1.
Friedman WE. The meaning of Darwin’s “abominable mystery.” Am J Bot. 2009;96(1):5–
21.
2.
Crepet WL. Progress in understanding angiosperm history, success, and relationships:
Darwin’s abominably “perplexing phenomenon.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2000;97(24):12939–41.
3.
Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in
monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(21):11910–5.
4.
Bleiweiss R. Mimicry on the QT(L): Genetics of speciation in Mimulus. Evolution (N Y).
2001;55(8):1706–9.
5.
Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD, Fenster CB, et al.
Pollination Syndromes and Floral Specialization. Rev Lit Arts Am [Internet].
2004;35(2004):375–403. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034121
6.
Wilkins AS, Wrangham RW, Tecumseh Fitch W. The “domestication syndrome” in
mammals: A unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and genetics.
Genetics. 2014;197(3):795–808.
7.
Driscoll CA, Macdonald DW, O’Brien SJ. From wild animals to domestic pets, an
evolutionary view of domestication. Light Evol. 2009;3:89–109.
8.
Meyer RS, Purugganan MD. Evolution of crop species : genetics of domestication and
diversification. Nat Publ Gr [Internet]. 2013;14(12):840–52. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3605
9.
Milla R, Osborne CP, Turcotte MM, Violle C. Plant domestication through an ecological
lens. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30(8):463–9.
10.
Gerbault P, Allaby RG, Boivin N, Rudzinski A, Grimaldi IM, Pires JC, et al. Storytelling
and story testing in domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(17):6159–64.
11.
Ota KG, Abe G. Goldfish morphology as a model for evolutionary developmental biology.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2016;5(3):272–95.
12.
似田坂英二. 変化朝顔図鑑. 初版. 化学同人; 2014.
13.
柴田道夫[編]. 花の品種改良の日本史. 悠書館; 2016.
14.
山口裕文[著・編]. 栽培植物の自然史II ―東アジア原産有用植物と照葉樹林帯の民族文
化. 北海道大学出版会; 2013.
15.
日高敏隆[編], 白幡洋三郎[編集]. 人はなぜ花を愛でるのか. 八坂書房; 2007.
16.
中尾佐助. 花と木の文化史. 岩波書店; 1986.
17.
Nitasaka E. Insertion of an En/Spm-related transposable element into a floral homeotic
gene DUPLICATED causes a double flower phenotype in the Japanese morning glory.
169
Plant J. 2003;36(4):522–31.
18.
Gessert G. Green Light Toward an Art of Evolution. Cambridge: MIT press; 2010. 233 p.
19.
Duthie R. Florists’ Flowers and Societies. Shire Pubns; 1988.
20.
Carter T. The Victorian Garden. Bracken Books; 1988.
21.
Glenny G. The Culture of Flowers and Plants. Houlston and Wright; 1861.
22.
アレックス・メスーディ[著], 竹澤正哲[解説], 野中香方子[訳]. 文化進化論:ダーウィン
進化論は文化を説明できるか. NTT出版; 2016.
23.
中尾央[著], 松木武彦[著], 三中信宏[著]. 文化進化の考古学. 勁草書房; 2017.
24.
田村光平. 文化進化の数理. 森北出版; 2020.
25.
Chitwood DH. Imitation, genetic lineages, and time influenced the morphological
evolution of the violin. PLoS One. 2014;9(10).
26.
Gessert G. Why I Breed Plants. In: Signs of Life Bio Art and Beyond. the MIT press;
2007.
27.
Fisher RA. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen.
1936;7:179–88.
28.
石橋友也. キンギョの逆品種改良と実験生物学を内包するアート作品としての展開. 早
稲田大学; 2014.
29.
Abe G, Ota KG. Evolutionary developmental transition from median to paired
morphology of vertebrate fins: Perspectives from twin-tail goldfish. Dev Biol [Internet].
2017;427(2):251–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.11.022
30.
