リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Contract Farming in Pakistan and its Microeconomic Implications for the Participating Farmers」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Contract Farming in Pakistan and its Microeconomic Implications for the Participating Farmers

カーン, ムハマド ファワード 東京大学 DOI:10.15083/0002006888

2023.03.24

概要





















ムハマド

ファワード

カーン

過去数十年にわたり、所得水準の上昇、人口増加、都市化により、食品の需
要は、高品質で標準化されたブランド製品へと大きく変化した。高品質の原材
料の供給を確保するために、食品流通業者や食品加工業者は、農民との契約栽
培を進めている。契約栽培が農家家計に及ぼす影響については、多くの先行研
究があるが、次の 4 点については十分に解明されていない。
第一に契約栽培が農家家計の経済厚生に及ぼすインパクトは作物により異な
るかどうか、第二に契約栽培への参加が農家の総所得や非農業所得にどのよう
な影響を及ぼすか、第三に契約栽培への参加が農家の労働需要(自家および雇
用)にどのような影響を及ぼすか、第四に契約栽培への参加が農家の資金借入
の制約を緩和するか、といった点である。本研究は、パキスタンで自ら収集し
たデータを用いて、この 4 点に回答することを目的とする。
第一章は、契約栽培の先行研究を整理し、本研究の課題を上記のように提示
した。加えて、パキスタンにおける契約栽培の状況を記述した。
第二章では、トウモロコシとジャガイモの契約栽培が農家にもたらすインパ
クトを比較した。その結果、農家が種子や定期的な技術サービスなどの支援を
受けて加工向けの高品質のジャガイモを生産するジャガイモ契約栽培では、農
家の大幅な収入の増加につながることがわかった。しかし、トウモロコシの契
約栽培では、このような収入の改善傾向は見られない。これは、契約で生産す
るトウモロコシとほぼ同じ品質のトウモロコシが、市場でも広く入手可能であ
るためであると考えられる。他方、トウモロコシとジャガイモいずれについて
も、契約栽培が農家所得(契約作物以外の作物からの収入、家畜収入、非農業
収入など)に及ぼす効果は見いだせなかった。これは、これらの契約栽培が自
家労働の配分に重要な影響を与えていないと解釈できる。しかし、労働力の使
用については、両者に違いがある。ジャガイモの契約栽培をしている農家は、
非契約栽培の農家と比べて、給与契約による労働者の雇用が有意に多い。しか
し、日雇い労働者の雇用については両者に違いはない。トウモロコシでは、給
与、日雇いのいずれの労働者についても、契約農家と非契約農家の間で雇用量

に違いはなかった。
第三章は、タバコの契約栽培農家を対象に、契約栽培とインフォーマルな金
貸しからの借入および返済の関係を分析した。この調査における農民の約 77%
が、タバコの栽培の期間に融資を受けている。タバコの契約栽培は、農家がよ
り多額の借入をすることを可能にし、しかもその返済を確実にしている。この
ような契約農家の高い返済能力は、タバコ会社による迅速で期限内の代金支払
いのために生じる。それに対して、市場で取引をしているタバコ業者は、しば
しば支払いを遅らせることがある。農家がタバコ会社と契約することは、金融
機関からの借入の際に担保としての役割を果たすだけでなく、その農民がよい
取引相手であるというシグナルを提供することになる。
以上のように、本研究は、パキスタンにおけるジャガイモ、トウモロコシ、
タバコという異なる作物の契約栽培を取り上げ、先行研究では十分に解明され
ていない 4 つの問いに回答を与えた。
これらの研究成果は、学術上応用上寄与するところが少なくない。よって、
審査委員一同は本論文が博士(農学)の学位論文として価値あるものと認めた。

見本




















本郷 太郎

(※履歴書の記載と同じにしてください。)
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
これらの研究成果は、学術上応用上寄与するところが少なくない。よって、
審査委員一同は本論文が博士(農学)の学位論文として価値あるものと認めた。

※「文書ファイル(Word 等で作成したもの)」及び「PDF ファイル」を提出し
てください。

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

Abebe, G. K., Bijman, J., Kemp, R., Omta, O., & Tsegaye, A. (2013). Contract farming configuration:

Smallholders’ preferences for contract design attributes. Food Policy, 40, 14-24.

Akudugu, M. A. (2012). Estimation of the determinants of credit demand by farmers and supply by rural banks

in Ghana’s Upper East Region. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2(393-201623992), 189-200.

Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the

effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of political economy, 113(1), 151-184.

Arene, C. J. (1993). An analysis of loan repayment potentials of smallholder soya bean group farmers in

Nigeria. Quarterly journal of international agriculture (Germany).

