1. Gay NJ, Symmons MF, Gangloff M, Bryant CE. Assembly and localization of Toll- like receptor signalling complexes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(8):546-558. doi:10.1038/nri3713
2. Krieg AM. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA and their immune effects. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:709-760. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064842
3. Krieg AM. Therapeutic potential of toll-like receptor 9 activation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(6):471-484. doi:10.1038/nrd2059
4. Klinman DM. Immunotherapeutic uses of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(4):249-258. doi:10.1038/nri1329
5. Fire Andrew, Si-Qun Xu. Rolling replication of short DNA circles. PNAS. 1995;92(Biochemistry):4641-4645.
6. Liu D, Daubendiek SL, Zillman MA, Ryan K, Kool ET. Rolling circle DNA synthesis: Small circular oligonucleotides as efficient templates for DNA polymerases. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118(7):1587-1594. doi:10.1021/ja952786k
7. Zhang L, Zhu G, Mei L, et al. Self-Assembled DNA Immunonanoflowers as Multivalent CpG Nanoagents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(43):24069-24074. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b06987
8. Jung H, Kim D, Kang YY, Kim H, Lee JB, Mok H. CpG incorporated DNA microparticles for elevated immune stimulation for antigen presenting cells. RSC Adv. 2018;8(12):6608-6615. doi:10.1039/c7ra13293j
9. Zhou L, Ou LJ, Chu X, Shen GL, Yu RQ. Aptamer-based rolling circle amplification: A platform for electrochemical detection of protein. Anal Chem. 2007;79(19):7492- 7500. doi:10.1021/ac071059s
10. Al-Ogaili AS, Liyanage R, Lay JO, et al. DNA aptamer-based rolling circle amplification product as a novel immunological adjuvant. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-12. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79420-w
11. Yata T, Takahashi Y, Tan M, Hidaka K, Sugiyama H. Efficient amplification of self- gelling polypod-like structured DNA by rolling circle amplification and enzymatic digestion. Nat Publ Gr. 2015;(September):1-9. doi:10.1038/srep14979
12. Ouyang X, Li J, Liu H, et al. Rolling circle amplification-based DNA origami nanostructrures for intracellular delivery of immunostimulatory drugs. Small. 2013;9(18):3082-3087. doi:10.1002/smll.201300458
13. Kim KR, Röthlisberger P, Kang SJ, et al. Shaping rolling circle amplification products into DNA nanoparticles by incorporation of modified nucleotides and their application to in vitro and in vivo delivery of a photosensitizer. Molecules. 2018;23(7). doi:10.3390/molecules23071833
14. Hollenstein M, Damha MJ. Rolling circle amplification with chemically modified nucleoside triphosphates. Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem. 2016;67(December):7.26.1-7.26.15. doi:10.1002/cpnc.17
15. Kim JH, Jang M, Kim YJ, Ahn HJ. Design and Application of Rolling Circle Amplification for a Tumor-Specific Drug Carrier. J Med Chem. 2015;58(19):7863- 7873. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01126
16. Zhao H, Yuan X, Yu J, et al. Magnesium-Stabilized Multifunctional DNA Nanoparticles for Tumor-Targeted and pH-Responsive Drug Delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(18):15418-15427. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b01932
17. Amberlyn M. Peterson, Zhesen Tan, Evelyn M. Kimbrough, Jennifer M. Heemstra. 3,3′-Dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate (DiO) as a fluorogenic probe for measurement of critical micelle concentration. Anal Methods. 2015;7(16). doi:10.1039/c5ay01444a
18. Dwight S. Seferos, Andrew E. Prigodich, David A. Giljohann, Pinal C. Patel CAM. Polyvalent DNA Nanoparticle Conjugates Stabilize Nucleic Acids. Nano Lett. 2009;9(1):308–311. doi:10.1021/nl802958f.Polyvalent
19. Li H, Zhang B, Lu X, et al. Molecular spherical nucleic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(17):4340-4344. doi:10.1073/pnas.1801836115
20. Wang Y, Wu C, Chen T, et al. DNA micelle flares: A study of the basic properties that contribute to enhanced stability and binding affinity in complex biological systems. Chem Sci. 2016;7(9):6041-6049. doi:10.1039/c6sc00066e
21. Mohri K, Nishikawa M, Takahashi N, et al. Design and development of nanosized DNA assemblies in polypod-like structures as efficient vehicles for immunostimulatory cpg motifs to immune cells. ACS Nano. 2012;6(7):5931-5940. doi:10.1021/nn300727j
22. Mohri K, Nagata K, Ohtsuki S, et al. Elucidation of the Mechanism of Increased Activity of Immunostimulatory DNA by the Formation of Polypod-like Structure. Pharm Res. 2017;34(11):2362-2370. doi:10.1007/s11095-017-2243-y
23. Hamblin GD, Hariri AA, Carneiro KMM, Lau KL, Cosa G, Sleiman HF. Simple design for DNA nanotubes from a minimal set of unmodified strands: Rapid, room- temperature assembly and readily tunable structure. ACS Nano. 2013;7(4):3022- 3028. doi:10.1021/nn4006329
24. Hamblin GD, Carneiro KMM, Fakhoury JF, Bujold KE, Sleiman HF. Rolling circle amplification-templated DNA nanotubes show increased stability and cell penetration ability. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(6):2888-2891. doi:10.1021/ja2107492