Chen Z, Omori Y, Koren S, Shirokiya T, Kuroda T, Miyamoto A, et al. De novo assembly
of the goldfish (Carassius auratus) genome and the evolution of genes after wholegenome duplication. Sci Adv. 2019;5(6):1–13.
31.
Abe G, Lee SH, Chang M, Liu SC, Tsai HY, Ota KG. The origin of the bifurcated axial
skeletal system in the twin-tail goldfish. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–7.
32.
Kon T, Omori Y, Fukuta K, Wada H, Watanabe M, Chen Z, et al. The Genetic Basis of
Morphological Diversity in Domesticated Goldfish. Curr Biol [Internet].
2020;30(12):2260-2274.e6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.034
33.
ISHIBASHI T. TOMOYA ISHIBASHI [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 3]. Available from:
https://www.shibashiishibashi.com/
34.
美術手帖編集部. 美術手帖6月号. 美術出版社. 2020 Jun;77.
35.
Sansom RS, Gabbott SE, Purnell MA. Unusual anal fin in a Devonian jawless vertebrate
reveals complex origins of paired appendages. Biol Lett. 2013;9(3).
36.
Chase MW, Christenhusz MJM, Fay MF, Byng JW, Judd WS, Soltis DE, et al. An update
of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering
plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;181(1):1–20.
170
37.
Borsch T, Löhne C, Wiersema J. Phylogeny and evolutionary patterns in Nymphaeales:
integrating genes, genomes and morphology Thomas. Taxon. 2008;57(November):1052–
81.
38.
Warner KA, Rudall PJ, Frohlich MW. Environmental control of sepalness and petalness in
perianth organs of waterlilies: A new Mosaic Theory for the evolutionary origin of a
differentiated perianth. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(12):3559–74.
39.
Goethe JW von, Miller. GL. THE METAMORPHOSIS OF PLANTS. London, England:
MIT press; 2009.
40.
Volkova PA, Choob V V., Shipunov AB. The flower organ transition in water lily
(Nymphaea alba s.l., Nymphaeaceae) under cross-examination with different
morphological approaches. Belgian J Bot. 2007;140(1):60–72.
41.
Buzgo M, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Floral developmental morphology of Amborella trichopoda
(Amborellaceae). Int J Plant Sci. 2004;165(6):925–47.
42.
Soltis DE, Chanderbali AS, Kim S, Buzgo M, Soltis PS. The ABC model and its
applicability to basal angiosperms. Ann Bot [Internet]. 2007 Aug 1;100(2):155–63.
Available from: http://academic.oup.com/aob/article/100/2/155/104506/The-ABCModel-and-its-Applicability-to-Basal
43.
Theissen G, Melzer R. Molecular mechanisms underlying origin and diversification of the
angiosperm flower. Ann Bot. 2007;100(3):603–19.
44.
ES C, EM M. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development.
Nature. 1991;353(6339):31.
45.
Chanderbali AS, Yoo MJ, Zahn LM, Brockington SF, Wall PK, Gitzendanner MA, et al.
Conservation and canalization of gene expression during angiosperm diversification
accompany the origin and evolution of the flower. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2010;107(52):22570–5.
46.
Yoo M, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Expression of Floral MADS‐Box Genes in Two Divergent
Water Lilies: Nymphaeales and Nelumbo. Int J Plant Sci. 2010;171(2):121–46.
47.
Luo H, Chen S, Jiang J, Chen Y, Chen F, Teng N, et al. The expression of floral organ
identity genes in contrasting water lily cultivars. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(10):1909–18.
48.
Chanderbali AS, Berger BA, Howarth DG, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Museum F, et al.
Evolving Ideas on the Origin and Evolution of Flowers : New Perspectives in the
Genomic Era. Genetics. 2016;202(April):1255–65.
49.
Chen F, Liu X, Yu C, Chen Y, Tang H, Zhang L. Water lilies as emerging models for
Darwin’s abominable mystery. Hortic Res [Internet]. 2017;4(July). Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.51
50.