Arouna, A., Michler, J. D., & Lokossou, J. C. (2019). Contract farming and rural transformation: Evidence from

a field experiment in Benin (No. w25665). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ashraf, N., Giné, X., & Karlan, D. (2009). Finding missing markets (and a disturbing epilogue): Evidence from

an export crop adoption and marketing intervention in Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural

Economics, 91(4), 973-990.

Barrett, C. B., Bachke, M. E., Bellemare, M. F., Michelson, H. C., Narayanan, S., & Walker, T. F. (2010).

Smallholder participation in agricultural value chains: Comparative evidence from three

continents. Available at SSRN 1733942.

Barrett, C. B., Bachke, M. E., Bellemare, M. F., Michelson, H. C., Narayanan, S., & Walker, T. F. (2012).

Smallholder participation in contract farming: comparative evidence from five countries. World

Development, 40(4), 715-730.

Bastiaensen, J., & Marchetti, P. (2011). Rural microfinance and agricultural value chains: Strategies and

perspectives of the Fondo de Desarrollo Local in Nicaragua. Handbook of Microfinance, 461-500.

Bell, C. (1988). Credit markets and interlinked transactions. Handbook of development economics, 1, 763-830.

Bellemare, M. F. (2012). As you sow, so shall you reap: The welfare impacts of contract farming. World

Development, 40(7), 1418-1434.

Bellemare, M. F., & Bloem, J. R. (2018). Does contract farming improve welfare? A review. World

Development, 112, 259-271.

Bellemare, M. F., & Novak, L. (2017). Contract farming and food security. American Journal of Agricultural

Economics, 99(2), 357-378.

Besley, T. (1995). Savings, credit and insurance. Handbook of development economics, 3, 2123-2207.

Birthal, P. S., P. K. Joshi and A. Gulati. (2005). Vertical coordination in high value commodities: implications

for the smallholders. MTID Discussion Paper 85, IFPRI, Washington D.C.

Bolwig, S., Gibbon, P., & Jones, S. (2009). The economics of smallholder organic contract farming in tropical

Africa. World Development, 37(6), 1094-1104.

Carney, J., & Watts, M. (1990). Manufacturing dissent: work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant

society. Africa, 207-241.

Chaudhry, M. G. & Ahmad, B. (2000). Pakistan. In M. Ali (Ed.), Dynamics of vegetable production, distribution

and consumption in Asia (pp. 271-302). Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC).

53

Chodavarapu, S., Giertz, A., & Jaeger, P. (2016). Agribusiness in South Asia. World Bank.

Da Silva, C. A. B. (2005). The growing role of contract farming in agri-food systems development: Drivers, theory

and practice. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome.

Dedehouanou, S. F., Swinnen, J., & Maertens, M. (2013). Does Contracting Make Farmers Happy? Evidence

from S enegal. Review of Income and Wealth, 59, S138-S160.

deHaan, E., Lawrence, A., & Litjens, R. (2019). Measurement Error in Dependent Variables in Accounting:

Illustrations Using Google Ticker Search and Simulations. Available at SSRN 3398287.

Dolan, C. S. (2004). On farm and packhouse: employment at the bottom of a global value chain. Rural

sociology, 69(1), 99-126.

Dolan, C., & Humphrey, J. (2000). Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: the impact of UK supermarkets on

the African horticulture industry. Journal of development studies, 37(2), 147-176.

Dubbert, C. (2019). Participation in contract farming and farm performance: Insights from cashew farmers in

Ghana. Agricultural Economics, 50(6), 749-763.

Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2007). Using randomization in development economics research: A

toolkit. Handbook of development economics, 4, 3895-3962.

Eaton, C., & Shepherd, A. (2001). Contract farming: partnerships for growth (No. 145). Food & Agriculture Org..

Eze, C. C., & Ibekwe, U. C. (2007). Determinants of loan repayment under indigenous financial system in

Southeast, Nigeria.

Gatto, M., Wollni, M., Asnawi, R., & Qaim, M. (2017). Oil palm boom, contract farming, and rural economic

development: Village-level evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 95, 127-140.

Glover, D. J. (1984). Contract farming and smallholder outgrower schemes in less-developed countries. World

development, 12(11-12), 1143-1157.

Goldsmith, A. (1985). The private sector and rural development: Can agribusiness help the small farmer?. World

development, 13(10-11), 1125-1138.

Government of Pakistan., (2010). Census of agriculture 2010. Islamabad: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics

Hayami, Y. (2001). Ecology, history, and development: A perspective from rural Southeast Asia. The World Bank

Research Observer, 16(2), 169-198.

Henning, J. I., & Jordaan, H. (2016). Determinants of financial sustainability for farm credit applications—A

Delphi study. Sustainability, 8(1), 77.

Herrmann, R., & Grote, U. (2015). Large-scale agro-industrial investments and rural poverty: evidence from

sugarcane in Malawi. Journal of African Economies, 24(5), 645-676.

