Tree-level S-matrix of superstring field theory with homotopy algebra structure

[1] E. Witten, Interacting Field Theory of Open Superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B 276 (1986) 291

[INSPIRE].

[3] I.Y. Arefeva, P.B. Medvedev and A.P. Zubarev, New Representation for String Field Solves

the Consistency Problem for Open Superstring Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 341 (1990) 464

[INSPIRE].

[4] N. Berkovits, SuperPoincaré invariant superstring field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 450 (1995) 90

[Erratum ibid. 459 (1996) 439] [hep-th/9503099] [INSPIRE].

[5] Y. Okawa and B. Zwiebach, Heterotic string field theory, JHEP 07 (2004) 042

[hep-th/0406212] [INSPIRE].

[6] N. Berkovits, Y. Okawa and B. Zwiebach, WZW-like action for heterotic string field theory,

JHEP 11 (2004) 038 [hep-th/0409018] [INSPIRE].

[7] B. Jurčo and K. Muenster, Type II Superstring Field Theory: Geometric Approach and

Operadic Description, JHEP 04 (2013) 126 [arXiv:1303.2323] [INSPIRE].

[8] Y. Iimori, T. Noumi, Y. Okawa and S. Torii, From the Berkovits formulation to the Witten

formulation in open superstring field theory, JHEP 03 (2014) 044 [arXiv:1312.1677]

[INSPIRE].

[9] T. Erler, S. Konopka and I. Sachs, Resolving Witten’s superstring field theory, JHEP 04

(2014) 150 [arXiv:1312.2948] [INSPIRE].

[10] T. Erler, S. Konopka and I. Sachs, NS-NS Sector of Closed Superstring Field Theory, JHEP

08 (2014) 158 [arXiv:1403.0940] [INSPIRE].

[11] H. Matsunaga, Nonlinear gauge invariance and WZW-like action for NS-NS superstring field

theory, JHEP 09 (2015) 011 [arXiv:1407.8485] [INSPIRE].

[12] A. Sen, Gauge Invariant 1PI Effective Superstring Field Theory: Inclusion of the Ramond

Sector, JHEP 08 (2015) 025 [arXiv:1501.00988] [INSPIRE].

[13] T. Erler, Y. Okawa and T. Takezaki, A∞ structure from the Berkovits formulation of open

superstring field theory, arXiv:1505.01659 [INSPIRE].

[14] T. Erler, S. Konopka and I. Sachs, Ramond Equations of Motion in Superstring Field

Theory, JHEP 11 (2015) 199 [arXiv:1506.05774] [INSPIRE].

[15] A. Sen, BV Master Action for Heterotic and Type II String Field Theories, JHEP 02 (2016)

087 [arXiv:1508.05387] [INSPIRE].

[16] H. Kunitomo and Y. Okawa, Complete action for open superstring field theory, Prog. Theor.

Exp. Phys. 2016 (2016) 023B01 [arXiv:1508.00366] [INSPIRE].

[17] T. Erler, Y. Okawa and T. Takezaki, Complete Action for Open Superstring Field Theory

with Cyclic A∞ Structure, JHEP 08 (2016) 012 [arXiv:1602.02582] [INSPIRE].

– 37 –

JHEP03(2021)193

[2] C.R. Preitschopf, C.B. Thorn and S.A. Yost, Superstring Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 337

(1990) 363 [INSPIRE].

A Self-archived copy in

Kyoto University Research Information Repository

https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp

[18] S. Konopka and I. Sachs, Open Superstring Field Theory on the Restricted Hilbert Space,

JHEP 04 (2016) 164 [arXiv:1602.02583] [INSPIRE].

[19] K. Goto and H. Kunitomo, Construction of action for heterotic string field theory including

the Ramond sector, JHEP 12 (2016) 157 [arXiv:1606.07194] [INSPIRE].

[20] T. Erler, Supersymmetry in Open Superstring Field Theory, JHEP 05 (2017) 113

[arXiv:1610.03251] [INSPIRE].