Lohaus R, Chang X, Dong W, Ho SYW, Liu X, Song A, et al. The water lily genome and
171
the early evolution of flowering plants. Nature [Internet]. 2020;577(January):79–84.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1852-5
51.
Slocum PD. Waterlilies and Lotuses Species, Cultivars, and New Hybrids. TIMBER
PRESS; 2005.
52.
Conard HS. The Waterlilies: A Monograph of the Genus Nymphaea [Internet]. the
Carnegie Institution of Washington; 1905. Available from:
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/64590
53.
Songpanich P, Hongtrakul V. Intersubgeneric cross in Nymphaea spp. L. to develop a
blue hardy waterlily. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) [Internet]. 2010;124(4):475–81. Available
from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.024
54.
ガブリエル・ターギット[著], 遠山茂樹[訳]. 図説 花と庭園の文化史事典. 八坂書房;
2014.
55.
Hariot P, Hariot P. Atlas colorié des plantes médicinales indigènes [Internet]. Paris : P.
Klincksieck,; 1900 [cited 2020 Dec 3]. 1–377 p. Available from:
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/23170
56.
Sheldon RC. Inventing water lilies: Latour-Marliac and the social dynamics of market
creation. Entrep Hist. 2018;88(3):147–65.
57.
Holmes C. Water Lilies: and Bory Latour-Marliac, the Genius Behind Monet’s Water
Lilies. Garden Art Press ACC; 2015.
58.
SARL Latour-Marliac Webpage - history [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 3]. Available from:
http://latour-marliac.com/en/content/category/4-history
59.
岡本隆. 理論形態学の方法. In: 古生物学の形態と解析［普及版］. 朝倉書店; 1999. p.
140–73.
60.
McGhee GR. Limits in the evolution of biological form: A theoretical morphologic
perspective. Interface Focus. 2015;5(6).
61.
Stone JR. The spirit of D’Arcy Thompson dwells in empirical morphospace. Math Biosci.
1997;142(1):13–30.
62.
Mitteroecker P, Huttegger SM. The Concept of Morphospaces in Evolutionary and
Developmental Biology: Mathematics and Metaphors. Biol Theory. 2009;4(1):54–67.
63.
Raup DM, Michelson A. Theoretical morphology of the coiled shell. Science (80- ).
1965;147(3663):1294–5.
64.
Raup DM. Geometric Analysis of Shell Coiling: General Problems. J Paleontol.
1966;40(5):1178–90.
65.
OKAMOTO T. Analysis of heteromorph ammonoids by differential geometry. Vol. 31,
Palaeontology. 1988. p. 35–52.
66.
Noshita K, Shimizu K, Sasaki T. Geometric analysis and estimation of the growth rate
172
gradient on gastropod shells. J Theor Biol [Internet]. 2016;389:11–9. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.10.011
67.
Chartier M, Jabbour F, Gerber S, Mitteroecker P, Sauquet H, Von Balthazar M, et al. The
floral morphospace - a modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution.
New Phytol. 2014;204(4):841–53.
68.
Runions A, Tsiantis M, Prusinkiewicz P. A common developmental program can produce
diverse leaf shapes. New Phytol. 2017;216(2):401–18.
69.
Niklas KJ. The evolution of plant body plans - A biomechanical perspective. Ann Bot.
2000;85(4):411–38.
70.
Niklas KJ. Evolutionary walks through a land plant morphospace. J Exp Bot.
1999;50(330):39–52.
71.
Niklas KJ. Morphological evolution through complex domains of fitness. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 1994;91(15):6772–9.
72.
Kitazawa MS, Fujimoto K. A Dynamical Phyllotaxis Model to Determine Floral Organ
Number. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(5):1–27.
73.
Miriam Leah Zelditch DLS, Sheets HD. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A
Primer. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2012.
