1. Karlsson, T. et al. Quiet, discrete auroral arcs—observations. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 16 (2020).
2. Knight, S. Parallel electric fields. Planet. Space Sci. 21, 741–750 (1973).
3. Lyons, L. R. The field-aligned current versus electric potential relation and auroral electrodynamics. In Physics of Auroral Arc
Formation (Es. Akasofu, S. -I. & Kan J. K.) 252–259 (American Geophysical Union, 2013).
4. Ergun, R. E. et al. Parallel electric fields in the upward current region of the aurora: Indirect and direct observations. Phys. Plasmas
9, 3685 (2002).
5. Mozer, F. S. & Kletzing, C. A. Direct observation of large, quasi-static, parallel electric fields in the auroral acceleration region.
Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 1629–1632 (1998).
6. McFadden, J. P., Carlson, C. W. & Ergun, R. E. Microstructure of the auroral acceleration region as observed by FAST. J. Geophys.
Res. Space Phys. 104, 14453–14480 (1999).
Scientific Reports |
Vol:.(1234567890)
(2021) 11:1610 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79665-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
7. Alm, L., Marklund, G. T. & Karlsson, T. In situ observations of density cavities extending above the auroral acceleration region. J.
Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119, 5286–5294 (2014).
8. Alm, L., Li, B., Marklund, G. T. & Karlsson, T. Statistical altitude distribution of the auroral density cavity. J. Geophys. Res. Space
Phys. 120, 996–1006 (2015).
9. Figueiredo, S. et al. Temporal and spatial evolution of discrete auroral arcs as seen by Cluster. Ann. Geophys. 23, 2531–2557 (2005).
10. Shiokawa, K. et al. Arase observation of the source region of auroral arcs and diffuse auroras in the inner magnetosphere. J. Geophys.
Res. Space Phys. 125, e2019JA027310 (2020).
11. Kazama, Y. et al. Low-energy particle experiments–electron analyzer (LEPe) onboard the Arase spacecraft. Earth Planets Space
69, 165 (2017).
12. Angelopoulos, V. The THEMIS mission. Space Sci. Rev. 145, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1 (2008).
13. Mende, S. B. et al. The THEMIS array of ground-based observatories for the study of auroral substorms. Space Sci. Rev. 145, 357.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9380-x (2008).
14. Asamura, K., Kazama, Y., Yokota, S., Kasahara, S. & Miyoshi, Y. Low-energy particle experiments–ion mass analyzer (LEPi) onboard
the ERG (Arase) satellite. Earth Planets Space 70, 70 (2018).
15. Kasahara, Y. et al. The plasma wave experiment (PWE) on board the Arase (ERG) satellite. Earth Planets Space 70, 86 (2018).
16. Kasaba, Y. et al. Wire Probe Antenna (WPT) and Electric Field Detector (EFD) of Plasma Wave Experiment (PWE) aboard the
Arase satellite: Specifications and initial evaluation results. Earth Planets Space 69, 174 (2017).
17. Matsuoka, A. et al. The ARASE (ERG) magnetic field investigation. Earth Planets Space 70, 43 (2018).
18. Miyoshi, Y. et al. The ERG Science Center. Earth Planets Space 70, 96 (2018).
19. Miyoshi, Y. et al. Geospace exploration project ERG. Earth Planets Space 70, 101 (2018).
20. Tsyganenko, N. A. & Andreeva, V. A. A forecasting model of the magnetosphere driven by an optimal solar wind coupling function. J. Geophys. Res. A: Space Phys. 120, 8401–8425 (2015).
21. Tsyganenko, N. A. & Sitnov, M. I. Modeling the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms. J.
Geophys. Res. 110, A03208 (2005).
22. Tsyganenko, N. A. A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 107, 1–17 (2002).
23. Tsyganenko, N. A. Effects of the solar wind conditions in the global magnetospheric configurations as deduced from data-based
field models. in International conference on substorms vol. 389 181 (1996).
24. Akasofu, S. I. The development of the auroral substorm. Planet. Space Sci. 12, 273–282 (1964).
25. Lin, C. S. & Hoffman, R. A. Characteristics of the inverted-V event. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 1514 (1979).
26. Reiff, P. H. et al. Determination of auroral electrostatic potentials using high- and low-altitude particle distributions. J. Geophys.
Res. 93, 7441 (1988).
27. Chaston, C. C. et al. Driven Alfven waves and electron acceleration: A FAST case study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 30–1–30–4 (2002).
28. Wygant, J. R. et al. Evidence for kinetic Alfvén waves and parallel electron energization at 4–6 Re altitudes in the plasma sheet
boundary layer. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 107, 1–15 (2002).