[21] H. Kunitomo, Space-time supersymmetry in WZW-like open superstring field theory, Prog.

Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017 (2017) 043B04 [arXiv:1612.08508] [INSPIRE].

[23] T. Erler, Superstring Field Theory and the Wess-Zumino-Witten Action, JHEP 10 (2017)

057 [arXiv:1706.02629] [INSPIRE].

[24] H. Kunitomo and T. Sugimoto, Heterotic string field theory with cyclic L∞ structure, Prog.

Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019 (2019) 063B02 [Erratum ibid. 2020 (2020) 019201]

[arXiv:1902.02991] [INSPIRE].

[25] H. Kunitomo and T. Sugimoto, Type II superstring field theory with cyclic L∞ structure,

Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020 (2020) 033B06 [arXiv:1911.04103] [INSPIRE].

[26] D. Friedan, E.J. Martinec and S.H. Shenker, Conformal Invariance, Supersymmetry and

String Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 271 (1986) 93 [INSPIRE].

[27] E. Witten, Superstring Perturbation Theory Revisited, arXiv:1209.5461 [INSPIRE].

[28] S.B. Giddings, E.J. Martinec and E. Witten, Modular Invariance in String Field Theory,

Phys. Lett. B 176 (1986) 362 [INSPIRE].

[29] M. Saadi and B. Zwiebach, Closed String Field Theory from Polyhedra, Annals Phys. 192

(1989) 213 [INSPIRE].

[30] T. Kugo, H. Kunitomo and K. Suehiro, Nonpolynomial Closed String Field Theory, Phys.

Lett. B 226 (1989) 48 [INSPIRE].

[31] B. Zwiebach, Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the Batalin-Vilkovisky master

equation, Nucl. Phys. B 390 (1993) 33 [hep-th/9206084] [INSPIRE].

[32] A. Sen and E. Witten, Filling the gaps with PCO’s, JHEP 09 (2015) 004

[arXiv:1504.00609] [INSPIRE].

[33] N. Berkovits and C.T. Echevarria, Four point amplitude from open superstring field theory,

Phys. Lett. B 478 (2000) 343 [hep-th/9912120] [INSPIRE].

[34] H. Kunitomo, Y. Okawa, H. Sukeno and T. Takezaki, Fermion scattering amplitudes from

gauge-invariant actions for open superstring field theory, arXiv:1612.00777 [INSPIRE].

[35] S. Konopka, The S-matrix of superstring field theory, JHEP 11 (2015) 187

[arXiv:1507.08250] [INSPIRE].

[36] A. Jevicki and C.-k. Lee, The S Matrix Generating Functional and Effective Action, Phys.

Rev. D 37 (1988) 1485 [INSPIRE].

[37] I.Y. Arefeva, L.D. Faddeev and A.A. Slavnov, Generating Functional for the s Matrix in

Gauge Theories, Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (1975) 1165 [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 21 (1974) 311]

[INSPIRE].

– 38 –

JHEP03(2021)193

[22] H. Matsunaga, Notes on the Wess-Zumino-Witten-like structure: L∞ triplet and NS-NS

superstring field theory, JHEP 05 (2017) 095 [arXiv:1612.08827] [INSPIRE].

A Self-archived copy in

Kyoto University Research Information Repository

https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp

[38] T. Erler, Relating Berkovits and A∞ superstring field theories; small Hilbert space

perspective, JHEP 10 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1505.02069] [INSPIRE].

[39] H. Erbin, C. Maccaferri, M. Schnabl and J. Vošmera, Classical algebraic structures in string

theory effective actions, JHEP 11 (2020) 123 [arXiv:2006.16270] [INSPIRE].

[40] A.S. Arvanitakis, O. Hohm, C. Hull and V. Lekeu, Homotopy Transfer and Effective Field

Theory I: Tree-level, arXiv:2007.07942 [INSPIRE].