Ito, J., Bao, Z., & Su, Q. (2012). Distributional effects of agricultural cooperatives in China: Exclusion of

smallholders and potential gains on participation. Food policy, 37(6), 700-709.

K&N’s:

Vertically

Integrated

Business

Approach.

(n.d.)

Retrieved

from

https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/bio16610w18/chapter/kns-health-and-happiness-for-pakistan/

Kaur, L., Sharma, P., & Garg, L. (2016). Causes and Cure of Farmer's Suicide. Indian Journal of Economics and

Development, 12(1a), 305-310.

54

Key, N., & Runsten, D. (1999). Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the

organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World development, 27(2),

381-401.

Khan, M. F., Nakano, Y., & Kurosaki, T. (2019). Impact of contract farming on land productivity and income of

maize and potato growers in Pakistan. Food Policy, 85, 28-39.

Konare, K. (2001). Challenges to agricultural financing in Mali (Unpublished master’s thesis). Michigan State

University, Michigan, USA.

Kurosaki, T. (2003). Specialization and diversification in agricultural transformation: The case of West Punjab,

1903–1992. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(2), 372-386.

Little, P. D., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (1994). Living under contract: contract farming and agrarian transformation in

sub-Saharan Africa. Univ of Wisconsin Press.

MacDonald, J. M., Perry, J., Ahearn, M. C., Banker, D., Chambers, W., Dimitri, C., ... & Southard, L. W. (2004).

Contracts, markets, and prices: Organizing the production and use of agricultural commodities. USDAERS Agricultural Economic Report, (837).

Maertens, M., & Swinnen, J. F. (2009). Trade, standards, and poverty: Evidence from Senegal. World

development, 37(1), 161-178.

Maertens, M., & Velde, D. V. (2017). Contract-farming in staple food chains: The case of rice in Benin. World

Development, 95, 73-87.

Mashatola, M. C., & Darroch, M. A. (2003). Factors affecting the loan status of sugarcane farmers using a

graduated mortgage loan repayment scheme in KwaZulu-Natal. Agrekon, 42(4), 353-365.

Meemken, E. M., & Bellemare, M. F. (2020). Smallholder farmers and contract farming in developing countries.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(1), 259-264.

Michelson, H. C. (2013). Small farmers, NGOs, and a Walmart world: Welfare effects of supermarkets operating

in Nicaragua. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(3), 628-649.

Minot, N. (1986). Contract Farming and its Effect on Farmers in Less Developed Countries. Department of

Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University. Food Security International Development Working

Papers Series Number, 54740.

Minot, N., & Ngigi, M. (2004). Are horticultural exports a replicable success story?: evidence from Kenya and

Côte d'Ivoire. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.

Minot, N., & Ronchi, L. (2015). Contract farming: Risks and benefits of partnership between farmers and firms.

The World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA

Minten, B., Randrianarison, L., & Swinnen, J. (2007). Spillovers from high‐value agriculture for exports on land

use in developing countries: evidence from Madagascar. Agricultural Economics, 37(2-3), 265-275.

Miyata, S., Minot, N., & Hu, D. (2009). Impact of contract farming on income: linking small farmers, packers,

and supermarkets in China. World development, 37(11), 1781-1790.

Narayanan, S. (2014). Profits from participation in high value agriculture: Evidence of heterogeneous benefits in

contract farming schemes in Southern India. Food Policy, 44, 142-157.

Nolte, K., & Ostermeier, M. (2017). Labour Market Effects of Large-Scale Agricultural Investment: Conceptual

Considerations and Estimated Employment Effects. World Development, 98, 430-446.

55

Ochieng, C. M. O. (2010). The political economy of contract farming in tea in Kenya: the Kenya Tea Development

Agency (KTDA), 1964–2002. In The Comparative Political Economy of Development (pp. 162-183).

Routledge.

Ochieng, D. O., Veettil, P. C., & Qaim, M. (2017). Farmers’ preferences for supermarket contracts in Kenya.

Food Policy, 68, 100-111.

Oladeebo, J. O., & Oladeebo, O. E. (2008). Determinants of loan repayment among smallholder farmers in

Ogbomoso agricultural zone of Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 59-62.

Oster, E. (2019). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business &

Economic Statistics, 37(2), 187-204.

Otsuka, K., Nakano, Y., & Takahashi, K. (2016). Contract farming in developed and developing countries. Annual

Review of Resource Economics, 8, 353-376.

Oya, C. (2012). Contract farming in sub‐Saharan Africa: A survey of approaches, debates and issues. Journal of

Agrarian Change, 12(1), 1-33.

Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, & International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. (1989). Maize

research and development in Pakistan. CIMMYT.