74.
Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; 1991.
75.
Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. Elliptic Fourier Features of a Closed Contour. Comput Graph
image Process. 1982;18:236–58.
76.
Hiroyoshi Iwata, Satoshi Niikura, Seiji Matsuura, Yasushi Takano YU. Evaluation of
variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis
using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Vol. Volume 102, Euphytica. 1998. p. 143–9.
77.
Freeman H. Computer Processing of Line-Drawing Images. ACM Comput Surv.
1974;6(1):57–97.
78.
Yoshioka Y, Iwata H, Ohsawa R, Ninomiya S. Analysis of petal shape variation of Primula
sieboldii by elliptic fourier descriptors and principal component analysis. Ann Bot.
2004;94(5):657–64.
79.
Yoshioka Y, Iwata H, Ohsawa R, Ninomiya S. Quantitative evaluation of the petal shape
variation in Primula sieboldii caused by breeding process in the last 300 years. Heredity
(Edinb). 2005;94(6):657–63.
80.
Kawabata S, Yokoo M, Nii K. Quantitative analysis of corolla shapes and petal contours in
single-flower cultivars of lisianthus. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2009;121(2):206–12.
81.
農林水産省生産局知的財産課種苗審査室. すいれん（ひつじぐさ）属. 2010.
82.
International water lily society. Idenfitication of hardy nymphaea. Stapeley Water
173
Gardens Ltd; 1993.
83.
Detienne P. Les nymphéas rustiques. Editions “Jardins et décors aquatiques”; 2006.
84.
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image
analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.
85.
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carrera I, Frise E, Verena K, Mark L, Tobias P, et al. Fiji: an opensource platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82.
86.
Iwata H, Ukai Y. SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of
biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J Hered. 2002;93(5):384–5.
87.
Bonhomme V, Picq S, Gaucherel C, Claude J. Momocs: Outline analysis using R. J Stat
Softw. 2014;56(13):1–24.
88.
Conard HS, Conard HS, Hus H. Water-lilies and how to grow them, with chapters on the
proper making of ponds and the use of accessory plants [Internet]. New York,:
Doubleday, Page & company,; [cited 2020 Dec 3]. 1–284 p. Available from:
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/91862
89.
Kawabata S, Nii K, Yokoo M. Three-dimensional formation of corolla shapes in relation
to the developmental distortion of petals in Eustoma grandiflorum. Sci Hortic
(Amsterdam) [Internet]. 2011;132(1):66–70. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.09.034
90.
Wang CN, Hsu HC, Wang CC, Lee TK, Kuo YF. Quantifying floral shape variation in 3D
using microcomputed tomography: A case study of a hybrid line between actinomorphic
and zygomorphic flowers. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6(September).
91.
Hsu HC, Wang CN, Liang CH, Wang CC, Kuo YF. Association between petal form
variation and CYC2-like genotype in a hybrid line of Sinningia speciosa. Front Plant Sci.
2017;8(April):1–13.
92.
An N, Palmer CM, Baker RL, Markelz RJC, Ta J, Covington MF, et al. Plant highthroughput phenotyping using photogrammetry and imaging techniques to measure leaf
length and rosette area. Comput Electron Agric [Internet]. 2016;127:376–94. Available
from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.04.002
93.
An N, Welch SM, Markelz RJC, Baker RL, Palmer CM, Ta J, et al. Quantifying timeseries of leaf morphology using 2D and 3D photogrammetry methods for highthroughput plant phenotyping. Comput Electron Agric [Internet]. 2017;135:222–32.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.02.001
94.
Andújar D, Calle M, Fernández-Quintanilla C, Ribeiro Á, Dorado J. Three-dimensional
modeling of weed plants using low-cost photogrammetry. Sensors (Switzerland).
2018;18(4):1–11.
95.
Guo W, Fukano Y, Noshita K, Ninomiya S. Field-based individual plant phenotyping of
174
herbaceous species by unmanned aerial vehicle. Ecol Evol. 2020;10(21):12318–26.
