リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「The protective effect of tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirators during chest compressions」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

The protective effect of tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirators during chest compressions

Goto, Yukari Jingushi, Naruhiro Hiraiwa, Hiroaki Ogawa, Hiroaki Sakai, Yoshinori Kasugai, Daisuke Tanaka, Taku Higashi, Michiko Yamamoto, Takanori Numaguchi, Atsushi 名古屋大学

2021.11

概要

Background: Airborne personal protective equipment is required for healthcare workers when performing aerosol-generating procedures on patients with infectious diseases. Chest compressions, one of the main components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, require intense and dynamic movements of the upper body. We aimed to investigate the protective effect of tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) during chest compressions. Methods: This single-center simulation study was performed from February 2021 to March 2021. The simulated workplace protection factor (SWPF) is the concentration ratio of ambient particles and particles inside the PAPR mask; this value indicates the level of protection provided by a respirator when subjected to a simulated work environment. Participants performed continuous chest compressions three times for 2 min each time, with a 4-min break between each session. We measured the SWPF of the tight-fitting PAPR during chest compression in real-time mode. The primary outcome was the ratio of any failure of protection (SWPF <500) during the chest compression sessions. Results: Fifty-four participants completed the simulation. Overall, 78% (n = 42) of the participants failed (the measured SWPF value was less than 500) at least one of the three sessions of chest compressions. The median value and interquartile range of the SWPF was 4304 (685–16,191). There were no reports of slipping down of the respirator or mechanical failure during chest compressions. Conclusions: Although the median SWPF value was high during chest compressions, the tight-fitting PAPR did not provide adequate protection.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

[1] World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. Accessed December 30, 2020.

[2] Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035797.

[3] Nam HS, Yeon MY, Park JW, Hong JY, Son JW. Healthcare worker infected with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Korea, 2015. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017052. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017052.

[4] Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, et al. CDC; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004;53:1–36.

[5] Shin H, Oh J, Lim TH, Kang H, Song Y, Lee S. Comparing the protective performances of 3 types of N95 filtering facepiece respirators during chest compressions: A randomized simulation study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(42):e8308. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008308.

[6] Hwang SY, Yoon H, Yoon A, Kim T, Lee G, Jung KY, et al. N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(1):12-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.041.

[7] Park SH, Hwang SY, Lee G, Park JE, Kim T, Shin TG, et al. Are loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators safe during chest compression? A simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2020https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.054.

[8] National Institutes of Health, Division of Occupational Health and Safety. The National Institutes of Health Respiratory Protection Program 2018. Authored by the Division of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS) Respiratory Protection Program (RPP) Manager. https://www.ors.od.nih.gov/sr/dohs/Documents/ Respiratoryprotecttionprogram.pdf [accessed 29 December 2020].

[9] Kolesar ES, Jr., Cosgrove DJ, de la Barre CM, Theis CF. Comparison of respirator protection factors measured by two quantitative fit test methods. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982;53(11):1116-22.

[10] Kim JY, Song JY, Yoon YK, Choi SH, Song YG, Kim SR, et al. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Infection Control and Prevention Guideline for Healthcare Facilities. Infection & chemotherapy. 2015;47(4):278-302. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2015.47.4.278.

[11] Lee JY, Kim G, Lim DG, Jee HG, Jang Y, Joh JS, et al. Seroprevalence of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Among Healthcare Personnel Caring for Patients With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in South Korea. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(12):1513-4. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.221.

[12] Lim SM, Cha WC, Chae MK, Jo IJ. Contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment by healthcare providers. Clinical and experimental emergency medicine. 2015;2(3):162-7. https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.019.

[13] Christian MD, Loutfy M, McDonald LC, Martinez KF, Ofner M, Wong T, et al. Possible SARS coronavirus transmission during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(2):287-93. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1002.030700.

[14] Edelson DP, Sasson C, Chan PS, Atkins DL, Aziz K, Becker LB, et al. Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(25):e933-e43. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.047463.

[15] Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(1):53-61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.282538.

[16] Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Jr., Brouwer MA, et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):741-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.005.

[17] Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140- 6736(14)61886-9.

[18] William P, Rao P, Kanakadandi UB, Asencio A, Kern KB. Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In and On the Way to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. Circ J. 2016;80(6):1292-9. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0330.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文
を
一発検索！

この論文の関連論文を見る