Paxton, J., Graham, D., & Thraen, C. (2000). Modeling group loan repayment behavior: New insights from

Burkina Faso. Economic Development and cultural change, 48(3), 639-655.

Porter, G., & Phillips-Howard, K. (1997). Comparing contracts: an evaluation of contract farming schemes in

Africa. World Development, 25(2), 227-238.

Ragasa, C., Lambrecht, I., & Kufoalor, D. S. (2018). Limitations of contract farming as a pro-poor strategy: The

case of maize outgrower schemes in upper West Ghana. World Development, 102, 30-56.

Reardon, T., & Barrett, C. B. (2000). Agroindustrialization, globalization, and international development: an

overview of issues, patterns, and determinants. Agricultural economics, 23(3), 195-205.

Reardon, T., & Berdegué, J. A. (2002). The rapid rise of supermarkets in Latin America: Challenges and

opportunities for development. Development Policy Review, 20(4), 371-88.

Reardon, T., & Timmer, C. P. (2007). Transformation of markets for agricultural output in developing countries

since 1950: How has thinking changed?. Handbook of agricultural economics, 3, 2807-2855.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies. Springer-Verlag. New York, NY.

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for

causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.

Scott, K. (2000). Chapter 21: Credit. In M. Grosh & P. Glewwe (Eds.) Designing Household Survey

Questionnaires for Developing Countries, Lessons from 15 years of the Living Standards Measurement

Study. The World Bank.

Sethboonsarng, S., Leung, P., & Stefan, A. (2008). Rice contract farming in Lao PDR: Moving from subsistence

to commercial agriculture (Discussion paper 90). Tokyo: ADB Institute.

Simmons, P., Winters, P., & Patrick, I. (2005). An analysis of contract farming in East Java, Bali, and Lombok,

Indonesia. Agricultural Economics, 33, 513-525.

Singh, S. (2002). Contracting out solutions: Political economy of contract farming in the Indian Punjab. World

Development, 30(9), 1621-1638.

56

Soullier, G., & Moustier, P. (2018). Impacts of contract farming in domestic grain chains on farmer income and

food insecurity. Contrasted evidence from Senegal. Food Policy, 79, 179-198.

State Bank of Pakistan. (2014). Guidelines for Value Chain Contract Farmer Financing. Agricultural Credit and

Microfinance Department, State Bank of Pakistan. https://www.sbp.org.pk/acd/2014/C5-Annex-1.pdf

Strengmann-Kuhn, W. (2000, August 27-September 2). Theoretical definition and empirical measurement of

welfare and poverty: A microeconomic approach [Paper Presentation]. 26th General Conference of the

International Association for Research on Income and Wealth, Cracow, Poland.

Swinnen, J. F., & Maertens, M. (2007). Globalization, privatization, and vertical coordination in food value chains

in developing and transition countries. Agricultural economics, 37, 89-102.

Swinnen, J., & Vandeplas, A. (2011). Rich consumers and poor producers: quality and rent distribution in global

value chains. Journal of Globalization and Development, 2(2).

Ton, G., Desiere, S., Vellema, W., Weituschat, S., & D'Haese, M. (2017). The effectiveness of contract farming

for raising income of smallholder farmers in low‐and middle‐income countries: a systematic

review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1-131.

Ton, G., Vellema, W., Desiere, S., Weituschat, S., & D'Haese, M. (2018). Contract farming for improving

smallholder incomes: What can we learn from effectiveness studies?. World Development, 104, 46-64.

UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2009). World investment report 2009.

https://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2009_en.pdf

USAID.

(2009).

Pakistan’s

Food

and

Agriculture

Systems.

https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/8E9D75DE4787AA59492575CA00221A5BFull_Report.pdf

Wang, H., Moustier, P., & Loc, N. T. T. (2014a). Economic impact of direct marketing and contracts: The case

of safe vegetable chains in northern Vietnam. Food Policy, 47, 13-23.

Warning, M., & Key, N. (2002). The social performance and distributional consequences of contract farming: An

equilibrium analysis of the Arachide de Bouche program in Senegal. World Development, 30(2), 255263.

Watts, M. (1994) Life under contract: Contract farming, agrarian restructuring, and flexible accumulation, In P.

Little & M. Watts (Eds.), Living Under Contract, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

Westfall, P. H., & Young, S. S. (1993). Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for p-value

adjustment (Vol. 279). John Wiley & Sons.

Winters, P., Simmons, P., & Patrick, I. (2005). Evaluation of a hybrid seed contract between smallholders and a

multinational company in East Java, Indonesia. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(1), 62-89.

Yaron, J. (1994). What makes rural finance institutions successful?. The World Bank Research Observer, 9(1),

49-70.

Yehuala, S. (2008). Determinants of smallholder farmers access to formal credit: the case of Metema Woreda,

North Gondar, Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Haramaya University).