29. Egedal, J., Daughton, W. & Le, A. Large-scale electron acceleration by parallel electric fields during magnetic reconnection. Nat.
Phys. 8, 321–324 (2012).
30. Varsani, A. et al. Simultaneous remote observations of intense reconnection effects by DMSP and MMS spacecraft during a storm
time substorm. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 10891–10909 (2017).
31. Block, L. P. A double layer review. Astrophys. Space Sci. 55, 59–83 (1978).
32. Ergun, R. E., Carlson, C. W., McFadden, J. P., Mozer, F. S. & Strangeway, R. J. parallel electric fields in discrete arcs. Geophys. Res.
Lett. 27, 4053–4056 (2000).
33. Mozer, F. S. et al. Megavolt parallel potentials arising from double-layer streams in the earth’s outer radiation belt. Phys. Rev. Lett.
111, 1–5 (2013).
34. Mauk, B. H. et al. Discrete and broadband electron acceleration in Jupiter’s powerful aurora. Nature 549, 66–69 (2017).
35. Xu, S. et al. Inverted-V electron acceleration events concurring with localized auroral observations at mars by MAVEN. Geophys.
Res. Lett. 47, 1–8 (2020).
36. Tsyganenko, N. A. A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet. Planet. Space Sci. 37, 5–20 (1989).
37. Miyoshi, Y., Shinohara, I. & Jun, C.-W. The Level-2 orbit data of Exploration of energization and Radiation in Geospace (ERG)
Arase satellite, v03. https://doi.org/10.34515/DATA.ERG-12000 (2018).
38. Asamura, K., Miyoshi, Y. & Shinohara, I. The LEPi instrument Level-2 3D flux data of Exploration of energization and Radiation
in Geospace (ERG) Arase satellite, v03.00. https://doi.org/10.34515/DATA.ERG-05000 (2018).
39. Matsuoka, A. et al. The MGF instrument Level-2 high-resolution magnetic field data of Exploration of energization and Radiation
in Geospace (ERG) Arase satellite, v03.03. https://doi.org/10.34515/DATA.ERG-06000 (2018).
40. Matsuoka, A. et al. The MGF instrument Level-2 spinfit magnetic field data of Exploration of energization and Radiation in Geospace (ERG) Arase satellite, v03.03. https://doi.org/10.34515/DATA.ERG-06001 (2018).
41. Kasahara, Y. et al. The PWE/EFD instrument Level-2 spin-fit electric field data of Exploration of energization and Radiation in
Geospace (ERG) Arase satellite, v03.00. https://doi.org/10.34515/DATA.ERG-07000 (2018).
42. Kasahara, Y. et al. The PWE/EFD instrument Level-2 spin-averaged potential data of Exploration of energization and Radiation
in Geospace (ERG) Arase satellite, v03.01. https://doi.org/10.34515/DATA.ERG-07001 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI 15H05747, 16H06286, 17H00728, 20H01959, and 19K03949.
This study was supported by JSPS Bilateral Open Partnership Joint Research Projects. The LEP-e development
is supported by the Academia Sinica, the National Cheng Kung University, and also the Ministry of Science
and Technology of Taiwan under Contract No. MOST 105-311z1-Y-001-042 and MOST 106-2111-M-001-011.
T.-F. Chang acknowledges support from Taiwan grant MOST 109-2635-M-006-001. The authors would also like
to extend sincere thanks to all members of the ERG project, the ERG Science Center, the THEMIS team, and
contributors to SPEDAS and IDL GEOPACK software.
Author contributions
S.I. identified the event, analyzed the combined dataset, and wrote the paper. Y.M. oversaw the production of the
combined dataset and discussed its interpretation. I.S. oversaw the ERG project and discussed the interpretation
of the event. K.S. discussed the interpretation of the event and drafting the paper. Y. Kazama, S-Y.W., S.W.Y.T.,
T-F.C., B-J.W., and C-W.J. provided the low-energy particle experiments-electron analyser (LEP-e) data. K.A.
provided the low-energy particle experiments-ion analyser (LEP-i) data and discussed the interpretation of the
event. Y. Kasahara, Y. Kasaba, M.S., S.N., and M.K. provided plasma wave experiment/electric field detector
(PWE/EFD) data. A.M., M.T., and S.K., provided MaGnetic Field experiment (MGF) data. V.A. provided ASI/
Scientific Reports |
(2021) 11:1610 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79665-5
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
THEMIS data and discussed drafting the paper. T.H. developed the pitch angle sorting tool for LEP-i data and
discussed the interpretation of the event. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41598-020-79665-5.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.I.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
© The Author(s) 2021
Scientific Reports |
Vol:.(1234567890)
(2021) 11:1610 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79665-5
...