[41] M. Kohriki, T. Kugo and H. Kunitomo, Gauge Fixing of Modified Cubic Open Superstring

Field Theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. 127 (2012) 243 [arXiv:1111.4912] [INSPIRE].

[43] N. Ohta, Covariant Quantization of Superstrings Based on BRS Invariance, Phys. Rev. D 33

(1986) 1681 [INSPIRE].

[44] M. Ito, T. Morozumi, S. Nojiri and S. Uehara, Covariant Quantization of

Neveu-Schwarz-ramond Model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 75 (1986) 934 [INSPIRE].

[45] M. Henneaux, BRST Cohomology of the Fermionic String, Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987) 59

[INSPIRE].

[46] H. Kajiura, Noncommutative homotopy algebras associated with open strings, Rev. Math.

Phys. 19 (2007) 1 [math/0306332] [INSPIRE].

[47] M. Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. 1, Lett. Math. Phys. 66

(2003) 157 [q-alg/9709040] [INSPIRE].

[48] M. Markl, Loop homotopy algebras in closed string field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 221

(2001) 367 [hep-th/9711045] [INSPIRE].

[49] K. Munster and I. Sachs, Quantum Open-Closed Homotopy Algebra and String Field Theory,

Commun. Math. Phys. 321 (2013) 769 [arXiv:1109.4101] [INSPIRE].

[50] R. Donagi and E. Witten, Supermoduli Space Is Not Projected, in Proceedings of Symposia in

Pure Mathematics 90, American Mathematical Society (2015), p. 19 [arXiv:1304.7798]

[INSPIRE].

[51] T. Erler and S. Konopka, Vertical Integration from the Large Hilbert Space, JHEP 12 (2017)

112 [arXiv:1710.07232] [INSPIRE].

[52] S.F. Moosavian and R. Pius, Hyperbolic Geometry of Superstring Perturbation Theory,

arXiv:1703.10563 [INSPIRE].

[53] S.F. Moosavian and R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry and closed bosonic string field theory.

Part I. The string vertices via hyperbolic Riemann surfaces, JHEP 08 (2019) 157

[arXiv:1706.07366] [INSPIRE].

[54] S.F. Moosavian and R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry and closed bosonic string field theory.

Part II. The rules for evaluating the quantum BV master action, JHEP 08 (2019) 177

[arXiv:1708.04977] [INSPIRE].

[55] R. Pius, Quantum Closed Superstring Field Theory and Hyperbolic Geometry I: Construction

of String Vertices, arXiv:1808.09441 [INSPIRE].

[56] K. Costello and B. Zwiebach, Hyperbolic String Vertices, arXiv:1909.00033 [INSPIRE].

– 39 –

JHEP03(2021)193

[42] M. Kato and K. Ogawa, Covariant Quantization of String Based on BRS Invariance, Nucl.

Phys. B 212 (1983) 443 [INSPIRE].

A Self-archived copy in

Kyoto University Research Information Repository

https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp

[57] C. de Lacroix, H. Erbin, S.P. Kashyap, A. Sen and M. Verma, Closed Superstring Field

Theory and its Applications, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 (2017) 1730021 [arXiv:1703.06410]

[INSPIRE].

[58] H. Matsunaga, Light-cone reduction of Witten’s open string field theory, JHEP 04 (2019) 143

[arXiv:1901.08555] [INSPIRE].

[59] J.M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and T. Kimura, The cohomology of BRST complexes, submitted to

Commun. Math. Phys., ITP-SB-88-34-REV (1988) [INSPIRE].

[60] J.M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and T. Kimura, The BRST Cohomology of the NSR String:

Vanishing and ‘No Ghost’ Theorems, Commun. Math. Phys. 124 (1989) 105 [INSPIRE].

– 40 –

JHEP03(2021)193

[61] B.H. Lian and G.J. Zuckerman, BRST Cohomology of the Supervirasoro Algebras, Commun.

Math. Phys. 125 (1989) 301 [INSPIRE].

...