splicing in Mice. iScience 23, 100929
(2020).
29. Jam, F. A., Kadota, Y., Mendsaikhan, A., Tooyama, I. & Mori, M. Identification of juvenility-associated genes in the mouse hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–5 (2018).
30. Kolahgar, G. et al. Cell competition modifies adult stem cell and tissue population dynamics in a JAK-STAT-dependent manner.
Dev. Cell 34, 297–309 (2015).
31. Goldstein, J. C. et al. Cytochrome c is released in a single step during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 12, 453–462 (2005).
32. Norman, M. et al. Loss of scribble causes cell competition in mammalian cells. J. Cell Sci. 125, 59–66 (2012).
33. Risso, G., Pelisch, F., Quaglino, A., Pozzi, B. & Srebrow, A. Critical review regulating the regulators: serine/arginine-rich proteins
under scrutiny. IUBMB Life https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1075 (2012).
34. Chen, Y. et al. Mutually exclusive acetylation and ubiquitylation of the splicing factor SRSF5 control tumor growth. Nat. Commun.
9, 1–21 (2018).
35. Nonaka, S., Shiratsuchi, A., Nagaosa, K. & Nakanishi, Y. Mechanisms and significance of phagocytic elimination of cells undergoing
apoptotic death. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 40, 1819–1827 (2017).
36. Moreno, E. Is cell competition relevant to cancer?. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 141–147 (2008).
37. Hashimoto, M. & Sasaki, H. Epiblast formation by TEAD-YAP-dependent expression of pluripotency factors and competitive
elimination of unspecified cells. Dev. Cell 50, 139-154.e5 (2019).
38. Mamada, H., Sato, T., Ota, M. & Sasaki, H. Cell competition in mouse NIH3T3 embryonic fibroblasts is controlled by the activity
of Tead family proteins and Myc. J. Cell Sci. 128, 790–803 (2015).
39. Bowling, S., Lawlor, K. & Rodríguez, T. A. Cell competition: the winners and losers of fitness selection. Development 146(13),
dev167486 (2019).
40. Gimple, R. C. & Wang, X. RAS: striking at the core of the oncogenic circuitry. Front. Oncol. 9, 1–16 (2019).
41. Guha, A., Feldkamp, M. M., Lau, N., Boss, G. & Pawson, A. Proliferation of human malignant astrocytomas is dependent on RAS
activation. Oncogene 15, 2755–2765 (1997).
42. Kon, S. et al. Cell competition with normal epithelial cells promotes apical extrusion of transformed cells through metabolic
changes. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 530–541 (2017).
43. Maruyama, T. & Fujita, Y. Cell competition in mammals—novel homeostatic machinery for embryonic development and cancer
prevention. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 48, 106–112 (2017).
44. Lu, Z. et al. Phagocytic activity of neuronal progenitors regulates adult neurogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1076–1084 (2011).
45. Ito, T., Teo, Y. V., Evans, S. A., Neretti, N. & Sedivy, J. M. Regulation of cellular senescence by polycomb chromatin modifiers
through distinct DNA damage- and histone methylation-dependent pathways. Cell Rep. 22, 3480–3492 (2018).
46. Akizu, N. & Martìnez-Balbàs, M. A. EZH2 orchestrates apicobasal polarity and neuroepithelial cell renewal. Neurogenesis 3, 1–7
(2016).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the lab members of the Molecular Neuroscience Research Center (MNRC) for the
helpful discussions and sincere cooperation. This research was supported by the Central Research Laboratory
at Shiga University of medical science (SUMS). M.M. is supported by research grants from the Kato Memorial
Bioscience Foundation, the Japan Epilepsy Research Foundation (JERF), the Hoansha Foundation, MSD Life
Science Foundation, the Ichiro Kanehara Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Sciences and Medical Care,
Japan Brain Foundation, Takeda Science Foundation and the Japan Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus Research
Foundation. This study was supported Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research for Young Scientists from the Japan
Intractable diseases (Nanbyo) Research Foundation. This study was supported by MEXT KAKENHI Grant
Number 15K15387, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 15H01486, 18K07788, and 19H04774, the Leading Initiative
for Excellent Young Researchers (LEADER) 5013323 and Initiative for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (IRUD)
of AMED.
Author contributions
F.A.J and M.M. conceived the project and designed experiments. F.A.J, T.M. and A.Ts. conducted most of the
experiments. A.Ta. and Y.T. conducted gene expression analysis and assisted cell culture experiments. Y.M.
Scientific Reports |
(2020) 10:18044 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74874-4
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
performed flow cytometer experiments. T.Y. assisted confocal imaging and time-lapse video recordings. M.N.
and I.T. assisted in the data analysis and discussed the results with M.M., F.A.J. and M.M. conceived the experiment. F.A.J. and M.M. and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74874-4.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.M.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
© The Author(s) 2020
Scientific Reports |
Vol:.(1234567890)
(2020) 10:18044 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74874-4
14
...