25. Lizardi PM, Huang X, Zhu Z, Bray-Ward P, Thomas DC, Ward DC. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat Genet. 1998;19(3):225-232. doi:10.1038/898
26. Van Amersfoort ES, Van Strijp JAG. Evaluation of a flow cytometric fluorescence quenching assay of phagocytosis of sensitized sheep erythrocytes by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Cytometry. 1994;17(4):294-301. doi:10.1002/cyto.990170404
27. Busetto S, Trevisan E, Patriarca P, Menegazzi R. A Single-Step, Sensitive Flow Cytofluorometric Assay for the Simultaneous Assessment of Membrane-Bound and Ingested Candida albicans in Phagocytosing Neutrophils. Cytom Part A. 2004;58(2):201-206. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20014
28. Nuutila J, Lilius EM. Flow cytometric quantitative determination of ingestion by phagocytes needs the distinguishing of overlapping populations of binding and ingesting cells. Cytom Part A. 2005;65(2):93-102. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20139
29. Illien F, Rodriguez N, Amoura M, et al. Quantitative fluorescence spectroscopy and flow cytometry analyses of cell-penetrating peptides internalization pathways: Optimization, pitfalls, comparison with mass spectrometry quantification. Sci Rep. 2016;6(April):1-13. doi:10.1038/srep36938
30. Wang P, Rahman MA, Zhao Z, et al. Visualization of the Cellular Uptake and Trafficking of DNA Origami Nanostructures in Cancer Cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(7):2478-2484. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b09024
31. Umemura K, Ohtsuki S, Nagaoka M, et al. Critical contribution of macrophage scavenger receptor 1 to the uptake of nanostructured DNA by immune cells. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology, Biol Med. 2021;34:102386. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2021.102386
32. Maezawa T, Ohtsuki S, Hidaka K, et al. DNA density-dependent uptake of DNA origami-based two-or three-dimensional nanostructures by immune cells. Nanoscale. 2020;12(27):14818-14824. doi:10.1039/d0nr02361b
33. Karsdal MA, Nielsen SH, Leeming DJ, et al. The good and the bad collagens of fibrosis – Their role in signaling and organ function. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;121:43-56. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.07.014
34. Myllyharju J, Kivirikko KI. Collagens and collagen-related diseases. Ann Med. 2001;33(1):7-21. doi:10.3109/07853890109002055
35. Mrevlishvili GM, Svintradze D V. Complex between triple helix of collagen and double helix of DNA in aqueous solution. Int J Biol Macromol. 2005;35(5):243-245. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.02.004
36. Kaya M, Toyama Y, Kubota K, et al. Effect of DNA structure on the formation of collagen-DNA complex. Int J Biol Macromol. 2005;35(1-2):39-46. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2004.11.005
37. Ochiya T, Takahama Y, Nagahara S, et al. New delivery system for plasmid DNA in vivo using atelocollagen as a carrier material: The Minipellet. Nat Med. 1999;5(6):707-710. doi:10.1038/9560
38. Harris JR, Reiber A. Influence of saline and pH on collagen type I fibrillogenesis in vitro: Fibril polymorphism and colloidal gold labelling. Micron. 2007;38(5):513-521. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2006.07.026
39. McAlinden A, Havlioglu N, Liang L, Davies SR, Sandell LJ. Alternative splicing of type II procollagen exon 2 is regulated by the combination of a weak 5′ splice site and an adjacent intronic stem-loop cis element. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(38):32700- 32711. doi:10.1074/jbc.M505940200
40. Alexakis C, Partridge T, Bou-Gharios G. Implication of the satellite cell in dystrophic muscle fibrosis: A self-perpetuating mechanism of collagen overproduction. Am J Physiol - Cell Physiol. 2007;293(2). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00061.2007
41. Svintradze D V, Mrevlishvili GM, Metreveli N, et al. Collagen – DNA Complex. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:21-28.
42. Sprangers S, Everts V. Molecular pathways of cell-mediated degradation of fibrillar collagen. Matrix Biol. 2019;75-76:190-200. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2017.11.008
43. Varma S, Orgel JPRO, Schieber JD. Nanomechanics of Type I Collagen. Biophys J. 2016;111(1):50-56. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.038
44. Wang P, Gaitanaros S, Lee S, Bathe M, Shih WM, Ke Y. Programming Self- Assembly of DNA Origami Honeycomb Two-Dimensional Lattices and Plasmonic Metamaterials. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(24):7733-7740. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b03966
45. Sun W, Ji W, Hall JM, et al. Self-Assembled DNA Nanoclews for the Efficient Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Editing. Angew Chemie. 2015;127(41):12197- 12201. doi:10.1002/ange.201506030
46. Mo R, Jiang T, Disanto R, Tai W, Gu Z. ATP-triggered anticancer drug delivery. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1-10. doi:10.1038/ncomms4364
47. Everts V, Beertsen W. The Role of Microtubules in the Phagocytosis of Collagen by Fibroblasts. Top Catal. 1987;7(1):1-15. doi:10.1016/S0174-173X(87)80017-1