96.
Gerber S. The geometry of morphospaces: Lessons from the classic raup shell coiling
model. Biol Rev. 2017;92(2):1142–55.
97.
Prusinkiewicz P, Mündermann L, Karwowski R, Lane B. The use of positional
information in the modeling of plants. Proc 28th Annu Conf Comput Graph Interact
Tech SIGGRAPH 2001. 2001;289–300.
98.
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikitlearn: Machine Learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2012;12:2825–30.
99.
Chacón B, Ballester R, Birlanga V, Rolland-Lagan AG, Pérez-Pérez JM. A quantitative
framework for flower phenotyping in cultivated carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.).
PLoS One. 2013;8(12).
100.
Bradski G. The OpenCV Library. Dr Dobb’s J Softw Tools. 2000;
101.
Chanderbali AS, Berger BA, Howarth DG, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Evolving ideas on the
origin and evolution of flowers: New perspectives in the genomic era. Genetics.
2016;202(4):1255–65.
102.
Qi W, Chen X, Fang P, Shi S, Li J, Liu X, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic sequencing
of Rosa hybrida provides microsatellite markers for breeding, flower trait improvement
and taxonomy studies. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):1–11.
103.
Yagi M, Shirasawa K, Waki T, Kume T, Isobe S, Tanase K, et al. Construction of an SSR
and RAD Marker-Based Genetic Linkage Map for Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.).
Plant Mol Biol Report [Internet]. 2017;35(1):110–7. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11105-016-1010-2
104.
Su J, Jiang J, Zhang F, Liu Y, Ding L, Chen S, et al. Current achievements and future
prospects in the genetic breeding of chrysanthemum: a review. Hortic Res [Internet].
2019;6(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0193-8
105.
Yoshida Y, Ueno S, Honjo M, Kitamoto N, Nagai M, Washitani I, et al. QTL analysis of
heterostyly in Primula sieboldii and its application for morph identification in wild
populations. Ann Bot. 2011;108(1):133–42.
106.
Minamikawa MF, Nonaka K, Kaminuma E, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Onogi A, Goto S, et al.
Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction in citrus: Potential of genomicsassisted breeding for fruit quality traits. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–2.
107.
He Y, Wu D, Wei D, Fu Y, Cui Y, Dong H, et al. GWAS, QTL mapping and gene
expression analyses in Brassica napus reveal genetic control of branching morphogenesis.
Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017;7(1):1–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598017-15976-4
108.
Yamamoto E, Matsunaga H, Onogi A, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Minamikawa M, Suzuki A, et al.
175
A simulation-based breeding design that uses whole-genome prediction in tomato. Sci
Rep. 2016;6(January):1–11.
109.
Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, et al. Rapid SNP
discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):1–
7.
110.
Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. Double digest RADseq: An
inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model
species. PLoS One. 2012;7(5).
111.
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence
data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.
112.
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.
113.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence
Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9.
114.
Mckenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The
Genome Analysis Toolkit : A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA
sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.
115.
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant
call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8.
116.
Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data
inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.
Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(5):1084–97.
117.
SARL Latour-Marliac Webpage - catalog [Internet]. [cited 2006 Jan 20]. Available from:
http://latour-marliac.com/en/12-hardy-water-lilies
118.
Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, et al. A unified mixedmodel method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness.
Nat Genet. 2006;38(2):203–8.
119.
Hamazaki K, Iwata H. Rainbow: Haplotype-based genome-wide association study using a
novel SNP-set method. PLoS Comput Biol [Internet]. 2020;16(2):1–17. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007663
120.
Vitezica ZG, Legarra A, Toro MA, Varona L. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for
Additive ,. Genetics. 2017;206(July):1297–307.
121.
VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci
[Internet]. 2008;91(11):4414–23. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.20070980
122.
de Bem Oliveira I, Amadeu RR, Ferrão LFV, Muñoz PR. Optimizing whole-genomic
176
prediction for autotetraploid blueberry breeding. Heredity (Edinb) [Internet].
2020;125(6):437–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-00357-x
123.
de Bem Oliveira I, Resende MFR, Ferrão LF V., Amadeu RR, Endelman JB, Kirst M, et
al. Genomic prediction of autotetraploids; influence of relationship matrices, allele
dosage, and continuous genotyping calls in phenotype prediction. G3 Genes, Genomes,
Genet. 2019;9(4):1189–98.
124.
Santantonio N, Jannink JL, Sorrells M. Prediction of subgenome additive and interaction
effects in allohexaploid wheat. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2019;9(3):685–98.
125.
Larson G, Piperno DR, Allaby RG, Purugganan MD, Andersson L, Arroyo-Kalin M, et al.
Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2014;111(17):6139–46.
126.
Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using
genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157(4):1819–29.
127.
Lindenmayer A. Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development II. Simple
and branching filaments with two-sided inputs. J Theor Biol [Internet]. 1968;18(3):300–
15. Available from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022519368900805
128.
Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer-Verlag;
1990.
129.
Ridley JN. Ideal phyllotaxis on general surfaces of revolution. Math Biosci. 1986;79(1):1–
24.
130.
Douady S, Couder Y. Phyllotaxis as a dynamical self organizing process part I: The spiral
modes resulting from time-periodic iterations. J Theor Biol [Internet]. 1996;178:255–74.
Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519396900247
131.
Douady S, Couder Y. Phyllotaxis as a Dynamical Self Organizing Process Part II: The
Spontaneous Formation of a Periodicity and the Coexistence of Spiral and Whorled
Patterns. J Theor Biol. 1996;178(3):275–94.
132.
Douady S, Couder Y. Phyllotaxis as a dynamical self organizing process part III: The
simulation of the transient regimes of ontogeny. J Theor Biol. 1996;178(3):295–312.
133.
Fowler DR, Prusinkiewicz P, Battjes J. Collision-based model of spiral phyllotaxis.
Comput Graph. 1992;26(2):361–8.
134.
Prusinkiewicz P, Erasmus Y, Lane B, Harder LD, Coen E. Evolution and development of
inflorescence architectures. Science (80- ). 2007;316(5830):1452–6.
135.
Owens A, Cieslak M, Hart J, Classen-Bockhoff R, Prusinkiewicz P. Modeling dense
inflorescences. ACM Trans Graph. 2016;35(4).
136.
Godin C, Caraglio Y. A Multiscale Model of Plant Topological Structures. J Theor Biol.
177
1998;1–46.
137.
Pradal C, Boudon F, Nouguier C, Chopard J, Godin C. PlantGL: A Python-based
geometric library for 3D plant modelling at different scales. Graph Models.
2009;71(1):1–21.
138.
Boudon F, Pradal C, Cokelaer T, Prusinkiewicz P, Godin C. L-Py: An L-system
simulation framework for modeling plant architecture development based on a dynamic
language. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3(MAY).
139.
Pradal C, Dufour-Kowalski S, Boudon F, Fournier C, Godin C. OpenAlea: A visual
programming and component-based software platform for plant modelling. Funct Plant
Biol. 2008;35(10):751–60.
140.
Pradal C, Fournier C, Valduriez P, Cohen-Boulakia S. OpenAlea: Scientific workflows
combining data analysis and simulation. ACM Int Conf Proceeding Ser. 2015;29-June-20.
141.
Lintermann B, Deussen O. Interactive modeling of plants. IEEE Comput Graph Appl.
1999;19(1):56–65.
142.
Boudon F, Prusinkiewicz P, Federl P, Godin C, Boudon F, Prusinkiewicz P, et al.
Interactive design of bonsai tree models To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-00827461.
2013;
143.