57

Appendix

Appendix Table A1: Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) Estimation Results for Two Contracts Pooled – PSM

Treatment: Either or Both Contracts

Control: Non-Contract

|-----Kernel Matching--------|

Rosenbaum

bounds

Unit

Treatment Control

ATT

S.E.

critical

level of

odds ratio

Potato Price

USD Per 100Kg 8.33

5.69

2.64***

0.51

3.00

Potato Yield

Tons per acre

10.46

10.25

0.21

0.22

n.a

Potato Income per Acre

USD/Acre

85.86

-73.77 159.63***

55.02

2.50

Percent of Land Allocated to Potato Percent

75.24

70.93

4.32

4.34

n.a

Maize Price

USD Per 100Kg 20.82

20.70

0.12

0.37

n.a

Maize Yield

Tons per acre

2.69

2.81

-0.12

0.08

n.a

Maize Income per Acre

USD/Acre

175.15 158.23

16.92

25.13

n.a

Percent of Land Allocated to Maize Percent

68.47

69.74

-1.26

4.41

n.a

Total Farm Income per Acre

USD/Acre

249.72 134.73 115.00***

41.73

2.00

Total Farm Income

USD

34,816 15,172 19,644***

6,756

1.50

Total Farm Profit

USD

24,186 2,394 21,791**

6,859

2.00

Total Household Income

USD

45,702 23,909 21,793***

7,506

1.50

Non-Potato-Maize Crop Income

USD

3,518

5,397

-1,878

2,243

n.a

Livestock Income

USD

8,375

8078

297

1,550

n.a

Other Income

USD

2,510

658

1852*

1,070

1.00

Number of Salaried Workers

6.34

5.76

0.58

0.82

n.a

Cost of Salaried Workers

USD/Year

7,964

7,320

645

1,165

n.a.

|----------NN Matching--------|

Rosenbaum

bounds

ATT

S.E.

critical

level of

odds ratio

2.76***

0.5

3.50

0.34*

0.27

1.50

174.3*** 47.706

3.00

4.92

4.10

n.a

0.18

0.43

n.a

-0.11*

0.10

1.50

14.90

27.57

n.a

-0.78

4.74

n.a

119.5*** 45.58

2.00

16,886** 7,982

1.75

19,105

7,954

1.75

18,267** 8,766

1.50

-3,791

2,756

n.a

-409

1,934

n.a

1790

1144

n.a

0.48

1.04

n.a

628

1,507

n.a.

Standard errors are obtained by bootstrapping. *Significant at 10% level; **Significant at 5% level; ***Significant at 1% level.

58

Off Support

in PSM

184

184

184

184

177

177

177

177

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

Appendix Table A2: ATT Estimation Results for Potato Contract – PSM

Treatment: Potato Contract

Control: Non-Contract

Potato Price

Potato Yield

Potato-Gross Output Value

Potato-Cost of Machinery

Potato-Cost of Inputs

Potato-Cost of Casual Labor

Potato-Cost of Salaried Labor

Percent of Land Allocated to Potato

Potato Income per Acre

Total Farm Income per Acre

Total Farm Income

Total Farm Profit

Total Household Income

Non-potato Crop Income

Livestock Income

Other Income

Number of Salaried Workers

Cost of Salaried Workers

Unit

Treatment

Control

USD Per 100Kg

Tons per acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

Percent

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD

USD

USD

USD

USD

USD

16.10

10.14

1,100.9

74.68

553.63

81.9

23.81

80.67

366.91

486.12

67,000

55,281

77,742

25,778

9,718

1,024

7.11

9,097

5.57

10.26

568.97

73.44

488.73

84.2

23.16

72.02

-100.59

124.33

13,851

922

21,205

16,309

6,951

402

5.38

6,885

USD/Year

|-------Kernel Matching--------|

Rosenbau

m bounds

ATT

S.E.

critical

level of

odds ratio

10.53***

0.48

9.00

-0.12

0.32

n.a

531.97***

95.51

6.50

1.24

6.14

n.a

64.90***

23.19

4.00

-2.30

5.08

n.a

0.65

4.93

n.a

8.65

4.91

n.a

467.49***

96.50

6.00

361.79*** 129.91

2.75

53,149**

22,896

3.50

54,358**

22,280

3.50

56,537**

22,401

4.00

9,469

9,402

n.a

2,766

3,323

n.a

621

729

n.a

1.72

1.84

n.a

2,212

2,220

n.a

Standard errors are obtained by bootstrapping. *Significant at 10% level; **Significant at 5% level; ***Significant at 1% level.

