1. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Yoon ST, Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Lawrence BD. Symptomatic progression of cervical myelopathy and the role of nonsurgical management: a consensus statement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:S19-20.
2. Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:E675-93.
3. Tetreault L, Goldstein CL, Arnold P, Harrop J, Hilibrand A, Nouri A, Fehlings MG. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Spectrum of Related Disorders Affecting the Aging Spine. Neurosurgery. 2015;77 Suppl 4:S51-67.
4. Lad SP, Patil CG, Berta S, Santarelli JG, Ho C, Boakye M. National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol. 2009;71:66-9; discussion 9.
5. Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1994;68:490-503.
6. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1890-4; discussion 5.
7. Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981;6:354-64.
8. Chen FF. What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95:1005-18.
9. Roh YH, Yang BK, Noh JH, Baek GH, Song CH, Gong HS. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan hand questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:1497-503.
10. Leonardi M, Boos N. Degenerative Disorders of the Cervical Spine. In: Boos N, Aebi M, editors. Spinal Disorders. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. p. 429-80.
11. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4:286-95.
12. Keller A, von Ammon K, Klaiber R, Waespe W. [Spondylogenic cervical myelopathy: conservative and surgical therapy]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1993;123:1682-91.
13. Chiles BW 3rd, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:762-9; discussion 9-70.
14. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM, Vaccaro AR, Brodke DS, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Woodard EJ, Banco RJ, Chapman JR, Janssen ME, Bono CM, Sasso RC, Dekutoski MB, Gokaslan ZL. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1651-8.
15. Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Riew KD, Bisson EF, Heary RF. Surgery vs Conservative Care for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Surgery Is Appropriate for Progressive Myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2015;62 Suppl 1:56-61.
16. Zhu B, Xu Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Dang G. Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and metaanalysis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1583-93.
17. Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Wang H, Jin A. Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:362-72.
18. Liu X, Wang H, Zhou Z, Jin A. Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. Orthopedics. 2014;37:e117-22.
19. Sun Y, Li L, Zhao J, Gu R. Comparison between anterior approaches and posterior approaches for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;134:28-36.
20. Jiang L, Tan M, Dong L, Yang F, Yi P, Tang X, Hao Q. Comparison of Anterior Decompression and Fusion With Posterior Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:282-90.
21. Luo J, Cao K, Huang S, Li L, Yu T, Cao C, Zhong R, Gong M, Zhou Z, Zou X. Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1621-30.
22. An HS, Al-Shihabi L, Kurd M. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:420-9.
23. Epstein NE. What you need to know about ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament to optimize cervical spine surgery: A review. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:S93-S118.
24. Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Takenaka S, Kashii M, Kaito T, Yoshikawa H. Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:58-67.
25. Kim B, Yoon do H, Shin HC, Kim KN, Yi S, Shin DA, Ha Y. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. 2015;15:875-84.
26. Shamji MF, Mohanty C, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. The Association of Cervical Spine Alignment with Neurological Recovery in a Prospective Cohort of Surgical Myelopathy Patients: Analysis of a Series of 124 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2015.
27. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
28. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T, Takahashi K, Takeshita K, Tani T, Toyama Y, Wada E, Yonenobu K, Tanaka T, Hirota Y, Subcommittee on Low Back P, Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic A. An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12:227-40.
29. Ware J Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-33.
30. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409-15.
31. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-83.
32. Ottenbacher KJ, Stull GA. The analysis and interpretation of method comparison studies in rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72:266-71.
33. Madsen OR. Agreement between the DAS28-CRP assessed with 3 and 4 variables in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological agents in the daily clinic. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:379-85.
34. Gasparovic H, Gabelica R, Ostojic Z, Kopjar T, Petricevic M, Ivancan V, Biocina B. Diagnostic accuracy of central venous saturation in estimating mixed venous saturation is proportional to cardiac performance among cardiac surgical patients. J Crit Care. 2014;29:828-34.
35. Randleman JB, Akhtar J, Lynn MJ, Ambrosio R, Jr., Dupps WJ, Jr., Krueger RR, Klyce SD. Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:286-94.
36. Siemons L, Vonkeman HE, ten Klooster PM, van Riel PL, van de Laar MA. Interchangeability of 28-joint disease activity scores using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or the C-reactive protein as inflammatory marker. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:783-9.
37. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-10.
38. Tetreault L, Nouri A, Kopjar B, Cote P, Fehlings MG. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1653-9.
39. Naruse T, Yanase M, Takahashi H, Horie Y, Ito M, Imaizumi T, Oguri K, Matsuyama Y. Prediction of clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy focusing on spinal cord motion in intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2634-41.
40. Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Kanbara S, Morita D, Takahashi H, Imagama S, Ito Z, Ishiguro N, Kato F. Prediction of lower limb functional recovery after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: focusing on the 10-s step test. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:1389-95.
41. Anscombe FJ. Graphs in Statistical Analysis. The American Statistician. 1973;27:17- 21.
42. Cooper PR, Epstein F. Radical resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in adults. Recent experience in 29 patients. J Neurosurg. 1985;63:492-9.
43. Vitzthum HE, Dalitz K. Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:2096-103.
44. Herdman J, Linzbach M, Krzan M. The European myelopathy score. In: Bauer B, Brock M, Klinger M, editors. Advances in Neurosurgery. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 266–8.
45. King JT Jr, Tsevat J, Moossy JJ, Roberts MS. Preference-based quality of life measurement in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1271-80.