Dror R, Shimshoni I. Using phyllotaxis for date palm tree 3D reconstruction from a single
image. VISAPP 2009 - Proc 4th Int Conf Comput Vis Theory Appl. 2009;2(c):288–96.
144.
Isokane T, Okura F, Ide A, Matsushita Y, Yagi Y. Probabilistic Plant Modeling via Multiview Image-to-Image Translation. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern
Recognit. 2018;2906–15.
145.
Ubbens J, Cieslak M, Prusinkiewicz P, Stavness I. The use of plant models in deep
learning: An application to leaf counting in rosette plants. Plant Methods [Internet].
2018;14(1):1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0273-z
146.
Toda Y, Okura F, Ito J, Okada S, Kinoshita T, Tsuji H, et al. Training instance
segmentation neural network with synthetic datasets for crop seed phenotyping.
Commun Biol [Internet]. 2020;3(1):1–12. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0905-5
147.
Sievänen R, Godin C, De Jong TM, Nikinmaa E. Functional-structural plant models: A
growing paradigm for plant studies. Ann Bot. 2014;114(4):599–603.
148.
Han L, Costes E, Boudon F, Cokelaer T, Pradal C, Da Silva D, et al. Investigating the
influence of geometrical traits on light interception efficiency of apple trees: A modelling
study with MAppleT. Proc - 2012 IEEE 4th Int Symp Plant Growth Model Simulation,
Vis Appl PMA 2012. 2012;152–9.
149.
Braghiere RK, Gérard F, Evers JB, Pradal C, Pagès L. Simulating the effects of water
178
limitation on plant biomass using a 3D functional-structural plant model of shoot and
root driven by soil hydraulics. Ann Bot. 2020;126(4):713–28.
150.
Cieslak M, Cheddadi I, Boudon F, Baldazzi V, Génard M, Godin C, et al. Integrating
physiology and architecture in models of fruit expansion. Front Plant Sci.
2016;7(NOVEMBER2016):1–19.
151.
Donald CM. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica. 1968;17(3):385–403.
152.
Yoshioka Y, Ohashi K, Konuma A, Iwata H, Ohsawa R, Ninomiya S. Ability of
bumblebees to discriminate differences in the shape of artificial flowers of Primula
sieboldii (Primulaceae). Ann Bot. 2007;99(6):1175–82.
153.
Campos EO, Bradshaw HD, Daniel TL. Shape matters: Corolla curvature improves
nectar discovery in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Funct Ecol. 2015;29:462–468.
154.
Peng F, Campos EO, Sullivan JG, Berry N, Song B Bin, Daniel TL, et al. Morphospace
exploration reveals divergent fitness optima between plants and pollinators. PLoS One.
2019;14(3):1–12.
155.
Policha T, Davis A, Barnadas M, Dentinger BTM, Raguso RA, Roy BA. Disentangling
visual and olfactory signals in mushroom-mimicking Dracula orchids using realistic threedimensional printed flowers. New Phytol. 2016;210(3):1058–71.
156.
Iwata H, Ebana K, Uga Y, Hayashi T. Genomic prediction of biological shape: Elliptic
Fourier analysis and kernel Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression applied to grain shape
prediction in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS One. 2015;10(3):1–17.
157.
Iwata H, Hayashi T, Terakami S, Takada N, Saito T, Yamamoto T. Genomic prediction of
trait segregation in a progeny population: A case study of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia).
BMC Genet. 2013;14.
158.
ケイシー・リース, チャンドラー・マクウィリアムス, 久保田晃弘[監], 吉村マサテル
[訳]. FORM+CODE -デザイン／アート／建築における、かたちとコード. ビー・エ
ヌ・エヌ新社; 2011.
159.
秋庭史典. あたらしい美学をつくる. みすず書房; 2011.
160.
秀雄岩崎. 〈生命〉とは何だろうか――表現する生物学、思考する芸術. 講談社; 2013.
179
...
論文の公開元へ