59

|---------NN Matching----------|

Rosenbau

m bounds

ATT

S.E.

critical

level of

odds ratio

10.39*** 0.47

10.00

0.00

0.47

n.a

531.98*** 104.91

5.25

-1.09

6.40

n.a

73.45*** 27.67

3.00

-2.04

5.61

n.a

1.43

7.32

n.a

3.28

7.96

n.a

460.22*** 110.81

4.75

334.35** 123.79

2.25

52,260** 21,080

3.50

54,407*** 20,091

3.50

57,015*** 20,723

5.00

9,004

10,075

n.a

3,951

3,051

n.a

804

734

n.a

3.02**

1.69

2.25

5,594** 2,464

2.25

Off

Support

in PSM

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

117

117

117

117

117

117

117

117

117

Appendix Table A3: ATT Estimation Results for Maize Contract – PSM

Treatment: Maize Contract

Control: Non-Contract

|-------Kernel Matching-------|

Treatment

Control

ATT

S.E.

Rosenbau

m bounds

critical

level of

odds ratio

USD Per 100Kg

Tons per acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

20.77

2.67

572.03

45.33

252.53

87.38

15.30

20.69

2.80

554.06

48.13

247.76

85.36

16.15

0.08

-0.13

17.97

-2.80

4.77

2.01

-0.85

0.35

0.09

21.12

2.52

6.54

1.64

3.00

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

-0.02

-0.18***

-0.9

-3.52

5.58

2.19

-1.31

0.39

0.09

23.66

3.23

8.35

1.84

3.87

n.a

1.75

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

162

162

162

162

162

162

162

Percent

67.25

69.59

-2.35

4.58

n.a

-2.80

5.53

n.a

162

USD/Acre

USD/Acre

USD

USD

USD

USD

USD

USD

170.91

195.84

28,850

1,8262

39,731

11,463

8,106

2,775

6.46

8,147

156.65

134.27

15,329

2,521

24,799

4,524

8,749

720

6.16

7,936

14.25

61.57

13,520*

1,5741*

14,932

6,938

-644

2,055

0.30

210

21.44

45.67

7,642

8,019

9,152

4,854

3,019

1,620

1.64

2,417

n.a

n.a

1.25

1.25

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

-4.42

59.51

12,870*

14,627*

13,185

6,601*

-1,320

2,020

-0.52

-767

26.08

55.09

8,855

9,309

10,508

5,932

3,371

1,565

1.90

3,224

n.a

n.a

1.25

1.25

n.a

1.00

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

162

184

184

184

184

184

184

184

184

184

Unit

Maize Price

Maize Yield

Maize-Gross Output Value

Maize-Cost of Machinery

Maize-Cost of Inputs

Maize-Cost of Hired Labor

Maize-Cost of Salaried Labor

Percent of Land Allocated to

Maize

Maize Income per Acre

Total Farm Income per Acre

Total Farm Income

Total Farm Profit

Total Household Income

Non-maize Crop Income

Livestock Income

Other Income

Number of Salaried Workers

Cost of Salaried Workers

|----------NN Matching---------|

USD/Year

ATT

Standard errors are obtained by bootstrapping. *Significant at 10% level; **Significant at 5% level; ***Significant at 1% level.

60

S.E.

Rosenbau

m bounds

critical

level of

odds ratio

Off

Support

in PSM

Appendix Table A4: Income and Cost Structure of five farmers who contract with both companies

Potato

Maize

Price (USD per 100 KG)

16.54

20.48

Yield (tons per acre)

10.56

1.81

Gross Output Value (USD per acre)

1005.33

374.52

Paid Cost of Machinery (USD per acre)

66.67

39.28

Paid Cost of Inputs (USD per acre)

559.24

190.00

Paid Cost of Casual Labor (USD per acre)

78.78

86.29

Paid Cost of Salaried Workers (USD per acre)

40.55

29.10

Income (USD per acre)

260.10

29.85

61

Appendix Table A5: Characteristics of representative farmers from other secondary data sources

Data Source

PRHPS 20121

PSLM 2018-192

Key characteristics:

Education of the farmer (years)

7.32

7.33

(3.25)

(2.63)

Age of the farmers (years)

47.42

52.44

(14.66)

(15.53)

Amount of land owned (acres)

4.84

4.34

(3.61)

(5.57)

Number of farmers

57

34

Standard deviations in parentheses.

Notes:

1: PRHPS refers to the Pakistan Rural Household Panel Survey. These statistics are from the first round of the survey which

was conducted in 2012. This dataset contains about 57 households from the district of Kasur (adjoining district of Okara) who

are engaged in farming and were randomly selected for the survey and thus they are regarded as almost representative farmers

from the study site.

2: PSLM refers to the Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement Survey. This nationally representative dataset

contains information about 34 families from the adjacent districts of Sahiwal, Pakpattan and Okara.