46. Singh A, Crockard HA. Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative improvement. J Outcome Meas. 2001;5:798-818.
47. Kopjar B, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Fehlings M. Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:E23-8.
48. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95:87-100.
49. Revanappa KK, Rajshekhar V. Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1545-51.
50. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC, Fehlings MG, Guiot BH. Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:1013-6.
51. Fehlings MG, Ibrahim A, Tetreault L, Albanese V, Alvarado M, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Bartels R, Bolger C, Defino H, Kale S, Massicotte E, Moraes O, Scerrati M, Tan G, Tanaka M, Toyone T, Yukawa Y, Zhou Q, Zileli M, Kopjar B. A global perspective on the outcomes of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results from the prospective multicenter AOSpine international study on 479 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1322-8.
52. Nouri A, Martin AR, Nater A, Witiw CD, Kato S, Tetreault L, Reihani-Kermani H, Santaguida C, Fehlings MG. Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:864-74.
53. Bilsky MH, Laufer I, Fourney DR, Groff M, Schmidt MH, Varga PP, Vrionis FD, Yamada Y, Gerszten PC, Kuklo TR. Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:324-8.
54. Taniyama T, Hirai T, Yamada T, Yuasa M, Enomoto M, Yoshii T, Kato T, Kawabata S, Inose H, Okawa A. Modified K-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts insufficient decompression of cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:496-501.
55. Sun LQ, Li M, Li YM. Prediction of incomplete decompression after cervical laminoplasty on magnetic resonance imaging: The modified K-line. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;146:12-7.
56. Taniyama T, Hirai T, Yoshii T, Yamada T, Yasuda H, Saito M, Inose H, Kato T, Kawabata S, Okawa A. Modified K-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcome in patients with nonlordotic alignment after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:E1261-8.
57. Nouri A, Martin AR, Tetreault L, Nater A, Kato S, Nakashima H, Nagoshi N, ReihaniKermani H, Fehlings MG. MRI Analysis of the Combined Prospectively Collected AOSpine North America and International Data: The Prevalence and Spectrum of Pathologies in a Global Cohort of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:1058-67.
58. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17:1281-4.
59. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1443-7; discussion 8.
60. Hirai T, Okawa A, Arai Y, Takahashi M, Kawabata S, Kato T, Enomoto M, Tomizawa S, Sakai K, Torigoe I, Shinomiya K. Middle-term results of a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:1940-7.
61. Liu T, Yang HL, Xu YZ, Qi RF, Guan HQ. ACDF with the PCB cage-plate system versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:213-20.
62. Ghogawala Z, Martin B, Benzel EC, Dziura J, Magge SN, Abbed KM, Bisson EF, Shahid J, Coumans JV, Choudhri TF, Steinmetz MP, Krishnaney AA, King JT, Jr., Butler WE, Barker FG, 2nd, Heary RF. Comparative effectiveness of ventral vs dorsal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:622-30; discussion 30-1.
63. Fehlings MG, Barry S, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Arnold P, Massicotte EM, Vaccaro A, Brodke DS, Shaffrey C, Smith JS, Woodard E, Banco RJ, Chapman J, Janssen M, Bono C, Sasso R, Dekutoski M, Gokaslan ZL. Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:2247-52.
64. Lin D, Zhai W, Lian K, Kang L, Ding Z. Anterior versus posterior approach for fourlevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthopedics. 2013;36:e1431-6.
65. Seng C, Tow BP, Siddiqui MA, Srivastava A, Wang L, Yew AK, Yeo W, Khoo SH, Balakrishnan NM, Bin Abd Razak HR, Chen JL, Guo CM, Tan SB, Yue WM. Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty. Spine J. 2013;13:723-31.
66. Kanchiku T, Imajo Y, Suzuki H, Yoshida Y, Nishida N, Taguchi T. Results of surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients aged 75 years or more: a comparative study of operative methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:1045-50.
67. Qian L, Shao J, Liu Z, Cheng L, Zeng Z, Jia Y, Li X, Wang H. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of anterior 'skip' corpectomy versus posterior decompression in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:63.
68. Lawrence BD, Jacobs WB, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Chapman JR, Brodke DS. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:S173-82.
69. Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Heary RF, Riew KD, Albert TJ, Butler WE, Barker FG, 2nd, Heller JG, McCormick PC, Whitmore RG, Freund KM, Schwartz JS. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgical trial: randomized, controlled trial design and rationale. Neurosurgery. 2014;75:334-46.
70. Cole T, Veeravagu A, Zhang M, Azad TD, Desai A, Ratliff JK. Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Disease: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study of the MarketScan Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1033-8.
71. Lubelski D, Healy AT, Silverstein MP, Abdullah KG, Thompson NR, Riew KD, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Reoperation rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy: a propensity-matched analysis. Spine J. 2015;15:1277-83.
72. Kato S, Nouri A, Reihani-Kermani H, Oshima Y, Cheng J, Fehlings MG. Postoperative Resolution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Intensity Changes and the Associated Impact on Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of a Global Cohort of Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:824-31.
73. Fehlings MG, Santaguida C, Tetreault L, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Defino H, Kale S, Zhou Q, Yoon TS, Kopjar B. Laminectomy and fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the AOSpine North America and International prospective multicenter studies. Spine J. 2017;17:102-8.
74. Xiao SW, Jiang H, Yang LJ, Xiao ZM. Anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:31-9