62

Appendix Table A6: Correlates of attrition from the second-round survey

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

VARIABLES

Probit

Probit

Probit

Probit

Family size

Age of farmer

Education

Contract farmer

-0.00463

(0.0167)

-0.0194**

(0.00970)

-0.0263

(0.0271)

-0.111

(0.242)

Land owned

Contract farmers known

Livestock owned

Land rented-in

-0.0115

(0.0183)

-0.0198**

(0.00978)

-0.0274

(0.0289)

-0.189

(0.258)

-0.0101

(0.0321)

0.00319

(0.00508)

0.0535

(0.0506)

-0.0116

(0.0184)

-0.0199**

(0.00980)

-0.0278

(0.0290)

-0.189

(0.258)

-0.0113

(0.0339)

0.00334

(0.00512)

0.0554

(0.0514)

-0.00301

(0.0126)

Area under tobacco

Constant

-0.413

-0.460

-0.429

(0.525)

(0.531)

(0.546)

Observations

286

286

286

Standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

63

-0.00826

(0.0190)

-0.0208**

(0.00998)

-0.0277

(0.0293)

-0.105

(0.266)

0.00689

(0.0357)

0.00399

(0.00518)

0.0478

(0.0526)

0.00858

(0.0149)

-0.0973

(0.0754)

-0.282

(0.575)

286

Appendix Table A7: Probit model results for outside contract sale in 2018

Outside contract

sale in 2018

Dep. Variable

(Dummy)

Age

Education

Family Size

Land owned

Number of livestock owned

Number of farm assets owned

Number of other contract farmers known

Birth order

Constant

-0.00104

(0.00839)

0.0177

(0.0262)

0.0287*

(0.0169)

-0.0389

(0.0428)

-0.0709

(0.0443)

0.0882*

(0.0487)

0.0103*

(0.00601)

-0.0998

(0.0781)

-0.424

(0.521)

Observations

163

Pseudo R-squared

0.0678

Standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

64

Appendix Table A8: Probit model estimation results for determinants of new entry into contract in 2019

among non-contract farmers in 2018

New contract in 2019

(dummy)

Dep. Variable

Covariates

Outside contract sale to PTC in 2018

0.781***

(0.224)

0.0212

(0.0274)

0.000420

(0.00878)

0.0127

(0.0180)

0.0379

(0.0405)

-0.0851

(0.0527)

-0.663

(0.504)

146

Education

Age

Family Size

Land owned

Farm assets

Constant

Observations

Standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

65

Appendix Table A9: First stage results for IV 2SLS

Dep. Variable

Year (dummy = 1 if 2019)

HH head education (years)

HH head age (years)

Family_Size

# of people met per day

(1)

Contract Farmer (Dummy)

(2)

Contract Farmer (Dummy)

0.20***

(0.032)

0.016***

(0.0057)

0.0039*

(0.0021)

0.0058*

(0.0032)

0.00067

(0.00095)

0.19***

(0.032)

0.013**

(0.0059)

0.0038*

(0.0020)

0.0040

(0.0032)

0.00057

(0.00095)

0.0024

(0.0028)

0.011

(0.010)

-0.010

(0.32)

-0.050

(0.051)

0.0049

(0.0040)

0.0043***

(0.0011)

-0.11

(0.16)

532

0.23

YES

266

16.2

0.23

Land owned (acres)

Number of farm assets

Loan from formal source (Dummy)

No credit (dummy)

Tobacco cultivated area (acres)

Contract farmers known

Constant

Observations

R-squared

Village Dummies

Number of hhid

F-stat

R-squared overall

0.0047***

(0.0011)

-0.078

(0.16)

532

0.21

YES

266

19.29

0.21

Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

66

Appendix Table A10: Impact of participation in tobacco contract farming on production costs and crop income

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

|-------------------------------------------Production costs---------------------------------------------|

Per acre

Total

Per acre

Total

expense

expense

expense

expense

Per acre

of inputs Total all of inputs

Per acre

of inputs

Total all

of inputs

all

Dependent Variable

not

inputs

not

all inputs

not

inputs

not

inputs

supplied expenses supplied

expense

supplied

expenses

supplied

expense

under

under

under

under

contract

contract

contract

contract

Estimation method

|---------------- Pooled OLS ----------------|

|------------------------ IV-2SLS -------------------|

Year (dummy = 1 if 2019)

-4.65

-3.81

-101**

-111***

-9.45

-6.08

-278***

-249***

(4.72)

(3.95)

(42.6)

(39.6)

(7.02)

(5.64)

(103)

(86.7)

Contract farmer (dummy)

23.8***

5.94

197***

131**

48.3*

17.5

1,102***

842**

(5.21)

(4.37)

(43.8)

(51.9)

(25.3)

(20.7)

(399)

(338)

HH head education (years)

0.32

0.17

10.7*

6.27

-0.058

-0.0023

-3.01

-4.21

(0.55)

(0.49)

(6.40)

(5.65)

(0.69)

(0.59)

(9.05)

(8.15)

HH head age (years)

0.090

0.025

2.88

0.79

-0.0075

-0.021

-0.70

-1.98

(0.19)

(0.17)

(2.26)

(2.01)

(0.22)

(0.19)

(3.14)

(2.85)

Family Size

-0.21

-0.045

-3.28

1.62

-0.30

-0.088

-6.54

-0.74

(0.35)

(0.32)

(3.42)

(3.32)

(0.35)

(0.29)

(4.67)

(4.59)

Land owned (acres)

-0.20

-0.14

7.11

11.6

-0.24

-0.16

5.88

11.1

(0.32)

(0.27)

(10.8)

(8.76)

(0.28)

(0.27)

(8.60)

(7.34)

Tobacco cultivated area (acres)

-0.27*

-0.22**

72.1***

35.1***

-0.44

-0.30*

65.4***

28.3***

(0.15)

(0.10)

(6.20)

(11.1)

(0.28)

(0.18)

(2.66)

(6.35)

Number of farm assets

2.25**

1.16

38.7***

29.6***

1.91*

1.00

26.6*

21.3

(0.98)

(0.87)

(12.0)

(10.8)

(1.04)

(0.96)

(14.0)

(13.4)

# of people met per day

0.094

0.067

0.14

0.27

0.078

0.059

-0.43

-0.15

(0.082)

(0.073)

(0.78)

(0.80)

(0.088)

(0.077)

(1.08)

(1.16)

Constant

56.7***

46.6***

-277

-171

56.7***

46.6***

-272

-149

(13.1)

(11.4)

(184)

(161)

(15.4)

(13.3)

(259)

(244)

Observations

532

532

532

532

532

532

532

532

R-squared

0.124

0.071

0.759

0.531

0.11

0.061

0.62

0.37

Number of hhid

266

266

266

266

266

266

266

266

Village Dummies

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

67

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

|---------------Crop income--------------|

Total

Income

from

the

crop

Income

per acre

|----Pooled OLS---|

667*** 51.4***

(164)

(16.9)

85.4

46.7**

(178)

(18.7)

8.30

-1.47

(25.2)

(2.03)

5.77

-0.42

(7.49)

(0.75)

-19.7

-1.65

(15.9)

(1.21)

-3.54

0.31

(22.0)

(0.98)

359***

0.70

(19.1)

(0.60)

-108**

-6.77*

(45.2)

(3.59)

0.63

0.054

(4.16)

(0.35)

194

330***

(860)

(57.7)

532

532

0.803

0.114

266

266

YES

YES

Total

Income

from

the crop

Income

per acre

|------IV-2SLS-----|

648***

33.1

(250)

(23.7)

178

140

(1,043)

(94.0)

6.66

-2.88

(28.3)

(2.57)

5.37

-0.79

(7.44)

(0.88)

-20.2

-1.99

(18.2)

(1.28)

-4.05

0.18

(26.7)

(1.34)

360***

0.022

(18.0)

(0.76)

-110**

-8.03*

(44.6)

(4.17)

0.55

-0.0048

(4.09)

(0.38)

179

330***

(889)

(60.8)

532

532

0.80

0.091

266

266

YES

YES

Appendix Table A11: Relation between contract farming and having account at bank

VARIABLES

Contract farmer (dummy)

(1)

OLS

Dependent variable: Account at bank (dummy)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

OLS

OLS

Probit

Probit

0.111**

(0.050)

0.027***

(0.006)

0.002

(0.002)

-0.004

(0.003)

0.114**

0.120**

0.409*

(0.050)

(0.048)

(0.214)

HH head education (years)

0.028*** 0.024***

0.089***

(0.006)

(0.006)

(0.021)

HH head age (years)

0.002

0.004**

0.007

(0.002)

(0.002)

(0.007)

Family Size

-0.004

-0.006**

-0.013

(0.003)

(0.003)

(0.012)

Land owned (acres)

-0.005*

-0.004

(0.003)

(0.003)

Number of farm assets

0.006

0.012

(0.010)

(0.009)

# of people met per day

0.004*** 0.004*** 0.003***

0.012***

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.003)

Constant

-0.161

-0.181*

0.431*** -2.164***

(0.100)

(0.100)

(0.137)

(0.448)

Observations

266

266

266

266

R-squared

0.190

0.195

0.379

0.170

Village Fixed Effects

No

No

Yes

No

Robust standard errors inZ parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

68

0.418*

(0.215)

0.098***

(0.023)

0.009

(0.007)

-0.012

(0.013)

-0.026

(0.021)

0.030

(0.035)

0.013***

(0.003)

-2.313***

(0.477)

266

0.177

No

(6)

Probit

(7)

2SLS

(8)

2SLS

(9)

2SLS

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る